oktober 24, 2022
© gpointstudio / Freepik
De meeste mensen zagen dit niet aankomen: waar de “ongevaccineerden” ooit
werden behandeld als melaatsen, waarbij velen suggereerden dat
Covid-beperkingen moesten worden gebruikt om hen te verhinderen volledig deel
te nemen aan de samenleving en het bedrijfsleven, zou de worm nu wel eens
kunnen draaien, schrijft Selwyn
Duke.
Volgens auteur en TEDx-spreker Laura J. Wellington zijn gevaccineerden in toenemende mate persona non grata bij vrouwen (en mannen) als het gaat om dating.
In een vrijdag
gepubliceerd artikel stelt
Wellington dat dit een toch al moeilijk datingklimaat voor sommige
ongevaccineerde vrouwen nog problematischer heeft gemaakt. Een deel van de
bezorgdheid betreft zaken die bij intieme relaties horen, zoals de uitwisseling
van speeksel. Dit is natuurlijk ook een overweging voor degenen die dergelijke
relaties nog steeds voorbehouden aan het huwelijk.
Wellington schrijft
dat “de grootste zorg is dat de
schadelijke effecten van dit vaccin uiteindelijk bij deze vrouwen kunnen
binnendringen” tijdens intiem contact.
Als dit fantasievol
lijkt, merk dan op dat de voorzitter van Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division,
Stefan Oelrich, tijdens een globalistische gezondheidsconferentie [in oktober
2021] aan “internationale ‘deskundigen’ toegaf
dat de mRNA COVID-19 injecties inderdaad ‘cel- en gentherapie’ zijn die als
‘vaccins’ op de markt worden gebracht om voor het publiek smakelijk te zijn,” meldde LifeSite
vorig jaar.
Daarom is het voor
veel Amerikanen logisch dat de “gevaccineerde” (genetisch gemanipuleerde?) nu
niet aantrekkelijk is. Voor hen is het absoluut niet zo fantasievol als zeggen
dat de “ongevaccineerden” niet in de samenleving zouden mogen rondlopen omdat
ze geen preventief medicijn hebben genomen dat de overdracht van een gevreesde
ziekte niet echt voorkomt.
Wat betreft deze
vrouwen die “er met een reden voor kozen om
ongevaccineerd te blijven, is het beperken van elk risico door kandidaten te
elimineren op basis van de vaccinatiestatus hun nieuwe norm geworden,” schrijft
Wellington. Dit heeft echter ook nadelen: mannen die gedwongen werden de
gentherapiemiddelen (GTA’s) te nemen en op grond daarvan in een romance worden
afgewezen, nemen dit niet erg goed op, aldus Wellington.
“Ik ben uitgescholden omdat ik zei dat het vaccin voor mij een
spelbreker is”, citeert de schrijfster ene Anika Janis.
“Voor deze vrouwen is er gewoon niet genoeg informatie over het vaccin
of de effecten ervan om het te overwegen,” legt Wellington uit. “Niemand kent de gevolgen of wat er te wachten staat voor degenen die
het vaccin hebben genomen.”
Dit is volkomen
realistisch. Ons medisch establishment heeft het publiek de GTA’s onder valse
voorwendselen verkocht, met boude beweringen over de doeltreffendheid ervan die
niet klopten; in feite hebben diezelfde pseudo-elites de Covid-situatie in alle
opzichten verkeerd aangepakt en vervolgens telkens gelogen.
Wellington vermeldt
dit door te stellen dat voor de vrouwen in kwestie “de wetenschap die ‘spreekt over de werkzaamheid van de Covid-19
vaccins’ weinig afdoet aan de angst die gepaard gaat met wat zij overal om zich
heen waarnemen, simpelweg omdat ‘niemand meer weet wie te vertrouwen’.”
Ze zijn ook verre
van alleen. Wellington stelt dat veel GTA-vrije ouders hun kinderen waarschuwen
voor afspraakjes met GTA’s, en dat sommige vrijgezelle mannen ook terughoudend
zijn. En verschillende GTA-vrije getrouwde vrouwen “hebben mij laten weten dat ‘scheiden een optie is geworden’ als hun man
zou zwichten voor de druk om zich te laten vaccineren,” aldus
Wellington.
