Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked August 03, 2022
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
·
The World Economic Forum (WEF) envisions a food
system that doesn’t include animal foods or require a large land footprint. In
fact, for several years now, the WEF has promoted the idea that we should get
used to eating bugs and drinking reclaimed sewage. Both are now being rolled out
·
In a July 2022 article, The New York Times took the
WEF’s dystopian projections to a whole new level, announcing that the time to
consider cannibalism is now upon us
·
Interpretation: The WEF and its allies are
manufacturing food shortages, which in some areas may progress into actual
famine, and they want you to know that when that time comes, it’s OK for you to
eat your neighbor
·
In addition to a recent rash of books and TV shows
that glorify cannibalism, there’s lab-grown human steak “art,” and vegan meat
designed to taste like human flesh. In 2019, a Swedish professor also argued
for cannibalism as a more sustainable alternative to eating bugs
·
Much of the supposed “inspiration” behind the
promotion of unnatural diets is said to come from a desire to save the planet.
While that’s admirable, it’s important to realize that the “green” agenda — as
it is currently promoted — is nothing but a scare tactic to bring people to the
point of accepting living conditions that would otherwise be unacceptable, such
as eating a diet of bugs, drinking reclaimed sewage water and even, apparently,
cannibalism
Time and again,
the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its global collaborators have
"predicted" the future with stunning accuracy, sometimes years in
advance, and then when the predictions come true they pretend as though they
had nothing to do with it.
It's worth
remembering, then, that WEF founder Klaus Schwab, during the May 2022 meeting
in Davos, clearly stated that the future doesn't just happen, it is "BUILT
— by us," referring to himself and the other attendees in the room. So,
make no mistake, they truly believe they have the right to decide the fate of
the world, and that you and I have no say in the matter.
That fate was
in June 2020 formally announced under the banner of "The Great
Reset," by Schwab himself.1 This "build back better" scheme
involves the complete reorganization and restructuring of all parts of society,
including finance, industry, education, "social contracts," the
energy sector and the food system.
As far as the
food system is concerned, the WEF envisions a food system that doesn't include
animal foods or require a large land footprint. In fact, for several years now,
the WEF has promoted the idea that we should get used to eating bugs2,3,4 and drinking
reclaimed sewage. As just one example, in mid-October 2018, the WEF posted on
Twitter:5
"Good
grub: why we might be eating insects soon."
Bugs, Sewage and
Cannibalism — The Cabal's Plans for You
The WEF's many
predictions are now rapidly turning into reality, and its selfish agendas are,
of course, hailed as brilliant and necessary by its media allies. For example,
in February 2021, Time magazine6 insisted we really ought to eat more bugs to
save the planet, and in May 2021, Bloomberg announced that "The Future of
Water Is Recycled Sewage, and We'll All Be Drinking It."7
Indeed,
California has already started its toilet-to-tap transition.8 July 23, 2022, The
New York Times9,10 then took the WEF's dystopian projections to a whole new level,
announcing that the time to consider cannibalism is now upon us:
"An image
came to Chelsea G. Summers: a boyfriend, accidentally on purpose hit by a car,
some quick work with a corkscrew and his liver served Tuscan style, on toast.
That figment of her twisted imagination is what prompted Ms. Summers to write
her novel, 'A Certain Hunger,' about a restaurant critic with a taste for
(male) human flesh.
Turns out,
cannibalism has a time and a place. In the pages of some recent
stomach-churning books, and on television and film screens, Ms. Summers and
others suggest that that time is now ... Can you stomach it?"
The NYT writer,
Alex Beggs — who also writes for the food magazine, Bon Appétit — goes on to
list several recent TV shows and films featuring cannibalism in a romanticized
light. Well, how else do you brainwash people — especially young people — into
accepting the unacceptable if not by glamorizing it through the magic of
tell-a-vision? And it's working. A Reddit message board dedicated to the
Showtime series "Yellowjackets" has 51,000 members.
"The
show's tension is in the knowledge that you know cannibalism is coming, but
when? And why?" Beggs writes. The show, no doubt, mirrors a tension the
elitists of the world actually want to emerge in real life.
"What in
the world are you talking about?" you may ask. Let me put it bluntly and
not beat around the bush: The WEF and its allies are manufacturing food shortages,
which in some areas may progress into actual famine, and they want you to know
that when that time comes, it's OK for you to eat your neighbor.
