dinsdag 13 december 2022

Will 100 Million Die From the COVID Vax by 2028?

FEATURED  HEALTH VIEWPOINTS

Jul 16 2022

biggersmaller

If these injections are NOT vaccines, then the liability shield falls away, because there is no liability shield for a medical emergency countermeasure that is gene therapy. (By ffikretow/Shutterstock)

Via this genetic engineering experiment, they’ve literally injected ‘seeds of demise’ into everyday people like a cockroach spray. Based on a 2011 estimate, he believes an extra 700 million will be killed from this bioweapon – and they’ve known about the risks since 2005.

 

Video Link on Rumble: https://rumble.com/v1acoaa-up-to-100-million-will-die-from-cv19-vax-by-2028-dr-david-martin.html

 STORY AT-A-GLANCE

·         David Martin, Ph.D., presents evidence that COVID-19 injections are not vaccines, but bioweapons that are being used as a form of genocide across the global population

·         The spike protein that the COVID-19 shots manufacture is a known biologic agent of concern

·         Martin believes the number that may die may have been revealed back in 2011, when the World Health Organization announced their “decade of vaccination”

·         The objective for the decade of vaccination was a population reduction of 15% globally, which would be about 700 million people dead; in the U.S., this may amount to between 75 million and 100 million people dying from COVID-19 shots

·         When asked what timeframe these people may die in, Martin suggested “there’s a lot of economic reasons why people hope that it’s between now and 2028”

·         The projected illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs by 2028 suggests the “fewer people who are recipients of these programs, the better;” Martin believes this may be why people 65 and over were targeted with COVID-19 shots first

 

In this revealing interview with Greg Hunter of USAWatchdog.com, David Martin, Ph.D., presents evidence that COVID-19 injections are not vaccines but bioweapons that are being used as a form of genocide across the global population.1

In March 2022, Martin filed a federal lawsuit against President Biden, the Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services alleging that COVID-19 shots turn the body into a biological weapons factory, manufacturing spike protein. Not only is the term “vaccination” misleading when referring to COVID-19 shots, it’s inaccurate since they are actually a form of gene therapy.2

“And we are not only not going to be sued for, you know, any libel or misinformation, we are actually holding people criminally accountable for their domestic terrorism, their crimes against humanity and the story of the coronavirus weaponization that goes back to 1998,” Martin says.3

 

SARS-CoV-2 Has Been in the Works for Decades

Martin has been in the business of tracking patent applications and approvals since 1998. His company, M-Cam International Innovation Risk Management, is the world’s largest underwriter of intangible assets used in finance in 168 countries. M-Cam has also monitored biological and chemical weapons treaty violations on behalf of the U.S. government, following the anthrax scare in September 2001.4

According to Martin, there are more than 4,000 patents relating to the SARS coronavirus. His company has also done a comprehensive review of the financing of research involving the manipulation of coronaviruses that gave rise to SARS as a subclade of the beta coronavirus family.

Much of the research was funded by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) under the direction of Dr. Anthony Fauci.5 Martin explained:6

 

“I think it’s important for your listeners and viewers to remember that it was 1999 when Anthony Fauci and Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill decided to start weaponizing coronavirus they patented in 2002 — and you heard that date correctly, that’s a year before the SARS outbreak in China.

You know, they knew it was a bioweapon since 2005. They knew it was effective at harming populations, intimidating and coercing populations”

 

COVID-19 Shots Are an ‘Act of Bioterrorism’

According to Martin, the spike protein that the COVID-19 shots manufacture is a computer simulation of a chimera of the spike protein of coronavirus. “It is, in fact, not a coronavirus vaccine. It is a spike protein instruction to make the human body produce a toxin, and that toxin has been scheduled as a known biologic agent of concern with respect to biological weapons for the last now decade and a half,” he said.7

Rather than being a public health measure as they were widely campaigned to be, COVID-19 shots are an act of bioweapons and bioterrorism. Martin shared that in 2015, Dr. Peter Daszak, head of the EcoHealth Alliance that funneled research dollars from the NIAID to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for coronavirus research, stated:8

 

“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan-coronavirus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage, to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.”

 

Daszak, who Martin refers to as “the money launderer in chief,” “actually stated that this entire exercise was a campaign of domestic terror to get the public to accept the universal vaccine platform using a known biological weapon. And that is their own words, not my interpretation,” Martin said.9

Martin: 100 Million May Die Due to COVID Shots

Both Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 shots contain nucleic acid sequences that are not part of nature and have not been previously introduced to the human body. This amounts to a genetic engineering experiment that did not go through animal studies or clinical trials.

However, already people are dying from the shots and, Martin states, “many more will” due to issues such as blood clots, damage to the cardiovascular system and problems with liver, kidney and pulmonary function.10

An onslaught of reproductive and cancer cases related to the shots are also anticipated. “The fact of the matter is an enormous number of people who are injected are already carrying the seeds of their own demise,” Martin said.11 As for how many may die, Martin believes the numbers may have been revealed back in 2011, when the World Health Organization announced their “decade of vaccination”:12

 

“Based on their own 2011 estimate, and … this is a chilling estimate, but we just have to put it out there … When the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Chinese CDC, the Jeremy Farrar Wellcome Trust and others published The Decade of Vaccination for the World Health Organization back in 2011 their stated objective was a population reduction of 15% of the world’s population.

Put that in perspective, that’s about 700 million people dead … and that would put the U.S. participation in that certainly as a pro rata of injected population somewhere between 75 and 100 million people.”

When asked what timeframe these people may die in, Martin suggested “there’s a lot of economic reasons why people hope that it’s between now and 2028.”13 This is because of “a tiny little glitch on the horizon” — the projected illiquidity of the Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid programs by 2028.

“So the fewer people who are recipients of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, the better,” Martin said. “Not surprisingly, it’s probably one of the motivations that led to the recommendation that people over the age of 65 were the first ones getting injected.”14 Other populations at risk are caregivers, including health care providers, and others in the workforce who were forced to be injected, such as pilots.

“Why is it that we’re suddenly having 700 flights a day being canceled because, allegedly, airlines don’t have pilots? … the dirty secret … is there a lot of pilots who are having microvascular problems and clotting problems, and that keeps them out of the cockpit, which is a good place to not have them if they’re going to throw a clot for a stroke or a heart attack,” Martin said.

“But the problem is we’re going to start seeing that exact same phenomenon in the health care industry and at a much larger scale, which means we now have, in addition to the problem of the actual morbidity and mortality, meaning people getting sick and people dying.

We actually have that targeting the health care industry writ large, which means we are going to have doctors and nurses who are going to be among the sick and the dead. And that means that the sick and the dying also do not get care.”15

Why COVID Shots May Change Your DNA

It’s been stressed by the media and public health officials that COVID-19 shots do not alter DNA. However, Martin brings attention to a little-known grant from the National Science Foundation, known as Darwinian chemical systems,16 which involved research to incorporate mRNA into targeted genomes. According to Martin:17

 

“Moderna was started … on the back of a 10-year National Science Foundation grant. And that grant was called Darwinian chemical systems … the project that gave rise to the Moderna company itself was a project where they were specifically figuring out how to get mRNA to write itself into the genome of whatever target they were going after.

That could be a single-celled organism, it could be a multi-celled organism or it could be a human. And the fact of the matter is Moderna was started on the back of having proven that mRNA can be transfected and write itself into the human genome.”

 

It is completely unknown what the short- or long-term effects of the spike protein analog that’s inside people who received COVID-19 injections will be. But with respect to alteration of the genome, Martin states that data show mRNA has the capacity to write into the DNA of humans, and “as such, the long-term effects are not going to merely be symptomatic. The long-term effects are going to be the human genome of injected individuals is going to be altered.”18

Fraud Removes Big Pharma’s Liability Shield

The 2001 anthrax attack, which came out of medical and defense research, led to the passage of the PREP Act, which removed liability for manufacturers of emergency medical countermeasures.

This means that as long as the U.S. is under a state of emergency, things like COVID-19 “vaccines” are allowed under emergency use authorization. And as long as the emergency use authorization is in effect, the makers of these experimental gene therapies are not financially liable for any harm that comes from their use.

