Halt All Covid-19 Mass Vaccination Immediately (Open Letter to the WHO) — Vaccine Research Expert
https://dryburgh.com/geert-vanden-bossche-open-letter-to-who-halt-all-covid-19-mass-vaccination/
Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD
Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM, is a
vaccine research expert. He has a long list of companies and organizations
he’s worked with on vaccine discovery and preclinical research, including GSK,
Novartis, Solvay Biologicals, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Dr
Vanden Bossche also coordinated the Ebola vaccine program at GAVI (Global
Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization).
He is
board-certified in Virology and Microbiology, the author of over 30
publications, and inventor of a patent application for universal vaccines. He
currently works as an independent vaccine research consultant.
MARCH 6, 2021
“One could only think of
very few other strategies to achieve the same level of efficiency in turning a
relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction.”
GEERT VANDEN BOSSCH
Vaccine Research Expert
We’re Risking
Creating a Global, “Uncontrollable Monster”
Dr Bossche
believes that vaccinologists, clinicians, and scientists are only focusing on
short-term results at the individual level and not the consequences at the
global population level, which he believes will soon become evident. Evident in
the form of having transformed “a quite harmless virus into an
uncontrollable monster”.
His concern
rests on ‘immune escape’. For those needing an quick introduction to the topic,
read Jemma
Moran’s article Mutant variations and the danger of lockdowns.
For those needing a sweeping overview of our immunology, watch Ivor Cummins interview Creon Levit, Ep81 The Amazing Immunology of our Viral Issue – Incredible Science at Work! Many physicians would also benefit from watching this (note: the average physician receives exceptionally little training in immunology and virology). Those wishing to dig deeper into immunology in general, read for example, Roitt’s Essential Immunology, Thirteenth Edition.
Bossche states
that the multiple emerging, “much more infectious” viral variants, are already
examples of “immune escape” from our ‘innate immunity’, and were most-likely
created by the government interventions themselves; the so-called
Non-Pharmacological Interventions (NPIs) – i.e. lockdowns and cloth facial
coverings. Unofficially, but also more aptly known as the Non-Scientific
Interventions.
He believes
that:
Ongoing mass
vaccination deployments are “highly-likely to further enhance ‘adaptive’ immune
escape as none of the current vaccines will prevent replication/transmission of
viral variants”
·
As such, “The more we use these vaccines for
immunizing people in the midst of a pandemic, the more infectious the virus
will become”.
·
And “With increasing infectiousness comes an
increased likelihood of viral resistance to the vaccines”.
He claims his
beliefs are basic principles taught in a student’s first vaccinology class –
“One shouldn’t use a prophylactic vaccine in populations exposed to high
infectious pressure (which is now certainly the case as multiple highly
infectious variants are currently circulating”).
He states that
to “fully escape”, the highly mutable virus, “only needs to add another few
mutations in its receptor-binding domain”.
People Stand to
Lose their Natural ‘Innate’ Immunity as a Consequence of the Meddling
His real worry
though, or as he puts it, “beyond worried”, is that the humankind may severely damage
it’s own, natural ‘innate’ immunity, because of the mass
deployment of vaccination programs at this critical juncture. Our ‘innate’
immunity would be lost (a rich, variant-nonspecific, form of natural immunity).
It would also
mean that vaccine-mediated protection would be lost.
All whilst new, more dangerous variants would be getting actively breed by mankind. In effect, “turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction”.
Further
Pre-Notes
Vanden Bossche
– Vaccine Summit Ohio, March 2nd), keynote slides PDF, ‘Why should
current Covid-19 vaccines not be used for mass vaccination during a pandemic?’
·
Vanden Bossche – ‘We must halt all ongoing Covid-19
mass vaccination campaigns as a temporary health benefit to the most vulnerable
groups does not justify a public health disaster of international concern’,
summary of the manuscript PDF, February
26th. Note “In our naïve and simplistic attempt to prevent the pandemic from
running its natural course, we are in fact providing the beast with an even
much better opportunity to escape host immunity than natural infection does.”
Below is his
open letter to the WHO, issued March 6th, 2021. I’ve only added more paragraph
breaks and blue highlights, to help others be able to process faster.
A PDF
version is available.
Telegram
Open Letter to
the WHO: Immediately Halt All Covid-19 Mass Vaccinations
Geert Vanden
Bossche, DMV, PhD, independent virologist and vaccine expert,
formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
To all
authorities, scientists and experts around the world, to whom this concerns:
the entre world population.