You'll be
saving the planet, and yourself. Cannibalism is a "win" for the
world, so don't be squeamish. Heck, you might even enjoy it, and there's no
need to be riddled with useless guilt. You're still a good person.
That's the
subliminal message being broadcast through these articles, books and TV shows
that normalize cannibalism, and it's not by accident. Need I remind you that
the NYT deputy managing editor, Rebecca Blumenstein, is a WEF member?11 She knows what's
coming.
And then, of
course, there's the fact checkers insisting The NYT "did not publish an
article that normalizes cannibalism,"12 which is basically
proof that it did just that. Those of us who read it did not misunderstand its
unstated purpose. The New York Times has also written glowing tributes to
Marina Abramovic, whose “art” involves graphic references to cannibalism.13
Lab-Grown Human Steak
In addition to
books and TV shows that glorify cannibalism, there's lab-grown human steak, and
vegan meat designed to taste like human meat. Starting with the former, in
December 2020, steak grown from human cells was featured as "art" at
the Design Museum in London, U.K.14
The creator of
the "Ouroboros Steak" — a reference to the ancient alchemical symbol
of the snake that devours its tail and is reborn from itself — claimed the
installation was a critique against the meat industry, and arose from spending
a year "imagining how climate change might impact the future of food
consumption."15
He was
reportedly upset about the fact that "the focus quickly became centered on
accusations that we were promoting cannibalism." At the time, The New York
Times reported:16
"'Ouroboros
Steak' examines, but does not promote, auto-cannibalism as a satirical take on
the increasing demand for meat products around the world, which scientists have
warned will likely contribute to carbon emissions and reduced biodiversity.
The designers
hoped that shocking audiences with the suggestion would trigger an examination
of environmental responsibility and the clean-meat industry, which has promoted
itself as producing 'kill-free' food, although most companies heavily rely on
fetal bovine serum harvested during the slaughter of pregnant cows for cell
cultivation."
While the
designers may have had pure intentions, the end result is still something that
benefits the depraved agenda of the global elite. It's also worth noting that livestock
— raised in a regenerative fashion, and not in concentrated animal feeding
operations (CAFOs) — actually have a very positive impact on the climate.
Are They Trying to
Normalize Cannibalism? Absolutely
Taking the
human steak idea a step further, a company called BiteLabs claims to be selling
artisanal salami made from lab-grown celebrity flesh.17 According to their
website, they intend to collect biopsy samples from celebrities, isolate the
muscle cells, and then grow the celebrity meat using a proprietary bioreactor.
The lab-grown
flesh is then cured, dried, aged and spiced according to Italian tradition.
It’s unclear whether any celebrities have signed up to become salami, but the
company does appear to be real. New York Grub Street wrote an article about the
startup in 2014.18 IFL Science19 followed up in January 2022, noting that
“It’s perfectly possible” to create salami from cloned celebrity meat.
Other examples
of an ongoing effort to normalize cannibalism include a 2018 article discussing
the benefits of teenage blood plasma,20 said to have
rejuvenating effects. A 2.5-liter order was said to cost about $8,000 at the
time. In a bit of predictive programming, the film “Soylent Green” — in which
the protagonist realizes the government food being handed out is made from
humans — was set in the year 2022.21 And then, there’s
Katy Perry (below).
Video
Link: https://youtu.be/dPI-mRFEIH0
Vegan Burger Made to Taste Like
Human Flesh
Video Link: https://youtu.be/CPdmWTLh45o
Continuing the
parade of cannibalism-normalizing trends, in June 2022, a vegan burger said to
“taste like human meat” won a silver award at the annual Cannes Lions festival
of Creativity.22,23 The human meat burger, made from soy, mushrooms, wheat protein,
plant-based fats and a secret spice mix, debuted during a 2021 Halloween
festival in Stockholm, Sweden.
The video above
was the ad for that event. While they state that "no humans were injured
in the development of this product," one obviously wonders how they came
up with the taste profile for human meat in the first place.
Perhaps they
invented it, and it actually doesn't taste anything like human flesh. Who'd be
able to tell the difference? Either way, this is yet another example where the
idea of cannibalism is embraced and lauded.
