Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked
· According to Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention data, COVID-19 “cases” have trended downward
since peaking during the first and second week of January 2021. At first
glance, this decline appears to be occurring in tandem with the rollout of
COVID shots. However, “cases” were on the decline before a meaningful number of
people had been vaccinated
· COVID-19 “cases” peaked
January 8, 2021, when more than 300,000 new positive test results were recorded
on a daily basis. By February 21, that had declined to a daily new case count
of 55,000
· COVID-19 gene modification
injections were granted emergency use authorization at the end of December
2020, and by February 21, only 5.9% of American adults had been fully injected
with two doses. Despite such a low injection rate, new “cases” had declined by
82%
· The best explanation for a
declining COVID-19 case rate appears to be natural immunity from previous
infections. A study by the National Institutes of Health suggests COVID-19
prevalence was 4.8 times higher than previously thought, thanks to undiagnosed
infection
· The survivability of
COVID-19 outside of nursing homes is 99.74%. If you’re under the age of 40,
your chance of surviving a bout of COVID-19 is 99.99%. You can’t really improve
your chances of surviving beyond that, so COVID shots cannot realistically end
the pandemic
According to
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data,1 COVID-19 “cases” have
trended downward since peaking during the first and second week of January
2021.
At first
glance, this decline appears to be occurring in tandem with the rollout of
COVID shots. January 1, 2021, only 0.5% of the U.S. population had received a
COVID shot. By mid-April, an estimated 31% had received one or more shots,2 and as of July 13,
48.3% were fully “vaccinated.”3
However, as
noted in a July 12, 2021, STAT News article,4 “cases” had started
their downward trend before COVID shots were widely used. “Following patterns
from previous pandemics, the precipitous decline in new cases of Covid-19
started well before a meaningful number of people had been vaccinated,” Robert
M. Kaplan, Professor Emeritus at the UCLA Fielding School of Public Health,
writes. He continues:
“Nearly 50 years ago, medical sociologists John and
Sonja McKinlay examined5 death
rates from 10 serious diseases: tuberculosis, scarlet fever, influenzae,
pneumonia, diphtheria, whooping cough, measles, smallpox, typhoid, and polio.
In each case, the new therapy or vaccine credited with overcoming it was
introduced well after the disease was in decline.
More recently, historian Thomas McKeown noted6 that
deaths from bronchitis, pneumonia, and influenza had begun rapidly falling 35
years before the introduction of new medicines that were credited with their
conquest. These historical analyses are relevant to the current pandemic.”
‘Case’ Decline Preceded
Widespread Implementation of Jab
As noted by
Kaplan, COVID-19 “cases” peaked in early January 2021. January 8, more than
300,000 new positive test results were recorded on a daily basis. By February
21, that had declined to a daily new case count of 55,000. COVID-19 gene
modification injections were granted emergency use authorization at the end of
December 2020, but by February 21, only 5.9% of American adults had been fully
vaccinated with two doses.
Despite such a
low vaccination rate, new “cases” had declined by 82%. Considering health
authorities claim we need 70% of Americans vaccinated in order to achieve herd
immunity and stop the spread of this virus, this simply makes no sense.
Clearly, the COVID shots had nothing to do with the decline in positive test
results.
To be clear,
reported cases mean positive test results, and we now know the vast majority of
positive PCR tests have been, and still are, false positives. They’re not sick.
They simply had a false “positive.” Right now, we’re also faced with yet
another situation that complicates attempts at data analysis, and Kaplan
understandably did not address any of these confounding factors.
But just so
you’re aware, if you have been fully “vaccinated,” then the CDC recommends
running the PCR test at a cycle threshold (CT) of 28 or lower, which
dramatically lowers your chance of a false positive result, but if you are
unvaccinated, the PCR test is recommended to be run at a CT of 40 or higher,
virtually guaranteeing a false positive.
This is just
one way by which the CDC is manipulating data to make the COVID shots appear
more effective than they are. This also allows them to falsely claim that the
vast majority of new cases are among the unvaccinated.
Naturally, if
unvaccinated are tested in such a way as to maximize false positives, then
they’re going to make up the bulk of the so-called caseload. In reality,
though, the vast majority of them aren’t sick.
Meanwhile,
those who have received the jabs only count as a COVID case if they’re
hospitalized and/or die with a positive test result. These widely differing
testing strategies skew the data and allow for false interpretations to be
made.
