woensdag 30 november 2022

Hij komt, Hij komt en het is NIET Sint-Niklaas!

 Hij komt, Hij komt (*)

         De DIGITALE MUNT

Daar gaat, Daar gaat

         Onze PRIVACY en CASH GELD

Hij komt, Hij komt

         en BIG BROTHER klopt daar aan ons deurtje …

(*) vrij naar Sint-Niklaasliedje

 

      De digitale euro zou eraan komen, maar wat dan met cash geld? © Getty Images

Betekent de digitale euro het einde van cash geld? “Dit wordt een fundamentele verandering van ons financiële stelsel”

Europese centrale banken werken hard aan de invoering van de digitale euro, een nieuwe munt die evenveel waard zal zijn als de contante euro, maar dan in een aparte app of op een nieuwe betaalkaart. Nog voordat er een officieel plan is, roept dit heel wat vragen op. Moeten we met zijn allen overstappen naar een volledig ander betalingssysteem, en verdwijnt daarmee ons contant geld? “Het baart critici zorgen dat de code van een digitale munt programmeerbaar is.”

Tom van der Meer 30-11-22, 09:20 Laatste update: 10:17 Bron: AD

Een digitale euro, is dat wat anders dan mijn huidige geld?

Ja en nee. Het is net zoveel waard als de contante euro die nu in je portemonnee zit, of op je online rekening staat. Het verschil is alleen dat dit digitale geld wordt uitgegeven door de Europese Centrale Bank (ECB). Hoe precies, is nog onderdeel van discussie. Mogelijk krijg je een aparte app, of een nieuwe betaalkaart in de bestaande app van je bank, waarmee je bij alle Europese winkels en websites gemakkelijk kunt betalen.

Waarom wil Europa dit?

Europese centrale banken zijn enorm geschrokken toen Facebook (nu Meta) in 2019 een eigen online munt aankondigde: de Libra. Die plannen zijn alweer van tafel, maar de ECB is wakker en wil niet dat op de Europese geldmarkt een andere grote munt dan de euro rondgaat die de markt kan verstoren, van bijvoorbeeld techbedrijven of Amerikaanse creditcardmaatschappijen.

Terwijl er politiek nog niet eens een voorstel is gedaan, werken de ambtenaren van de ECB al volledige plannen uit. Dat roept argwaan op.

De ECB wil ook grip houden op commerciële banken, die kunnen omvallen bij een grote crisis. De digitale euro komt net als ons cashgeld van de ECB, die gedekt wordt door de staat en niet failliet kan.

Ook moet een digitale euro het overmaken van geld makkelijker maken. Bij ons kan dat al vlot met Payconiq, ook naar rekeningen van andere banken. Maar dat is nog niet overal in Europa zo.

Waarom is er bezwaar tegen de digitale euro?

Terwijl er politiek nog niet eens een voorstel is gedaan, werken de ambtenaren van de ECB al volledige plannen uit. Dat roept argwaan op. Ook banken zijn kritisch. De ECB heeft nu een controlerende rol, maar lijkt straks een deel van de sector te privatiseren en misschien zelfs een concurrent te worden. Digitaal expert Teunis Brosens van ING vindt de plannen te ver gaan. “Je kunt de afhankelijkheid van Mastercard ook verminderen zonder een eigen munt te introduceren.”

Ook baart het critici zorgen dat de code van een digitale munt programmeerbaar is. In het script zou kunnen worden beschreven wanneer en aan welke doelen het geld moet worden uitgegeven. De Nederlandse vicepremier en minister van Financiën Sigrid Kaag (nvdr.: Een Young Global Leader (YGL) die de plannen van The Great Reset van Klaus Schwab v/h WEF in Nederland mee helpt doorduwen nota bene ten koste van de eigen bevolking!) heeft al gezegd dat ze alleen akkoord gaat met een digitale munt ‘waarbij programmeerbaarheid uitgesloten kan worden’. (nvdr.: Het is nog maar de vraag in hoeverre men een YGL hierover kan geloven?)

