vrijdag 13 januari 2023

Plots vallen er 19 procent meer doden in België, en aan corona ligt het niet!

December kende 19 procent meer sterfgevallen. © Getty Images

Plots vallen er 19 procent meer doden in ons land, en aan corona ligt het niet: wat is er aan de hand?

Van begin december tot Kerstmis stierven in ons land 9.294 mensen. Dat is gemiddeld 19 procent meer dan in andere decembermaanden, in jaren zonder corona welteverstaan. Maar in tegenstelling tot de vorige jaren heeft corona er deze keer niets mee te maken. Wat dan wel? Griep, RSV of zelfs fijn stof? Sciensano zoekt mee naar de oorzaak van de plotse oversterfte.

Marc Coppens 13-01-23, 06:00 HLN.be 13/01/2023

In HlN.be van 13/01/2023 of via de mainstream media (MSM) - berichtgeving verscheen een artikel over de oversterfte in België.

Ten eerste toch verwonderlijk dat dit in de MSM in België vermeld wordt.

Ten tweede, plots vallen er (naargelang de interpretatie van Sciensano) tussen de 14 % en de 19% meer doden in ons land in december 2022. Bij begrafenisondernemers en crematoria is het dan ook opvallend druk geweest de voorbije weken.

Men vraagt zich nu af wat er toch wel aan de hand zou zijn?

Volgens het Belgisch Statistiekbureau Statbel waren er van begin december tot en met Kerstmis 9.294 sterfgevallen. Dat zijn er minder dan de 9.331 van in 2021 en de 9.798 van 2020, maar wel 17,6% meer dan in 2019 en zelfs 18,6% meer dan in 2018. Vergeleken met het decembergemiddelde gemeten tussen 2009 en 2018, telt 2022 zelfs 19% meer sterfgevallen. Volgens Sciensano zit het aantal oversterfte wel eerder rond de 14%, waarbij de oversterfte zich vooral concentreerde in de voorlaatste week van het jaar.

Maar aan Corona ligt het niet want volgens Stabel waren er maar 222 sterfgevallen tussen 1/12 en kerst 2022 die te wijten waren aan Corona.

Als corona de oversterfte niet verklaart, wat dan wel?

Bij Sciensano kunnen ze er niet precies de vinger op te leggen. Sciensano noemt niettemin de griep als mogelijke oorzaak van de oversterfte. De laatste weken van december woedde er tegelijk een RSV-epidemie en een griepepidemie. Het is wel eerder uitzonderlijk dat mensen rechtstreeks aan griep overlijden.

In 2013 waren het er 147 maar in de meeste andere jaren zijn het er tussen 50 en 100. “Het is geweten dat griep, maar ook andere luchtwegaandoeningen zoals Covid-19 en RSV een risicofactor vormen voor overlijden, vooral bij ouderen”, zegt Sciensano.

Maar dan zijn dit ook maar een paar honderd sterfgevallen.

Dit verklaart nog altijd niet de getallen van de oversterfte.

Dus zegt Sciensano dat het ook kan liggen aan het fijnstof en de koudeprik! Naast griep is de koudeprik van december volgens hen mogelijk een nog belangrijkere verklaring voor de oversterfte.

Van 8 tot 18 december (10 dagen) werden in het hele land vriestemperaturen opgetekend en

tussen 15 en 18 december (3 dagen) hing er ontzettend veel fijnstof in de lucht.

Dus, lees goed, 10 dagen vrieskou en 3 dagen fijnstof zou dan de reden zijn voor de oversterfte?!

Wie gelooft dat nu?

Niet alleen in ons land wordt oversterfte in december gerapporteerd, in Nederland ligt het aantal nog veel hoger en is zelfs sprake van een kwart meer overlijdens. “De bevolkingspiramide in de West-Europese landen is vrij vergelijkbaar”, zegt Sciensano. “België en Nederland hebben allebei een oudere populatie. De oudere leeftijdscategorieën zijn gevoeliger voor de risicofactoren die oversterfte in de hand werken.

Maar er is meer aan de hand

Kijk eens naar de oversterftecijfers per leeftijdscategorie.

Het zijn niet enkel de ouderen waar het probleem zich voordoet. Er is ook een opvallende oversterfte bij gewone volwassenen en opvallend veel te jonge mensen sterven plots.

En niet alleen vorige maand, het is al meer dan een jaar aan de gang. Maar blijkbaar is dit Sciensano ontgaan of vind de overheid dat niet alarmerend.

Wij dachten even om onderstaande quote te publiceren bij de reakties op dit artikel van HLN, maar dit was buiten de censuur van het officiële narratief gerekend. Onze reactie werd dan ook NIET geplaatst?!

Hierbij onze kleine door HLN gecensureerde bijdrage:

En waarom denkt niemand aan de Covid-19 vaccinatieschade? Alle landen met een hoge vaccinatiegraad, krijgen te maken met een grote oversterfte

Te wijten aan het feit dat onze natuurlijke immuniteit door de covid-vaccins (inclusief de Boosters) buiten werking wordt gesteld.

En dan krijg je te maken met oversterfte (in alle leeftijdsgroepen). Denk aan hart- en vaatziekten, hevig uitbrekende kankers, neurologische oorzaken enz…

Er zijn wetenschappelijke onderzoeken te over die dit bevestigen.

Maar wat baten kaars en bril als de uil niet zien wil !

Michel & Mathieu

Immune Tolerance: IgG4 Class Switch Starts with Even Two Doses of mRNA Vaccines

This is bad news - and a very interesting new study

Igor Chudov

Jan 13

Save

▷ Listen

Three weeks ago, I reported on mRNA vaccines causing immune tolerance.

Igor’s Newsletter

Booster-Caused IgG4 Immune Tolerance Explains Excess Mortality and "Chronic Covid"

Rintrah Radagast posted a very important article yesterday. It shows us a potential explanation of why excess mortality is related to COVID boosters, why the association of Covid vaccines with mortality strengthens as time goes on instead of declining, and why…

18 days ago · 847 likes · 814 comments · Igor Chudov

That previous post, which went viral and brought me 1,008 new subscribers, was based on a study that reported levels of IgG4 (causing deadly immune tolerance to Sars-Cov-2) rising after a booster dose of mRNA vaccines and especially after breakthrough infections.

Unfortunately, another piece of bad news came out yesterday. A study analyzing antibody classes in vaccinated people was just published. It has many findings and is worth several separate posts.

The main finding and the bad news is that mRNA vaccines induce immune tolerance, evidenced by IgG4 antibodies, even after two doses (initial “fully vaccinated” series).

This is one chart from it, to be looked at again later, with my annotations in RED:

It shows that for previously uninfected people, as time passes after mRNA vaccinations (purple for Moderna and blue for Pfizer):

the quantity of good, disease-fighting IgG3 antibodies declines
the quantity of bad, disease-ignoring IgG4 antibodies rises
This leads to “immune tolerance,” causing multiple problems explained in my previous post.

Interestingly, the same problem does not appear after inoculation with AstraZeneca, which is viral-vector based and has no mRNA.

You can see in the picture above that the AstraZeneca line (yellow) stays on the bottom. Thus, the problem of immune tolerance and rising IgG4 only applies to mRNA vaccines. That’s good news for people who had their adenovirus vector vaccination only.

Another good news is that for people who had previous Covid-19 infection (before vaccination), IgG4 also does NOT rise, even after mRNA injections:

So, the kinds of people most affected by IgG4 are infection-naive persons who got mRNA vaccinated before having their Covid-19 infection.

People’s Antibody Responses Are Wildly Different

Take another look at the same charts. I picked a couple and highlighted (in orange) how wildly spread are the antibody counts. Look at the surprised face:

Is that wild variation because of the different lots of mRNA vaccines? Is that because of individual differences? Could accidental injections into small blood vessels play a role? I have no idea, but someone needs to look into this.

Good News for mRNA Vaccinated People!

The wild spread of antibody counts means some individuals did not develop immune tolerance despite receiving mRNA shots!

So if you, dear reader, or your loved ones had mRNA vaccines, do not despair — you may be one of those lucky people whose IgG4 count is low, and thus you would NOT be affected by immune tolerance. Such people exist -- see the chart above.

How would such a vaccinated person know if they are, or are not, immune-tolerant to Sars-Cov-2 without expensive lab tests?

My answer is SPECULATIVE, but if your breakthrough infection involved a lot of fever, bone aches, and other signs of a vigorous immune reaction, you may be lucky and have low IgG4 levels. Do not take this suggestion with any degree of certainty!

This is a Great Study. We need MORE of Those!

The study I am discussing is excellent and gives an in-depth dive into what sorts of “antibodies” people develop. The study offers multiple interesting findings; the one I am reporting is only one of many.

One aspect I always lamented about our “Covid response” is that the science is not interested in comprehensive research on people's immune reactions, the differences between natural and vaccinated immunity, and so on.

This Buhre et al. study finally provides an in-depth look and detailed answers to the questions we were all asking.

There is enough material for many interested substack authors to analyze and report on.

What do you think explains a huge variation in immune responses? Any idea?

You're currently a free subscriber to Igor’s Newsletter. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

Comment

Ivermectin's Effectiveness Proven Again; Patented Version of the Cheap Drug Shows 72% Efficacy

800,000 people died in the USA for nothing.