'Cannibals Against Climate
Change'
Coincidentally,
another Swede, professor Magnus Soderlund, made headlines in 2019 by suggesting
"humans should become cannibals to fight climate change, because eating
human flesh is more 'sustainable' than the meat industry."24 He even insisted
cannibalism was a more sustainable option than a diet of insects. While his
concept didn't grow legs right then and there, it seems someone, somewhere,
took note of his insane ideas.
While
cannibalism has indeed featured on and off throughout human history, it was
typically — although with some notable exceptions — a measure of last resort.
People ate family members and neighbors to survive famine.25
To suggest that
the most advanced human civilization in known memory start eating each other
"to save the environment" is unreasonable in the extreme. We have
regenerative farming methods that would ease most of our environmental
concerns. There's absolutely no reason to jump from industrial farming all the
way to cannibalism.
Green Agenda Seeks to
Normalize Lowered Standard of Living
Much of the
supposed "inspiration" behind the promotion of unnatural diets is
said to come from a desire to save the planet. While that's admirable, it's
important to realize that the entire "green" agenda — as it is
currently promoted — is nothing but a ruse, a scare tactic, to bring people to
the point of accepting living conditions that would otherwise be unacceptable,
such as eating a diet of bugs, drinking reclaimed sewage water and even,
apparently, cannibalism.
The green
agenda is based on cherry-picked flawed ideas, such as the idea that nitrogen
fertilizer is a pollutant that must be reined in by eliminating farming.
Without farmers, what will we eat? The technocratic, transhumanist-loving
cabal's answer: Weeds, bugs and, possibly, each other.
It sounds wild
and crazy, but they really do want to get rid of as many people as possible,
and no strategy is ethically off-limits, be it the promotion of abortion, the
elimination of fossil fuels without having a workable replacement, the
mandating of experimental gene transfer injections, insect diets, reclaimed
sewage water or cannibalism.
By the way, a
number of U.S. states have also adopted alkaline hydrolysis26 as an alternative to
cremation, where dead bodies are dissolved and the water from the process is
flushed down the sewer. What could possibly go wrong by combining the flushing
of water used to dissolve human remains into the sewer and then repurposing
that same water into drinking water? Even if mostly symbolic, this too is a
form of cannibalism.
Why Are the Elitists'
'Answers' so Gross?
If you're like
most, you're probably wondering why everything the technocratic cabal presents
as "the answer" to our global woes is so darn gross and dehumanizing.
The simple answer is that we're not human to them. We're a commodity, like
cattle, that exist for their benefit and exploitation. They're
"above" the rest of us. We may not have a caste system, officially,
but there are two classes in this world.
Before farmers
realized that mad cow was created by the feeding of bovine parts back to
cattle, this practice was commonplace. And, frankly speaking, the technocratic
elitists see us the same way. Why not feed useless eaters back to the ones that
still have some worker-bee value? To them, that's just plain rational.
It's efficient,
and technocracy is based in large part on the efficiency of any given system.
Robots are more efficient than humans, hence robots are the better choice.
Artificial intelligence is more efficient than the human intellect, and hence
they want to merge with it. What to do with useless humans, is the question.
And the answer is to get rid of them, in whatever way works, without raising
the ire of too many peasants.
Celebrities Embrace Bug
Diet
Video Link: https://youtu.be/e3UqLAtdZ04
"Three
million people in the world eat bugs, and I'm one of them," she says,
wolfing down a number of different insects, some live and others fried for a
crispy crunch. You can bet your bottom dollar that the fried ones were fried in
seed oils. My skepticism of her genuineness aside, research has concluded that
celebrities can indeed "persuade people to eat insects." As reported
by PsychReg.org:27
"Using
celebrity endorsements in adverts for insect-based foods can increase people's
willingness to include insects in their diet, finds new research from BI
Norwegian Business School (BI), Chuo University, Miyagi University, and Oxford
University.
To combat and
prevent a global food crisis, we need to explore alternative protein sources.
The UN has urged people to consider the consumption of insects as they are
nutritious, sustainable, and readily available worldwide. However, many
struggles with the concept of eating insects ...
The findings
showed that celebrities' perceived trustworthiness, knowledge about
insect-based foods, and appropriateness are crucial factors in increasing
people's willingness to eat insects.
However,
different genders responded differently: For men, ads featuring actors or
athletes were most effective, while only actors effectively influenced women.
In comparison, musicians did not appear to be as influential. Using musicians
in ads made women less willing to consume insect-based foods ...
'Our findings
demonstrate that celebrity endorsement can be a very effective strategy to
increase consumer interest in eating more insects, as long as the right
celebrity is targeted at the right gender.'"
Obviously, this
research is not languishing in a hidden drawer. The technocratic Great Reset
adherents are putting the findings to work. Examples of celebrities espousing
the deliciousness and healthiness of bugs include Drew Barrymore, Robert Downey
Jr., celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay, Salma Hayek and Angelina Jolie, just to name
a few.28
Other Types of
'Cannibalism'
While
cannibalism is now being approached in a more head-on manner, humans have been
ingesting and taking in other humans in other ways for many years. For example,
human aborted fetal cells are frequently used in the development of vaccines.
And, while
human cells are not present in the final product, DNA fragments and cell
proteins can still be present. To learn more about this process, see this article. A short excerpt reads as
follows:29
"Apart
from any moral conflict one might have over the use of aborted fetuses for
vaccine production, we need to remember that DNA from the aborted fetuses
actually ends up in vaccines as a contaminant ...
Independent
research30 has found
that vaccines manufactured in human fetal cell lines contain 'unacceptably high
levels of fetal DNA fragment contaminants,' These fragments, while in trace
amounts, are still biologically active once injected into the body of another
individual via vaccine.
Vaccines elicit
systemic immune activation and inflammatory responses, which increases the
likelihood of foreign DNA uptake into the host's genome. And in fact, it has
been found that fetal cell DNA can spontaneously integrate into the genome of
the vaccinated person."
Other products
that use aborted fetus parts in their development include cosmetics,
pharmaceutical drugs and flavor enhancers found in many foods and beverages.31 Is the use of aborted
fetal cells in these kinds of products justifiable?
When Ends Justify the
Means, Bad Things Happen
Surprisingly,
according to Human Life International (HLI),32 a supposedly
pro-life, Catholic organization, it is justifiable if it's "in the service
of humanity." HLI believes vaccines are in the service of humanity, so
therefore the use of aborted fetal cells in the development of vaccines is
acceptable. Cosmetics, however, cannot save lives, so therefore, the
"disgusting practice" of using fetuses in the creation of cosmetics
should be opposed.
It seems to me that this is really splitting hairs. HLI is basically saying that the ends justify the means, even if otherwise deemed abhorrent and potentially unhealthy (as injecting another person's DNA fragments can be). By that rationale, cannibalism could be justified in the name of environmental protection (as some people insist), and I really don't think we ought to go there.
As mentioned
earlier, we have good, solid solutions for our environmental concerns.
Regenerative agriculture — which includes and indeed requires livestock — is
the way to go if we really want to clean up the globe, reduce water consumption
and normalize weather.
The notion that our only
way out is a diet of insects and cannibalism is foolishly ignorant in the
extreme, and needs to be opposed at every turn. Those are not foundational
solutions in the least. They are tools to enslave, denigrate and dehumanize
humanity, invented by people who see every steak on your plate as something
that has been stolen from theirs.
Sources and References
·
4 Twitter WEF January 21, 2021
·
5 Twitter WEF October 14, 2018
·
9 The New
York Times July 23, 2022 (Archived)
·
10 Twitter NYT July 23, 2022
·
11 Real Clear Politics May 23, 2022
·
12 Misbar Fact Check July 25, 2022
·
13 New York
Times Novemer 18, 2011 (Archived)
·
14, 15, 16 The New York Times December 7, 2020 (Archived)
·
17 Bitelabs.org
·
18 Grub Street February 27, 2014
·
19 IFL Science January 18, 2022
·
20 The Times September 8, 2018
·
21 Maajid Nawaz Substack July 27, 2022
·
22 Washington Examiner June 28, 2022
·
24 Daily Mail September 9, 2019
·
25 Vox July 22, 2015
·
26 Cremation Association Alkaline
Hydrolysis
·
27 Psychreg.org February 1, 2022
·
28 Buzzing Substack April 1, 2022
·
29 Think Love Healthy July 6, 2017
·
30 Issues Law Med 2015; 30(1): 47-70
·
31 J&J Ranch August 24, 2021
·
32 HLI January 7, 2022