I am all but an
antivaxxer. As a scientist I do not usually appeal to any platform of this kind
to make a stand on vaccine-related topics. As a dedicated virologist and
vaccine expert I only make an exception when health authorities allow vaccines
to be administered in ways that threaten public health, most certainly when
scientific evidence is being ignored.
The present
extremely critical situation forces me to spread this emergency call. As
the unprecedented extent of human intervention in the Covid-19pandemic is now
at risk of resulting in a global catastrophe without equal, this call cannot
sound loudly and strongly enough.
As stated, I am
not against vaccination. On the contrary, I can assure you that each of the
current vaccines have been designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant
and competent scientists. However, this type of prophylactic vaccines are
completely inappropriate, and even highly dangerous, when used in mass
vaccination campaigns during a viral pandemic.
Vaccinologists,
scientists and clinicians are blinded by the positive short-term effects in
individual patents, but don’t seem to bother about the disastrous consequences
for global health. Unless I am scientifically proven wrong, it is
difficult to understand how current human interventions will prevent
circulating variants from turning into a wild monster.
Racing against
the clock, I am completing
my scientific manuscript, the publication of which is, unfortunately,
likely to come too late given the ever increasing threat from rapidly
spreading, highly infectious variants. This is why I decided to already post a
summary of my findings as well as my keynote speech at the recent Vaccine
Summit in Ohio on LinkedIn.
Last Monday, I
provided international health organizations, including the WHO, with my
analysis of the current pandemic as based on scientifically informed insights
in the immune biology of Covid-19. Given the level of emergency, I urged them
to consider my concerns and to initiate a debate on the detrimental
consequences of further ‘viral immune escape’.
For those who
are no experts in this field, I am attaching below a more accessible and
comprehensible version of the science behind this insidious phenomenon.
While there
is no time to spare, I have not received any feedback thus far. Experts
and politicians have remained silent while obviously still eager to talk about
relaxing infection prevention rules and ‘springtime freedom’. My statements are
based on nothing else but science. They shall only be contradicted by science.
While one can
barely make any incorrect scientific statements without being criticized by
peers, it seems like the elite of scientists who are currently advising
our world leaders prefer to stay silent. Sufficient scientific evidence
has been brought to the table.
Unfortunately,
it remains untouched by those who have the power to act. How long can one
ignore the problem when there is at present massive evidence that viral immune
escape is now threatening humanity? We can hardly say we didn’t know – or
were not warned.
In this
agonizing letter I put all of my reputation and credibility at
stake. I expect from you, guardians of mankind, at least the same. It is
of utmost urgency. Do open the debate. By all means: turn the tide!
Why mass
vaccination amidst a pandemic creates an irrepressible monster
THE key
question is: why does nobody seem to bother about viral immune
escape? Let me try to explain this by means of a more easily understood
phenomenon: Antimicrobial resistance. One can easily extrapolate this scourge
to resistance to our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics’. Indeed, antibodies
(Abs) produced by our own immune system can be considered self-made antiviral
antibiotics, regardless of whether they are part of our innate immune system
(so-called ‘natural’ Abs’) or elicited in response to specific pathogens
(resulting in so-called ‘acquired’ Abs).
Natural Abs are
not germ-specific whereas acquired Abs are specifically directed at the
invading pathogen. At birth, our innate immune system is ‘unexperienced’
but well-established. It protects us from a multitude of pathogens,
thereby preventing these pathogens from causing disease.
As the innate
immune system cannot remember the pathogens it encountered (innate immunity has
no so-called ‘immunological memory’), we can only continue to rely on it
provided we keep it ‘trained’ well enough.
Training is
achieved by regular exposure to a myriad of environmental agents, including
pathogens. However, as we age, we will increasingly face situations where
our innate immunity (often called ‘the first line of immune defense’) is not
strong enough to halt the pathogen at the portal of entry (mostly mucosal
barriers like respiratory or intestinal epithelia).
When this
happens, the immune system has to rely on more specialized effectors of our
immune system (i.e., antigen-specific Abs and T cells) to fight the pathogen.
So, as we grow up, we increasingly mount pathogen-specific immunity, including
highly specific Abs. As those have stronger affinity for the pathogen (e.g.,
virus) and can reach high concentrations, they can quite easily outcompete our
natural Abs for binding to the pathogen/virus.
It is precisely
this type of highly specific, high affinity Abs that current Covid-19 vaccines
are inducing. Of course, the noble purpose of these Abs is to protect us
against Covid-19. So, why then should there be a major concern
using these vaccines to fight Covid-19?
Well, similar
to the rules applying to classical antimicrobial antibiotics, it is paramount
that our self-made ‘antiviral antibiotics’ are made available in sufficient
concentration and are tailored at the specific features of our enemy.