Maar het grootste bezwaar zit ’m in de privacy?

Ja, mensen die nu contant geld gebruiken zijn volledig anoniem. Niemand weet aan wie je betaalt en hoeveel. De ECB hoopt met de digitale euro meer toezicht te kunnen houden op grote (criminele) uitgaven. Daarom wordt erover gedacht om een grens te stellen waaronder betalingsverkeer altijd anoniem is. Alleen de bedragen daarboven worden gecontroleerd. Maar, zegt Martijn Jeroen van der Linden, hoogleraar New Finance aan de Haagse Hogeschool: “Er worden bedragen genoemd van 50 tot 100 euro.” Veel te laag, volgens critici. Dan kan al worden geregistreerd als iemand naar de kapper gaat.

In algemene zin is cash het beste back-up-sys­teem, voor als alles een keer uitvalt.

Verdwijnt cash geld hiermee dan helemaal?

Dat is niet de bedoeling, de digitale euro moet een aanvulling worden, ook op de bestaande online bankrekening. “Cash blijft belangrijk en de overheid zet daarop in”, verzekerde minister Sigrid Kaag onlangs. (nvdr.: voorlopig althans, maar ik zou mijn hand daarvoor niet in het vuur durven steken)

Professor Van der Linden snapt dat banken af willen van het ‘onhandige’ contante geld. Maar overheden niet. “Ouderen en bijvoorbeeld blinden hebben dat nodig (nvdr.: ... en OOK intelligente burgers met VERSTAND!) . In algemene zin is cash het beste back-up-systeem, voor als alles een keer uitvalt.”

Wanneer gaat die digitale euro er dan komen?

De ECB is met nationale centrale banken al een jaar bezig met uitwerken van de plannen. Zij hebben haast: hoewel de Libra van Meta er niet komt, kloppen andere techbedrijven op de deur. Eind 2023 moet er een concreet plan liggen. Of hij er echt komt en hoe de munt dan werkt, is uiteindelijk aan de Europese politici. En dat is goed, vindt Teun Brosens van ING. “Want het gaat om een fundamentele verandering van ons financiële stelsel.”

------

 

Geldautomaten verdwijnen meer en meer uit het straatbeeld, Test Aankoop klaagt aan: "Probleem voor mensen die digitaal niet mee zijn"

30/11/22 om 18:59

Banken sluiten in een te hoog tempo kantoren en bankautomaten. Dat zegt onder meer Test Aankoop. Met twee andere partners vragen ze aan de regering om die sluitingen te bevriezen. "Banken snellen in hun digitale sprong de bevolking voorbij", zegt Simon November, woordvoerder van Test Aankoop in "De wereld vandaag".

    Geldautomaten verdwijnen meer en meer uit het straatbeeld, Test Aankoop klaagt aan: "Probleem voor mensen die digitaal niet mee zijn"© VRTNWS

Grote banken bieden steeds meer diensten online aan. En daardoor sluiten die heel wat bankkantoren en geldautomaten. Maar volgens Test Aankoop, Financité (een vzw voor meer digitale inclusie) en ouderenorganisatie Okra, doen ze dat in een te hoog tempo. Daarom vragen ze de regering om de sluiting van bankautomaten te bevriezen. 

Volgens Simon November van Test Aankoop vallen te veel mensen nu uit de boot: "Banken snellen de maatschappij voorbij. We kunnen er niet omheen dat ouderen en mensen die niet mee zijn met de digitale trends, vasthouden aan oude banktradities."

''Batopin schiet tekort''

Op plaatsen waar grote banken automaten sluiten, verschijnen nu Batopin-automaten. Batopin is een netwerk van automaten van de grote banken ING, KBC, Belfius en BNP Paribas. Met die fusie willen de banken toegang tot cash geld op een efficiëntere manier aanbieden.  