Igor Chudov

Jan 11

Save

▷ Listen

You are not a horse! You are not a cow! That’s what the FDA told us to dissuade us from taking Ivermectin.

Fortunately, we are also not sheep and did not believe the FDA. Many of us stocked up on Ivermectin, and most found it helpful. While I did not use it when I had my Covid in Nov 2020, it worked great for my wife in Dec 2021 and other family members during the summer of 2022.

Ivermectin, a cheap and safe generic medication, was of little interest to profit-minded pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer and Merck. Therefore, they conspired with the FDA to lie that it did not work and instead pushed expensive Covid vaccines and non-working drugs like mutagenic Molnupiravir and rebound-causing Paxlovid.

Expensive Patented Version of Ivermectin Proven to Work!

A company called MedinCell came up with an expensive, patentable version of Ivermectin. The only difference between the pills you can freely buy in Mexico or India and MedinCell’s version is that the patented solution is “slow-release.”

MedinCell conducted a randomized controlled trial of their version of Ivermectin and found that it reduces Covid infections by 72%!

The study was very well designed because the participants were EXPOSED to the Covid infection within five days. Given the exposure, the outcomes were more likely to happen and thus were easier to compare between groups, giving the trial greater statistical power.

The 72% reduction in infection is much MORE effective than the “covid vaccine.”

The trial encompassed the period of Mar-Nov 2022, thus giving us the real-world effectiveness of Ivermectin against the Omicron variant.

While I am happy at the finding, there are several things to be NOT happy about.

If we are to believe official numbers, about 1,121,000 people died of Covid in the USA. Given published effectiveness estimates of Ivermectin coming from honest studies, Ivermectin could save eight hundred thousand of those lives. The intentional suppression of Ivermectin cost us so dearly.
Given a 72% reduction in infection, natural immunity with Ivermectin would likely have stopped the pandemic entirely in 2020.
This is an expensive, patented “slow-release” version of Ivermectin. The “slow release” likely brings no clinical benefit but will bring financial benefit to Medincell.
Had Ivermectin been recognized as an effective antiviral, the “Covid vaccines” could not get EUA approval, and thus we would avoid thousands of vaccine victims and destroyed immune systems.
Second-largest Democratic donor and the largest crypto thief Sam Bankman-Fried donated 18 million dollars to the Together trial after it falsely demonstrated a finding that Democrat-aligned Covid vaccine pushers wanted, namely that Ivermectin allegedly was useless.

The good news here is that Ivermectin works, and to simulate slow release, you can take smaller dosages more frequently or cut pills into smaller pieces.

Here are some of my other articles about Ivermectin — with honest trials showing a comparable reduction in illness and death.

Igor’s Newsletter

New Ivermectin Study -- Same 70% Reduction in Deaths

A new study of Ivermectin is out and, while we should celebrate the results, they are just like results of all other honest previous Ivermectin studies. What was the study about? Researchers compared patients in the United States who were treated with Ivermectin (they identified 1,072 such patients), and compared them with patients who were treated with …

10 months ago · 169 likes · 85 comments · Igor Chudov

Igor’s Newsletter

CNN vs Ivermectin

Came across this tweet from a bluecheck CNN anchor: I was so sad to hear that Ivermectin is not effective, so I decided to give the study a closer look…

a year ago · 287 likes · 297 comments · Igor Chudov

So, thousands of people died of Covid. Thousands of people died of Covid vaccines. The pandemic, prolonged by vaccination, is raging and reinfects people with immunity disabled by mystery genetic treatments. My prediction from last March, unfortunately, is coming true.

Igor’s Newsletter

AIDS-Like "Chronic Covid" is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZ

This article will explain exactly why endless Covid reinfections happen, and the dangerous consequences that they lead to, based on recent scientific advances. What’s happening? When Omicron appeared around December of last year, the powers-to-be in most Western countries found themselves in a situation of mass vaccine failure, where a Covid variant Omic…

9 months ago · 726 likes · 771 comments · Igor Chudov

All of this happened because of the recklessness and greed of the biomedical-industrial complex, which developed Sars-Cov-2 and then pushed an unproven, ineffective vaccine that worsened the pandemic.

While the above paragraph is upsetting, the good news is that Ivermectin was validated, and “we have the tools” to manage a Covid infection or exposure. Do not worry about “slow release”, it is just a money grab by MedinCell.

Lastly, take a minute to think about millions of victims of suppression of Ivermectin worldwide, who died to make a few companies and foundations richer and more powerful.

Will Ivermectin ever be recommended officially? And do we even care about such approval if we can still order it online? (except in Australia where they still cannot) Let us know what you think!