Health Officials Admit Bill Gates Runs the World

In a report published in Politico, US and European officials and global health specialists admitted that Bill Gates is running the global COVID response.

Dr. Joseph Mercola

29/09/2022

Video Link on Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/tDEYcW9Zi9xy/

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• September 14, 2022, Politico published a special report based on four dozen interviews with U.S. and European officials and global health specialists, who admit Bill Gates is running the global COVID response
• Four health organizations — The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the Wellcome Trust — rapidly took a lead on the global pandemic response, and while all four claim to be independent organizations, they’re all actually founded and/or funded by Gates
• During the earliest days of the outbreak, the Gates Foundation, GAVI, CEPI and the Wellcome Trust began a coordinated effort to identify vaccine makers, fund tests, drug treatments and mRNA shots, and develop a global distribution plan in collaboration with the World Health Organization. In the end, they failed to meet their own goals on all fronts
• Gates is unqualified to make health recommendations, and he’s never been elected to represent the public
• Gates has used his wealth, influence and sheer shrewdness to get him into a position where he can dictate global health policy for his own financial benefit

 

The idea that Bill Gates exerts undue influence over global health has consistently been denied and dismissed as a loony conspiracy theory. But as with so many other things, this conspiracy theory is now turning out to be a conspiracy fact.

September 14, 2022, Politico published an extensive special report based on “four dozen interviews with U.S. and European officials and global health specialists,” headlined, “How Bill Gates and His Partners Took Over the Global COVID Response.”¹

As noted by Igor Chudov on Substack,² within hours the headline was edited to read: “How Four Private Groups Used Their Clout to Control the Global COVID Response — With Little Oversight,”³ as illustrated in Chudov’s screen captures below.

 

Curiously, five hours after that edit, Politico changed the headline back, so at the time of this writing, it reads:⁴ “How Bill Gates and Partners Used Their Clout to Control the Global Covid Response — With Little Oversight.” The only word now missing from the original headline is “his.” You can see how the headline shifted back and forth over the course of 15 hours on archive.today.⁵

Four Gates Organizations Monopolize the Global COVID Response

According to Politico,⁶ four health organizations — the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI) and the Wellcome Trust — rapidly took a lead on the global pandemic response, and while all four claim to be independent organizations, they’re all actually founded and/or funded by Gates.

Six Takeaways From Politico’s Investigation

During the earliest days of the outbreak, while governments were still debating the seriousness of it, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, CEPI and the Wellcome Trust began a coordinated effort to identify vaccine makers, fund tests, drug treatments and mRNA shots, and develop a global distribution plan in collaboration with the World Health Organization. In a side bar, Politico highlights six key takeaways from their investigation:⁷

Unqualified and Unelected

As detailed by Politico, through Gates’ lobbying and financial might, the international response to COVID rapidly shifted from individual governments to “a privately overseen global constituency of nongovernmental experts.”

“What makes Bill Gates qualified to be giving advice and advising the U.S. government on where they should be putting ... tremendous resources?” ~ Kate Elder, senior policy adviser for the Doctors Without Borders’ Access Campaign

In the U.S., president Biden has earmarked $500 million to CEPI alone in his $5 billion COVID budget, which has yet to be approved by Congress. But, as noted by Kate Elder, a senior vaccines policy adviser for the Doctors Without Borders’ Access Campaign:⁸

Lawrence Gostin, a Georgetown University professor who specializes in public-health law told Politico:

Gates ‘Owns’ the WHO

Many have pointed out that Gates, through his billions in donations to the WHO, has significant leverage over the WHO’s decisions. In September 2021, Astrid Stuckelberger, Ph.D., a WHO insider, blew the whistle on Gates, explaining how the WHO is, in fact, controlled by Gates, who in turn dictates policy for his own personal financial benefit.

Of the four organizations Politico focuses on, GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance, may be the most important. GAVI, founded by Gates, is headquartered in Switzerland. In 2009, GAVI was recognized as an international institution and granted total blanket immunity, including qualified diplomatic immunity, which is extremely odd considering the organization has no political power that would warrant diplomatic immunity.⁹

Odder still is that GAVI’s immunity clauses go beyond even that of diplomats. GAVI’s immunity covers all aspects of engagement, including criminal business dealings. Equally strange is the fact that they’re completely tax exempt.