This is why in
case of bacterial disease it is critical to not only chose the right type of
antibiotic (based on the results from an antibiogram) but to also take the
antibiotic for long enough (according to the prescription).
Failure to
comply with these requirements is at risk of granting microbes a chance to
survive and hence, may cause the disease to fare up. A very similar mechanism
may also apply to viruses, especially to viruses that can easily and rapidly
mutate (which is, for example, the case with Coronaviruses); when the pressure
exerted by the army’s (read: population’s) immune defense starts to threaten
viral replication and transmission, the virus will take on another coat so
that it can no longer be easily recognized and, therefore, attacked by the host
immune system. The virus is now able to escape immunity (so-called: ‘immune
escape’).
However, the
virus can only rely on this strategy provided it still has room enough to
replicate. Viruses, in contrast to the majority of bacteria, must rely on
living host cells to replicate. This is why the occurrence of ‘escape mutants’
isn’t too worrisome as long as the likelihood for these variants to rapidly
find another host is quite remote. However, that’s not particularly the
case during a viral pandemic!
During a
pandemic, the virus is spreading all over the globe with many subjects shedding
and transmitting the virus (even including asymptomatic ‘carriers’). The higher
the viral load, the higher the likelihood for the virus to bump into subjects
who haven’t been infected yet or who were infected but didn’t develop symptoms.
Unless they are sufficiently protected by their innate immune defense (through
natural Abs), they will catch Covid-19 disease as they cannot rely on other,
i.e., acquired Abs.
It has been
extensively reported, indeed, that the increase in S (spike)-specific Abs in
asymptomatically infected people is rather limited and only short-lived.
Furthermore, these Abs have not achieved full maturity.
The combination
of viral infection on a background of suboptimal Ab maturity and concentration
enables the virus to select mutations allowing it to escape the immune
pressure. The selection of those mutations preferably occurs in the S protein
as this is the viral protein that is responsible for viral infectiousness.
As the selected
mutations endow the virus with increased infectious capacity, it now becomes
much easier for the virus to cause severe disease in infected subjects. The
more people develop symptomatic disease, the better the virus can secure its
propagation and perpetuation (people who get severe disease will shed more
virus and for a longer period of time than asymptomatically infected subjects
do).
Unfortunately,
enough, the short-lived rise in S-specific Abs does, however, surface to
bypass people’s innate/natural Ab. Those are put out of business as their
affinity for S is lower than the affinity of S-specific Abs. This is to say
that with an increasing rate of infection in the population, the number of
subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary increase in S-specific
Abs will steadily increase.
Consequently,
the number of subjects who get infected while experiencing a momentary decrease
in their innate immunity will increase. As a result, a steadily increasing
number of subjects will become more susceptible to getting severe disease
instead of showing only mild symptoms (i.e., limited to the upper
respiratory tract) or no symptoms at all.
During a
pandemic, especially youngsters will be affected by this evolution as their
natural Abs are not yet largely suppressed by a panoply of ‘acquired’,
antigen-specific Abs. Natural Abs, and natural immunity in general, play a
critical role in protecting us from pathogens as they constitute our first line
of immune defense. In contrast to acquired immunity, innate immune
responses protect against a large spectrum of pathogens (so don’t compromise or
sacrifice your innate immune defense!).
Because natural
Abs and innate immune cells recognize a diversified spectrum of foreign (i.e.,
non-self) agents (only some of which have pathogenic potential), it’s
important, indeed, to keep it sufficiently exposed to environmental challenges.
By keeping the
innate immune system (which, unfortunately, has no memory!) TRAINED, we
can much more easily resist germs which have real pathogenic potential. It has,
for example, been reported and scientifically proven that exposure to other,
quite harmless Coronaviruses causing a ‘common cold ’ can provide protection,
although short-lived, against Covid-19 and its loyal henchmen (i.e., the more
infectious variants).
Suppression of
innate immunity, especially in the younger age groups, can, therefore, become
very problematic. There can be no doubt that lack of exposure due to stringent
containment measures implemented as of the beginning of the pandemic has not
been beneficial to keeping people’s innate immune system well trained.
As if this was
not already heavily compromising innate immune defense in this population
segment, there comes yet another force into play that will dramatically
enhance morbidity and mortality rates in the younger age groups: MASS
VACCINATION of the ELDERLY.
The more
extensively the later age group will be vaccinated and hence, protected, the
more the virus is forced to continue causing disease in younger age groups.
