dinsdag 10 augustus 2021

Preeminent European physicians, scientists push back on claim that children must be vaccinated for COVID: “Unnecessary” and potentially “catastrophic”

Monday, August 09, 2021 by: JD Heyes
Tags: adolescentsbadhealthbadmedicinebadsciencebiological weaponsChild abusechildrencoronaviruscovid-19deathexpertskidspandemicResearchersschoolscientistsvaccinevaccine warsvaccines

5,220VIEWS

(Natural News) Scores of top, European senior scientists and physicians are railing against plans by leaders to vaccinate children and adolescents for COVID-19 because they say there is no evidence it is necessary and plenty of reason to believe mass inoculation of youth could be “catastrophic” in terms of health outcomes.

LifeSite News notes:

Eminent European physicians and scientists this month co-authored an expert statement regarding Comirnaty–COVID-19 mRNA vaccine for children, outlining their expert opinions that “vaccination of adolescents for COVID-19 is unnecessary, claims demonstrating efficacy are misleading, and the safety profiles are catastrophic.”

Declaration of Bhakdi, Hockertz, Palmer, and Wodarg – unabridged

Download PDF file on https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/files/declaration-of-bhakdi-hockertz-palmer-and-wodarg-unabridged/

“This declaration is submitted in support of legal actions to revoke the COVID-19 injections and to revoke  the  emergency use authorization for COVID-19 injections,” the document states, adding that the statement is signed “under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States  of America.”

Specifically, the document was written to answer three basic questions:

— Is vaccination of adolescents against COVID-19 necessary?

— Is the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine effective?

— Is the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine safe?

To begin with, the authors point out what we’ve known about the novel coronavirus practically since the pandemic began.

“There are several lines of evidence that show vaccination of adolescents against COVID-19 to be unnecessary. The vast majority of all persons infected with COVID-19 recovers after minor, often uncharacteristic illness,” they write.

“According to world-leading epidemiologist John Ioannidis, the infection fatality rate of COVID-19 is on the order of 0.15% to 0.2% across all age groups, with a very strong bias towards old people, particularly those with co-morbidities. This rate does not exceed the range commonly observed with influenza, against which a vaccination of adolescents is not considered urgent or necessary,” the experts continued, adding that beginning in April 2020, as the virus spread around the U.S., infection rates for Americans younger than 18 years old was a minuscule 1.7 percent.

“Within this age group, the most severe cases were observed among very young infants,” the wrote.

What’s more, the group states clearly that vaccines are not even necessary because COVID-19 can be (and has been) successfully treated with existing medications.

“Treatment options are available both for the early stage of the disease, at which emphasis is placed on inhibiting viral replication, and for the later stage, at which anti-inflammatory treatment is paramount. Two drugs that have been used successfully at the early stage are hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Both drugs have been, and continue to be, in use against a variety of other diseases,” they wrote.

Of course, these treatments have been suppressed on social media and anyone who has pushed them — including experts who have used the drugs to treat COVID-infected patients — have been booted off their platforms.

Another reason why vaccines are unnecessary is that people who have had the virus, and hundreds of millions of people around the world have, is that they develop good antibodies and reinfection rates are extremely low.

“Past COVID-19 infection has been found to protect very reliably from reinfection [10 ], and strong specific humoral and cellular immunity is detected in almost all recovered individuals,” write the researchers.

Even as the Biden regime claims in recent days that the new Delta variant makes it necessary to ensure that kids go back to school being forced to wear masks all day — which are useless — the researchers write that “asymptomatic transmission does not occur.”

The experts also concluded that giving vaccines to those who do not need one can lead to hugely negative consequences, such as fatalities among breastfed infants and blood clotting disruptionThe experts also discuss “antibody-dependent enhancement” (ADE), where in some cases antibodies can actually increase the severity of the disease, even though antibodies generally act to protect humans from infections.

“The only possible conclusion from this analysis is that the use of this vaccine in adolescents cannot be permitted, and that its ongoing use in any and all age groups ought to be stopped immediately,” the authors recommend.

Sources include:

LifeSiteNews.com

NaturalNews.com

 

 Dr. Dan Stock's Presentation to the Mt. Vernon School Board in Indiana Over The Futility of Mask Mandates and Covid-19 Protocols


Sunday, August 8, 2021

LINK:  https://hancockcountypatriots.blogspot.com/2021/08/dr-dan-stocks-presentation-to-mt-vernon.html


On Friday, August 7th Dr. Dan Stock addressed the Mt. Vernon School Board in Indiana over the futility of mask mandates and Covid-19 protocols in most schools. 