GAVI can basically do whatever it wants without any repercussions. Police can’t even investigate or collect evidence from GAVI were they to be implicated in a criminal investigation. That’s how well-protected they are. And, according to Stuckelberger, GAVI is the entity that is really directing the WHO.

According to Stuckelberger, Gates did, in 2017, request to be put on the WHO’s executive board — like a member state — ostensibly because he gives them so much money. There’s no evidence that Gates was ever officially granted the status of a member state, but it appears he figured out an alternative power play.

Stuckelberger pointed out that Gates and the WHO entered into a three-way contract agreement with Swissmedic, the Food and Drug Administration of Switzerland, which is highly unusual. So, essentially, when Gates did not get voted in as a one-man nation state, he created three-party contracts with member states and the WHO, essentially placing him on par with the WHO!

One curiosity that supports the idea that Gates is either the real power behind the WHO, or has the same amount of power as the WHO, is the fact that Gates has repeatedly been the first to announce what the world needs to do to address the pandemic, and then the WHO would come out with an identical message that member states then had to follow.

But who the heck is Gates to direct global health and pandemic responses? He’s a nobody. He has no medical training. He’s completely unqualified to speak to any health issues whatsoever. He didn’t even graduate college. And he’s never been elected to represent the people in any capacity.

Basically, what we have here is one wealthy individual who figured out a way to unofficially monopolize the decision-making ability of a global health authority in order to enrich himself, which is beyond crazy.

The WHO Was Instrumental in Gates’ Rise to Power

Gates’ influence over the WHO is undoubtedly why the WHO allowed these four Gates-funded groups to direct the global response to COVID in the first place. As reported by Politico:¹⁰

It would be one thing if these organizations actually did an excellent job. But they didn’t. An independent review¹¹ by Dalberg Global Development Advisors, a New York policy advisory firm, found the initiative created by Gates’ groups, the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-A), failed on all fronts.

Despite a $23 billion budget,¹² ACT-A procured only 16% of its target number of tests for low-and middle-income countries, and of the 245 million treatments it was supposed to deliver to low- and middle-income countries, they only allocated 1.8 million. Similarly, of the 2 billion COVID shots that were supposed to be delivered by the end of 2021, only 319 million doses were delivered.

Of course, one could argue that failure to deliver fraudulent CPR tests and dangerous treatments and mRNA shots were a blessing in disguise. But the fact remains that these organizations are far from excellent and fail miserably in reaching many of their stated goals.

They overpromise and underdeliver. They’re willing to sacrifice lives to maintain control over moneymaking patents. And, while they’re more or less singlehandedly shaping the global response to pandemics, there’s no one to hold them to account for their performance.

What Politico Left Out

While Politico’s report is sweeping in breadth, it still failed to include a number of important puzzle pieces listed in Chudov’s Substack article. For example:¹³

• SARS-CoV-2 appears to be an intentionally engineered bioweapon.
• The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation helped organize Event 201, a tabletop pandemic preparedness exercise in October 2019 that prophetically predicted COVID-19 — and the need for a massive propaganda and censorship campaign to quash “conspiracies” about the virus.
• Gates purchased 3.1 million shares of BioNTech in September 2019 for $55 million.^14 15 At the time, BioNTech was working on patient-specific immunotherapies for cancer and other chronic diseases. In mid-March 2020, BioNTech partnered with Pfizer to develop a COVID mRNA jab.¹⁶ By August 2021, Gates’ prescient investment was worth $1.7 billion.
• The Gates Foundation financed EcoHealth Alliance,¹⁷ the organization suspected of having a hand in the development of SARS-CoV-2.
• The Gates Foundation also financed the University of North Carolina (UNC) with at least 56 different grants, where Ralph Baric, Ph.D., conducted gain-of-function research linked to the development of SARS-CoV-2. Baric also worked with EcoHealth Alliance and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

As noted by Chudov in his closing remarks:¹⁸

The Gates-Fauci Scheme to Vaccinate the World

Gates is far from the only nemesis in this orchestrated drama, however. Dr. Anthony Fauci is another key player. Ironically, Gates claims he’s “taken the brunt of COVID conspiracy abuse” because Europeans are not familiar with Fauci. He recently told Fortune magazine:¹⁹

But while Gates tries to pass it off people’s concerns about his undue influence over their health as a joke, there’s no shortage of evidence that he really is pulling strings he’s far from qualified to pull.

