The Nature Magazine reported that the World Health Organization “abandons plans to investigate Covid origin.”
The
World Health Organization (WHO) has quietly shelved the second phase of
its much-anticipated scientific investigation into the origins of the
COVID-19 pandemic, citing ongoing challenges over attempts to conduct
crucial studies in China, Nature has learned.
Interestingly, the WHO abandoned plans for the investigation shortly after Jeremy Farrar,
an ally of Bill Gates and a co-conspirator in Dr. Fauci’s email group
discussing plans to hide the origins of Covid-19 in 2020, was appointed to be the WHO’s chief scientist. Here’s Jeremy Farrar on the left side of this picture:
Below is the stated reason why the WHO abandoned the investigation: China does not want to provide the investigators with information!
Researchers
say they are disappointed that the investigation isn’t going ahead,
because understanding how the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 first infected
people is important for preventing future outbreaks. But without access to China, there is little that the WHO can do to advance the studies, says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada. “Their hands are really tied.”
Please
appreciate the ridiculousness of the above argument and the gullibility
of anyone who would believe such a nonsensical statement:
A pathogen was released that killed millions.
The country where the pathogen allegedly first appeared does not want investigations.
Because of that, investigations are called off.
This makes no sense!
Consider this analogy:
Imagine that a victim was robbed while visiting a particular house.
The homeowner, unsurprisingly, does not want to grant investigators
access to the premises. Would that be a good reason to call off the
investigation? Of course, no! Even if the house where the crime occurred
was inaccessible or even burned down, investigators could ask for
witnesses, summon cell phone records and text messages, collect
recordings from nearby street cameras, and perhaps check nearby pawn
shops to see if they sell any goods in question, and so on.
So, why would Jeremy Farrar
and the WHO decline to investigate the origin of COVID-19, citing the
refusal of China to allow access as the [bogus] reason not to
investigate?
The explanation is quite apparent: the World Health Organization does NOT want us to know the origin of Covid-19. Had the WHO been interested, it could accomplish quite a bit without involving China. WHO could:
Ask
independent geneticists why Sars-Cov-2 has several genetic inserts that
fold to form an analog of HIV gp120 protein, as described in Jan 2020
by a Pradhan et al. “uncanny similarity” article.
Ask for any and all correspondence that led to a withdrawal of the above article on a SUNDAY two days later.
Ask
for any and all documentation from DARPA, EcoHealth Alliance, NIH, and
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation related to EcoHealth Alliance, which described SARS-Cov-2 in its 2018 DEFUSE proposal.
Ask independent geneticists why the Sars-Cov-2 genome contains a reverse complement to a nucleotide sequence CTCCTCGGCGGGCACGTAG from Moderna cancer patent 9,587,003.
Ask
UNC virologist Ralph Baric, and the University of North Carolina,
described by the DEFUSE proposal as the person to develop experimental
viruses, for any and all correspondence starting from a few years ago.
It would help if the WHO could ask why the DEFUSE proposal contains the blueprint for designing a perfect ACE2-targeting mechanism binding to human lungs and a furin cleavage site conferring infectiousness and pathogenicity:
It
would be good to ask EcoHealth’s Dr. Peter Daszak and Dr. Ralph Baric
what was the reason to add HIV inserts to their experimental virus to
infect immune cells via DC-SIGN (a mechanism independent of ACE2),
described in the 2018 DEFUSE proposal here:
Infecting
cells expressing DC-SIGN is what the HIV inserts of Sars-Cov-2 do, just
like HIV itself, and it is the key to Covid-19 and Covid
vaccine-mediated immune suppression.
Is
Sars-Cov-2 airborne HIV? Two days ago, an interesting article came out:
This article was not written by a bunch of random scientists, but
instead was written by people from the Wuhan Institute of Virology,
including the infamous batwoman Shi Zheng-Li. Just keep this in mind. It
was originally submitted in Sep 2021 and revised in January 2022, so it
d…
a year ago · 398 likes · 302 comments · Igor Chudov
It
would also be good to ask how Dr. Fauci, on Feb 4, 2020, in his email
exchange with Dr. Farrar and Francis Collins, knew that Sars-Cov-2 was
grown in humanized ACE2 transgenic mice:
So,
three years ago, in 2020, Fauci and Farrar had a pretty good idea of
how Sars-Cov-2 evolved in transgenic mice, just as the DEFUSE proposal
described.
The
same Jeremy Farrar, also on Feb 4, 2020, knew full well about the
reasons why Sars-Cov-2 had a “furin cleavage site,” as he forwarded an
email to Fauci asking it to be kept in secret:
Perhaps
Mr. Farrar can explain why he “forgot” all his 2020 discussions about
engineered features of Sars-Cov-2 and instead decided to “stop
investigations of Covid origin” in 2023 once he was appointed chief UN
scientist.
There are some things that we know about Sars-Cov-2:
Sars-Cov-2 was lab engineered
It
was designed to be a pandemic pathogen inducing immune suppression in
the population and being vaccine-resistant (with the spike-based vaccine inducing same immune suppression).
Extensive preparations for its release were undertaken in 2019. Examples include unexplained NIH work on a “novel coronavirus vaccine” in July 2019, a strangely specific pandemic preparedness exercise “Event 201” in Oct 2019, and more.
In a moment of unlikely serendipity, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation bought shares
in an obscure startup BioNTech in September 2019. BioNTech, to that
date, never produced any vaccine but was destined to become a
multibillion “Covid vaccine manufacturer,” making the famous Pfizer
vaccine. Such a lucky investment produced a 50-fold financial windfall
for Bill.
There are some things that we do not yet know with any certainty. We do not know:
Who exactly authorized its release?
When was Sars-Cov-2 released?
Where was it released? (could be Wuhan but far from certain)
What was the objective of its developers and funders?
While
we have some “pieces of the puzzle,” we do not have all of them, and
they do not yet give us a perfect, day-by-day timeline. Be skeptical of
claims about Sars-Cov-2 and its origin that are too specific without an
extraordinary amount of data confirming such claims.
In addition, there seems to be a concerted effort to lay all blame on China
and the Wuhan lab. While China likely played a role in the pandemic, it
did not cause it unilaterally, and possibly was played.
We
are in the fifth calendar year of a pandemic. All countries experienced
excess mortality. In many places, excess mortality is continuing,
baffling doctors and puzzling authorities.
Had
we known the names and intentions of persons who guided the development
of Sars-Cov-2, we would be better equipped to start working on
countermeasures that work.
In
addition, pandemic pathogens can be created (or adapted from animals to
humans) in a moderately expensive lab employing only one or two
talented virologists.
If
this pandemic does not result in honest investigations, fair trials,
and fitting punishments, another pandemic will be waiting just around
the corner.
In a way, I am glad that the WHO is not “investigating” the origin of Covid-19. It would never be honest with us anyway.
I am not holding my breath waiting for “honest investigations,” but we cannot lose hope, right?
What do you think? Will the perpetrators be punished? Or was Covid-19 a perfect crime?
Share
