By Makia
Freeman
Global Research, July 13,
2020
The Freedom Articles 2 July 2020
Theme: Intelligence, Media
Disinformation, Science
and Medicine
COVID assumptions
– the assumptions people make about COVID, how dangerous it is, how it
spreads and what we need to do to stop it – are running rampant, running far
more wildly than the supposed virus SARS-CoV2 itself. The coldly calculated
campaign of propaganda surrounding this ‘pandemic’ has achieved its aim.
Besieged with a slew of contradictory information coming from all angles,
people in general have succumbed to confusion. Some have given up trying to
understand the situation and found it is just easier to obey official
directives, even if it means giving up long-held rights.
Below is a list of commonly
held COVID assumptions which, if you believe them, will make you much more
likely to submit to the robotic, insane and abnormal conditions of the New
Normal – screening, testing, contact tracing, monitoring,
surveillance, mask-wearing, social distancing, quarantine and isolation, with
mandatory vaccination and microchipping to come.
|
Assumption
1: The Method of Counting COVID Deaths is Sensible and Accurate
A grand assumption of the COVID plandemic
is that the numbers are real and accurate, especially the death toll. Yet,
nothing could be further from the truth. We have had confirmation after confirmation after confirmation (in
nations all over the world) that authorities are counting the deaths in a way
that makes no sense. Well,
it makes no sense if you want to be sensible or accurate, but it makes
perfect sense if you are trying to artificially inflate the numbers and
create the impression of a pandemic where there is none. The sleight of hand
is achieved by counting those who died with the virus
as dying from the virus. This one
trick alone is responsible for vastly skewing the numbers and turning the
‘official’ death count into a meaningless farce devoid of any practical
value.
|
|
Assumption
2: The PCR Test for COVID is Accurate
As I covered in previous articles, the PCR
test (Polymerase Chain Reaction) was invented by scientist Kary Mullis as a manufacturing technique (since
it is able to replicate DNA sequences millions and billions of times),
not as a diagnostic tool. COVID or SARS-CoV2 fails Koch’s postulates. The virus which shut the world down has
still to this day never been isolated, purified and re-injected, or in other
words, has never been 100% proven to exist, nor 100% proven to be the cause
of the disease. When used to determine the cause of a disease, the PCR test
has many flaws:
1. There is
no gold standard to which to compare its results (COVID fails Koch’s
postulates);
2. It
detects and amplifies genetic code (RNA sequences) but offers no proof these
RNA sequences are of viral origin;
3. It
generates many false positive results;
4. The PCR
test can give a completely opposite result (positive or negative) depending
upon the number of cycles or amplifications that are used, which is
ultimately arbitrarily chosen. For some diseases, if you lower the number of
cycles to 35, it can make everyone appear negative, while if you increase
them to above 35, it can make everyone appear positive;
5. Many
patients switch back and forth from positive to negative when taking the PCR
test on subsequent days; and
6. Even a
positive result does not guarantee the discovered ‘virus’ is the cause of the
disease!
In summary, the PCR test doesn’t
identify or isolate viruses, doesn’t provide RNA sequences of pathogens,
offers no baseline for comparison with patient samples, and cannot determine
an infected from an uninfected sample. That is staggeringly useless!
Here is a quote from the article COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless:
“Tests need
to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their
“sensitivity” and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,”
meaning the most accurate method available. As an example, for a pregnancy
test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian
infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an
ABC TV interview in an answer to the question “How accurate is the [COVID-19]
testing?”:
If we had a
new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already
got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades,
and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have
a gold standard test.”
Jessica C.
Watson from Bristol University confirms this. In her paper “Interpreting a
COVID-19 test result”, published recently in The British Medical Journal, she
writes that there is a “lack of such a clear-cut ‘gold-standard’ for COVID-19
testing.”“
Here is the admission about the PCR test by
the CDC and FDA:
“Detection
of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that
2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms …this test cannot rule
out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”
Accurate would be about the last word I
would use to describe COVID PCR testing, yet it is currently the standard
test worldwide for COVID. Another magnificent example of many
COVID assumptions. Go figure.
|
|
Assumption
3: The Antibody Test for COVID is Accurate If you realized by reading the last section
that the COVID PCR tests are
flawed and meaningless, get ready for more absurdity with the COVID antibody tests. As I covered in the article COVID Antibody Tests: Here Comes More Trickery and Fakery, there are numerous reasons why the
antibody tests don’t really work and can be interpreted any way you want:
1. Old
blood samples contain COVID antibodies, so if a test find antibodies, they
may have been there for years or decades. There is no way to tell if they
were recently acquired;
2. Like the
COVID PCR test, they generate many false positive results;
3. They
test for antibodies which may not even be specific for COVID;
4.