 

SO, what happened after Dr. Stock spoke? Let's just say, his speech had an impact. The school board "tabled" their plans and will "contemplate" what Dr. Stock said and make a decision by August 16th. If you would like transcripts of his speech click HERE

In his presentation, he references a flash drive he gave the school board members to review with all of the scientific literature he referenced. 

Click on the links to access the following studies. 

1. SARS-CoV2-Transmission Among Marine Recruits during Quarantine.  

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

2. 
Longitudinal analysis shows durable and broad immune memory after SARS-CoV-2 infection with persisting antibody responses and memory B and T cells.  

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

3. 
Vitamin D for prevention of respiratory tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.  

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

 

4. Facemasks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

 

5. CDC assessment of non-pharmaceutical influenza methods. 

6. 
Federalist cases/mortality mask comparison

7. 
Heritage Foundation Study - In fact, mask use during the pandemic has been recommended by The Heritage Foundation’s Coronavirus Commission guidelines. However, our findings do suggest that public health strategies relying predominantly on mask mandates are inadequate, and thus other initiatives, in addition to mask wearing, should have been a component of policies aimed to limit the spread of the disease. 

8. 
Declaration of Great Barrington- The Great Barrington Declaration- As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection. Over 60,000 medical experts have signed this declaration. 

9. 
Covid-19 Breakthrough Infections in Vaccinated Health Care Workers. 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

10. 
Calcifediol Treatment and Hospital Mortality Due to COVID-19: A Cohort Study 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

11. 
Experimental Assessment of Carbon Dioxide Content in Inhaled Air With or Without Face Masks in Healthy Children. 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

12. 
Calcifediol treatment and COVID-19-related outcomes 

READ THE PDF STUDY
 HERE

13. 
"Effect of calcifediol treatment and best available therapy versus best available therapy on intensive care unit admission and mortality among patients hospitalized for COVID-19: A pilot randomized clinical study. 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

14. 
Effectiveness of Adding a Mask Recommendation to Other Public Health Measures to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Danish Mask Wearers 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE. 

15. 
Community Use Of Face Masks And COVID-19: Evidence From A Natural Experiment Of State Mandates In The US 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

16. 
Face-Masks in the COVID-19 era: A health hypothesis

17. 
Infection Fatality Ratios for COVID-19 Among Non-Institutionalized Persons 12 and Older: Results of a Random-Sample Prevalence Study 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

18. 
Open Schools, COVID-19, and Child and Teacher Morbidity in Sweden. 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

19. 
Face-Masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review  

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

20. 
Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gathering- Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

21. 
Short term, high-dose vitamin D supplementation for COVID-19 disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, study 

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

22. 
Rapid Expert Consultation on the Effectiveness of Fabric Masks for the COVID-19 Pandemic (April 8, 2020)  

READ THE PDF STUDY 
HERE

Other Locations of this video:

You can watch his 6 minute presentation before the school board 
HERE on Facebook or HERE on youtube (15:20 mark) HERE on Rumble. 


 

Transcript of Dr Dan Stark to the Mt Vernon Community School Corporation

Friday August 7th 2021

Mt Vernon Indiana

Guilty as charged.

Dr. Dan Stark, [redacted

 

The address you're about to see is hard to believe 18 months into this and still

having a problem. And I would suggest the reason we still have a problem is

because we're doing things that are not useful and we're getting our sources of

information from the Indiana State board of Health and the CDC who actually don't

bother to read science before they do this.

I'm actually a functional family medicine physician. That means I am speciality

trained in immunology and inflammation, regulation.

And everything being recommended by the CDC and the State Board of Health is

actually contrary to all the rules of science.

So things you should know about coronavirus and all other respiratory viruses, they

are spread by aerosol particles which are small enough to go through every mask.

By the way, the literature that supports all of that is in a flash drive that we

presented to you. It's been given to the secretary.

As a matter of fact, it quotes at least three studies that’s sponsored by the NIH to

that exact fact, even though the CDC in the NIH have chosen to to ignore the very

science that they paid to have done.

That is why you keep struggling with this, is because you cannot make these

viruses go away.

The natural history of all respiratory viruses is that they circulate all year long

waiting for the immune system to get sick through the winter or become deranged,

as has happened recently with these vaccines. And then they cause symptomatic

disease because they cannot be filtered out and they have animal reservoirs.

And this is a very important point. No one can make this virus go away. The CDC

has managed to convince everybody that we can handle this like we did smallpox,

where we could make a virus go away.

 

Smallpox had no animal reservoirs. The only thing it learned to infect was humans.

That's why we're able to make that virus go away. That will not happen with this any

more than it will with influenza, the common cold, respiratory syncytial virus,

adenoviral respiratory syndromes, or anything else that has animal reservoirs.