In “Bill Gates Lays Out Plan for Global Takeover,” I review Gates’ role in the WHO and the WHO’s plan to, ultimately, seize control over all health care decisions, worldwide. I’ve also reviewed how Gates and Fauci have collaborated, forming a formidable public-private partnership that wields incredible power over the American public.

As early as 2000, Fauci and Gates formed an agreement to control and expand the global vaccine enterprise, which in 2021 culminated in a plan to inject every man, woman and child on the planet with an experimental COVID shot. Gates and Fauci’s collaboration are detailed in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s best-selling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci.” The video at the top of this article summarizes their joint scheme.

Subscribe to Mercola Newsletter

Disclaimer: The entire contents of this website are based upon the opinions of Dr. Mercola, unless otherwise noted. Individual articles are based upon the opinions of the respective author, who retains copyright as marked.

The information on this website is not intended to replace a one-on-one relationship with a qualified health care professional and is not intended as medical advice. It is intended as a sharing of knowledge and information from the research and experience of Dr. Mercola and his community. Dr. Mercola encourages you to make your own health care decisions based upon your research and in partnership with a qualified health care professional. The subscription fee being requested is for access to the articles and information posted on this site, and is not being paid for any individual medical advice.

If you are pregnant, nursing, taking medication, or have a medical condition, consult your health care professional before using products based on this content.

1 Politico September 14, 2022 (Archived w original headline)

2 Igor Chudov Substack September 15, 2022

3 Politico September 14, 2022 (Archived w changed headline)

4 Politico September 14, 2022

5 Archive.today Screenshots of Politico article between Sep 15, 2022 02:09 through Sep 20, 2022 01:29

6 Politico September 14, 2022

7 Politico September 14, 2022

8 Politico September 14, 2022

9 GAVI.org June 23, 2009

10 Politico September 14, 2022

11 Dalberg Global Development Advisors, ACT-Accelerator Strategic Review

12 Politico September 14, 2022

13 Igor Chudov Substack September 15, 2022

14 Sec.gov Investment Agreement

15 BioNTech September 4, 2019

16 BioNTech March 17, 2020

17 Gates Foundation Committed Grants to EcoHealth Alliance

18 Igor Chudov Substack September 15, 2022

19 Fortune September 13, 2022 (Archived)

 

Subscribe to Dr. Mercola's Censored Library (Private Membership)

By Dr. Joseph Mercola  ·  Tens of thousands of paid subscribers

 Source: https://takecontrol.substack.com/p/does-bill-gates-run-the-world

‘Deze vaccinatiecampagne wordt het grootste medische schandaal van deze eeuw’

Een arts die in eerste instantie voorstander was van de coronavaccinatie roept gezondheidsautoriteiten nu op om te stoppen met vaccineren. Volgens de Britse cardioloog Aseem Malhotra wegen de voordelen niet op tegen de risico’s.

De arts stelt dat er meer dan genoeg bewijs – overweldigend bewijs zelfs – is om de uitrol van het vaccin op te schorten. Hij heeft dit bewijs maandag gepubliceerd in een paper.

Smoking gun

Malhotra verwijst onder meer naar een recente analyse van de vaccinonderzoeken van Pfizer en Moderna waaruit blijkt dat gevaccineerde proefpersonen meer kans hadden op ernstige bijwerkingen. De cardioloog noemt de studie een ‘smoking gun’.

Het is hoog tijd om te stoppen met vaccineren zodat autoriteiten en experts de gegevens kunnen analyseren, aldus de arts. De paper is in twee delen gepubliceerd in het Journal of Insulin Resistance. De krant The Epoch Times kon Pfizer en Moderna niet bereiken voor commentaar.

Mark my words

Neuroloog Jan Bonte raadt iedereen aan de twee artikelen te downloaden, te lezen en te bewaren. “Alles wat ik heb aangevoerd als argumenten voor en tegen vaccinatie in de afgelopen twee jaren staat erin. Zéér de moeite waard!” schrijft hij.