Natural Immunity Explains
Decline in Cases
As noted by
Kaplan, the most reasonable explanation for declining rates of SARS-CoV-2
appears to be natural immunity from previous infections, which vary
considerably from state to state.7 He goes on to cite a study8 by the National
Institutes of Health, which suggests SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was 4.8 times higher
than previously thought, thanks to undiagnosed infection.
In other words,
they claim that for every reported positive test result, there were likely
nearly five additional people who had the infection but didn’t get a diagnosis.
To analyze this data further, Kaplan calculated the natural immunity rate by dividing
the new estimated number of people naturally infected by the population of any
given state. He writes:9
“By mid-February 2021, an estimated 150 million
people in the U.S. (30 million times five) may have had been infected with
SARS-CoV-2. By April, I estimated the natural immunity rate to be above 55% in
10 states: Arizona, Iowa, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South
Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, and Wisconsin.
At the other end of the continuum, I estimated the
natural immunity rate to be below 35% in the District of Columbia, Hawaii,
Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Vermont, Virginia, and
Washington …
By the end of 2020, new infections were already
rapidly declining in nearly all of the 10 states where the majority may have
had natural immunity, well before more than a minuscule percentage of Americans
were fully vaccinated. In 80% of these states, the day when new cases were at
their peak occurred before vaccines were available.
In contrast, the 10 states with lower rates of
previous infections were much more likely to experience new upticks in Covid-19
cases in March and April ... By the end of May, states with fewer new
infections had significantly lower vaccination rates than states with more new
infections.”
COVID Shots Cannot
Eliminate COVID-19
So, SARS-CoV-2
cases were actually higher in states where natural immunity was low but
vaccination rates were high. Meanwhile, in states where natural immunity due to
undiagnosed exposure was high, but vaccination rates were low, the daily new
caseload was also lower.
This makes
sense if natural immunity is highly effective (which, historically it has
always been and there’s no reason to suspect SARS-CoV-2 is any different in
that regard). It also makes sense if the COVID shots aren’t really offering any
significant protection against infection, which we also know is the case.
The
survivability of COVID-19 outside of nursing homes is 99.74%. If you’re under
the age of 40, your chance of surviving a bout of COVID-19 is 99.99%.
Vaccine
manufacturers have already admitted these COVID shots will not provide
immunity, meaning they will not prevent you from being infected. The idea
behind these gene modification injections is that if/when you do get infected,
you’ll hopefully experience milder symptoms, even though you’re still
infectious and can spread the virus to others.
Kaplan ends his
analysis by saying that COVID shots are a safer way to achieve herd immunity,
and that they are “the best tool available for assuring that the smoldering
fire of [COVID-19] is extinguished.” I disagree, based on two major issues.
First, and
perhaps most importantly, this is an untested “vaccine” and we have no idea of
the short-term let alone long-term damage it will cause, as any reasonable
effort at collecting this data has been actively suppressed. Secondly, the
survivability of COVID-19 outside of nursing homes is 99.74%. If you’re under
the age of 40, your chance of surviving a bout of COVID-19 is 99.99%.10,11,12
You can’t
really improve your chances of surviving beyond that, so COVID shots cannot
realistically end the pandemic. Meanwhile, the COVID shots come with an
ever-growing list of potential side effects that can take years if not decades
off your natural life span. The shots are particularly unnecessary for anyone
with natural immunity,13 yet that’s what the CDC recommends.14
Why Push COVID Jab on Those
with Natural Immunity?
In January
2021, Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, a cardiac surgeon and patient advocate, sent a
public letter15 to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration commissioner detailing
the risks of vaccinating individuals who have previously been infected with
SARS-CoV-2, or who have an active SARS-CoV-2 infection.
He urged the
FDA to require prescreening for SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins to reduce the risk of
injuries and deaths following vaccination, as the vaccine may trigger an
adverse immune response in those who have already been infected with the virus.
In March 2021, Fox TV host Tucker Carlson interviewed him about these risks. In
that interview, Noorchashm said:16
“I think it’s a dramatic error on part of public
health officials to try to put this vaccine into a one-size-fits-all paradigm …
We’re going to take this problem we have with the COVID-19 pandemic, where a
half-percent of the population is susceptible to dying, and compound it by
causing totally avoidable harm by vaccinating people who are already infected …
The signal is deafening, the people who are having
complications or adverse events are the people who have recently or are
currently or previously infected [with COVID]. I don’t think we can ignore
this.”