Bovendien zijn
sommige mensen bezorgd over “gevaccineerd
bloed”. Zoals Moa Refm, een andere vrouw die door Wellington wordt geciteerd,
zij zegt: “Helaas is de bloedvoorziening ook
besmet, dus geen bloedtransfusies.”
Wellington geeft
toe dat de standpunten van sommige van deze mensen mettertijd kunnen
verzachten. “Maar velen zeggen ‘Nee’,” vertelt
ze, “met het argument dat de
verschillende vaccinatiestatussen en de ‘algemene perspectieven tussen
gevaccineerden en ongevaccineerden’ gewoon te groot zijn.” En eigenlijk
zijn het deze sociale zorgen, meer dan de gezondheidsoverwegingen, die het
meest relevant zijn.
Zoals Kathy
McPherson het verwoordde, in verband met Wellington: “Het (het vaccin) zegt veel over wie deze mannen in de kern zijn,
inclusief hun niveau van bewustzijn en definitie van het leven.”
Dat doet het zeker,
over het algemeen – net zoals het dragen van een masker als je alleen buiten
bent of in je auto zit, boekdelen spreekt.
Wellingtons
beweringen werden onderschreven door commentatoren onder haar artikel. “Dorothy
Todd” zei dat zij ook een bloedtransfusie zou weigeren uit bezorgdheid over GTA.
“Curt” woog mee over de karakterkwestie en schreef: “Het beschadigde bloed is één ding, leven met een lafaard is iets heel
anders.” “Neil Timmerman” was dezelfde mening toegedaan. “U kunt mij toevoegen aan de lijst van mensen die liever niet uitgaan met
de “vaxxed”,” schreef hij. “Ze hebben bewezen
een slecht beoordelingsvermogen te hebben.”
Er was ook spot –
van de “andere kant”. “Larry Svestka” schreef dat “ongevaccineerd zijn nu hetzelfde is als behoren tot een religie”. Dit is
ironisch, omdat de gouverneur van New York, Kathy Hochul, vorig jaar namens
vele Branch COVIDianen verkondigde dat de GTA’s “van God” zijn en dat we allemaal haar “apostelen” zouden moeten zijn en de GTA’s zouden moeten laten injecteren.
“Wel, jongens, zoek een leuk
katholiek meisje zonder tatoeages (en zonder paars haar of piercings in
wenkbrauwen),” vervolgde Svestka, “en eentje die dat
demonische gif niet in haar aderen heeft gestopt.”
Behalve dat het
(onbedoeld) een geweldig advies is, weerspiegelt deze opmerking een tweedeling
die Wellington aanpakt. “Wie had ooit
gedacht dat ‘vaccinstatus’ voor een groot deel van onze natie zo centraal zou
komen te staan bij het cultiveren van nieuwe vriendschappen en
liefdesrelaties?”, schrijft ze. “De verdeeldheid is
hier om te blijven omdat de schade die het heeft veroorzaakt al is aangericht.
Niets kan die geest terug in de fles stoppen.”
A Shot=No Date? The “Vaccinated” as the New Lepers
by Selwyn Duke October 23, 2022
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Print PDF
NBedov/iStock/Getty Images
Plus
Most people didn’t see this coming: Where the
“unvaccinated” were once treated like lepers, with many suggesting that Covid
restrictions be used to prevent them from fully participating in society and
commerce, the worm may now be turning.
In fact, the vaccinated are
increasingly persona non grata with women (and men) now when
it comes to dating, according to author and TEDx speaker Laura J. Wellington.
In a piece published Friday, Wellington states that this
has made an already tough dating climate all the more problematic for some
unvaccinated women. Part of the concern, with our society’s acceptance of
fornication, involves things attending intimate relations, such as salivary
exchanges. Of course, this is also a consideration for those who still reserve
such relations to marriage.
Perhaps stating the obvious, Wellington writes that
the “overriding concern [is] that the harmful effects of this vaccine may,
ultimately, enter these women” during intimate contact.
If this seems fanciful, note that the president of
Bayer’s Pharmaceuticals Division, Stefan Oelrich, admitted to “international
‘experts’ during a globalist health conference [in October 2021] that the mRNA COVID-19
shots are indeed ‘cell and gene therapy’ marketed as ‘vaccines’ to be palatable
to the public,” reported LifeSite last year.