Maar volgens Test Aankoop schiet Batopin daarin tekort: "Batopin voorziet in zijn plannen een bankautomaat binnen een straal van vijf kilometer voor 95 procent van de bevolking. Maar in de kleine lettertjes staat dat het ook om vijf kilometer in vogelvlucht kan gaan. Bovendien betaal je in sommige gevallen ook al om geld af te halen in die automaten. Dat is nu al zo voor KBC-klanten die geld afhalen in Batopin-automaten. Die betalen 50 cent om aan hun eigen geld te kunnen. Dat is niet aanvaardbaar voor ons."

"We vragen dat de regering de sluiting van de bankautomaten bevriest. Dat er binnen het Batopin-project meer automaten worden voorzien en dat het afhalen van geld gratis blijft."

https://www.msn.com/nl-be/nieuws/other/geldautomaten-verdwijnen-meer-en-meer-uit-het-straatbeeld-test-aankoop-klaagt-aan-probleem-voor-mensen-die-digitaal-niet-mee-zijn/ar-AA14KtOX?cvid=d84784af9dd44909a35ef218a4d513a4


Bioboeren winnen strijd tegen OCMW en Fernand Huts

 



Bioboerderij De Vierklaver uit Lokeren krijgt gelijk: er was geen eerlijke concurrentie en de verkoopprijs komt neer op staatssteun.

In categorie 

·         agro-ecologie & Voedsel Anders

·         eerlijke-prijs

Het hof van beroep in Gent heeft dinsdag de zaak rond de verkoop van 72 percelen landbouwgrond aan Fernand Huts nietig verklaard. Een koppel bioboeren uit Lokeren had deze verkoop aangeklaagd, omdat zij geen echte kans hadden gekregen om een stukje landbouwgrond van het OCMW Gent te kopen. Justitie is hen daarin gevolgd. Bioboerin Annelies: "Hopelijk is dit een positief signaal voor lokale besturen om bij de verkoop van landbouwgronden ook stil te staan bij hun lokale voedselstrategie."


Het verhaal gaat terug tot in 2016. Toen besloot het Gentse OCMW om zo’n 450 hectare vruchtbare landbouwgrond in Zeeuws-Vlaanderen van de hand te doen om er onder andere een nieuw woon-zorgcentrum in de stad mee te kunnen bouwen. ‘Omwille van het gemak’ werden de meer dan 70 percelen in één lot aangeboden. Uiteindelijk kocht Bijloke BV, een investeringsmaatschappij van Fernand Huts, alle gronden voor 17,5 miljoen euro. 

De Belgische bioboer Pieter Van Poucke en zijn partner Annelies Marchand verzetten zich echter tegen de verkoop. Door de Gentse beslissing om alles als één lot te zien, maakten lokale boeren zoals zij geen enkele kans meer om te bieden.  Een deel van de gronden, tussen Zelzate en Sas-van-Gent ligt op 17 kilometer van hun bedrijf. “Dat was ideaal voor hem om zijn bedrijf uit te breiden”, licht hun advocaat Nic Reynaert toe. 

Verkoop toch ongeldig

Het hof van beroep in Gent oordeelde dat het OCMW van Gent een fout heeft gemaakt. “De fout van het OCMW Gent bestaat erin dat zij aan Bijloke BV op onwettige wijze een voordeel heeft verleend die deze laatste onder normale marktvoorwaarden niet had kunnen krijgen”, oordeelde het hof in zijn arrest, waarop het de verkoop van de gronden nietig verklaarde.

De rechtbank viel ook vooral over de prijs die Huts heeft moeten betalen. Die prijs was namelijk een pak lager dan de eerder geschatte waarden van de gronden. Volgens Nic Reynaert, advocaat van de bioboeren, was die op 22,5 miljoen euro geschat. “Dat is dus een reële staatssteun van 5 miljoen euro”, zegt hij.