In an email to
The Defender, Noorchashm fleshed out his concerns, saying:17
“Viral antigens persist in the tissues of the
naturally infected for months. When the vaccine is used too early after a
natural infection, or worse during an active infection, the vaccine force
activates a powerful immune response that attacks the tissues where the natural
viral antigens are persisting. This, I suggest, is the cause of the high level
of adverse events and, likely deaths, we are seeing in the recently infected
following vaccination.”
Despite being
widely ignored, Noorchashm continues to push for the implementation of
prevaccine screening using PCR or rapid antigen testing to determine whether
the individual has an active infection, and an IgG antibody test to determine
past infection.
If either test
is positive, he recommends delaying vaccination for a minimum of three to six
months to allow your IgG levels to wane. At that point, he recommends testing
your blood IgG level and use that as a guide to decide the timing of your
vaccination.
Those with Natural Immunity
Have Higher Risk of Side Effects
Mere weeks
after Noorchashm’s letter to the FDA, an international survey18 confirmed his
concerns. After surveying 2,002 people who had received a first dose of
COVID-19 vaccine, they found that those who had previously had COVID-19
experienced “significantly increased incidence and severity” of side effects,
compared to those who did not have natural immunity.
The mRNA COVID-19
vaccines were linked to a higher incidence of side effects compared to the
viral vector-based COVID-19 vaccines, but tended to be milder, local reactions.
Systemic reactions, such as anaphylaxis, flu-like illness and breathlessness,
were more likely to occur with the viral vector COVID-19 vaccines.
Like Noorchashm
before them, the researchers called on health officials to reevaluate their
vaccination recommendations for people who’ve had COVID-19:19
“People with prior COVID-19 exposure were largely
excluded from the vaccine trials and, as a result, the safety and
reactogenicity of the vaccines in this population have not been previously
fully evaluated. For the first time, this study demonstrates a significant
association between prior COVID19 infection and a significantly higher
incidence and severity of self-reported side effects after vaccination for
COVID-19.
Consistently, compared to the first dose of the
vaccine, we found an increased incidence and severity of self-reported side
effects after the second dose, when recipients had been previously exposed to
viral antigen.
In view of the rapidly accumulating data
demonstrating that COVID-19 survivors generally have adequate natural immunity
for at least 6 months, it may be appropriate to re-evaluate the recommendation
for immediate vaccination of this group.”
CDC Misrepresents Data to
Push Jab on Those with Immunity
So far, the CDC
has refused to change its stance on the matter. Instead, officials at the
agency seem to have doubled down and actually go out of their way to
misrepresent data in an effort to harass those with natural immunity to
inappropriately take the jab, which is clearly clinically unnecessary.
In a report
issued by the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)
December 18, 2020, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was said to have
“consistent high efficacy” of 92% or more among people with evidence of
previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.20
After looking
at the Pfizer trial data, Rep. Thomas Massie — a Republican Congressman for
Kentucky and an award-winning scientist in his own right — discovered that’s
completely wrong. In a January 30, 2021, Full Measure report, investigative
journalist Sharyl Attkisson described how Massie tried, in vain, to get the CDC
to correct its error. According to Massie:21,22
“There is no efficacy demonstrated in the Pfizer
trial among participants with evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infections and
actually there's no proof in the Moderna trial either …
It [the CDC report] says the exact opposite of what
the data says. They're giving people the impression that this vaccine will save
your life, or save you from suffering, even if you've already had the virus and
recovered, which has not been demonstrated in either the Pfizer or the Moderna
trial.”
After multiple
phone calls, CDC deputy director Dr. Anne Schuchat finally acknowledged the
error and told Massie it would be fixed. “As you note correctly, there is not
sufficient analysis to show that in the subset of only the people with prior
infection, there's efficacy. So, you're correct that that sentence is wrong and
that we need to make a correction of it,” Schuchat said in the recorded call.
January 29,
2021, the CDC issued its supposed correction, but rather than fix the error,
they simply rephrased the mistake in a different way. This was the “correction”
they issued:
“Consistent high efficacy (≥92%) was observed
across age, sex, race, and ethnicity categories and among persons with
underlying medical conditions. Efficacy was similarly high in a secondary
analysis including participants both with or without evidence of previous
SARS-CoV-2 infection.”
As you can see,
the “correction” still misleadingly suggests that vaccination is effective for
those previously infected, even though the data showed no such thing. Children
of ever-younger ages are also being pushed to get the COVID jab, even though
they have the absolute lowest risk of dying from COVID-19 of any group.
