Wiped Out Immune Systems Take Time to Manifest
Nobody exemplifies this wave of cancers better than
the Belgian Covid
vaccine advocate and misinformation fighter Michel Goldman, who developed
a “rare” form of lymphoma (immune
system cancer) following his Covid vaccination. His lymphoma rapidly worsened
after his booster dose and Michel’s chance of 5-year survival is below 30
percent.
Michel Goldman is not an ordinary citizen. He is a lifelong promoter of vaccines and a famous immunologist. For example, Prof. Goldman lamented the slow
vaccine rollout in the EU in a high-profile
article from April 2021. He
expressed dismay over pausing the AstraZeneca vaccine due to a “very small”
number of thrombosis cases, as the pause could “fuel distrust in all Covid
vaccines”, and admonished EU leaders that they must “must urgently accelerate
the region’s COVID-19 vaccine rollout”.
Ironically, the above article was written on April 2, 2021, almost exactly when Michel was getting his second dose of the Pfizer vaccine - that caused his cancer.
Prof. Goldman is also cited in fact-checks such
as this one:
The fact check (which did not age well in general,
unlike Dr.
Malone’s article) says:
For instance, human trials for a cancer mRNA
vaccine have been going on since at least 2021. As Michel
Goldman, a professor of immunology
at the Université Libre de Bruxelles, explained: “If there was a real problem with the technology, we’d have seen it
before now for sure”.
What is odd is that at the time the above fact check was written in Dec
2021, Michel Goldman already knew that Covid vaccine and booster caused his
lymphoma and that he was fully aware that he already
was in Stage IV of the disease.
So you can see that this vaccine-caused lymphoma
could not have happened to a nicer guy!
The
Atlantic Article, as well as
the scientific
article authored by Michel Goldman himself, describing his own cancer, glosses over the fact that his cancer was
not just accelerated, but was initiated by the Pfizer
vaccine. Here’s the picture from Michel’s scientific article, edited by me for
clarity (my addition is in red). It shows that Prof. Goldman received the
initial dose of the Pfizer Covid vaccine six months before his cancer
diagnosis:
Unprecedented 9-Sigma Increase Increase in Cancer
Deaths in the US
There are thousands of “Michel Goldmans” in just
the United States, most of whom are not as famous, but more unlucky compared to
Michel. Unlike Michel, who is still alive, those thousands of people in the death statistics
are already dead — and they possibly
would not die if not for the Covid vaccines.
The Ethical Skeptic on Twitter has been analyzing
US mortality (which is reported by the CDC on a weekly basis), which is a very
difficult job due to the CDC’s strange, never-ending “system upgrade” that
magically seems to hold back a lot of deaths and reclassified cancer deaths
into Covid deaths.
Ethical Skeptic ☀ @EthicalSkeptic
He discovered the misclassification and corrected
it, to show the true number of cancer deaths:
Similar Increases in the UK
The UK had 10-17% excess all-cause mortality in the
last few months, and the concerned British government put up an “Excess
Mortality Presentation”, showing us
these excess deaths in a variety of ways. The page for cancer deaths is here:
Unlike the Ethical Skeptic data, the UK
presentation is NOT adjusted for the “pull-forward effect”, that is, the fact
that many cancer patients already prematurely died with Covid in 2020-early
2021. Had the Covid pandemic not happened, these patients would be dying
somewhat later, such as in 2021 or 2022.
Therefore, had no additional “factor” introduced
excess cancer mortality in 2021, these early deaths with “Covid and cancer”
would have resulted in a lowered rate of cancer deaths
in 2021 and 2022 — so the excess deaths shown in the above presentation
UNDERSTATE the true extent of excess deaths.
I used a BLUE line on the above UK chart, to
qualitatively show the pull-forward effect and how
it underscores that the excess cancer deaths are somewhat understated.
Since the UK excess mortality data is available for
download, I took a look at May-August excess cancer deaths, a total of 1,990
deaths.
For May-August of 2022, these excess cancer deaths
amount to 110 excess cancer deaths per week. Had the UK’s population (68M) been
the same as the United States (330M), that difference would amount to 550
excess cancer deaths per week, which is comparable to the Ethical Skeptic’s
800+ deaths a week. Again, The Ethical Skeptic’s numbers are adjusted for the
pull-forward effect and the UK data is not so adjusted. The UK excess cancer
mortality would be somewhat higher if adjusted comparably.
So, our calculations show that the UK and the US
experience roughly similar excess cancer mortality. Anecdotally, we are seeing
more rapidly developing cancers, that Etana Hechts calls “Turbo-cancers”.
Just to be clear: these increases do NOT show causation, just as Michel Goldman possibly was an extremely unlucky victim of a
coincidence. (It was not a coincidence, as Brian
Mowrey’s post and Goldman’s
own article explain
and refer to Goldman’s RHOA G17V mutation).