“En iets wat ik in kleine kring al langer zei, durf ik nu ook wel in het openbaar te stellen: deze vaccinatiecampagne wordt het grootste medische schandaal van deze eeuw. Mark my words,” waarschuwt Bonte. 

Kamerlid Ralf Dekker: ‘Het verhoogde sterfteniveau loopt in tijd gelijk op met de massa-inenting’

De berichten over ernstige bijwerkingen van de prik stapelen zich op. Veel wijst erop dat de relatieve aantallen bijwerkingen erg hoog zijn, zei Tweede Kamerlid Ralf Dekker (FVD) in de Kamer.

Er is veel casuïstiek die aanleiding geeft tot zorg. Een enorme spike in het aantal ontstekingen rondom het hart, ook bij jongeren. Ongekende aantallen sporters die omvallen als gevolg van acute gezondheidsproblemen. Er wordt zelfs gesproken over het Sudden [Adult] Death Syndrome, dat tegenwoordig gezonde mensen plotseling lijkt te kunnen treffen, somde Dekker op.

Ook zijn er nogal wat deskundigen die naar buiten treden met zorgen en waarschuwingen. En in veel landen is er sprake van opvallende oversterfte. Er overlijden significant meer mensen dan kan worden verwacht, aldus het Kamerlid.

(Video verwijderd? Klik hier...)

Bijzonder jammer

Het verhoogde sterfteniveau loopt in tijd gelijk op met de massa-inenting. “Zou de prik iets met deze verhoogde sterfte te maken kunnen hebben?”

De prik lijkt op het eerste gezicht een serieuze kandidaat en zeker de moeite van het onderzoeken waard. Het is daarom bijzonder jammer dat het onderzoek dat zeer terecht naar dit oversterftefenomeen is ingesteld, niet meteen deze prik als focus heeft gekozen, zei Dekker. “Zeker in het licht van de nieuwe vaccinatieronde, waarbij miljoenen extra prikken zullen worden gezet.”

Ernstig gefrustreerd

Het onderzoeksonderdeel waarbij wel naar eventuele effecten van de prik wordt gekeken, lijkt ernstig te worden gefrustreerd doordat de gegevens van het RIVM en de GGD over vaccinatie en testuitslagen die daarvoor nodig zijn, niet worden vrijgegeven, merkte het Kamerlid op.

“Wanneer mocht blijken dat de prik een groter sterfterisico met zich meebrengt dan nu wordt gedacht, trekt men zich toch de haren uit het hoofd als er net een grootschalige prikcampagne is uitgevoerd. Dat moeten we als het even kan toch voorkomen,” benadrukte Dekker.

Giorgia Meloni maakt zich niet geliefd: ‘Dit verzin je niet, één dag aan de macht en dan deze tweet’

Giorgia Meloni, de winnaar van de Italiaanse presidentsverkiezingen, heeft de Oekraïense president Zelenski verzekerd dat de nieuwe regering van Italië volledige steun aan zijn land zal bieden.

“Je weet dat je kunt rekenen op onze loyale steun voor de vrijheid van het Oekraïense volk. Blijf sterk en blijf standvastig in je geloof!” zei Meloni op Twitter tegen Zelenski, die haar daarvoor had gefeliciteerd met haar overwinning.

Hier zijn we dus mooi klaar mee

Eerder veroordeelde Meloni de oorlog in Oekraïne en daarnaast steunt ze de sancties van de EU tegen Rusland.

“Nou. Hier zijn we dus mooi klaar mee,” reageert journalist Annelies Strikkers. Jurist Sietske Bergsma zegt: “Het waren drie fantastische dagen.”

Viruswaarheid-jurist Jeroen Pols schrijft: “Dit verzin je niet. Eén dag aan de macht en dan deze tweet.”

Berlusconi

Silvio Berlusconi, één van de andere kopstukken uit de rechtse alliantie waarmee Meloni een regering wil vormen, werd jaren geleden in verband gebracht met Italiaanse maffialeiders. Hij was ook lid van vrijmetselaarsloge P2 (Propaganda Due), die ook wel een ‘staat binnen een staat’ of een ‘schaduwregering’ wordt genoemd.