Data23 from the first 12
months of the pandemic in the U.K. show just 25 people under the age of 18 died
from or with COVID-19.24 In all, 251 children under 18 were admitted
to intensive care between March 2020 and February 2021. The absolute risk of
death from COVID-19 in children is 2 in 1 million.
Vaccine Provides Far Less
Protection Than Natural Immunity
While some
claim vaccine-induced immunity offers greater protection against SARS-CoV-2
infection than natural immunity, historical and current real-world data simply
fail to support this non-common sense assertion.
As recently
reported by Attkisson25,26 and David Rosenberg 7
Israeli National News,27 recent Israeli data show those who have
received the COVID jab are 6.72 times more likely to get infected than people
who have recovered from natural infection.
Among the 7,700
new COVID cases diagnosed so far during the current wave of infections that
began in May 2021, 39% were vaccinated (about 3,000 cases), 1% (72 patients)
had recovered from a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and 60% were neither
vaccinated nor previously infected. Israeli National News notes:28
“With a total of 835,792 Israelis known to have
recovered from the virus, the 72 instances of reinfection amount to 0.0086% of
people who were already infected with COVID.
By contrast, Israelis who were vaccinated were 6.72
times more likely to get infected after the shot than after natural infection,
with over 3,000 of the 5,193,499, or 0.0578%, of Israelis who were vaccinated
getting infected in the latest wave.”
Breakthrough Infections Are
on the Rise
Other Israeli
data also suggest the limited protection offered by the COVID shot is rapidly
eroding. August 1, 2021, director of Israel’s Public Health Services, Dr.
Sharon Alroy-Preis, announced half of all COVID-19 infections were among the
fully vaccinated.29 Signs of more serious disease among fully vaccinated
are also emerging, she said, particularly in those over the age of 60.
Even worse,
August 5, Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of the Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem,
appeared on Channel 13 News, reporting that 95% of severely ill COVID-19
patients are fully vaccinated, and that they make up 85% to 90% of
COVID-related hospitalizations overall.30
Other areas
where a clear majority of residents have been vaccinated are also seeing spikes
in breakthrough cases. In Gibraltar, which has a 99% COVID jab compliance rate,
COVID cases have risen by 2,500% since June 1, 2021.31
US Outbreak Shatters
‘Pandemic of Unvaccinated’ Narrative
An
investigation by the CDC32,33 also dispels the
narrative that we’re in a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” An outbreak in
Barnstable County, Massachusetts, resulted in 469 new COVID cases among
residents who had traveled into town between July 3 and July 17, 2021.
Of these cases,
74% were fully vaccinated, as were 80% of those requiring hospitalization.Most,
but not all, had the Delta variant of the virus. The CDC also found that fully
vaccinated individuals who contract the infection had as high a viral load in
their nasal passages as unvaccinated individuals who got infected.34 This means the
vaccinated are just as infectious as the unvaccinated. According to Attkisson:35
“CDC's newest findings on so-called ‘breakthrough’
infections in vaccinated people are mirrored by other data releases. Illinois
health officials recently announced36 more than
160 fully-vaccinated people have died of Covid-19, and at least 644 been
hospitalized; 10 deaths and 51 hospitalizations counted in the prior week …
In July, New Jersey reported 49 fully vaccinated
residents had died of Covid; 27 in Louisiana; 80 in Massachusetts … Nationally,
as of July 12, CDC said it was aware of more than 4,400 people who got Covid-19
after being fully vaccinated and had to be hospitalized; and 1,063 fully
vaccinated people who died of Covid.”
It is important
to note this data is over 1 month old now and it is likely that many thousands
of fully “vaccinated” have now died from COVID-19.
Natural Immunity Appears
Robust and Long-Lasting
An argument
we’re starting to hear more of now is that even though natural immunity after
recovery from infection appears to be quite good, “we don’t know how long it’ll
last.” This is rather disingenuous, seeing how natural immunity is typically
lifelong, and studies have shown natural immunity against SARS-CoV-2 is at bare
minimum longer lasting than vaccine-induced immunity.