This is only
going to be possible provided it escapes to the S-specific Abs that are
momentarily raised in previously asymptomatically infected subjects. If the
virus manages to do so, it can benefit from the (momentarily) suppressed innate
immunity, thereby causing disease in an increasing number of these subjects and
ensuring its own propagation.
Selecting
targeted mutations in the S protein is, therefore, the way to go in order for
the virus to enhance its infectiousness in candidates that are prone to getting
the disease because of a transient weakness of their innate immune defense.
But in the
meantime, we’re also facing a huge problem in vaccinated people as they’re now
more and more confronted with infectious variants displaying a type of S
protein that is increasingly different from the S edition comprised with the
vaccine (the later edition originates from the original, much less infectious
strain at the beginning of the pandemic).
The more
variants become infectious (i.e., as a result of blocking access of the virus
to the vaccinated segment of the population), the less vaccinal Abs will
protect. Already now, lack of protection is leading to viral shedding and
transmission in vaccine recipients who are exposed to these more infectious
strains (which, by the way, increasingly dominate the field).
This is how we
are currently turning vaccines into asymptomatic carriers shedding infectious
variants.
At some point,
in a likely very near future, it’s going to become more profitable (in term of
‘return on selection investment’) for the virus to just add another few
mutations (maybe just one or two) to the S protein of viral variants (already
endowed with multiple mutations enhancing infectiousness) in an attempt to
further strengthen its binding to the receptor (ACE-2) expressed on the surface
of permissive epithelial cells.
This will now
allow the new variant to outcompete vaccinal Abs for binding to the ACE
receptor. This is to say that at this stage, it would only take very few
additional targeted mutations within the viral receptor-binding domain to fully
resist S-specific ant-Covid-19 Abs, regardless whether the later are elicited
by the vaccine or by natural infection.
At that stage,
the virus will, indeed, have managed to gain access to a huge reservoir of
subjects who have now become highly susceptible to disease as their S-specific
Abs have now become useless in terms of protection but still manage to provide
for long-lived suppression of their innate immunity (i.e., natural infection,
and especially vaccination, elicit relatively long-lived specific Ab titers).
The susceptible reservoir comprises both, vaccinated people and those who’re
left with sufficient S-specific Abs due to previous Covid-19 disease).So,
MISSION
ACCOMPLISHED
for Covid-19 but a DISASTROUS SITUATION for all vaccinated subjects and
Covid-19 seropositive people as they’ve now lost both, their acquired and
innate immune defense against Covid-19 (while highly infectious strains are
circulating!).
That’s ‘one
small step for the virus, one giant catastrophe for mankind’, which is to say
that we’ll have whipped up the virus in the younger population up to a
level that it now takes little effort for Covid-19 to transform into a highly
infectious virus that completely ignores both the innate arm of our immune
system as well as the adaptive/acquired one (regardless of whether the acquired
Abs resulted from vaccination or natural infection).
The effort for
the virus is now becoming even more negligible given that many vaccine
recipients are now exposed to highly infectious viral variants while having
received only a single shot of the vaccine.
Hence, they are
endowed with Abs that have not yet acquired optimal functionality. There is no
need to explain that this is just going to further enhance immune escape. Basically,
we’ll very soon be confronted with a super-infectious virus that completely
resists our most precious defense mechanism: The human immune system.
From all of the
above, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to imagine how the consequences of
the extensive and erroneous human intervention in this pandemic are not
going to wipe out large parts of our human population.
One could only
think of very few other strategies to achieve the same level of efficiency in
turning a relatively harmless virus into a bioweapon of mass destruction.
It’s certainly
also worth mentioning that mutations in the S protein (i.e., exactly the same
protein that is subject to selection of escape mutations) are known to enable
Coronaviruses to cross species barriers.
This is to say
that the risk that vaccine-mediated immune escape could allow the virus to jump
to other animal species, especially industrial livestock (e.g., pig and poultry
farms), is not negligible. These species are already known to host several
different Coronaviruses and are usually housed in farms with high stocking
density.
Similar to the
situation with influenza virus, these species could than serve as an additional
reservoir for SARS-COVID-2 virus.
As pathogens
have co-evolved with the host immune system, natural pandemics of acute
self-limiting viral infections have been shaped such as to take a toll on human
lives that is not higher than strictly required.
Due to human
intervention, the course of this pandemic has been thoroughly disturbed as of
the very beginning. Widespread and stringent infection prevention measures
combined with mass vaccination campaigns using inadequate vaccines will undoubtedly
lead to a situation where the pandemic is getting increasingly ‘out of
control’.
