- Covid 2.0 hysteria and mandates being
rolled out
- Atlanta college declares new mask mandate
- Lionsgate studios in Hollywood requires
daily swab testing again
- It's all THEATER to see who's stupid enough
to comply
- #Vaccine mandates are coming back,
#depopulation goals not yet reached
- White House tells all Americans to take
more jabs
- Feds are buying more covid equipment for
coming lockdowns
- Fertilizer plant in Texas burned to the
ground as food supply chain #sabotage accelerates
- 14 cities announce ZERO meat, zero dairy,
zero vehicles by 2030
- Each citizen only allowed to buy three
clothing items per year (unfair to women)
- Achieving this requires globalist to MASS
KILL humans living in cities
- Refugees will be fleeing the cities in
search of clothing, meat and #survival
- Covid 2.0 hysteria and mandates being
rolled out
- Atlanta college declares new mask mandate
- Lionsgate studios in Hollywood requires
daily swab testing again
- It's all THEATER to see who's stupid enough
to comply
- #Vaccine mandates are coming back, #depopulation
goals not yet reached
- White House tells all Americans to take
more jabs
- Feds are buying more covid equipment for
coming lockdowns
- Fertilizer plant in Texas burned to the
ground as food supply chain #sabotage accelerates
- 14 cities announce ZERO meat, zero dairy,
zero vehicles by 2030
- Each citizen only allowed to buy three
clothing items per year (unfair to women)
- Achieving this requires globalist to MASS
KILL humans living in cities
- Refugees will be fleeing the cities in
search of clothing, meat and #survival
For more updates, visit: http://www.brighteon.com/channel/hrreport
NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we
remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the
world on the subject of natural healing remedies and personal liberty (food
freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of speech, etc.). Together, we’re helping
create a better world, with more honest food labeling, reduced chemical
contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased
scientific transparency.
On Aug. 8
when the fires first began, the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural
Resources (DLNR) delayed the release of water requested by the West
Maui Land Co. to help keep the fire contained and well away from people's
properties.
Why did they
do this, exactly? One source claims that a "woke"
politician of a leftist bent set out to harm the people of Lahaina by intentionally depriving
them of water until after it was already too late.
M. Kaleo
Manuel, a native Hawaiian cultural practitioner and the DLNR's deputy director
for water resource management, made the decision to withhold water from
Lahaina. Manuel later released the requested water, but not until after the
fire had already run its course.
As of this
writing, neither Manuel nor any other government official in Hawaii has
commented on the revelation.
(Related: Is
America finally reaching a breaking point? Learn
more here.)
Gov. Josh Green: Water a source of great
conflict in Maui "for many years"
The West Maui
Land Co. (WML) manages a number of agricultural and residential subdivisions
all throughout West Maui. Other water regulators in the region include the
Launiupoko Irrigation Co., the Launiupoko Water Co., the Olowalu Water Co., and
the Ha'iku Town Water Association.
Four separate
sources with knowledge about the situation have pegged Manuel as the culprit in
rejecting the release of water to the fire-stricken area. Manuel reportedly
asked WML to first get permission from a kalo (taro) farm located downstream
from the company's property.
Hawaii Gov.
John Green, a Democrat, has promised a thorough investigation into this
and other strange matters related to the fires. According to an official
response from the governor's office, "conflicts over water are being
reshaped in an age of climate change and wildfires."
"One
thing that people need to understand, especially those from far away, is that
there's been a great deal of water conflict on Maui for many years," Green
said. "It's important that we're honest about this. People have been
fighting against the release of water to fight fires. I'll leave that to you to
explore."
Back in 2022,
two state senators, both from Maui, submitted a bill that would have pushed the
DLNR "to allow fresh water to be used to fight fires and pointed to West
Maui as being particularly vulnerable." That bill died without a hearing
and was never passed into law.
One would
think that in an emergency situation such as an out-of-control fire that it
would be an all-hands-on-deck kind of situation as far as getting as much water
to the scene as possible, as quickly as possible. The opposite happened in
Lahaina and West Maui.
The issue
seems to stem from Native Hawaiians' discontent with the takeover of their
homeland by what they deem to be outsiders. This includes land owners and their
water rights, which remains a point of contention across Maui.