That is, provided they’re “vaccines.” If these injections are NOT vaccines, then the liability shield falls away, because there is no liability shield for a medical emergency countermeasure that is gene therapy. Further, lawsuits that can prove the companies engaged in fraud will also negate the liability shield. Martin states:19

“One of the convenient things about the PREP Act is the immunity shield from liability actually is only as good as the absence of fraud. Because if there was fraud in the promulgation of the events, leading to an emergency use authorization, then all of the immunity shield gets wiped out.

So the reason why it is so important for conversations like the one we’re having to actually be promoted and be advanced is because the pharmaceutical companies — and this includes Pfizer and Moderna and J&J — know they are perpetuating a fraud. The great thing about this is when that fraud is established, 100% of the liability flows back to them.

… when a fraud was the basis for a fraud, then we actually have a number of other legal remedies that allow you to pierce that veil. So in the end, there’s no question … and it’s quite evident based on the current mortality and morbidity data that given the fact that when it comes to biological weapons and bioterror each count comes with $100 million penalty. That’s what the federal statute gives us.

The penalty for corporate domestic terrorism, when you have per count $100 million a pop liabilities — that is an existential threat that takes a company like Pfizer or takes a company like Moderna out of existence. And that is what we’re working for every day.”

If you’d like to follow the progress of the ongoing legal cases seeking to expose the truth — that a criminal organization is seeking to obtain control over the global population via the creation of patented bioweapons marketed as novel viruses and injections — you can find all the details at ProsecuteNow.io, a website compiled by Martin and colleagues.20

 

Originally published July 16, 2022 on Mercola.com

 

Sources and References

·         1 Rumble, Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog June 28, 2022

·         2 Europe Reloaded March 23, 2022

·         3 Rumble, Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog June 28, 2022, 1:21

·         4, 5 Substack July 24, 2021

·         6 Rumble, Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog June 28, 2022, 9:52

·         7, 8, 9 Rumble, Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog June 28, 2022, 3:26

·         10, 11 Rumble, Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog June 28, 2022, 6:22

·         12 Rumble, Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog June 28, 2022, 7:58

·         13, 14 Rumble, Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog June 28, 2022, 12:40

·         15 Rumble, Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog June 28, 2022, 13:38

·         16 National Science Foundation, Darwinian Chemical Systems

·         17, 18 Rumble, Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog June 28, 2022, 17:21

·         19 Rumble, Greg Hunter’s USA Watchdog June 28, 2022, 52:01

·         20 Prosecute Now

Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times. Epoch Health welcomes professional discussion and friendly debate. To submit an opinion piece, please follow these guidelines and submit through our form here.



 Joseph Mercola

Dr. Joseph Mercola is the founder of Mercola.com. An osteopathic physician, best-selling author, and recipient of multiple awards in the field of natural health, his primary vision is to change the modern health paradigm by providing people with a valuable resource to help them take control of their health.

 

Comedian Michael Van Peel na Antwerpse cyberaanval: “Ons blind vertrouwen in overheid en informatica is misplaatst”


In 2013 al wijdde hij zijn eindejaarsconferentie aan het topic van privacy. Doorheen de jaren bleef het zijn stokpaardje. Nu door een cyberaanval een massa Antwerpse gegevens dreigt te grabbel gegooid te worden, kan comedian Michael Van Peel niet stil blijven. “We wisten allemaal dat dit ging gebeuren.”

Eline Debie  13/12/2022 om 18:46

“Wie niets te verbergen heeft, heeft niets te vrezen, toch?”, schrijft Van Peel op Facebook bij twee screenshots van artikels. Het ene gaat over de cyberaanval op de stad Antwerpen, het andere over het corruptieschandaal in het Europees Parlement.


De Antwerpse komiek herhaalt een quote van Jan Jambon uit 2016, toen nog minister van Binnenlandse Zaken. Jambon reageerde met die uitspraak op de privacydiscussie die ontstond nadat hij voorstelde vingerafdrukken van Belgische burgers op te slaan. Intussen is het verplicht twee vingerafdrukken achter te laten wanneer je een nieuwe identiteitskaart aanvraagt.

“Geef dus gerust al je data aan de overheid, toch?”, vervolgt Van Peel zijn post. “Die overheid die nooit gehackt wordt en altijd 100% te vertrouwen is... Toch? #privacy #daaromdus.”