Paradoxically,
the only intervention that could offer a perspective to end this pandemic
(other than to let it run its disastrous course) is …VACCINATION. Of
course, the type of vaccines to be used would be completely different of
conventional vaccines in that they’re not inducing the usual suspects, i.e., B
and T cells, but NK cells.
There is,
indeed, compelling scientific evidence that these cells play a key role in
facilitating complete elimination of Covid-19 at an early stage of infection in
asymptomatically infected subjects.
NK cells are
part of the cellular arm of our innate immune system and, alike natural Abs,
they are capable of recognizing and attacking a broad and diversified spectrum
of pathogenic agents.
There is a
sound scientific rationale to assume that it is possible to ‘prime’ NK
cells in ways for them to recognize and kill Coronaviruses at large
(include all their variants) at an early stage of infection. NK cells have
increasingly been described to be endowed with the capacity to acquire
immunological memory.
By educating
these cells in ways that enable them to durably recognize and target
Coronavirus-infected cells, our immune system could be perfectly armed for a
targeted attack to the universe of Coronaviruses prior to exposure.
As NK
cell-based immune defense provides sterilizing immunity and allows for
broad-spectrum and fast protection, it is reasonable to assume that
harnessing our innate immune cells is going to be the only type of human
intervention left to halt the dangerous spread of highly infectious Covid-19
variants.
If we, human
beings, are committed to perpetuating our species, we have no choice left but
to eradicate these highly infectious viral variants. This will, indeed, require
large vaccination campaigns. However, NK cell-based vaccines will primarily
enable our natural immunity to be better prepared (memory!) and to induce
herd immunity (which is exactly the opposite of what current Covid-19 vaccines
do as those increasingly turn vaccine recipients into asymptomatic carriers who
are shedding virus).
So, there is
not one second left for gears to be switched and to replace the current killer
vaccines by life-saving vaccines.
I am appealing
to the WHO and all stakeholders involved, no matter their conviction, to
immediately declare such action as THE SINGLE MOST IMPORTANT PUBLIC HEALTH
EMERGENCY OF INTERNATIONAL CONCERN.
Minds
More Resources:
·
“I would probably prefer to have natural
immunity” — Dr Byram Bridle (Viral Immunologist)
Geplakt uit <https://dryburgh.com/geert-vanden-bossche-open-letter-to-who-halt-all-covid-19-mass-vaccination/>
Top vaccine
scientist warns the world: HALT all covid-19 vaccinations immediately, or
“uncontrollable monster” will be unleashed
Monday, March 15, 2021 by: Mike Adams
Tags: badhealth, badmedicine, badscience, catastrophe, coronavirus, covid-19, depopulation, Geert
Vanden Bossche, genocide, infections, outbreak, pandemic, Vaccine
deaths, vaccine
injury, vaccine
wars, vaccines
Bypass censorship by sharing this link:
64KVIEWS
(Natural News) A top vaccine scientist named Geert Vanden Bossche, who has worked with numerous vaccine corporations and organizations including GAVI, is sounding the alarm over the mass vaccination of populations around the world with covid-19 vaccines.
He says covid-19 vaccines are “brilliant” medicine
and insists they do work on an individual level, but says they are “the wrong
weapon” to be deployed on a global scale when high pressures of infectious
pathogens are present.
As he tweeted on March 3rd, “I am EXTREMELY
concerned about the impact current Covid-19 vaccines will have when
increasingly deployed in mass vaccination campaigns conducted in the heat of a
pandemic. Read my global WARNING & scientific evidence.” He then gives the
following link for his warning:
That URL links to a PDF document which we have saved
in the public interest, posting it on NaturalNews servers at
this link (PDF).
The document includes slides from a presentation
created by Dr. Bossche entitled, “Why should current Covid-19 vaccines not
be used for mass vaccination during a pandemic?”
A vaccine industry insider who worked with the Bill
& Melinda Gates Foundation
Before we get into the presentation and its
meaning, let us first take a quick look at the background of Dr. Bossche. A
good description is offered by Dryburgh.com, which covered this story in detail:
Geert Vanden Bossche, PhD, DVM, is a vaccine
research expert. He has a long list of companies and organizations he’s worked
with on vaccine discovery and preclinical research, including GSK, Novartis,
Solvay Biologicals, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Dr Vanden Bossche
also coordinated the Ebola vaccine program at GAVI (Global Alliance for
Vaccines and Immunization).
He is board-certified in Virology and Microbiology,
the author of over 30 publications, and inventor of a patent application for
universal vaccines. He currently works as an independent vaccine research
consultant.
In other words, you can hardly find someone who is
more qualified and experienced as a vaccine industry insider. Notably, Dr.
Dossche is obviously pro-vaccine, and not a so-called
“anti-vaxxer.” Yet even from his pro-vaccine vantage point, he sees enormous
risks and problems with mass vaccinations campaigns even assuming the
vaccines work as designed.
Dr. Bossche warns the world is creating an
“uncontrollable monster” and turning vaccines into “a bioweapon of mass
destruction”
Here’s an actual quote from Dr. Bossche:
One could only think of very few other strategies
to achieve the same level of efficiency in turning a relatively harmless virus
into a bioweapon of mass destruction.
As Dryburgh.com explains:
Dr Bossche believes that vaccinologists,
clinicians, and scientists are only focusing on short-term results at the
individual level and not the consequences at the global population level, which
he believes will soon become evident. Evident in the form of having
transformed “a quite harmless virus into an uncontrollable monster”.
His concern rests on ‘immune escape’. For those
needing an quick introduction to the topic, read Jemma Moran’s article
Mutant variations and the danger of lockdowns.
See my full coverage of this devastating phenomenon
in today’s Situation Update podcast, a special “Emergency Vaccine Alert”
edition:
Brighteon.com/e86a8f0d-bae2-4c3c-926d-61c60c6e4c38
Continuing from that site:
Bossche states that the multiple emerging, “much
more infectious” viral variants, are already examples of “immune escape” from
our ‘innate immunity’, and were most-likely created by the government
interventions themselves; the so-called Non-Pharmacological Interventions
(NPIs) – i.e. lockdowns and cloth facial coverings. Unofficially, but also more
aptly known as the Non-Scientific
Interventions.
He believes that:
·
Ongoing mass
vaccination deployments are “highly-likely to further enhance ‘adaptive’ immune
escape as none of the current vaccines will prevent replication/transmission of
viral variants”
·
As such, “The
more we use these vaccines for immunizing people in the midst of a pandemic,
the more infectious the virus will become”.
·
And “With
increasing infectiousness comes an increased likelihood of viral resistance to
the vaccines”.
He claims his beliefs are basic principles taught
in a student’s first vaccinology class – “One shouldn’t use a prophylactic
vaccine in populations exposed to high infectious pressure (which is now
certainly the case as multiple highly infectious variants are currently
circulating”).
He states that to “fully escape”, the highly
mutable virus, “only needs to add another few mutations in its receptor-binding
domain”.
Watch Del Bigtree from Highwire explain
the catastrophic consequences of the global vaccine push in this timely video:
Brighteon.com/257797f0-06fa-4596-be69-af71bb3adc21
Bossche explains that vaccines do work on an individual level, but in the aggregate create enormous risks due to “immune escape”
As a vaccine advocate, Bossche believes that
vaccines do work on an individual level and can create immunity against the
intended pathogen. However, in the aggregate, mass vaccinations of large
populations during a pandemic results in a phenomenon known as “immune escape,”
meaning the virus develops variants which are immune to the available vaccines.
This natural selection adaptation of the virus results in an
even more dangerous spectrum of virus strains escaping the
bodies of hosts and being reintroduced into the wild, now more dangerous than
the original pathogen the vaccines were designed to halt.
In his presentation, Bossche warns that
covid-vaccines, “cannot control replication of more infectious CoV variants and
may even
drive immune escape.”
He explains that “innate immunity” is crucial in
halting the cycle of mutations and infections that drive the “three distinct
waves” of pandemic disease. Yet innate immunity — the natural immunity
expressed by people without vaccines — is given no recognition
whatsoever by the vaccine-crazed medical establishment and global political
institutions now pushing for global mass vaccinations.
Dr. Bossche’s analysis hinges on the role of NACs (Non-Asymptomatic Carriers) in attenuating the spread of infectious viral strains. As he warns, when non-NACs are vaccinated, it results in an increase in viral infectiousness among NACs. Stated another way, when you mass vaccinate people who don’t show symptoms, you are creating population-wide viral adaptation pressures that result in increased viral pathogenicity among carriers who show symptoms. This drives the pandemic into high gear with more dangerous strains that are increasingly infectious.
As he states, “The resulting immune escape variants
are now resistant to the vaccine.” This renders the vaccine worse than useless…
it has actually primed the development of super strains while
weakening subsequent immune response when new strains are encountered by people
who were previously vaccinated.
Specifically, as he states:
Enhanced infection rates lead to increased rates of
transient seropositivity in NACs; seropositivity suppresses innate immunity
because Ag-specific Abs outcompete NABs for binding to CoV and prevent training
of innate immune system.
In other words, the vaccine suppresses the immune
system while generating deadly super strains. It makes you wonder: Is this all by
design?
People who get “fully vaccinated” are breeders for
“super strains” of even more deadly covid pathogens
Dr. Bossche goes on to document how important signs
are already appearing which point toward a catastrophic outcome if mass
vaccinations continue. On page 12 of his PDF presentation, he cites these
“strange observations” about the current covid-19 pandemic:
·
Untypical course/ waves of pandemic
·
Emergence of
several much more infectious strains
·
Viral
shedding (of more infectious variants) in fully vaccinated subjects
As he explains, this means the vaccine is
accelerating the adaptive response of the virus that forms new strains which
are far more infectious and potentially deadly… and that these “super
strains” are emerging from “fully vaccinated subjects.”
He summarizes this point with the statement:
Mass containment measures and mass vaccination in
NACs accelerates INNATE immune escape whereas mass vaccination of nonNACs
accelerates INNATE and ADAPTIVE immune escape.
Remember: “NAC” means “Non-Asymptomatic Carrier,”
or a person who shows symptoms and carries the pathogen.
The phenomenon of “adaptive immune escape” means
vaccines are providing natural adaptation pressures to the virus that result in
super strains being created and then shed by those who were already vaccinated.
Yet those people are not immune to the new super strains, so
even the vaccinated get infected with the new super strain. And because their
immune systems were never given the opportunity to actively defeat the first
strain, they have very little hope in successfully fighting the new super
strain, and many of these people will die. (That’s my conclusion, not Dr.
Bossche’s, but his work implies this conclusion.)
Warning from Bossche: “Immediate cancellation of
all ongoing Covid-19 mass vaccination campaigns should now become THE most
acute health emergency of international concern”
Here’s Bossche’s open letter to the WHO, in which
he warns that the global vaccination campaign must be immediately halted, or
humanity will pay the price for unleashing an “uncontrollable monster.”
Click here for the PDF of this letter, now mirrored on Natural News
servers.
Open Letter to the WHO: Immediately Halt All
Covid-19 Mass Vaccinations
Geert Vanden Bossche, DMV, PhD, independent
virologist and vaccine expert, formerly employed at GAVI and The Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation.
To all authorities, scientists and experts around
the world, to whom this concerns: the entire world population.
I am all but an antivaxxer. As a scientist I do not
usually appeal to any platform of this kind to make a stand on vaccine-related
topics. As a dedicated virologist and vaccine expert I only make an exception
when health authorities allow vaccines to be administered in ways that threaten
public health, most certainly when scientific evidence is being ignored.
The present extremely critical situation forces me
to spread this emergency call. As the unprecedented extent of human
intervention in the Covid-19 pandemic is now at risk of resulting in a global
catastrophe without equal, this call cannot sound loudly and strongly enough.
As stated, I am not against vaccination. On the
contrary, I can assure you that each of the current vaccines have been
designed, developed and manufactured by brilliant and competent scientists.
However, this type of prophylactic vaccines are completely inappropriate, and
even highly dangerous, when used in mass vaccination campaigns during a viral
pandemic.
Vaccinologists, scientists and clinicians are
blinded by the positive short-term effects in individual patents, but don’t
seem to bother about the disastrous consequences for global health. Unless I am
scientifically proven wrong, it is difficult to understand how current human
interventions will prevent circulating variants from turning into a wild
monster.
Racing against the clock, I am completing my
scientific manuscript, the publication of which is, unfortunately, likely to
come too late given the ever increasing threat from rapidly spreading, highly
infectious variants. This is why I decided to already post a summary of my
findings as well as my keynote speech at the recent Vaccine Summit in Ohio on
LinkedIn.
Last Monday, I provided international health
organizations, including the WHO, with my analysis of the current pandemic as
based on scientifically informed insights in the immune biology of Covid-19.
Given the level of emergency, I urged them to consider my concerns and to
initiate a debate on the detrimental consequences of further ‘viral immune
escape’.
For those who are no experts in this field, I am
attaching below a more accessible and comprehensible version of the science
behind this insidious phenomenon.
While there is no time to spare, I have not
received any feedback thus far. Experts and politicians have remained silent
while obviously still eager to talk about relaxing infection prevention rules
and ‘springtime freedom’. My statements are based on nothing else but science.
They shall only be contradicted by science.
While one can barely make any incorrect scientific
statements without being criticized by peers, it seems like the elite of
scientists who are currently advising our world leaders prefer to stay silent.
Sufficient scientific evidence has been brought to the table.