Antibodies don’t actually prove immunity, since there are people who fight
off disease with little or no antibodies, and conversely, there are those
with high antibody titers or counts, but who still get sick; and
5. The
results can be interpreted any way you want. The presence of antibodies could
mean you’re safe and immune to future COVID waves, or conversely, it could
mean you’re dangerous (sick and infected right now). It’s all about the
interpretation.
Hhmmm … all these COVID assumptions are not
exactly reassuring, are they?
|
|
Assumption
4: The COVID Case Count is Rising Someone skeptical of the alternative view I
am painting here may ask at this point: well if COVID is not that dangerous,
how come cases keep rising?
The answer is simple: because there is
more testing. The more we test, the more cases we will find, because this
‘virus’ (really an RNA sequence) is far more widespread than we
have been told, and there are far more asymptomatic people than we have
been told (which shows it’s not that dangerous).
As discussed in previous articles, there is
really no proof that people didn’t have this particular RNA sequence for
years or decades before the test, so the test results are quite meaningless.
That aside, a general rule of thumb is that
wherever there are people trying to gain power, there will be fraud, and
COVID testing is no exception.
It has been exposed that tens of
thousands of coronavirus tests have been double counted (in the UK, but
probably happening in many places).
This article explains
that the “discrepancy is in large part explained by the practice of counting
saliva and nasal samples for the same individual twice.” Additionally, the COVID tests are
using the PCR method as discussed above in COVID Assumption 3, which has many
flaws, including the flaw of results flipping back and forth depending on the
number of cycles, as this previously quoted article states:
” … it is
hardly surprising that there are several papers illustrating irrational test
results. For example, already in February the health authority in
China’s Guangdong province reported that people have fully recovered from
illness blamed on COVID-19, started to test “negative,” and then tested “positive” again.
A month
later, a paper published in the Journal of Medical Virology showed that 29
out of 610 patients at a hospital in Wuhan had 3 to 6 test results that
flipped between “negative”, “positive”
and “dubious”.
A third
example is a study from Singapore in which tests were carried out almost
daily on 18 patients and the majority went from “positive” to “negative” back
to “positive” at least once, and up to five times in one
patient.
Even Wang
Chen, president of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, conceded in
February that the PCR tests are “only 30 to 50 per cent
accurate”; while Sin Hang Lee from the Milford Molecular
Diagnostics Laboratory sent a letter to the WHO’s
coronavirus response team and to Anthony S. Fauci on March 22,
2020, saying that:
“It has
been widely reported in the social media that the RT-qPCR [Reverse
Transcriptase quantitative PCR] test kits used to detect SARSCoV-2 RNA
in human specimens are generating many false positive results and are not
sensitive enough to detect some real positive cases.” ”
|
|
Assumption
5: Thermal Imaging/Screening for COVID is Effective Taking people’s temperature by pointing a
gun at their head is blatant conditioning. It sends the subliminal message
that the State is all powerful and can aim a gun-like device at your head,
and you are powerless to do anything but submit. On a practical level, taking
people’s temperatures has no effect in stopping viral spread. Even if someone
has an elevated temperature, what does that mean? There is a natural
variation in human body temperatures; everyone operates at a slightly
different temperature. Besides, even if your temperature is elevated,
that could be because you were just exercising, running to catch a flight,
just had an angry conversation with someone, just got the phone after a
stressful call, had to discipline a disobedient child, etc. Think about all the things that make you stressed and
irritated, or raise your blood pressure, which could lead to an elevated
temperature!
In this way it is similar to the antibody
test; it can show a result, but the result can be interpreted in so many ways
that it renders the result pointless in terms of science (although there is a
very much a point in terms of control).
False Positives: Evidence Based Fact, What is the Reliability of the
PCR Test?
|
|
Assumption
6: Asymptomatic People Can Spread the Disease
One
particular piece of propaganda hammered in hard to people’s brains which is
still doing great damage is the idea that anyone could be a carrier and could
therefore infect anyone else. This has the effect of making people anxious,
scared and even paranoid in
just going about their daily life.
However the
idea that asymptomatic people can spread the disease is not something to
worry about. This
Chinese study A study on infectivity of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers published in May 2020 exposed 455
subjects to asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV2. None of the 455 were
infected!
WHO (World Health Organization) official
Dr. Maria van Kerkhove was reported by MSM CNBC saying the following last month in
June (though she later backtracked her comments):
““From the
data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person
actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,” Dr. Maria Van
Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said at a news
briefing from the United Nations agency’s Geneva headquarters. “It’s very rare.””
|
|
Assumption
7: Making Schools Adopt Insanely Restrictive Measures Will Stop COVID Spread Of the many COVID assumptions floating
around, these next two are based on the idea that children are a significant
source of COVID spread. They are not!