Given this, that what’s not palatable now is
closeness with the “vaccinated” (genetically altered?) makes sense to many
Americans. To them, it’s not at all as fanciful as saying that the
“unvaccinated” shouldn’t be allowed to circulate in society because they
haven’t taken a preventative drug that doesn’t actually prevent a feared
disease’s transmission.
As for these women who “chose to remain
unvaccinated for a reason, mitigating any risk by eliminating candidates based
upon vaccine-status has become their new norm,” Wellington writes. This does
come with downsides, though; for one thing, men who were compelled to take the
gene therapy agents (GTAs) and are rejected in romance on that basis don’t take
it very well, avers Wellington.
“I have been called names for stating that the
vaccine is a dealbreaker for me,” the writer quotes one Anika Janis as saying.
“For these women, there is simply not enough
information about the vaccine or its effects to warrant consideration,”
explains Wellington. “No one knows the ramifications or what is to come for
those who took the vaccine.”
This is entirely realistic. Our medical
establishment sold the public the GTAs under false pretenses, making bold
claims about their efficacy that fell flat; in fact, these same pseudo-elites
mishandled the Covid situation in every way and then lied at every turn.
Wellington mentions this, stating that for the
women in question, “science ‘speaking to the efficacy of the Covid-19 vaccines’
does little to remove the fear associated with what they are observing all
around them simply because ‘no one knows who to trust anymore.’”
They’re far from alone, too. Wellington states that
many GTA-free parents are cautioning their children about dating the
GTA-saddled, and some single men are also balking. And several GTA-free married
women “have noted to me that ‘divorce has been become an option’ if their
husbands buckled to the pressure of being vaccinated,” Wellington further
informs.
What’s more, some people are concerned about
“vaccinated blood” (even if they aren’t Count Dracula). As Moa Refm, another
woman quoted by Wellington, put it, “Unfortunately the blood supply is
contaminated too, so no blood transfusions.”
Wellington concedes that some of these people’s
positions may soften with time. “But many say ‘No,’ she relates, “citing
differing vaccination statuses and ‘overall perspectives between vaccinated and
unvaccinated’ being just too great.” And, really, it’s these social concerns
more than the health ones (which some consider a stretch) that are most
relevant.
As a Kathy McPherson put it, relates Wellington,
“It (the vaccine) says a lot about who these men are at the core, including
their level of awareness and definition of life.”
It certainly does, generally speaking — just as
wearing a mask while alone outside or in your car speaks
volumes.
Wellington’s claims were seconded by commenters
under her article. “Dorothy Todd” said that she would also refuse a blood
transfusion over GTA concerns. “Curt” weighed in on the character issue,
writing, “The damaged blood is one thing, living with a coward is another thing
altogether.” “Neil Timmerman” opined likewise. You can “add me to your tally of
people who prefer not [to] date the “vaxxed,” he wrote. “They have proven to have
bad judgement.”
There was mockery, too — from the “other side.”
“Larry Svestka” wrote that being “unvaccinated is now like belonging to a
religion.” This is ironic since, speaking for many Branch COVIDians, New York
Governor Kathy Hochul proclaimed
last year that the GTAs are
“from God” and that we should all be her “apostles” and push the shots.
“Now, sonny, find yerself a nice Catholic girl with
no tattoos (and no purple hair or pierced eyebrow),” Svestka continued, “and
one who hasn’t put that demonic poison in her veins.”
Aside from being (inadvertent) great advice, this
comment reflects a divide Wellington addresses. “Who would have ever thought
that ‘vaccine status’ would become so central to cultivating new friendships
and love relationships for much of our nation?” she writes. “The divide is here
to stay because the damage that caused it has already been done. Nothing can
put that genie back in its bottle.”
Well, God can. But this would require that people
once again start putting Him before needles, government health gurus, and Big
Pharma fantasies.
Source: https://thenewamerican.com/a-shotno-date-the-vaccinated-as-the-new-lepers/
October 21, 2022
Unvaccinated Single Women Say 'No' To Vaccinated Single Men
By Laura J. Wellington
Ask any single woman about the ease of dating in today’s world and they will most certainly roll their eyes and groan. As a single woman myself, I can vouch for how tough the dating climate is for every one of us. But unvaccinated, single women now have it that much harder. The reason? The decision as to whether or not they will date vaccinated men is now on the table. And I can tell you first-hand, which has nothing to do with the viability of the candidates, themselves, as rich and interesting prospects, but rather “sex” to put it bluntly.