Here’s a sampling of scholarly
publications that have investigated natural immunity as it pertains to
SARS-CoV-2 infection. There are several more in addition to
these:37
|
Science Immunology October 202038 found that “RBD-targeted
antibodies are excellent markers of previous and recent infection, that
differential isotype measurements can help distinguish between recent and
older infections, and that IgG responses persist over the first few months
after infection and are highly correlated with neutralizing antibodies.” |
|
The BMJ January 202139 concluded that “Of 11, 000 health care workers who had proved
evidence of infection during the first wave of the pandemic in the U.K.
between March and April 2020, none had symptomatic reinfection in the second
wave of the virus between October and November 2020.” |
|
Science February 202140 reported that “Substantial immune memory is generated after
COVID-19, involving all four major types of immune memory [antibodies, memory
B cells, memory CD8+ T cells, and memory CD4+ T cells]. About 95% of subjects
retained immune memory at ~6 months after infection. Circulating antibody
titers were not predictive of T cell memory. Thus, simple serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies do not
reflect the richness and durability of immune memory to SARS-CoV-2.” A 2,800-person
study found no symptomatic reinfections over a ~118-day window, and a
1,246-person study observed no symptomatic reinfections over 6 months. |
|
A February 2021 study posted on the prepublication server medRxiv41 concluded
that “Natural infection appears to elicit strong protection against
reinfection with an efficacy ~95% for at least seven months.” |
|
An April 2021 study posted on medRxiv42 reported “the
overall estimated level of protection from prior SARS-CoV-2 infection for
documented infection is 94.8%; hospitalization 94.1%; and severe illness
96·4%. Our results question the need to vaccinate previously-infected
individuals.” |
|
Another April 2021 study posted on the preprint server BioRxiv43 concluded
that “following a typical case of mild COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8+ T
cells not only persist but continuously differentiate in a coordinated
fashion well into convalescence, into a state characteristic of long-lived,
self-renewing memory.” |
|
A May 2020 report in the journal Immunity44 confirmed that
SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing antibodies are detected in COVID-19
convalescent subjects, as well as cellular immune responses. Here, they found
that neutralizing antibody titers do correlate with the number of
virus-specific T cells. |
|
A May 2021 Nature article45 found SARS-CoV-2
infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells, which are a crucial
source of protective antibodies. Even after mild infection, anti-SARS-CoV-2
spike protein antibodies were detectable beyond 11 months’ post-infection. |
|
A May 2021 study in E Clinical Medicine46 found “antibody
detection is possible for almost a year post-natural infection of COVID-19.”
According to the authors, “Based on current evidence, we hypothesize that
antibodies to both S and N-proteins after natural infection may persist for
longer than previously thought, thereby providing evidence of sustainability
that may influence post-pandemic planning.” |
|
Cure-Hub data47 confirm that while COVID shots can generate higher antibody
levels than natural infection, this does not mean vaccine-induced immunity is
more protective. Importantly, natural immunity confers much wider protection
as your body recognizes all five proteins of the virus and not just one. With
the COVID shot, your body only recognizes one of these proteins, the spike
protein. |
|
A June 2021 Nature article48 points out that
“Wang et al. show that, between 6 and 12 months after infection, the
concentration of neutralizing antibodies remains unchanged. That the acute
immune reaction extends even beyond six months is suggested by the authors’
analysis of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells in the blood of the
convalescent individuals over the course of the year. These memory B cells continuously enhance the reactivity of their
SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies through a process known as somatic
hypermutation. The good news is that the evidence thus far predicts that
infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces long-term immunity in most individuals.” |
|
Another June Nature paper concluded that “In the absence of
vaccination antibody reactivity [to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of
SARS-CoV-2], neutralizing activity and the number of RBD-specific memory B
cells remain relatively stable from 6 to 12 months.” According to the
authors, the data suggest “immunity in convalescent individuals will be very
long lasting.” |
What Makes Natural Immunity
Superior?
The reason
natural immunity is superior to vaccine-induced immunity is because viruses
contain five different proteins. The COVID shot induces antibodies against just
one of those proteins, the spike protein, and no T cell immunity. When you’re
infected with the whole virus, you develop antibodies against all parts of the
virus, plus memory T cells.
This also means
natural immunity offers better protection against variants, as it recognizes
several parts of the virus. If there are significant alternations to the spike
protein, as with the Delta variant, vaccine-induced immunity can be evaded. Not
so with natural immunity, as the other proteins are still recognized and
attacked.
Not only that
but the COVID jabs actually actively promote the production of variants for
which they provide virtually no protection at all, while those with natural
immunity do not cause variants and are nearly universally protected against
them.