The figures from WorldOMeter state that children aged 0-17 years
have 0.02-0.06% share of world COVID deaths, which is essentially zero.
Meanwhile, CDC stats show
that “among 149,082 (99.6%) cases for which patient age was known, 2,572
(1.7%) occurred in children aged <18 years” which is likewise a tiny fraction.
With this in mind, why on Earth would the
CDC issue these draconian guidelines (pictured above and also found at this link in full) for American schoolchildren,
if not to condition and dehumanize them?
|
|
Assumption
8: It’s a Good Idea for Government to Take Abduct Kids from
COVID-Positive Parents Governmental abduction of children using
COVID as a pretext has begun. This article from
June 17th 2020 reports how the “LA County Dept. of
Children and Family Services (DCFS) recommended that the court remove [a]
child from their physical custody after the parent tested positive for
COVID-19. This is a non-offending parent. The judge ruled in favor of DCFS
and detained.”
Let that sink in for a minute. The State
stole a child from his/her parents just because a parent showed a
COVID-positive result on a (deeply flawed) test! Can anyone spell T-Y-R-A-N-N-Y?
This is the outcome of the sinister and
oxymoronic warning given by WHO official Michael Ryan in March, that people would be
removed from their families in a “safe and dignified” way. Ryan said:
“In some
senses, transmission has been taken off the streets and pushed back into
family units. Now we need to go and look in families to find those people who
may be sick and remove them and isolate them in a safe and dignified manner.”
ercola.com reports that the CDC is recommending newborns be separated at birth from
their parents for COVID testing.
How bad does it have to get before people
wake up to what is happening?
|
|
Assumption
9: Social Distancing is Backed by Solid Scientific Evidence Another of the baseless COVID assumptions
is that all this social distancing or physical distancing is backed by solid
scientific evidence. It’s not. Whether it’s 6 feet, 1.5 meters or 2
meters, the virus seems to be able to jump different distances depending
upon what country it is in. The article There is no scientific evidence to support the disastrous two-metre
rule states:
“The influential
Lancet review provided evidence from 172 studies in support of physical
distancing of one metre or more. This might sound impressive, but all the
studies were retrospective and suffer from biases that undermine the
reliability of their findings.”
Meanwhile UK governmental advisor Robert Dingwall said:
“We
cannot sustain [social distancing measures] without causing serious damage to
society, to the economy and to the physical and mental health of the
population …I think it will be much harder to get compliance with some of the
measures that really do not have an evidence base. I mean the two-metre
rule was conjured up out of nowhere … Well, there is a certain amount of
scientific evidence for a one-metre distance which comes out of indoor
studies in clinical and experimental settings. There’s never been a
scientific basis for two metres, it’s kind of a rule of thumb. But it’s
not like there is a whole kind of rigorous scientific literature that it is
founded upon.”
Of course, the assumption that social
distancing works is based on the underlying assumption that there is a
distinct and isolated virus SARS-CoV2 which is contagious and is the sole
cause of all the disease – which has not been proven.
|
|
Assumption
10: Mask Wearing for Healthy People is Backed by Solid Scientific Evidence The penultimate assumption for today is the
wonderful topic of masks, or face diapers and face nappies as many have started calling them.
One of the COVID assumptions that many are still clinging to is that it is
‘respectful’ to wear masks because masks protect healthy individuals from
getting sick from viruses. This is patently false. As covered in the
previous article Unmasking the Truth: Studies Show Dehumanizing Masks Weaken You and
Don’t Protect You, masks are
designed for surgeons or people who are already sick, not for healthy people.
They stop sick people spreading a disease
through large respiratory droplets; they do nothing to protect well
people.
In fact, they restrict oxygen flow leading
to under-oxygenation (hypoxia), which in turns leads to fatigue,
weakness and a lower immunity.
With a lower immunity comes … more
susceptibility to disease. As I previously wrote, the masks many
people are wearing – homemade from cloth – are a joke if you think they will
stop a virus which is measured in nanometers (nanometer = 10–9 meters, or 0.000000001 meters).
They won’t stop a virus but they will assuredly become a hotbed for microbes
to develop due to the warm and humid conditions.