Het Marokkaanse model Imane Fadil, dat enkele jaren geleden onder verdachte omstandigheden overleed, zei over Berlusconi: “Deze man maakt deel uit van een sekte die de duivel oproept. Ik weet dat dit een boude uitspraak is, maar het is waar. En vele anderen weten dit.” Fadil was regelmatig te gast op de beruchte seksfeesten van Berlusconi.

 

---

Wie blies de Russisch-Duitse Nord Stream I en II pijpleidingen op? Qui bono?

Een vraag die belangrijk licht schijnt op motieven en mogelijke daders. Hoewel tegennatuurlijk voor sommigen, wijst veel erop dat niet Rusland, maar juist de Verenigde Staten deze terreurdaad beging.

Stefan Noordhoek Sep 28

SAVE

In een rake analyse van de gebeurtenissen in de Baltische Zee van 27 september jongstleden legt Tucker Carlson de feiten helder bloot. De vraag ‘wie profiteert?’ wordt duidelijk beantwoord: in elk geval niet Poetin, die wel gek moet zijn om z’n eigen kapitaal, z’n potentiële inkomstenstroom en z’n belangrijkste leverage richting het Energie-bedürftige Duitsland en de rest van Europa te vernietigen.

Ondanks dat, zijn de conclusies van de westerse kranten en media die beweren dat Poetin z’n eigen pijpleiding heeft gesaboteerd, niet van de lucht.

“Fuck the EU!”

Voor Amerika is dat precies andersom. Het finaal ‘beëindigen’ van Nord Stream is niet alleen datgene waarmee zowel Joe Biden nog vóór de start van de Speciale Militaire Operaties van Rusland stoer dreigde – “Then there will be no longer a North Stream 2”. Maar ook Victoria Nuland – bekend van haar saillante telefoongesprek “Fuck the EU!” op de vooravond van de US-backed coup in 2014 waarin ze nota bene met de Amerikaanse ambassadeur in Oekraïne, Geoffrey Pyatt, bespreekt wie als VS stroman als president van Oekraïne ‘democratisch verkozen’ ging worden – zei exact hetzelfde al trots in januari van dit jaar:

"With regard to Nord Stream 2, uh, we continue to have, uh, very strong and clear conversations, uh, with our German allies. And I wanna be clear with you today: if Russia invades Ukraine one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward! One way or the other. We'll stop Nord Stream."

---

Wil je ook iets doneren?

---

Geen Russisch gas naar Europa

Daarnaast is het evident dat de VS profiteert van het, ook voor de toekomst, onmogelijk maken van gasleveranties van Rusland aan Europa via de Nordstream pijpleidingen. Het is de VS geweest die al voor de ingebruikname van Nord Stream II pijpleiding tussen Rusland en Duitsland, handelsembargo’s. en regelrechte dreigementen uitsprak tegen elk bedrijf dat nog maar meewerkte aan de bouw ervan. Het Europese continent moest tegen elke prijs van het Russisch gas en aan het veel duurdere Amerikaanse LNG.

En sterker nog: op dezelfde dag dat door mysterieuze omstandigheden 2 ontploffingen en 3 lekkages de Nord Stream pijpleiding voor op z’n minst lange tijd stil legden, opende – oh toeval – net een nieuwe Baltic Pipeline, die Noors gas, via Denemarken naar Polen transporteert.

Qui bono?

Niet zonder risico’s

Tucker noemt de schrijnende tegenstelling tussen de jarenlange klimaatpaniek van de Biden regering en de vreselijk belangrijke rol daarin van methaan enerzijds en de schaamteloze natuurramp die het gevolg is van het opblazen van de pijpleidingen, waarbij miljoenen kubieke meters methaan in de zee en de lucht worden losgelaten.

Maar nog veel groter is het risico van de zoveelste escalatie die hiermee door de VS is gedaan.