"Lokale besturen moeten nadenken over een strategie voor landbouwgrond, en die niet zomaar aan investeerders geven die er alleen maar winst mee willen maken, onrechtstreeks op kap van de boeren."

Signaal voor lokale besturen

Bioboeren Annelies en Pieter hopen dat het arrest een duidelijk signaal geeft aan de lokale besturen. Dat er bij een nieuwe verkoop van de gronden duurzaamheidscriteria gehanteerd zullen worden. Dat het geen zuivere financiële operatie is, maar dat de stad Gent onder meer haar eigen voedselstrategie in het achterhoofd houdt. “Ze moeten nadenken over een strategie voor landbouwgrond, en die niet zomaar aan investeerders geven die er alleen maar winst mee willen maken, onrechtstreeks op kap van de boeren.”

De rechtszaak werd met veel interesse gevolgd door actievoerders die zich onder meer inzetten voor agro-ecologische landbouw. Ze hopen dat deze overwinning nu een maatschappelijke discussie los maakt over de beschikbaarheid van landbouwgrond. Boeren ondervinden steeds meer problemen om goede grond te vinden, omdat ze wel vaker moeten opboksen tegen kapitaalkrachtige speculanten.

Bron: Vilt & De Standaard

BRON: https://biomijnnatuur.be/nieuws/bioboeren-winnen-strijd-tegen-ocmw-en-huts

Duitse professor vertelt de waarheid over COVID-19 ‘vaccin’ terwijl de interviewer naar hem zwaait om te stoppen

augustus 7, 2021

2084915

De Franse site Qactus heeft een korte video waarop ene Professor Klaus Stohr te zien is die onlangs op de Duitse tv aan het woord is en een beetje te eerlijk is over de vaccins. Wanneer hij uitlegt dat kinderen meer risico lopen door het vaccin dan door de ziekte zelf, hoor je een kreun van de interviewer, die naar hem begint te zwaaien om te stoppen.

Een schrijnende herinnering aan hoe laag onze media en regeringen zijn gezonken.

Video on: https://www.frontnieuws.com/duitse-professor-vertelt-de-waarheid-over-covid-19-vaccin-terwijl-de-interviewer-naar-hem-zwaait-om-te-stoppen/


Copyright © 2021 door Frontnieuws

https://www.frontnieuws.com/duitse-professor-vertelt-de-waarheid-over-covid-19-vaccin-terwijl-de-interviewer-naar-hem-zwaait-om-te-stoppen/


dinsdag 29 november 2022

We Will Be Sacrificed for Global Standardization of Systems

 Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked

 

November 29, 2022

                 Video Link: https://youtu.be/3PrY7nFbwAY

 

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

·    Agenda 21 (Agenda for the 21st Century) is the inventory and control plan for all land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information, education and all human beings in the world

·    This roadmap for global totalitarianism was agreed to by 179 nations, including the U.S., at the 1992 Sustainable Development conference in Brazil

·    We’ve seen various facets of Agenda 21 being implemented throughout the last three years, under the cover of biosecurity and the global COVID-19 pandemic. The Green New Deal (Green Agenda), “Build Back Better,” the Fourth Industrial Revolution (the transhumanist movement) and The Great Reset all further and facilitate the implementation of Agenda 21

·    Agenda 21 is based on the ideology of “communitarianism,” which argues that “an individual’s rights should be balanced against rights of the community.” Community, however, in the mind of the globalists, is made up of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), corporations and government, which are to dictate what happens around the world. The people are not really part of the equation

·    “Sustainable development” is NOT about recycling or making sure there’s enough food and resources for everyone. It’s about moving populations from rural and suburban areas into concentrated city centers where they and their use of resources can be monitored and controlled

 

The video above features the late Rosa Koire, former executive director of the Post Sustainability Institute and Democrats Against UN Agenda 21,1 and author of "Behind the Green Mask: UN Agenda 21." She spent the decade before her untimely death researching and educating people about public policies intended to strip us of our individual rights.