For the scientifically minded, here’s what Dr. Russell
Blaylock had to say:
“The
importance of these findings is that a drop in oxygen levels (hypoxia) is
associated with an impairment in immunity. Studies have shown that hypoxia
can inhibit the type of main immune cells used to fight viral infections
called the CD4+ T-lymphocyte. This occurs because the hypoxia increases the
level of a compound called hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which inhibits
T-lymphocytes and stimulates a powerful immune inhibitor cell called the
Tregs. This sets the stage for contracting any infection, including COVID-19
and making the consequences of that infection much graver. In essence,
your mask may very well put you at an increased risk of infections and if so,
having a much worse outcome.”
|
|
Assumption 11: We Live in a World of
Indiscriminate Killer Viruses
The biggest assumption of this entire
scamdemic is that viruses are indiscriminate killers which can cross species
and jump bodies through the air to infect people. In fact, the nature of the
humble virus has been totally misunderstood by mainstream science, fueled by
the Medical Industry which promotes germ theory and the myth of contagion to
keep you in fear and to raise demand for its toxic products (Big Pharma
petrochemical drugs and vaccines). Viruses have been demonized. As discussed
in earlier articles such as Deep Down the Virus Rabbit Hole – Question Everything, virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka exposed the truth that viruses do
not cause disease. Lanka famously won a 2017 Supreme Court in Germany
where he proved that measles was not caused by a virus. Lanka writes:
“Since June 1954, the death of tissue and
cells in a test tube has been regarded as proof for the existence of a virus
… according to scientific logic and the rules of scientific conduct, control
experiments should have been carried out … These control experiments have
never been carried out by official science to this day. During the measles
virus trial, I commissioned an independent laboratory to perform this control
experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells die due to the
laboratory conditions in the exact same way as when they come into contact
with allegedly “infected” material.
In other words, the cells die of
starvation and poisoning (since they are separated from energy and nutrients
from the body, and since toxic antibiotics are injected into the cell
culture), not from being infected by a virus.
This great video presentation entitled Viral
Misconceptions: The True Nature of Viruses is well worth watching.
It outlines many stunning truths about the
nature of viruses, such as:
- Viruses are created
from within your cells; they do not come from outside the body
- They arise as a
result of systemic toxicity, not because the body has been invaded by an
external threat
- Viruses dissolve
toxic matter when body tissue is too toxic for living bacteria or
microbes to feed upon without being poisoned to death. Without viruses,
the human body couldn’t achieve homeostasis and sustain itself in the
face of systemic toxicity
- Viruses are very
specific. They dissolve specific tissues in the body. They do this with the
assistance of antibodies
- The more toxicity
you have in your body, the more viral activity you will have
- The only vector
transmission of a virus is through blood transfusion or vaccines;
otherwise, viruses cannot infect you by jumping from one body to another
- Viruses are
discriminatory by nature, made by the body for a specific purpose. They are not
indiscriminate killers
- The RT-PCR test (PCR
test for short) observes genetic material left over by the virus, not
the virus itself (see assumption 2)
|
Conclusion: Time to
Question all Your COVID Assumptions
The good news is that these are assumptions not facts. When you look
closely, you will realize the entire official narrative on COVID is a house
of cards built on sand. It cannot stand up to close scrutiny.
This knowledge is the key to remaining sane and free in a COVID-crazed
and brainwashed world. Spread the word. Evidence, information and knowledge
will dispel assumptions and ignorance.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward
this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet
forums. etc.
Makia Freeman is the editor of
alternative media / independent news site The
Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com. Makia is on Steemit and FB.
Sources
*https://www.bitchute.com/video/9GWhQ4v9H53E/
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g5f_6ltv7oI
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Fic2dlKlhw
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-19-umbrella-term-fake-pandemic-not-1-disease-cause/
*https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
*https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/covid-antibody-tests-here-comes-more-trickery-fakery/
*https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/tens-thousands-coronavirus-tests-have-double-counted-officials/
*https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7219423/
*https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/08/asymptomatic-coronavirus-patients-arent-spreading-new-infections-who-says.html
*https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/
*https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6914e4.htm
*https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schools-childcare/schools.html
*https://parentalrights.org/it-finally-happened-child-taken-due-to-covid-19/
*https://www.bitchute.com/video/CMPsWxDDTwMo/
*https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/06/09/newborns-and-coronavirus.aspx
*https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/15/no-scientific-evidence-support-disastrous-two-metre-rule/
*https://metro.co.uk/2020/04/25/two-metre-social-distancing-rule-conjured-nowhere-professor-claims-12609448/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/unmasking-the-truth-masks-weaken-dont-protect-you/
*https://thefreedomarticles.com/deep-down-virus-rabbit-hole-question-everything/
*https://davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Paper-Virus-Lanka-002.pdf
*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MtWYQS3LFlE
All images in this article
are from TFA
Related Articles
Selected Articles: The Pentagon's
"Anti-China Weapons" and "The New Silk Roads"
13 July 2020
Video: How COVID-19 Death Certificates Are
Being Manipulated. Montana Physician Dr. Annie Bukacek
19 November 2020
The Killer in the Bloodstream: the
"Spike Protein"
13 July 2021
The original source of this
article is The Freedom Articles
Copyright © Makia Freeman, The Freedom Articles, 2020
Source:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/11-covid-assumptions-based-fear-not-fact/5718352