"There
is going to be much more coming from this story of the Maui fires," one
commenter wrote about how all these anomalies and conspiracies are only scratching
the surface of the true extent of the criminality that took place behind the
scenes of this horrific incident.
"For
some reason, West Maui has become a 'media-free zone' with many highly
suspicious events surrounding the fire and how it originated in the first
place."
More related
news about the Maui fires can be found at Disaster.news.
The World Economic Forum has been on a tear lately! A recent article in the New York Times (paywall-free link) by a senior WEF agenda contributor, Adam Grant, a Wharton management expert and an adviser to Bill Gates, says, “Elections are Bad for Democracy.”
In
the United States, any private citizen can publish any opinion on their
web page or social network timeline. However, Mr. Grant is not an
ordinary private person; he is a WEF contributor
who participated in numerous WEF functions and authored many
agenda-setting articles. He is also an adviser to Google and Bill Gates.
Far from obscure is the venue
that gave him a voice to be heard: The New York Times is the foremost
“newspaper of record,” which used to be the most respected publication
many years ago.
Officials have been working hard to safeguard elections and assure citizens of their integrity. But if we want public office to have integrity, we might be better off eliminating elections altogether.
If you think that sounds anti-democratic, think again.
The ancient Greeks invented democracy, and in Athens many government
officials were selected through sortition — a random lottery from a pool
of candidates. In the United States, we already use a version of a
lottery to select jurors. What if we did the same with mayors,
governors, legislators, justices and even presidents?
Mr. Grant advocates “randomly selecting” officials from a “pool of candidates.”
Who forms the pool of candidates? Who is admitted
to the “pool”? Mr. Grant is vague on this question, but we can take a
guess. The pool would be formed by the no-longer-elected “guardians of
our democracy”; only the people acceptable to them would be allowed to
be randomly selected.
Indeed, Mr Grant explains that those seeking to enter the “pool” would need to be vetted:
In America, imagine that anyone who wants to enter the pool has to pass a civics test — the same standard as immigrants applying for citizenship.
I
am sure those who do not believe the WEF-promoted ideologies would be
ineligible for the pool and unable to pass the civics test. We do not want doubters to undermine our democracy, after all! (Note the sarcasm)
If you, my dear reader, wonder who will ensure that “random selection” is truly random, you are not alone!
Mr.
Grant is a senior adviser to the Department of Defense, Google, and the
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. So please take him seriously, as do
the organizations above who take his advice. He means it.
Just imagine the savings, Grant says:
Switching to sortition would save a lot of money too. The 2020 elections alone cost upward of $14 billion. And if there’s no campaign, there are no special interests offering to help pay for it.
Surely, we can save a lot of money if dirty peons like you and me are not allowed to vote!
The WEF is Serious About Abolishing Voting
Is the above a weird individual opinion only? Not quite!
In
this video, Klaus Schwab discusses the idea of using a “prescriptive
mode” to form the will of the electorate and do without elections:
The WEF views political systems with competing political parties as “toxic” and discusses “detoxifying politics,” understood as getting rid of party competition:
Unless
you have lived under a rock for the last several years, you probably
heard the famous prediction from the World Economic Forum: As the idea
of being happy while owning nothing sounds ridiculous to many of us, the
fact-checkers tended to write this forecast off…
24 days ago · 442 likes · 518 comments · Igor Chudov
The above well-being agenda is already being implemented in eight countries, as discussed in the article above.
These
radicals envision a future “free of party politics,” with “detoxified”
discourse, and with leaders selected from a pool of WEF-approved
candidates.
The
regular peons, like you and me, do not deserve a voice because we are
considered “toxic” and incompetent to select our future glorious
leaders. The WEF knows better!
Do you agree with the future they are envisioning for you?
If not, I suggest doing something: You can upgrade your subscription to a paid one. I will forward money to two anti-WEF candidates, as follows:
I will send $20 for each new paid subscription attributed to this post
(Substack tracks subscriptions from the subscribe buttons in posts):
$10 will go to Ron DeSantis, and $10 will go to Robert F. Kennedy. I
will report the totals after one week.
To make your paid subscription result in my electoral contribution, click here:
