Analysis by A Midwestern Doctor
THE Story at-a-glance
· Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), a forgotten gem from the
1960s, effectively treats a broad spectrum of conditions, including strokes,
tissue injuries, autoimmune inflammation, a myriad of skin diseases, and many
challenging infections
· One of the least-known benefits of DMSO is that it
also eliminates cancers (especially when combined with another therapy) and
protects the body from damage created by conventional cancer therapies
· In dozens of experiments, DMSO has been shown to
prevent the damage radiation does to cells, animals, and humans and to heal
existing radiation injuries — something relevant not only to cancer patients
but also to those receiving CT scans
· DMSO effectively prevents many of the illnesses and
complications that follow chemotherapy. Likewise, it also protects patients
from accidental chemotherapy injuries where the medication leaks into the
tissue
· DMSO heals surgical wounds
(which prevents many complications from cancer surgeries) and significantly
extends the survival of patients whose tumors were surgically removed
DMSO is a
remarkable naturally occurring substance that (provided it's used correctly1) safely and rapidly
improves a variety of conditions medicine struggles with — particularly chronic
pain. For example, thousands of studies show DMSO treats a wide range of:
•Injuries such
as sprains, concussions, burns, surgical incisions, and spinal cord injuries
(discussed here).
•Strokes,
paralysis, many neurological disorders (e.g., Down syndrome and dementia), and
numerous circulatory disorders (e.g., Raynaud's, varicose veins or
hemorrhoids), which were discussed here.
•Chronic pain
(e.g., from a bad disc, bursitis, arthritis, or complex regional pain
syndrome), which was discussed here.
•Many
autoimmune, protein, and contractile disorders such as scleroderma,
amyloidosis, and interstitial cystitis (discussed here).
•Head
conditions, such as tinnitus, vision loss, dental problems, and sinusitis
(discussed here).
•Internal organ
diseases such as pancreatitis, infertility, liver cirrhosis, and endometriosis
(discussed here).
•A wide range
of skin conditions such as burns, varicose veins, acne, hair loss, ulcers, skin
cancer, and many autoimmune dermatologic diseases (discussed here).
Many
challenging infections such as shingles, herpes, chronic ear or dental
infections, and osteomyelitis (discussed here). In turn, since I started this series, it struck
a cord, and I have received over 2000 reports of remarkable
responses to DMSO, and many readers have had for a variety of "incurable
conditions."
This begs an
obvious question — if a substance capable of doing all of that exists, why does
almost no one know about it? Simply put, like many other promising therapies,
it fell victim to a pernicious campaign by the FDA, which kept it away from
America despite decades of scientific research, congressional protest, and
thousands of people pleading for the FDA to reconsider its actions. Consider
for example, this 60 minutes program about DMSO that aired on March 23, 1980:
Video Link : https://x.com/MidwesternDoc/status/1845727169273868623
DMSO and Cancer
Since there is a longstanding tendency for any
"unproven cancer therapy" to be targeted by the medical industry,
once the pioneers of DMSO realized early research showed DMSO was also
remarkable for cancer, a decision was made not to focus on that research as a
justifiable fear existed that doing so would bury DMSO (particularly since DMSO
was already in a precarious position with the FDA). As a result, there is very
little knowledge of how DMSO changes the cancer paradigm. For example:
•There are hundreds of studies showing
DMSO routinely transforms cancerous cells into noncancerous ones.
•DMSO directly inhibits the
growth of a wide range of cancers.
•DMSO allows the immune system to regain the
ability to target cancerous cells that have evaded the immune system,2 which
not only eliminates cancer but also can create permanent
immunity to cancers.
•DMSO makes many conventional
cancer therapies much more potent, both making a cure more
likely and a far lower (and thus less toxic dose) dose needed to achieve it.
•Many natural therapies become dramatically more
potent when combined with DMSO (e.g., one DMSO combination behoort
tot de meest effectieve kankerbehandelingen die ik ooit ben tegengekomen).
Furthermore, in addition to directly eliminating
cancers, DMSO's remarkable ability to heal and protect the body can also make
challenging cancers far more manageable. In my eyes, the suppression of DMSO's
uses as an adjunctive cancer therapy represents the most egregious aspect of
this story as in those instances, it's not even competing with cancer
treatments — it's just reducing the suffering they cause (which if anything
should be good for the cancer business).
DMSO and Radiation Therapy
Many of DMSO's remarkable properties result from it
effectively protecting cells from a variety of otherwise lethal stressors
(e.g., burns,3 freezing,4 blood
loss,5 asphyxiation,6 UV
light,7 and
soundwaves8)
and it significantly accelerates healing from injuries (e.g., sprains9 or
burns10).
In addition to
protecting cells from other sources of injury, as early as 1961,11 DMSO was also
recognized to protect cells and tissues from radiation exposure, and by 1967,12 to protect the skin. This is because DMSO prevents radiation from:
•Breaking apart chromosomes,13 DNA,
RNA, proteins,14 and the mitochondria.15
•Creating damaging oxygen species16 and
free radicals.17
•Triggering an
immune response (e.g., by reducing IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β18), chronic inflammation,
fibrosis, and adhesions.
•Putting cells
into senescence19 (a state of permanent growth arrest).
•Causing normal
cells in the vicinity of the affected ones to die as well (e.g., when only 1%
of cells are exposed to radiation, approximately 30% of non-irradiated cells
will exhibit similar toxic effects too20), a fascinating phenomenon
I believe is mediated through mitogenic radiation emissions.
Since cancer
radiation therapy frequently creates a variety of acute and chronic injuries
such as burns, fibrosis, and internal tissue adhesions (all of which DMSO
treats), DMSO is incredibly valuable for cancer patients undergoing radiation
therapy — particularly since DMSO not only prevents radiation damage but also
rapidly heals the injuries radiation creates.21,22
Most
importantly, DMSO's protective effects are specific to normal cells. In
contrast, many studies show it increases cancer cells' susceptibility to
radiation.23
Note: I believe our focus
on radiation therapy ultimately resulted from mining magnate James Douglas
devising a way to produce cheap radium and then giving a large donation (along
with subsequent donations) to America's premier cancer institute to create a
program for developing cancer radiation therapy that then spread across the
world.24,25
Save This Article for Later - Get the PDF Nowhttps://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2025/April/PDF/how-dmso-eases-cancers-hidden-burdens-pdf.pdf
Radiation Exposure Studies
Studies have repeatedly shown that DMSO protects
cells26 (particularly when given prophylactically27)
from being damaged by (often otherwise fatal28) radiation. For example, DMSO was shown
to protect skin cells from dying after exposure to gamma radiation29 and make hamster
cells four times as resistant to radiation.30
These same
protective properties have also been found in plants31,32,33 and many animals
(e.g., mice,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43 rats,44,45,46,47,48,49 rabbits,50 newts,51 and fruit flies52).
In animals,
DMSO was repeatedly found to protect them from otherwise lethal radiation
exposures53,54,55 and protect their
skin,56 tails,57 oral mucosa,58 eyes,59 kidneys,60 intestines61 (which are
particularly vulnerable to radiation damage), and testicles62 from radiation
damage, along with protecting sperm from mutations63 and to accelerate
tissue cellular regeneration following an injury.64
Finally, DMSO
was shown to prevent the psychological trauma and behavioral changes rats typically
experienced from radiation injuries (presumably by preventing radiation from
causing injury65).
DMSO also has a
remarkable ability to protect and heal the skin from injury,66 and since 1966,67 numerous Russian,
German, and Japanese studies have demonstrated DMSO's impressive ability to
protect human skin (along with its collagen and mucopolysaccharides) from
radiation.68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80
For example,
DMSO has been shown to treat radiation fibrosis,81,82 radiation dermatitis,83 radiation injuries84 and other local
radiation complications.85
Note: While DMSO can treat
radiation injuries, it is the most effective if given immediately beforehand to
prevent radiation injuries.86
DMSO has also
been shown to protect tissues besides the skin. For example:
•In 80 patients
who'd developed late local radiation complications (induration, ulcers) from
the treatment of breast or genital cancer (or a non-cancerous disease) DMSO
resulted in both a high efficacy of treatment with no side effects.87
•In 22 patients
with cervical cancer topical found DMSO prior to internal gamma-ray radiation
therapy prevented the normally expected radiation burns and other toxic
reactions to the treatment (e.g., in the bladder and rectum) seen in 59
controls and that DMSO did not protect cancerous tissue.88
•In 807
patients with cervical uterine cancer, putting 10% DMSO into the bladders an
hour before receiving weekly internal irradiation therapy, dropped the
radiation damage to the rectum from 19.0% to 9.5% and to the bladder from 8.8%
to 7.1% (both of which dropped to 1.7% if metronidazole was also used).89
•In another
study, DMSO had a 50% success rate in treating patients which chronic radiation
cystitis (e.g., from prostate cancer therapy).90 Likewise, a 1979
study also used DMSO to treat radiation cystitis.91
•In 22 breast
and cervical cancer patients, DMSO protected them against radiation dermatitis
(e.g., erosion, blistering, itching, and pain) while also enhancing cancer
sensitivity to radiation (as the DMSO treated areas showed skin reddening and
exfoliation earlier) and accelerating the regrowth of normal tissues.
Additionally,
when DMSO was only applied to one side, the non-applied side did worse, the
hyperpigmentation that follows radiation therapy was greater in DMSO treated
patients, and that only one of the 22 patients had to stop DMSO (due to having
a skin eruption which may have been linked to DMSO).92
•This author
detailed a case of a patient with lung cancer that was treated with three
months of radiation therapy but severely damaged her lungs (making her require
oxygen and leaving her unsure if she'd survive) — but after topical and oral
DMSO, she had a rapid recovery.
Likewise, he
also shared a case of another woman with lung cancer who was expected to have
significant lung complications from the treatment (as she required a borderline
lethal dose), but took topical DMSO prior to each treatment and instead had no
complications and was fully healthy three years later.93
It is thus
quite remarkable that all of this remains unknown. To quote the author of a
2022 study94 which found DMSO
prevented testicular damage (and loss of hormonal function or fertility)
following radiation therapy:
"Currently, there is
no approved agent for the prevention or treatment of radiation-induced
testicular injury ... In summary, our findings demonstrate the radioprotective
efficacy of DMSO on the male reproductive system, which warrants further
studies for future application in the preservation of male fertility during
conventional radiotherapy and nuclear accidents."
Similarly, in
addition to the higher doses experienced from radiation therapy, diagnostic
radiation, specifically CT scans (which expose the body to much higher
radiation doses than X-rays) also pose a cancer risk — particularly since the
dose of radiation with CT scans can have over a 10-fold variation.95
In turn, a CT
scan was found to make you 17% to 24% more likely to develop cancer,96 with the risk
increasing97 the younger you were
at the time of the scan and is much higher for certain types of cancers.98,99,100,101,102 A 2009 study
estimated 29,000 cancers were caused by the CT scans performed in America in
2007.103
As such, I
avoid CT scans, which I do not feel are essential (particularly since a
detailed physical exam frequently provides more actionable information). It is
my sincere hope at some point in the future, DMSO will be given in conjunction
with CT scans (but unfortunately their use keeps going up, and they are viewed
as a highly lucrative growth market104).
Tumor Surgery
Since DMSO
rapidly accelerates the healing of tissue and addresses the neurological
components of pain, many studies have found that DMSO greatly facilitates surgical
recovery (e.g., by accelerating healing, improving the
strength of the final scar, reducing surgical site pain and eliminating
fibrosis, enlarged scars, or tissue adhesions).
As cancers are
frequently treated with surgical removal, DMSO can also greatly aid the
recovery from these surgeries (e.g., in dogs that required a unilateral
mastectomy, giving IV DMSO 15 minutes before the surgery's conclusion
significantly reduced post-surgical inflammation105).
Likewise,
studies such as a 1992 trial106 of 198 patients with Stage III colon cancer,
and a 1992 trial107 of 228 patients with stomach cancer found DMSO significantly
reduced the chance that those cancers would relapse.
Extravasation Injuries
Since the
medical field has been extremely reluctant to consider any alternative cancer
treatment that could threaten its bottom line (regardless of how much data is
behind it), DMSO has essentially not been utilized in the treatment of cancer. However, there is one exception to this rule, as
DMSO is able to address a challenging issue encountered with chemotherapy
without threatening the existing market.
Since many chemotherapy drugs are quite toxic, they
have to be administered in a tightly controlled manner. Unfortunately, in many
cases however, the drug gets through the injected vein (extravasates) and leaks
into the surrounding tissue.
Note: Since extravasations are often not reported,
estimates widely vary on how common they are (e.g., according to one study, in
0.1% to 6% of adults who receive chemotherapy108 while
another made a compelling case extravasations occur in 39% of patients109).
Due to how toxic some of the chemotherapy drugs are
(particularly the anthracyclines), when that leakage occurs and the drugs
concentrate in one area, it can often cause significant damage to the
surrounding tissues and lead to ulceration or necrosis (tissue death).
Since the existing treatments don't always give
satisfactory results and DMSO is extremely effective at
healing a wide range of tissue injuries, it eventually got used
as a treatment for these injuries and quickly caught on. For example:
•A 1981 rat study of doxorubicin extravasations
showed that daily topical applications of 1 ml 90% DMSO with 10% α-tocopherol
significantly reduced ulcer diameter.110
•A 1982111 and 1986112 study tested numerous agents on ulcers
created by applying intradermal doxorubicin to pigs and rats and found DMSO was
the only agent that prevented or healed those ulcers.
•A 1984,113 1987,114 and 1994115 pig study along with
a 2007 rat study116 also found DMSO treated or prevented extravasation injuries.
Likewise, in
humans:
•A 1983117 case report, another
1983 case report,118 a 1989 series119 of 4 patients, a 1991
series120 of two patients, a
1994 series of two patients121 and a 2001 case report122 reported that DMSO
prevented extravasations from causing ulcerations of tissue death or healed
existing injuries (e.g., with "striking" improvement).
•A 1988 study
gave topical DMSO for anthracycline extravasations every 6 hours for 14 days to
20 patients, which prevented all of them from developing ulcerations. In the 14 who were evaluated at 3 months, there was
no sign of residual damage in six patients, while a pigmented indurated area
remained in ten.123
•A 1995 study gave topical DMSO (for 8 hours a day
over 7 days) alongside 3 days of intermittent cooling to every patient who
experienced an extravasation over a 3.5 year period (which was either from
doxorubicin, epirubicin, mitomycin, mitoxantrone, cisplatin, carboplatin,
ifosfamide or fluorouracil).
Of those 144
patients, 127 could be evaluated, of whom only 1 ultimately developed an
ulceration from the extravasation, and none experienced side effects from DMSO
(beyond temporary skin irritation and a breath odor).124
•A 1996 study
of ten successive patients who experienced extravasation from chemotherapy were
given DMSO and alpha-tocopherol, all of whom avoided ulceration or tissue
death.125
•A 2004 study
of 147 patients with extravasations of anthracyclines (which typically leads to
28% developing ulcerations), found 99% DMSO caused only 1% to 2% of them to
develop ulcers.126
•A 2007 study
explored applying DMSO and α-tocopherol as a gel rather
than a liquid solution to treat extravasation injuries (which appeared to hold
promise).127
Chemotherapy Injuries
In addition to
addressing extravasation injuries, DMSO has also:
•Been found to
prevent doxorubicin cardiac toxicity.128
•Successfully
treated palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia resulting from doxorubicin treatment.129
•Prevent the
skin death that is often associated with injecting doxorubicin into the eyelid
(which is done to treat eye spasms).130
•Protect
against birth defects caused by hydroxyurea.131
•Reduce the
carcinogenicity of chlorambucil (which often causes a secondary tumor to form
after the initial treatment).132
•Potentially
decrease the lung injuries (e.g., pulmonary fibrosis) and weight loss caused by
bleomycin.133,134,135
DMSO has also
been found to improve many other symptoms associated with chemotherapy (e.g.,
DMSO is frequently used to treat hair loss from a variety of causes,
including chemotherapy) since it saves normal cells on the verge of dying
following chemotherapy.
Note: We find Ultraviolet Blood Irradiation following chemotherapy to be the most
effective option for protecting a patient's healthy cells from dying.
Cancer Pain
Cancer (and its
treatments) are often accompanied by many other debilitating symptoms,
including pain — which is so severe that opioids, rather than being restricted,
are routinely used to treat it (e.g., fentanyl is often used to treat advanced
cancer pain — but in 10% to 20% of patients the pain is severe enough that even
the strongest opioids can't address it136).
Since DMSO has
a rather unique mechanism of treating pain, it is often able to treat a wide
range of challenging pain conditions nothing else works on (e.g., I've now had
hundreds of readers share life-changing pain improvements from topical DMSO
nothing else they'd tried had ever worked on). As such, many over the years
have found it provided incredible relief for metastatic cancer pain.
One of the most
well-known examples was Otis Bowen MD (a popular second-term Indiana governor),
who "illegally" used topical DMSO to treat his wife's pain from
terminal multiple myeloma and then publicly denounced the FDA's absurd embargo
on it at the AMA's 1981 national meeting.137
Remarkably, a
few years later, Bowen became Reagan's Secretary of Health and Human Services.
Still, even then, with this highly ethical doctor at the helm of the HSS, DMSO
was unable to overcome the FDA's prohibition of it — which helps to highlight
the incredible challenge RFK Jr. is now facing (but gradually surmounting).
Likewise, a few studies have shown that DMSO can treat cancer pain:
•A 1967 study
included two older patients with cancer pain, one of whom had an excellent
response to DMSO and one who had a good response.138
•A 1967 study
found that of 7 patients with metastatic cancer pain, DMSO gave 2 full and 2
partial remission.139
•A 2011 trial
gave DMSO and sodium bicarbonate to 26 patients with advanced cancers who were
experiencing significant pain (even with all the available treatment options).140 This greatly improved
their pain, their quality of life (e.g., chemotherapy symptoms), their blood
counts, and their organ function:
Note: A 2010 paper further discusses DMSO's ability
to treat intractable cancer pain.141 It highlights that this may be due to DMSO's
ability to address membrane hyper-excitability (e.g., through suppressing NMDA
and AMPA induced ion fluxes — which are linked to central pain sensitization142,143 and
may explain why DMSO also effectively treats complex regional pain syndrome144).
Conclusion
DMSO's ability to heal the body and restore its
normal function transformed the practice of medicine, and had the FDA not
buried DMSO sixty years ago; our medical science would be leaps beyond where it
is now. In this article, I've tried to show how DMSO helps to address one of
the most challenging decisions many will face in their lifetimes — is it worth
tolerating the immense damage conventional cancer therapies will cause in
return for them potentially saving one's life?
As such, it's
unconscionable that DMSO was never incorporated as an adjunctive therapy for
conventional cancer care, particularly in the case of radiation therapy, since
a vast body of literature shows simply applying it shortly beforehand can
prevent most of the complications from radiation therapy and significantly
increase its ability to treat cancer.
However, while
it has been immensely painful to watch the unnecessary suffering created by our
outdated and pathological medical practices, for the first time in my life, I
am simultaneously immensely hopeful. That is because Make America Healthy Again
has created the window to spark the momentum to begin revisiting many of our
long accepted medical practices and have our society ask if there is actually a
better (or more affordable) way to do things.
Author's Note: This is an abridged
version of a longer article that reviews how DMSO
also directly treats cancer (e.g., by turning cancer cells back into normal
cells or mobilizing the immune system to eliminate them) and how it greatly
enhances the effectiveness of both conventional and natural cancer therapies
(along with guidance for using DMSO to treat cancer and many other related
conditions). That article can be read here.
A Note from Dr. Mercola
About the Author
A Midwestern Doctor (AMD)
is a board-certified physician from the Midwest and a longtime reader of
Mercola.com. I appreciate AMD's exceptional insight on a wide range of topics
and am grateful to share it. I also respect AMD's desire to remain anonymous
since AMD is still on the front lines treating patients. To find more of AMD's work, be sure to check
out The Forgotten Side of Medicine on
Substack.
Sources and
References
1. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, September 29, 2024
2. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, March 15, 2025
3. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, September 15, 2024
4. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, September 15, 2024
5. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, September 15, 2024
6. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, September 15, 2024
7. Radiatsionnaia Biologiia, Radioecologiia, 01 Mar 2014,
54(2):169-173
8. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1975 Jan 27:243:358-61
9. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, September 29, 2024
10. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, December 1, 2024
11. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1961
Jan:3:41-8
12. Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences, 141(1), Pages 45-62
13. Cytogenet
Genome Res. 2004;104(1-4):168-72
14. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46(11), 12718-12732
15. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46(11), 12718-12732
16. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2024, 46(11), 12718-12732
17. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, March 15, 2025
18. Radiat
Oncol J. 2014 Sep 30;32(3):103–115
19. Semin
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Oct;27(4):316–324
20. Journal
of Radiation Research, Volume 64, Issue 6, November 2023, Pages 870–879
21. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, September 29, 2024
22. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, December 1, 2024
23. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, March 15, 2025
24. Wikipedia, James Walter Douglas
25. National
Academy of Sciences, 1951
26. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, March 15, 2025
27. Radiat
Environ Biophys. 1985;24(3):175-84
28. Radiat
Environ Biophys. 1985;24(3):175-84
29. Department of Dental Radiology, Kyungpook National
University, 2002
30. Radiat
Res. 1981 Apr;86(1):52-66
31.
Radiation Botany, Volume 9, Issue 2, 1969, Pages 111-114
32.
Radiation Botany, Volume 10, Issue 1, 1970, Pages 69-78
33.
University of Nottingham, (2021)
34. Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences, 141(1), Pages 63-64
35. Health
Physics 13(6):p 601-606, June 1967
36. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med.
1970;18(4):301-9
37. Radiat
Res. 1970 Nov;44(2):368-78
38.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Volume 102, Issue
5, 1 December 2018, Pages 1577-1589
39. Radiat
Res (1996) 145 (6): 740–745
40.
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2022(1), 9137812
41. Clin
Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Mar 1;479(3):468-474
42.
Experientia. 1967 Nov 15;23(11):923
43. J
Invest Dermatol. 1969 Mar;52(3):277-9
44. Ann N Y
Acad Sci. 1967 Mar 15;141(1):45-62
45. Br J
Radiol. 1968 Dec;41(492):950
46. Journal
of BUON 17: 160-167, 2012
47. Br J
Radiol. 1968 Dec;41(492):950
48.
Radiobiology (USSR), 01 January 1977
49.
Pharmacologica, 01 February 1970, Volume 26, Pages 164–165, (1970)
50. Muğla
Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi, 9(3), 266-272
51.
International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics,
Chemistry and Medicine, 18(3), Pages 217–233
52. Radiat
Res. 1972 Jul;51(1):134-41
53. Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences, 141(1), Pages 63-64
54. Ann N Y
Acad Sci. 1967 Mar 15;141(1):45-62
55. Radiat
Res. 1972 Jul;51(1):134-41
56. Br J
Radiol. 1968 Dec;41(492):950
57.
Radiation Botany, Volume 10, Issue 1, 1970, Pages 69-78
58.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Volume 102, Issue
5, 1 December 2018, Pages 1577-1589
59. Radiat
Res. 1970 Nov;44(2):368-78
60. Journal
of BUON 17: 160-167, 2012
61. Radiat
Res (1996) 145 (6): 740–745
62.
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, 2022(1), 9137812
63. Radiat
Res. 1972 Jul;51(1):134-41
64. Radiobiology (USSR), 01 January 1977
65. Experientia 26, Pages 164–165 (1970)
66. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, December 1, 2024
67. Klinische Wochenschrift, 01 Oct 1966, 44(19):1151-1152
68. Klinische Wochenschrift, 01 Oct 1966, 44(19):1151-1152
69. Ger. Med. Mon., 12: 443-4(Sept. 1967)
70. J. Invest. Dermatol., 52: 277-9(Mar. 1969)
71. Med Radiol (Mosk). 1974 Nov;19(11):66-8
72. Med. Radiol.; (USSR); Journal Volume: 23:6
73. Ger. Med. Mon., 12: 443-4(Sept. 1967)
74. J. Invest. Dermatol., 52: 277-9(Mar. 1969)
75. Med. Radiol.; (USSR); Journal Volume: 23:6
76. Med Radiol (Mosk). 1974 Nov;19(11):66-8
77. Klinische Wochenschrift, 01 Oct 1966, 44(19):1151-1152
78. Radiobiol.-Radiother. 11: No. 4, 399-404(1970)
79. Radiobiologia, Radiotherapia, 01 Jan 1973, 14(5):471-479
80. IAEA, Published 1988 | Version v1
81. Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie, 01 Jul 1972,
94(27):854-858
82. Radiobiol.-Radiother. 11: No. 4, 399-404(1970)
83. Nippon
Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi, 26: 210-14(May 1966)
84. IAEA,
Published 1988 | Version v1
85. Med Radiol (Mosk). 1977 May;22(5):17-23
86. Med. Radiol.; (USSR); Journal Volume: 23:6
87. eLIBRARY, 1977 (Archived)
88. Med Radiol (Mosk). 1985 Mar;30(3):16-8
89. Vestn Rentgenol Radiol. 2006 May-Jun:(3):47-51
90. Urology. 1978 Mar;11(3):215-20
91. IAEA, Published 1979 | Version v1
92. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, March 15, 2025
93. Amazon, The DMSO Handbook for Doctors
94. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity,
2022(1), 9137812
95. FDA,
December 5, 2017
96. BMJ 2013;346:f2360
97. DailyMail.co.uk, March 10, 2025
98. DailyMail.co.uk, March 10, 2025
99. BMJ 2013;346:f2360
100. BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 30;22:1238
101. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071-2077
102. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Nov 14;4(1):pkz072
103. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(22):2071-2077
104. Collective Minds, November 2, 2024
105. cabidigitallibrary.org, (2020): 20203508209
106. Chemotherapy. 1992;38(2):127-34
107. Chemotherapy. 1992;38(2):135-44
108. ISRN Dermatol. 2013 May 8;2013:856541
109. ISRN
Dermatol. 2013 May 8;2013:856541
110. Cancer
Res (1981) 41 (9_Part_1): 3395–3399
111. Cancer
Treat Rep. 1982 Jun;66(6):1371-4
112.
Journal of Clinical Oncology, Volume 4, Number 9, September 1, 1986
113. Diss.
Catholic University of America, 1984
114. Oncol
Nurs Forum. 1987 Jan-Feb;14(1):39-44
115. Annals
of Surgical Oncology 1, Pages 411–414 (1994)
116. Journal of Southern Medical University, 01 Sep 2007,
27(9):1444-1446
117. Annals of Internal Medicine, Volume 98, Number 6, 1
June 1983
118. Cancer
Treat Rep. 1983 Apr;67(4):407-8
119. Cancer
Chemother. Pharmacol. 23, 316–318 (1989)
120. Oncol
Nurs Forum. 1991 May-Jun;18(4):693-5
121.
Journal of Intravenous Nursing 17(5):p 261-266, September 1994
122. Acta
Oncologica, 40:4, 541-542
123. J Clin
Oncol. 1988 Nov;6(11):1732-5
124. J Clin
Oncol. 1995 Nov;13(11):2851-5
125.
Annales de Dermatologie et de Venereologie, 01 Jan 1996, 123(10):640-643
126. Journal
of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, December 2004
127. Arch Dermatol Res 299, 201–207 (2007)
128. Clinical Research 1983 Jan 1 (Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. A406-A406)
129. Cancer
Chemother Pharmacol 44, 303–306 (1999)
130.
kiss.kstudy.com, March 2002
131. Toxicology
Letters, Volume 211, Supplement, 17 June 2012, Page S183
132.
Medical Hypotheses, Volume 6, Issue 10, October 1980, Pages 1035-1041
133.
Biochemical Pharmacology, Volume 34, Issue 13, 1 July 1985, Pages 2386-2389
134.
Toxicology. 1989 Feb;54(2):197-205
135. Seoul
University Journal of Veterinary Science, 1994-08-15, Volume 12 Issue 2
136. Pain
Ther. 2023 Apr 13;12(3):645–654
137.
NYtimes.com, November 8, 1985
138. Ann N
Y Acad Sci. 1967 Mar 15;141(1):572-85
139. Annals
of the New York Academy of Sciences, 141(1), 506-516
140. J Pain
Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2011;25(1):19-24
141.
Inflammation & Allergy-Drug Targets, Volume 9, Issue 4, Sep 2010, Pages
306-312
142. Exp
Neurol. 2001 Jul;170(1):180-5
143. Anesth Analg. 2003 Oct;97(4):1108-1116
144. The Forgotten Side of Medicine, September 29, 2024