If we are to
depend on vaccine-induced immunity, as public health officials are urging us to
do, we’ll end up on a never-ending booster treadmill. Boosters will absolutely
be necessary, as the shot offers such narrow protection against a single
protein of the virus. Already, Moderna has publicly stated that the need for
additional boosters is expected.49
Ultimately It’s About
Wealth Transfer, Power and Control
Government
agencies typically don’t issue recommendations without ulterior motives. Since
current recommendations make absolutely no sense from a medical and scientific
standpoint, what might the reason be for these illogical and reprehensibly
unethical recommendations to inject people who don’t need it with experimental
gene modification technology?
Why are they so
hell-bent on getting a needle in every arm? And why are they refusing to
perform any kind of risk-benefit analysis?
Data already
indicate these COVID-19 injections could be the most dangerous medical product
we’ve ever seen, and a June 24, 2021, peer-reviewed study published in the
medical journal Vaccines warned we are in fact killing nearly as many with the
shots as would die from COVID-19 itself.50
Using data from
a large Israeli field study and two European drug reactions databases, they
recalculated the NNTV for Pfizer’s mRNA shot. To prevent one case of COVID-19,
anywhere between 200 and 700 had to be injected. To prevent a single death, the
NNTV was between 9,000 and 50,000, with 16,000 as a point estimate.
Meanwhile, the
number of people reporting adverse reactions from the shots was 700 per 100,000
vaccinations. For serious side effects, there were 16 reports per 100,000
vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects was 4.11 per 100,000
vaccinations.
The final
calculation suggested that for every three COVID-19 deaths prevented, two died
from the shots. “This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink
their vaccination policy,” the authors concluded.
As has become
the trend, a letter expressing “concern” about the study was published June 28,
2021, resulting in the paper being abruptly retracted July 2, 2021, against the
authors’ objections. They disagreed with the accusation that their data and
subsequent conclusion were misrepresentative, but the paper was retracted
before they had time to publish a rebuttal.
Based on
everything we’ve discovered so far, it seems a pandemic virus industrial
complex is running the show, with a goal to eliminate medical rights and
personal freedoms in order to centralize power, control and wealth.
By the looks of
things, the COVID-19 mass psychosis and loss of any rational thinking by nearly
half the population will continue to persist as long as the propaganda
continues. Fear will continue and if need be, other engineered viruses may be
released, for which they’ll create even more gene modification injections.
I believe the truth will
eventually be so overwhelming, it’ll sweep away the confusion and the lies.
·
Sources and References
·
1 COVID.CDC.gov, COVID Cases in the US Reported to the
CDC, Viewed July 15, 2021
·
2 Bloomberg COVID Vaccine Tracker, see US Vaccinations
vs Cases graph, top portion
·
3 Mayo
Clinic COVID Vaccine Tracker
·
4, 7, 9 STAT News
July 12, 2021
·
5 Health
and Society 1977; 55(3): 405-428
·
6 Population Studies, A Journal of Demography 1975;
29(3): 391-422
·
10 Annals of Internal Medicine September 2, 2020 DOI: 10.7326/M20-5352
·
11 Greek
Reporter June 27, 2020
·
13 medRxiv
June 1, 2021
·
14 U.S. CDC, COVID-19 Vaccination FAQs April 30, 2021
·
16, 17 The
Defender March 23, 2021
·
19 Life 2021; 11(3): 249,
Discussion
·
21 Full Measure After Hours Podcast January 30, 2021
·
22 Full
Measure News January 31, 2021
·
23 Research Square July 7, 2021
·
24 BBC July 9, 2021
·
25 Sharylattkisson.com
August 8, 2021
·
26, 35 Sharylattkisson.com
August 6, 2021
·
27, 28 David Rosenberg 7 July 13, 2021
·
29 Bloomberg
August 1, 2021 (Archived)
·
30 American
Faith August 8, 2021
·
31 Big
League Politics August 4, 2021
·
32 CDC MMWR
July 30, 2021; 70
·
33 CNBC July
30, 2021
·
36 NBC
Chicago July 28, 2021
·
37 Reddit
COVID-19 and Immunity
·
38 Science Immunology October 8,
2020; 5(52): eabe0367
·
39 BMJ 2021;372:n99
·
40 Science February 5, 2021;
371(6529): eabf4063
·
41 medrxiv
February 8, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.15.21249731
·
42 medRxiv
April 24, 2021 (PDF)
·
43 BioRxiv
April 29, 2021 DOI: 10.1101/2021.04.28.441880
·
44 Immunity
June 16, 2020; 52(6): 971-977.E3
·
45 Nature 2021; 595: 421-425
·
46 E
Clinical Medicine 2021; 36: 100902 (PDF)
·
48 Nature June 14, 2021