Oud zeer

De komiek grijpt de gebeurtenissen van de voorbije week aan om zijn punt over privacy kracht bij te zetten. “Een oud zeer dat steeds weer terugkomt” noemt hij het, en waarvoor hij al jaren waarschuwt. Hate to say I told you so? “Ik wil het niet met zoveel genoegzaamheid gezegd hebben, maar daar komt het wel op neer. We wisten allemaal dat dit zou gebeuren.”

LEES OOK. Hackerscollectief Play eist cyberaanval op en eist losgeld van stad Antwerpen: “Het gaat om enorm veel persoonlijke data”

We dragen met z’n allen steeds meer gegevens over aan de overheid. Zomaar, vanuit een blind vertrouwen, aldus Van Peel. “Dat blind vertrouwen in de overheid en de informatica is misplaatst en kan grote gevolgen hebben. De uitspraak van Jambon (‘Wie niets te verbergen heeft, heeft niets te vrezen’, red.) gaat alleen op als de mensen en systemen aan wie je je gegevens toevertrouwt zĆ©lf te vertrouwen zijn, nu en in de toekomst.”

De recente gebeurtenissen bewijzen nog maar eens dat dat niet het geval is. De systemen beschermen onze gegevens niet voldoende, en ook bij de overheid zijn mensen corrumpeerbaar. “De overheid is niet honderd procent waterdicht, dus je vertrouwen mag dat ook niet zijn”, aldus Van Peel.

Privacy gaat volgens de komiek niet over geheimen. Het is niet iets voor criminelen, zoals Jambon destijds liet uitschijnen. “Het gaat over een machtsevenwicht tussen overheid en burger. Om het met een oude boutade te zeggen: in een echte democratie staan de camera’s gericht op het Schoon Verdiep en niet op de straat. Het zijn de burgers die de overheid moeten controleren. De overheid moet ook een bepaalde controle hebben over de burger, maar die twee moeten in evenwicht zijn. Privacy zorgt voor dat evenwicht. De balans helt nu te veel over naar de ene kant: we komen steeds meer in een wereld terecht waarin de overheid vindt dat ze recht heeft op al onze gegevens.”

Van Peel noemt het ironisch dat net Jambons partij N-VA – “de partij van law and order” – getroffen wordt door deze crisis in Antwerpen. Hij hoopt dat politici eindelijk alerter worden voor het privacyprobleem.

Damage control

Zijn eigen gegevens zijn gelukkig “veilig”, zegt de komiek met een kwinkslag, want hij woont niet meer in de stad. Waar hij naartoe verhuisde, houden we om privacyredenen geheim. “Al heb ik allang de hoop opgegeven dat er veilig wordt omgegaan met mijn gegevens, hoor. De geest is uit de fles”, zegt de Antwerpenaar. “Ik heb wel bewust een nieuwe identiteitskaart aangevraagd vlak voor de vingerafdrukken verplicht werden. Dat was mijn laatste poging tot damage control. Maar binnen vijf Ć  zes jaar zal ik toch moeten toegeven.”

Zijn voorzichtigheid ten spijt werd Van Peel al slachtoffer van identiteitsdiefstal. De dader had enkel zijn naam en geboortedatum nodig, die op Wikipedia te vinden zijn. “Er werd een abonnement bij Proximus genomen op mijn naam”, zegt de komiek. “Ik moest mezelf verdedigen omdat ik zogezegd mijn factuur niet betaalde. Urenlang heb ik met de deurwaarder aan de lijn gehangen.” Enkele jaren eerder waren anonieme simkaarten afgeschaft, omwille van terrorisme. “Ik heb er in mijn eindejaarsconference over privacy nog mee gelachen. ‘Nu moeten ze helemaal naar het buitenland rijden voor een simkaart, zeg!’ Bleek dat het hen nog makkelijker werd gemaakt. (lacht).”

LEES OOK. Privacyspecialist over gevaren van cyberaanval bij stad Antwerpen voor burger: “Dit is een jackpot voor criminelen”

Bron: https://www.gva.be/cnt/dmf20221213_96411302

 


Er komt meer zinnigs uit zijn mond dan de oorlogshitserij van het Westen

zondag, 22 december 2024 09:42 Als we kijken naar wie bij ons zomaar minister kan worden, dan is het niveau vaak om te huilen. Sommigen land...