So the reason you can't do this is because you're trying to do something which has

already been tried and can't be done.

Equally important is that vaccination changes none of this, especially with this

vaccine. And I would hope this board would start asking itself before it considers

taking the advice of the CDC, the NIH and the state board of health, why we are

doing things about this that we didn't do for the common cold, influenza, or

respiratory syncytial virus?

And then ask yourself, why is a vaccine that is supposedly so effective having a

breakout in the middle of the summer when respiratory viral syndromes don't do

that?

And to help you understand that, you need to know the condition that is called

antibody mediated viral enhancement. That is a condition done when vaccines

work wrong, as they did in every coronavirus study done in animals on

coronaviruses after the SARS outbreak and done in respiratory syncytial virus

where a vaccine used in a vulnerable individual, done the wrong way, which why it

cannot be done right for respiratory virus, which has a very low pathogenicity rate,

causes the immune system to actually fight the virus wrong and let the virus

become worse than it would with native infection.

And that is why you are seeing an outbreak right now. In fact, in that flash drive

you're going to have coming to you in the emails with six extra [??obiate] studies

showing that 75 percent of people who had covid-19 positive symptom cases in

Barnstable, Massachusetts outbreak were fully vaccinated.

Therefore, there is no reason for treating any person vaccinated any differently than

any person unvaccinated. You should also know that no vaccine, even the ones I

support and would give to myself and my children, ever stops infection.

In 2014, there was outbreak of mumps in the National Hockey League. The only

people who came down the symptoms were the people who were unvaccinated or

unknown vaccine status. Boy, that sounds like a great argument for vaccines, but a

question that you should ask yourself, knowing that half of the people who came

down with symptomatic disease had no contact with an unvaccinated or unknown

vaccine status individual, where did they get the disease?

 

And the answer was “from the vaccinated individuals.” No vaccine prevents you from

getting infection. You get infected, you shed pathogen. This is especially true of

viral respiratory pathogens. You just don't get symptomatic from it.

So you cannot stop spread. You cannot make these numbers that you've planned

on get better by doing any of the things you're doing, because that is the nature of

viral respiratory pathogens.

And you can't prevent it with a vaccine because they don't do the very thing you're

wanting them to do.

And you will be chasing this the remainder of your life until you recognize that the

Center for Disease Control and the Indiana State Board of Health are giving you

very bad scientific guidance. And instead read the articles that are coming in the

email and on this flash drive and listen to the people in this audience here tonight

who actually have recognized the advice they are getting from the CDC and the NIH

is counterfactual.

And that's why you're still fighting this with this vaccine that supposedly was going

 

to make all of this go away. But it suddenly managed to make an outbreak of covid-

19 develop in the middle of the summer when vitamin D levels are at their highest.

 

By the way, the other thing that would be necessary, any vaccine restriction to be

considered is if there were no other treatment available. And I can tell you, having

treated over 15 covid-19 patients, that between active loading with vitamin D,

ivermectin and zinc, that there is not a single person who has come anywhere near

the hospital.

And we already have studies that show that if you achieve a 25 hydroxy vitamin D

level greater than fifty five, your risk of covid-19 death will drop down to one quarter

of the population average for the United States.

And there are active treatment trials included on that flash drive that the show the

same is true. So if you were going to discriminate based upon vaccine, you should

also discriminate based upon 25 hydroxy vitamin D level, zinc taste test

response ,and probably previous infections.

Since there are also studies like Flash Drive that show that people who have

recovered from covid-19 infection actually get no benefit from vaccination at all, no

reduction in symptoms, no reduction in hospitalization and suffer two to four times

the rate of side effects if they are subsequently vaccinated.

Therefore, the policies that you are basing on are totally counterfactual.

 

I don't blame this board for that because I know you aren't scientists and you've

thought it was reasonable to listen to the CDC, NIH and the Indiana State Board of

Health, but I would encourage that instead, you listen to the people out here in this

audience and read what's on that data drive.

And if anybody here in this board has any questions about anything on that, I will

happily come back and sit with you individually. If you would like to explain the

science behind this and if you're worried about being sued by somebody because

you don't follow the guidance of the CDC and the NIH, I will tell you have a free pro

bono expert testimony at your disposal.

I will testify in defense of this court turning down all these recommendations for

free at any time, in any court.

 

Thank you.

Dr Dan Stock

KIJK: “RKI klokkenluider ontdekt Covid-oplichterij”

14/11/2024 Op 2 november gaf prof. Stefan Homburg deze presentatie in de Bondsdag in Berlijn, waarin hij de inhoud van een lek van ongecensu...