The overriding concern that the harmful effects of this vaccine may, ultimately, enter these women once the raincoat comes off.
As these women chose to remain unvaccinated for a reason, mitigating any risk by eliminating candidates based upon vaccine-status has become their new norm. Doing so isn’t without its issues, admittedly. Qualifying single men by such a standard makes the pool in which to select from additionally small, especially if one is living in a blue state. On top of that, plenty of single men don’t shine to the notion that they aren’t being considered simply because they decided to get vaccinated. Among the most disgruntled, hostile men tend to be those who succumbed to the vaccine by force. Feeling penalized twice over for a vaccine they never wanted to begin with, many of these men don’t handle these women’s rejection well.
Guilt, annoyance, diminishment, and just plain rudeness are known to occur in relation to these women’s decision to stay committed to their particular stance. “I have been called names for stating that the vaccine is a dealbreaker for me,” said Anika Janis.
For these women, there is simply not enough information about the vaccine or its effects to warrant consideration. No one knows the ramifications or what is to come for those who took the vaccine.
Where men might take being vetoed personally, women don’t see it that way. Women see it as an act of self-preservation and safety in the face of reality, given the nature of a large portion of men presently. Most will not want to keep that raincoat on for longer than absolutely necessary. With this in mind, until much, much more is uncovered about how this vaccine impacts lives, the decision ‘not to date’ vaccinated men remains steadfast for numerous unvaccinated women.
Although some may see these women’s extreme caution as being foolish, others point to the “intense criticism experienced, extreme pressure imposed by vaccine mandates, and the physical anomalies shared by outspoken vaccinated -- people no longer the picture of health after receiving the vaccine” to validate their decision. For these women, science ‘speaking to the efficacy of the
Covid-19 vaccines’ does little to remove the fear associated with what they are observing all around them simply because “no one knows who to trust anymore” in their opinion. That, in itself, is the only consistent truth these women feel that they can count on.
And if you think they are alone in this assertion, think again. Plenty of unvaccinated parents agree and are cautioning their teenage and adult children to adopt that same form of thinking when it comes to dating. Single, unvaccinated men are also following suit and running into the same issues as their single, unvaccinated, female counterparts. Calling themselves “Purebloods,” they too are only looking for unvaccinated partners to date. And even unvaccinated, married women have taken a stand with regards to their husbands’ decisions to take the vaccine or not. Several have noted to me that “divorce has been become an option” if their husbands buckled to the pressure of being vaccinated. All in all, the dilemma is resonating strongly across the unvaccinated board, beginning with single women.
As each person’s health is truly their own responsibility, the stance so many unvaccinated, single women are taking when contemplating future partners holds implications that span everything from ‘lost opportunity’ to ‘potentially moving to red states boasting larger pickings’ to the possibility of ‘remaining alone’ forever. That said, there is also the factor of time that may soften their positions. As more information comes out and more is understood, some of them may change their minds. But many say “No,” citing differing vaccination statuses and ‘overall perspectives between vaccinated and unvaccinated’ being just too great. The same holds true for blood transfusions, which they are also avoiding like the plague due to concerns over “vaccinated” blood being given to them.
“The Decision to Live. Unfortunately the blood supply is contaminated too, so no blood transfusions,” said Moa Refm.
“It (the vaccine) says a lot about who these men are at the core, including their level of awareness and definition of life,” said Kathy McPherson.
Fear over the exchange of bodily fluids (including saliva) combined with worries about the ramifications of shedding adds a further layer and deterrent beyond mere ejaculation. It isn’t one element alone that screams, “Stop,” rather many woven together -- all of which make complete sense in their particular view.
For now, dating for single, unvaccinated women has just become even more insufferable than before. Who would have ever thought that “vaccine status” would become so central to cultivating new friendships and love relationships for much of our nation? The divide is here to stay because the damage that caused it has already been done. Nothing can put that genie back in its bottle.
Laura J. Wellington is the founder of THREAD MB, author, award-winning children’s television creator, TEDx Speaker, and the founder of the ZNEEX app
Image: Pexels