Before taking up that fight, she was a district branch chief at the California Department of Transportation for nearly three decades. Koire passed away from a pulmonary embolism and metastatic lung cancer at the end of May 2021.

In the video above, Koire exposes the real agenda of the United Nations Agenda 21, which was laid out during a Sustainable Development conference in June 1992.

Documentation2,3 from this conference can be downloaded in multiple languages from the UN's Sustainable Development Goals page4 and the UN's digital library.5 Koire's many interviews and lectures on this topic can be found on DemocratsAgainstUNAgenda21.com.6


Agenda 21 Is Globalization on Steroids

Koire was adamant that Agenda 21 (aka Agenda for the 21st Century) was the most crucial topic of our time, as it is:

"The inventory and control plan for all land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, food, energy, information — and all human beings in the world."

This roadmap for global control and domination — global totalitarianism — was agreed to by 179 nations at the 1992 Sustainable Development conference in Brazil. Were Koire alive today, at the end of 2022, there's no doubt she would have warned us all that Agenda 21 was now in the final implementation stages.

We've seen various facets of Agenda 21 being implemented throughout the last three years, under the cover of biosecurity and the global COVID-19 pandemic. The Green New Deal (Green Agenda), "Build Back Better," the Fourth Industrial Revolution7 (the transhumanist movement) and The Great Reset, officially introduced by World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab and then-Prince Charles in June 20208 — these all exist to further and facilitate the implementation of Agenda 21.

What Is 'Sustainable Development' Really?

As noted by Koire, most people are under the illusion that "sustainable development" is about things like recycling and making sure there's enough food and resources for an ever-expanding population. But no, that's NOT what it's actually about. "It's about moving populations into concentrated city centers and clearing them out of rural areas," Koire says.

It's also a plan for robbing the lower and middle classes of their wealth and turning the global population into slaves under a digital dictatorship where all resources are controlled from the top. It's globalization on steroids, and the greater the globalization, the fewer individual rights can exist.

October 24, 2022, former Prime Minister of England, Margaret Thatcher, tweeted the following warning:9 "When the state does everything for you, it will soon take everything from you — you will then have no basis for personal freedom, political freedom, or economic freedom."

'Community' Is Not What You Think It Is

As explained by Koire, Agenda 21 is based on the ideology of "communitarianism," which argues that "an individual's rights should be balanced against rights of the community."

We may agree with this, at least in part, because we think of "community" as something that we're part of and have a responsibility to. However, "community" in the mind of the globalists is a construct made up of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), corporations and government, which are to dictate what happens around the world.

"We, as individuals, have literally no influence, unless we are in agreement with it," Koire says. "If you dissent against 'the community' [i.e., NGOs, corporations and government], against communitarian law or communitarian social tactics, you are rejected and basically made an outcast."

So, to be clear, Agenda 21 and The Great Reset are based on an ideology that says individual rights must be balanced against the rights of NGOs, private corporations and governments. The word "balanced" is misleading, however, because "the community" is the decision-maker. Your only option is to submit to their rule or be expunged from society.

Attempt at Preventing Local Agenda 21 Implementation Failed

In 2013, Koire's organization, the Post Sustainability Institute, sued to stop the Agenda 21 takeover of San Francisco, California. As reported by Off the Grid News at the time:10

"In the United States, more than 500 major- and moderate-sized cities are members of an international sustainability organization that reportedly supports the implementation of Agenda 21. A group known as the Post Sustainability Institute recently filed a lawsuit to stop a project, Plan Bay Area, which is a San Francisco-area long-range transportation and land-use/housing strategy that has a finish target of 2040.

According to the Plan Bay Area website, the goal is to 'accommodate future population growth and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from cars and light trucks.' That is done by building neighborhoods that are 'within walking distance of frequent transit service' and that offer 'a wide variety of housing options' and feature grocery stores, community centers, and restaurants."