Unfortunately, it remains untouched by those who
have the power to act. How long can one ignore the problem when there is at
present massive evidence that viral immune escape is now threatening humanity?
We can hardly say we didn’t know – or were not warned.
In this agonizing letter I put all of my reputation
and credibility at stake. I expect from you, guardians of mankind, at least the
same. It is of utmost urgency. Do open the debate. By all means: turn the tide!
Read the rest of his open letter at this link on Natural News servers.
Ok, maar dan lijkt me geboden dat er bv via café Weltschmerz , nu in de komende maanden , spraakmakende interviews in de confronterende zin komen met alle lijsttrekkers en bovenste 6 van de politieke partijen , dus in de verkiezingstijd , en dan het soort interviews zoal Ischa Meyer en Theo van Gogh dat konden en deden .
Knap werk en gezond verstand, velen van ons zagen al vanalles aan komen maar ja, niet iedereen is een schrijver. Nu nog een boek met de oplossingen om dit tegen te gaan want dat het fout loopt weet iedereen nu wel daar hebben we geen boek voor nodig.
Als je de verklaring hebt van hoe het werkt, weet je ook wat je ertegen kunt doen.
Iedereen met een werkend waarnemingsvermogen, heeft inmiddels gezien dat de wereldwijde corona-campagne niets met volksgezondheid te maken heeft.
Wat is dan WEL de bedoeling? WAAROM deze wereldwijde campagne? Met welk doel?
Het doel is totale herinrichting van de wereld. Gebruik makend van beschikbare technologie.
Stap voor stap:
1- Het vernietigen van alle bestaande sociale en economische structuren
2- De gehele mensheid daarmee in totale schaarste en ontreddering brengen
3- Vervolgens introduceren van centrale/digitale rantsoenering (op absoluut bestaansminimum). Van leven naar overleven. Het systeem bepaalt wie overleeft en wie niet
4- Het massaal uitdunnen en verzwakken van de wereldpopulatie via vaccins en verhongering
5- Het installeren van de digitale dictatuur. Voor ieder individueel gedrag/consumptie is digitale toestemming/toegang vereist
6- Totale digitale surveillance, op individueel niveau. Uitsluiting als bestraffingsmethode. Ongewenst gedrag? Geen toegang tot levensbehoeften! Ongehoorzaamheid = Sterven
7- Overbodig maken van handhaving door politie en justitie. Het digitale systeem is bepalend. Nee is nee. Met een computersysteem valt niet te discussiëren
8- Het centrale digitale systeem bestuurt alle mensen. Privileges voor gehoorzame mensen. Uitsluiting voor ongehoorzame
9- De bestuurders zijn anoniem, en bevinden zich aan de andere zijde van de digitale muur. De wereld wordt door hen digitaal geregeerd vanaf één plek. Één wereldregering dus
10- Alle mensen op de wereld, worden vanaf één centrale plek bestuurd. Zonder de mogelijkheid zich daaraan te onttrekken of er effectief bezwaar tegen te maken
11- Afschaffen van geld, en vervangen door toegekende of afgenomen privilegepunten op basis van gewenst/ongewenst gedrag
12- Totale centrale controle van ieder individu op de wereld. De eigenaren van het systeem bepalen via de technologie hoe en waar iedereen woont, welk werk hij/zij doet, wat hij/zij buiten het werk doet, wat hij/zij consumeert en wanneer, en wat hem/haar is toegestaan. En wat niet.
Om dit mogelijk te maken, moet de samenleving eerst worden vernietigd. Wie een nieuw gebouw wil neerzetten, moet het bestaande immers eerst slopen. De corona-campagne is de start van de sloop. De maatregelen zullen de gewenste ineenstorting veroorzaken. De ineenstorting zal een ongekende humanitaire ramp veroorzaken. De humanitaire ramp zal het nieuwe systeem “rechtvaardigen”.
Alleen onze massale weigering mee te gaan met de maatregelen, kan dit scenario voorkomen. Het goede nieuws is, dat we daartoe op ieder moment kunnen besluiten. Het eindresultaat wordt dus door ons bepaald.
In de Grondwet staat dat we vrijheid hebben van meningsuiting .Dan kan het toch niet zijn dat men van hogerhand de uitgave van een boek tegengaat ?
Het was mijn idee om 105 jaar te worden , ik denk dat ik het toch maar ga bijstellen als het zo de bedoeling is .
https://www.dlmplus.nl/2020/06/01/coronacrisis-het-einde-van-ons-individueel-zelfbeschikkingsrecht-is-nabij-schrijft-robin-de-ruiter/