• Na decennia van bouwen aan Oekraine als strategisch bruggenhoofd om Rusland mee te kunnen breken;

• Het kantelen van de Oekrainse pro-russische regering naar een pro-VS regime in 2014;

• Het sindsdien stelselmatig laten vernederen, mishandelen en tot Untermensch degraderen van de russisch-etnische Oekraïense burgers in de Donbass en Donetsk regio’s;

• De aanhoudende bombardementen op de eigen burgerbevolking met 14.000 doden tot gevolg,

• Het negeren van de Minsk akkoorden \en het opbouwen van een alarmerend grote NAVO troepenmacht op de stoep van Rusland..

waren hierin al uiterst gevaarlijke voorbereidende stappen.

• Het weigeren van de onderhandeling met Rusland eind 2021, waarbij Rusland ter waarborg van de eigen nationale veiligheid aandrong op een soeverein en neutraal Oekraïne dat geen onderdeel van de NAVO zou worden (wat het toen en nu trouwens ook niet is) en dat het geen onderdeel van de EU zou worden (wat het toen en nu trouwens ook niet is) en het daarmee direct aansturen op de Speciale Militaire Operaties van Rusland.

• Het frustreren van diplomatieke onderhandelingen (de diplomaten van Oekraïne en Rusland kwamen al in april 2022 op hoofdlijnen een vredesakkoord overeen, maar dat werd door het westen (in persoon van Boris Johnson) afgeschoten. Want niet vrede, maar oorlog is het doel.

• En - most telling of all - het inmiddels al $67 miljard in de Oekraïne-oorlog pompen. Geld dat wordt betaald aan de oorlogsindustrie en wapenleveranciers die daarmee zorgen voor nog meer oorlog. Nog meer dode Russische en Oekrainse militairen. Nog meer Oost-Oekrainse burgers gedood met westerse wapens.
  
  Let wel. $67 miljard alleen al van de VS. Een bedrag dat meer is dan het totale (!) Russische defensiebudget voor heel 2021.

Top 10 Countries with the Highest Military Expenditures (2020), bron: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/military-spending-by-country

---

Wil je ook iets doneren?

---

Hoog spel. Met opzet?

Tucker Carlson ziet de machinaties van het westen met lede ogen aan. Al een jaar of twee even verrassend (als intussen niet meer) dat juist uit deze hoek geluiden van zowel politiek links (Tulsi Gabbard, Michael Shellenberger, Glenn Greenwald) als politiek conservatief samen klinken in een strijd voor vrijheid, voor een open wetenschappelijk debat, voor transparantie, voor rechtstatelijkheid, voor gelijkheid voor de wet, voor gezondheid, voor vrede en voor gezond verstand.

Vanuit dit perspectief maakt Tucker Carlson zich – terecht – grote zorgen over de vrijwel grenzeloze westerse agressie. Waarin geen actie te goor, geen ingreep te gevaarlijk, geen positie te onhoudbaar, geen leugen te gek, geen false-flag te schaamteloos en geen sabotage te explosief lijkt.

Waarin alle redelijkheid van tafel is, en waarin zelfs het risico van een kernoorlog op het Europese continent de machthebbers niet meer doet terug deinzen.

Sterker nog. Misschien is het wel de intentie…

---

– onderstaand de transcriptie van het hele fragment van Tucker Carlson –

---

Good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight. I hate to start a Tuesday evening on a grim note, but one of the environmental catastrophes, one of the great environmental catastrophes of our time, is unfolding tonight off the coast of Denmark. The Nord Stream pipelines, which were enormous Russian owned conduits that carry natural gas from Russia to Western Europe have been breached as we speak.

Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 are pouring millions of cubic meters of natural gas into the Baltic. Pictures from the air, which you can now see on your screen, show a toxic bubble field more than half a mile wide. You can only guess at how many marine mammals are being killed right now. Countless, but the lasting damage may be to the atmosphere.

Natural gas is comprised of up to 90% Methane. Methane, as Joe Biden has often told you, is the key driver of global warming, which is of course 'an essential threat to humanity and the planet'. So if you're worried about climate change, what just happened to the Nord Stream pipelines is as close to the apocalypse as we have ever come.

So the question is, how did this happen? And it turns out it was not an accident. At the very same time that leaks in these pipelines were detected, Swedish officials recorded two powerful undersea explosions, each one of which was equivalent to hundreds of pounds of TNT. Nothing in nature can account for that.

Almost immediately the pipelines began leaking in three separate places. So there's only one explanation for what happened: this was an act of industrial terrorism. That was very obvious to the Prime Minister of Poland, and he wasted no time in saying so. Watch.