In the video, Koire explains what the Bay Area Plan is really trying to achieve. According to that plan, any future development in the San Francisco Bay area will be restricted to just 4% of the available land. All 101 cities and counties will be joined together, and all land use decisions will be made by an unelected board.

The ramifications this will have on land use, property values, businesses and the forced movement of people is "unfathomable," Koire says. She likens it to a "concentration camp of the future," where water and energy usage is monitored and restricted, and where access to nature and the land outside the city is denied. Sadly, after three years, they lost the case and the Bay Area Agenda 21 plan is still on track.11

The Importance of Taking Back Control Locally

Stopping the local adoption and implementation of Agenda 21 is a crucial tactic because, as she explains, "regionalization is the stepping stone to globalization, and globalization is the standardization of global systems."

Unless systems are synchronized to work together, they cannot be centrally controlled. This is also what The Great Reset is all about — the harmonization and synchronization of systems, globally, to allow for central control of the whole world. The Great Reset is Agenda 21 under a different name.

And again, the global systems we're talking about include the use of land, water, minerals, plants, animals and humans. It includes all types of construction, means of production, food, energy, information systems and education. ALL systems of the world are to be "harmonized" and brought under the control of a central entity.

Unless systems are synchronized to work together, they cannot be centrally controlled. This is also what The Great Reset is all about — the harmonization and synchronization of systems, globally, to allow for central control of the whole world. The Great Reset is Agenda 21 under a different name.

As noted by Koire, "The goal of Agenda 21 is one world government and total control from a central unit," and the plan is being rolled out under the false premise that we have to implement all these changes in order to stop climate change.

Agenda 21 Goals Summarized

In summary, the goals of Agenda 21 and The Great Reset are to:

Move ALL people into large cities where they can be easily controlled — The Great Reset plan is more specific, as it calls for people living in smart cities under 24/7 surveillance. The Fourth Industrial revolution adds another layer, as it calls for the merger of man with technology, so surveillance and control will occur down to the biological, mental and emotional levels.

Destroy representative government and instead have unelected boards make all the decisions.

Erase jurisdictional boundaries and national borders through regionalization (the European Union is an example of regionalization), and fascism, i.e., public-private partnerships — Public-private partnerships, or partnerships between corporations and government, cut voters out of the equation.

The "fascist community" (recalling the definition of both terms) want to be able to a) freely move workers across borders, b) freely move goods without regulations, and c) reduce wages. The easiest way to do all of that is to remove national borders.

The Three Pillars of Agenda 21

As explained by Koire, the three pillars of Agenda 21 are the three "E's":

1.     Economy

2.     Ecology

3.     Equity (social equity)

As with the term "community," most imagine they understand what the word "equity" means. They think it means there will be fair distribution of food, water, energy and so on. They think it's about lessening the disparities between the rich and the poor. But again, they're wrong.

Social equity involves "impoverishing huge portions of the population and bringing down developed nations," Koire explains, adding, "Social equity is code for this movement [of people and goods] and reduction of the population."

The three pillars, viewed as interconnected circles, are presented as the three areas that need to be balanced. But the "balance" spoken of is a communitarian balance. It's not balance for the well-being of the people. The balanced center point is the area of centralized control, so that corporations and governments can exploit and control the people at will.

How to Fight Back

While we are moving toward a centralized totalitarian one world government, we are not there yet. We still have the ability to push back, by:

·         Refusing to cooperate with the rollout and implementation of Agenda 21 items, tyrannical overreaches and surveillance/control tools such as digital identity and programmable central bank digital currencies (CBDCs)

·         Widely exposing and discussing the totalitarian plan

·         Working together to defund these plans, especially local Agenda 21 plans

·         Helping your children understand that they're being indoctrinated, from kindergarten through graduate school, to embrace and support their own demise

·         Standing up for personal rights and freedoms

Leadership Are Following a Script

Have you wondered why no one — with very few exceptions — in government, either locally or on the state or federal level, has apologized for any of their pandemic "mistakes"? Time and again, their assertions and promises have been proven wrong, yet no apologies have been forthcoming.12,13

Most are simply continuing as if none of their false statements and poor judgments ever happened. The reason they won't admit that anything that happened during the pandemic was a mistake is because they knew it was all a lie from the start.