We do not yet
have the smoking-gun level proof. We only
have a suspicion, fueled by the temporal coincidences of this excess cancer
mortality with the vaccination campaign. To know for sure, we need to compare
outcomes in vaccinated persons versus unvaccinated persons — something that the
UK and the US health authorities are not allowing.
These Excess Cancer Deaths are Likely a Sign of
Much Bigger Future Increases
This part of the post is written by A Midwestern
Doctor, whose substack I highly recommend. He explains why Covid vaccines are
genotoxic, mutagenic and have other effects to increase the rare of cancers far
beyond what we have experienced.
Are Spike Protein Vaccines Genotoxic?
Before the mRNA vaccines entered the market,
significant concerns existed regarding their cancer-causing potential. Despite
this, as leaked
documents from the EMA
(Europe’s FDA) show, Pfizer (and most likely the other manufacturers) was
exempted from testing their vaccines for genotoxicity before proceeding to
human trials. To quote some of the leaked EMA documents:
“No genotoxicity has been provided. The components
of the vaccine formulation are lipids and RNA that are not expected to have
genotoxic potential. That being said, the novel lipids possess an acetamide
moiety which is classified as possible human carcinogen (IARC Group 2B) with
debated genotoxic mechanism, which should be discussed further…as the lipids
contain an acetamide moiety which has been linked to carcinogenicity in
animals, including liver tumors, potentially related to genotoxicity, and liver
distribution and functional effects have been observed in rat, an extended
discussion of these lipids is requested.”
As this testing was typically required for any new
pharmaceutical and relatively easy to do, I interpreted it to mean that Pfizer
had discovered their vaccine caused significant genotoxicity and felt their
best option was to pretend they had never studied it so they would have
plausible deniability when cancers inevitably emerged in the future
(pharmaceutical companies frequently fail to report undesirable results as they
almost never suffer consequences for doing so—the SSRI saga which in many
ways is
the best precedent we have
for the current debacle is the only case I know of where pharmaceutical
companies were
eventually penalized by the courts for this criminally deceptive behavior).
As the vaccines began to enter the market, I then
began noticing countless media outlets state that the vaccines could not change
your DNA and that anyone who thought so lacked a basic understanding of
science. When I looked at the evidence for this claim, I could not help but
notice no direct evidence for it was provided, and rather the basis for the
claim was an expert’s authority or three common logical arguments (e.g.
consider these statements by Paul
Offit and Anthony
Fauci):
1. The vaccines cannot enter the nucleus of the
cell
2. mRNA from the vaccines breaks down rapidly
in the cell, so it does not have time to enter the nucleus and change your DNA.
3. mRNA is not DNA, and hence believing it
can change DNA represents a fundamental lack of knowledge of biology.
The problems with these arguments were that:
1. The lipid nanoparticles can traverse the
cell membrane, so it is entirely possible they can also traverse the nuclear
membrane. Additionally, the highly positive charge of the spike proteins
suggests they may be attracted to or able to bypass the negatively charged
nuclear membrane [this
was subsequently proven].
2. A major issue with the mRNA technology was
that foreign mRNA is rapidly broken down by the body and therefore degrades
before the desired proteins can be synthesized. To solve this problem, the
manufacturers randomly added pseudouridine to the mRNA product, allowing
it to resist degradation (and
persist for
at least 60 days).
Random
pseudouridation was potentially problematic because:
•Persistent mRNA can
produce an excessive dose of the spike protein product.
•Dysregulation of pseudouridation is
associated with a variety of cancers.
•Pseudouridation
is known to suppress innate immunity (which is necessary for a variety of things including eliminating
cancers within the body).
3. RNA (including
mRNA) can become DNA with the
aid of retrotranscriptases. In addition to many viruses doing this, natural
reverse transcriptases also
exist within human cells.
I was thus less than surprised to learn researchers
had discovered SARS-CoV-2 had done the impossible and
had been observed to change the DNA of infected patients.
Not long after, when independent researchers
finally examined the big question, they discovered that despite
all the reassurances to the contrary, the mRNA vaccines did change
liver cell DNA within 6 hours of exposure. In parallel, as Arkmedic
discussed, another paper discovered that the spike protein was highly genotoxic and did in fact enter the nucleus. As these findings were
extremely damning to the NIH, the leadership chose to address this issue by forcing
the paper to be retracted for spurious reasons (a pattern that has sadly become quite common in the pandemic
whenever inconvenient data emerges and may make these officials criminally
liable for the catastrophic
side effects that have resulted from their conduct).
In summary, there was a catastrophic failure on the
regulator's part to not require genotoxicity for the COVID-19 vaccines (which
may explain why the CDC has
quitely removed the
claim that their
vaccines cannot alter your
DNA). For those wishing to understand the potential genotoxicity of the mRNA
vaccines in more detail, this
recent paper by
Peter McCullough and others provides an excellent summary of what is currently
known on this topic.
A New Cancer Epidemic
For reasons detailed in the previous section,
I had expected the mRNA vaccines to increase the rates of cancer in those who
received them. However, what I did not expect was how rapid or unusual many of
the cancers would be.
One of the most definitive cases I saw for the
vaccine’s causing cancer was shared with me by a friend and colleague:
I had a patient that was a late 20s male with no
past medical history except for stable lipomas (benign fatty lumps under the
skin) he had had for years.
When the vaccine became available, he took both
doses of Moderna. Shortly after the second dose, his previously stable lipomas
started growing (this is extremely unusual). A month later, he was
able to receive a biopsy for the lipoma and it was determined to be a very rare
sarcoma.
The patient then full body imaging to stage it,
cancer was also detected in the organ where this type of cancer is almost
always found, he received a fairly invasive biopsy of that cancer and learned
that it had the same genetic lineage as cancer found within the lipoma.
When I later looked up this cancer, I found out
there are less than 100 cases a year of it in the United States, it never
appears in that patient demographic, it never presents in this manner, and has
a very poor prognosis.
Note: One of my good friends who is a nurse had a sarcoma form with a
very similar progression in her husband following vaccination.
In general, I tended to observe that the cancers I
heard of typically progressed rapidly, sometimes were quite unusual types, and
often were (eventually fatal) recurrences of cancers that had gone into
remission years before. Given that cancers normally take years to grow before
they are large enough to even be detected (one
estimate pegs it approximately ten years), the fact that I was seeing numerous immediately visible cancers emerging
within months of vaccination was highly concerning.
In parallel, I also came across many cases of
individuals rapidly developing diseases typically associated with immune
suppression after vaccination. These cases were part of a project I began at
the start of the vaccine rollout where after I began to have countless people
contacting me sharing stories of severe or fatal reaction they observed
following vaccination. After I realized almost none of my colleagues were open
to listening to me, I decided at the very least I could verify and document
these reports and then share them with the appropriate audiences. The tragic
thing about this experience was that the cases I alone encountered had
previously been sufficient to consider pulling a vaccine from the market.
Unfortunately, like many other red flags, they were instead ignored. Within
this compilation, the cases I encountered pertaining to the focus of this
article are summarized under the section titled “Immune Suppression and
Cancer”
The Forgotten Side
of Medicine
Adverse Reactions
to COVID Vaccines I Came Across During Their First Year on the Market
8 months ago · 483
likes · 592 comments · A Midwestern Doctor
Additionally, of the most common side effects of
the vaccine has
been the development of shingles, a complication that strongly indicates the vaccines suppress the
innate immune system. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is the
suppression of CD8 cells, immune cells responsible for both eliminating
cancerous cells and suppressing shingles infections, which physicians such as
Ryan Cole have observed
significantly decline following COVID-19 vaccination.
All of these observations led me to suspect
that the mRNA vaccines had a high propensity for creating genotoxicity in cells
and also suppressing the immune response that would typically eliminate these
cells. This hypothesis was further strengthened after the studies (detailed in
the previous section) were published and provided strong evidence this could
occur.
Typically, any time living organisms are exposed to
a toxin or disease, reactions to the disease distribute on a bell curve
resulting in the majority of them having relatively minor or invisible symptoms
and only a small minority having significant side effects. Given that cancer is
typically a slowly progressing disease, my great fear is that the rapid cases
of cancer we have seen thus far are the outliers that represent the tip of the
iceberg, and a significantly greater number of more slowly progressing cancers
will emerge in the future.
“I think in the next couple of months you’re going to see more cancers,” added the first lady. “It’s not a red issue, a blue issue,” Jill
Biden added. “Cancer affects every American.”
Her rationale for this trend was people finally
going back to doctors and getting caught up on their cancer screening, which is
odd, given that the pause in seeing doctors for non-essential visits ended over
a year ago.
The Cancer Vaccine?
Are you upset that cancers are on the rise?
Well, I have great news for you!
Moderna, another Covid vaccine company, is now
working on a “personalized
cancer vaccine”. (I guess they do not yet
consider their Covid vaccine to be a “cancer vaccine”). So, since Covid vaccine
sales are
flatlining, they are
now looking to create a new revenue stream with “personalized cancer vaccines”!
Those for sure will work great, right? For sure, desperate cancer patients will be good for cash generation — and the market may be huge!
Will the FDA approve those “cancer vaccines” based
on results in a dozen mice? Would you recommend a “personalized cancer vaccine”
to your personal friends?