"Today we are also dealing with an act sabotage. We do not know the details of what happened. But we can clearly see that it is an act of sabotage, an act that probably marks the next stage in the escalation of the situation we are dealing with in Ukraine."

We can clearly see, he said, this was an act of sabotage, an act of terrorism. Well, yes, we can see that.

So the question is who did it? And of course the prime suspect is obvious. It would be the same man who caused domestic inflation here in the US and stole the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton. That'd be Vladimir Putin. The Washington Post got right to it. Putin, they declared, is now weaponizing the Nord Stream pipelines.

According to the Canadian ambassador to the UN, Vladimir Putin has decided to use "pollution as an act of war". Progressive Twitter strongly endorsed this conclusion. "Putin did it" and that makes sense until you thought about it for just a moment. Vladimir Putin may be evil, they tell us that he is evil, but is he stupid?

Probably isn't stupid, and yet, and here's the strange part, if you are Vladimir Putin, you would have to be a suicidal moron to blow up your own energy pipelines. That's the one thing you would never do. Natural gas pipelines are the main source of your power and your wealth, and most critically, your leverage over other countries.

Europe needs your energy now more than ever with winter approaching. If you can't deliver that energy, then countries like Germany have no need to pay attention to what you want. You're in the middle of a war, an all hands on deck war. So you need all the leverage you can get.

Under these circumstances there is no chance you would blow up Nord Stream 1 or 2, not now, obviously. In fact, it's so obvious that even our famously dim Secretary of State, Tony Blink, seem to acknowledge it. Sabotaging Nord Stream, he said, today, is "clearly in no one's interest".

Right. But really only half right. It is true that blowing up Nords Stream does not help Vladimir Putin. He would not do that. Why would he? But that doesn't mean that other countries wouldn't consider doing it. They would consider it, and we know they have considered it because at least one of them has said so, in public in early February, less than three weeks before the war in Ukraine began, Joe Biden suggested -on camera- that he might take out these pipelines.

Biden: "If Russia invades, uh, that means tanks or troops crossing the, uh, the, the border of Ukraine again, then uh, there will be, uh, we, there will be no longer a north team too. We, we will bring it into it."

Journalist: " How will you, how will you do that exactly? Since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control?"

Biden: "We will, uh, I promise you, we'll be able to do it."

Notice how he phrased that and he's the president, he doesn't phrase things by accident, particularly when he is reading off cards. He didn't say "I will pause the delivery of gas from Russia to Germany", he said, "there won't be a Nord Stream 2". We'll put an end to it. We'll take it out. We'll blow it up.

"How will you do this?" He was asked, "I promise you we will be able to do it." They thought this through. And yet those watching, very much including us, didn't take Biden seriously when he said it. This is the president who has declared climate change, the most pressing emergency in the history of the world. This is the man who lectures you about using a wood stove or driving an SUV because if it's emissions. This is the guy who spent billions trying to mitigate cow flatulence because of methane. Would that guy really blow up a methane pipeline in the middle of the Baltic Sea? It was hard to imagine. That would be an unimaginably reckless act. That'd be the kind of thing you would do if you wanted to start a nuclear war. It would be insane. And yet in retrospect, it's obvious they were thinking about this because Joe Biden wasn't the only person to suggest it. Victoria at the State Department said pretty much the very same.

Nuland is a lifelong war cheerleader. She worked to bring about the Iraq invasion, never apologized, kept going. She helped engineer the coup that overthrew the Ukrainian government some years back. So capable. Clearly she's capable of anything. But environmental terrorism. Even for Victoria Nuland, that seemed too much, too extreme, and yet here she is in January:

Nuland: "With regard to Nord Stream 2, uh, we continue to have, uh, very strong and clear conversations, uh, with our German allies. And I wanna be clear with you today: if Russia invades Ukraine one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward! One way or the other. We'll stop Nord Stream."

Now looking back, those words seem chilling eight months later as natural gas pours into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere. So you have to ask, could the Biden administration really do something like this? We can't say for sure. We don't know for sure. We can tell you that close allies of the Biden White House believe they certainly did do it.