They were given a script and they followed that script. End of story. The script never made sense because it was a made-up narrative. Nothing was based on actual fact or real-world events. The script was created to give the illusion that the measures were necessary. In reality, the pandemic measures were a cover to push us into Agenda 21 and The Great Reset.

As the global systems are now falling apart due to those measures, the same villains are rolling out another narrative, another script, that says they'll fix it. They'll "build back better" and make everything equitable and green in the process. COVID was always about ushering in global totalitarianism.

The fly in the ointment was the fact that COVID was never as fatal as they tried to make it out to be and, over time, reality overtook the false narrative. Massive pushback against vaccine passports also hampered the takeover process, and now, Pfizer officials have driven the final nail into the coffin by admitting the COVID shots were never tested to see if they actually stopped infection and transmission, which was the sole basis for the passports.

Without the biosecurity justification, they're back to pushing for digital identity, which was the next step in the digital enslavement process, but now large swaths of the population have caught on and know what they're up to.

For example, well before the new Prime Minister of England, Rishi Sunak, took office, The National Pulse was reporting on his direct connections to a World Economic Forum partner company that pushes digital IDs and social credit scores.14 These kinks were perhaps divine intervention to prevent the whole world from falling into the trap.

The Administrative State Is a Major Part of the Problem

While many have hitched their hopes to a political change of guard, what most forget, or fail to understand, is that elected officials have nowhere near the power we expect them to have. As explained by The Epoch Times, the real power actually lies with the unelected administrators. That's where the real cleanout needs to occur:15

"It's rather obvious now that we're dealing with a beast that includes media, technology, nonprofits, and multinational and international government agencies and all the groups they represent.

That said, let's deal here with the most obvious problem: the administrative state ... [E]lected politicians are outnumbered and outwitted on all sides, only pretending to be in charge when, in fact, the actual affairs of state are managed by experienced professionals with permanent positions ...

[J]ust as the stakes are high, so, too, the problem of implementing a solution — representative democracy as a means to reobtain liberty itself — is also exceedingly difficult ... Indeed, the entire system seems rigged against change.

It starts with the permanent staff on Capitol Hill. It's a tribe. They move from office to office. They all know each other and also the permanent staff of the bureaucracies who serve Congress, and they, in turn, have close relations with the permanent staff of the executive bureaucracies, who, in turn, have close relationships with the media and the corporate executives lobbying the member of Congress.

The naive people, no matter how well intended, are quickly surrounded. This is essentially what happened to Donald Trump. He figured that as president, he would be like a CEO, not just of all of government, but the whole country. Within months, he was shown otherwise ...

This is precisely why there needs to be a focus as never before on the problem of the administrative state. It has to be penetrated and taken apart piece by piece.

That will involve not only constant investigations, but also courageous bills that seek not cuts but full-on defunding of whole agencies, one after another. That's what it will require to make genuine change ...

In the end, what's more powerful than political changes and even election upheavals, which too often fail through subversion, are dramatic shifts in public opinion.

Every institution ultimately bends to that, which is why research, education, great journalism, and competent media outlets, plus friendship networks and community organizing, might actually be more foundational than elections. All of this has begun and it's growing. Therein lies the real hope."

Realize Where Your True Power Lies

Regardless of which party holds the power, please realize that your power as an individual lies in your own personal day-to-day decisions. Politicians say what is necessary to get elected, based on the polling of talking points. A politician's public talking points constantly "evolve" and are rarely consistent with their actions that benefit their corporate sponsors.