Radek Sikorski is a Polish politician. He's chairman of the EU -USA Delegation in the European Parliament. He's connected. He's also the husband of regime stenographer Ann Applebaum of the Atlantic Magazine. Sikorski is so close to Joe Biden, he's got a picture of the two of them together in his Twitter profile. So when the pipelines blew up, Sikorski responded immediately, and here's what he wrote; "Thank you USA!"

So once again, did the Biden administration really do this? It's hard to believe, given that it's an atrocity, it's effectively an act of terrorism, we don't wanna make that accusation. But we should tell you that -maybe not coincidentally- today a brand new pipeline was unveiled. The pipeline that carries non-Russian natural gas in roughly the same area as Nord Streams 1 and 2.

This is called the Baltic Pipe. It was inaugurated in Poland. It will carry natural gas from Norway through Denmark to Poland and other countries nearby. And it's likely to do very well since now... it has less competition. Making sense? What does the White House say about this? How are they accounting for what happened today?

Well, they're not exactly enthusiastically denying responsibility for it. Instead, they're looking at the upside. Here's the president's publicist, noting that the destruction of yet another energy pipeline is yet another opportunity for you to buy an electric car.

White House Press Secretary: "Uh, as you all know, these pipelines weren't pumping gas into Europe at this time. Uh, Nord Stream 2 was never operational, as you guys know, Nord Stream 1 has not been operational for weeks because, uh, Putin has weaponized, uh, energy. And we have said this many times before. This just drives home the. Of our efforts to work together to get alternative gas, uh, supplies to Europe and to support efforts to reduce gas, uh, consumption, and accelerate true energy independence by moving to clean energy, uh, economy."

Oh, "moving to clean energy", say that people who very may well be responsible for letting methane, into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere at a scale that most people can't imagine. The people lecturing you about your SUV may have blown up a natural gas pipeline and created one of the great catastrophes of our time in its effect on the environment.

If they did this, this will be one of the craziest, most destructive things any American administration has ever done. But it would also be totally consistent with what they. What do they do? They destroy. These people, build nothing, not one thing. Instead, they tear down and they desecrate. From historic statues to the constitution to energy infrastructure. And no one in Congress is trying to stop any of it.

They're just preparing for the inevitable fallout. Tonight, the Senate just advanced is spending bill with 35 million for the Department of Energy to "prepare for, and respond to potential nuclear and radiological incidents in Ukraine." The spending bill also brings the total US expenditure on Ukraine, the war, but also funding its government and energy for Ukraine, to 67 billion on the eve of what could be a massive economic disruption here to our economy.

$67 billion. How much is that? Well, it's more than Russia's entire military budget last year. And Congress is expected to fully pass the bill later this week with Republicans nodding along like the zombies they are.

What will be the effect of this? Every action has a reaction, equal and opposite. Blow up the Nord Stream pipelines. Okay. We've entered a new phase. One in which the United States is directly at war with the largest nuclear power in the world. Doesn't mean it'll go nuclear immediately, but it does suggest there could be consequences.

If we actually blew up the North Dream pipe, why wouldn't Russia sever undersea internet cables? What would happen if they did that? What would happen if banks in London couldn't communicate with banks in New York? Just that one piece of it. Leaving aside its potential effects on our power grid, but let's just say the banks couldn't communicate with each other for one day. What the economic effect of that be? Or would it cascade downward into your house?

We can have an actual collapse. We could wind up very quickly in third world conditions. Those are the stakes. Had the people behind this, the geniuses like Victoria Nuland considered the effects? Maybe they have. Maybe that was the point.

Like

Comment

Share

“ de grondstroom van totalitarisme is het blinde vertrouwen in een statistisch-cijfermatig onderbouwde 'wetenschappelijke fictie' die een 'radicale minachting' voor de feiten vertoont” – Hannah Arendt

---

Je kan ons ook volgen op Telegram. En op Twitter en Youtube. Was het artikel de moeite waard vond je? Dan 🆆🅰🆃 🅰🅻🆂 misschien eens delen. Dankjewel!

---

© 2022 Stefan Noordhoek
Amsterdam, Nederland 

https://watals.substack.com/p/wie-blies-de-russisch-duitse-nord?utm_source=email