Also realize that creating divisiveness among people is part of a carefully orchestrated plan that works in the oligarchy's favor, so we really need to get smarter about how we engage in the political process and avoid falling for their carefully constructed and sophisticated strategies that limit us from achieving the changes we want and desperately need.

As long as we're at each other's throats, it distracts us from analyzing and addressing the underlying system that is creating the problems in the first place. So, let people have their opinion. Ultimately, controlling interests are writing the laws and paying the politicians to pass them. But knowledge is power, so use your knowledge to take control where it actually matters the most — locally.

The power of the individual is alive and well even in this deeply flawed system. It becomes yours by stepping OUTSIDE of the system with every decision and purchase you make. With every action you take, you also set the example for others to follow, thereby making you a change-agent within your own small circle of family, friends and acquaintances.

In the end, our collective actions will create the changes that are so desperately needed, and thinking locally will eventually have a global effect.

Remember, the industries that are currently buying our politicians and writing their own laws cannot maintain power without your ongoing financial support. While we may not have a significant choice in how our tax contributions are distributed to these industries through subsidies and contracts, we do have a very powerful influence by making responsible purchases each and every day.

Withdraw that support and you automatically redistribute financial power to a benevolent business aligned with your core principles. A perfect example of this is when you buy locally-grown foods from an organic farmer.

You're empowering that farmer to continue growing foods for the community that support environmental regeneration and human health, and you're disempowering the big junk food manufacturers that wield undue influence over agricultural policy. This is where your true power lies.


Food Independence Is the Key to Other Forms of Independence

It's time to dissent, to step out of the globalist and federalist systems, starting with your food. If you cannot grow your own, then get to know the farmer that can. Keep your money in your community; the closer the better. Kissinger said it best:16

"Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people."

If you don't like the state of the nation (or the world), stop eating processed and ultraprocessed junk foods. Some may initially think this decision would have nothing to do with anything that is wrong in the world, but if you really give it some thought, you'll realize that the more independence you gain with your food, the more independence you will create in other areas as well.

Because food is such a potent form of control, breaking that control mechanism will have a ripple effect that extends outward into many other industries and fields of activity, including the political arena.

As we move into 2023 and beyond, local food security will be more important than ever, as worldwide food shortages and famine are at our doorstep. So, prepare. If you don't, many of your options will be eliminated, as you'll be forced to accept the globalists standardization of the food system or starve.



- Sources and References

·         1, 6 Democrats Against UN Agenda 21

·         2 UN Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janerio, Brazil, June 3-14, 1992, Agenda 21 (PDF)

·         3 Report UN Conference on Environment and Development Volume 1, Resolutions Adopted June 1992 (PDF)

·         4 UN Sustainable Development Goals

·         5 UN Digital Library Report UN Conference on Environment and Development, Volume 2, Proceedings of the Conference

·         7 We Forum January 14, 2016

·         8 We Forum June 4, 2020

·         9 Twitter Margaret Thatcher October 24, 2022

·         10 Off the Grid News

·         11 Democrats Against UN Agenda 21 Appeal Update

·         12 Twitter Polimath October 23, 2022

·         13 Brownstone Institute October 23, 2022

·         14 The National Pulse July 16, 2022

·         15 Epoch Times October 23, 2022 (Archived)

·         16 Investmentwatchblog.com June 20, 2012

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/11/29/global-standardization-of-systems.aspx?ui=07ba04847d3da606336f089f0969627d79f1e004acb37b25456d0c6b44805309&sd=20210406&cid_source=wnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art4HL&cid=20221128Z2_NB&cid=DM1292523&bid=1655540918

Je staat er mee op en je gaat ermee naar bed

  vrijdag, 15 november 2024 09:08 Je vraagt je soms af of de mensheid ooit onder ogen wil zien wat de covid-19 ‘vaccins’ aan werkelijke scha...