BREAKING: CDC, FDA faked “covid” testing
protocol by using human cells mixed with common cold virus fragments… PCR tests
are merely detecting the common cold
Friday, July 30, 2021 by: Mike Adams
Tags: badhealth, CDC, COVID, Fake, FDA, hoax, influenza, lab tests, pandemic, PCR, Plandemic, Staged, virology, virus
88KVIEWS
(Natural News) In a
shocking revelation first reported by Dan Dicks of Press for
Truth (Canada), an FDA document admits that the CDC and FDA conspired to fabricate a
covid-19 testing protocol using human cells combined with common cold virus
fragments because they had no physical samples of the SARS-CoV-2 “covid”
virus available.
Without physical reference material to use for calibration and
confirmation, the test has zero scientific basis in physical reality. And all
the PCR analysis based on this protocol is utterly fraudulent, flagging people
as “positive” for covid when they merely possess tiny quantities of RNA
fragments from other coronavirus strains circulating in their blood.
The FDA document, available from the FDA.gov website, is entitled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel .” The document astonishingly admits:
(emphasis ours)
Since no quantified virus isolates of
the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and
this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were
tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N
gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/ĀµL) spiked into
a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral
transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
In other words, they had no covid virus from which to develop and
calibrate the test, so they mixed up a cocktail of human cells and RNA
fragments from a common cold virus, then called it “covid.” The GenBank
sequence referred to in this paragraph is simply a digital library
definition that’s labeled “covid” but has no supporting reference
materials in physical reality either.
That’s because no doctor or researcher has isolated “covid” from
any infected, symptomatic patient. As a result, no laboratory instruments
can be calibrated against actual covid, and the tests simply
rely on digital libraries pushed out by the CDC and WHO, using “covid” as the
label.
The PCR tests are then instructed to look for these genetic sequences
obtained from the fabricated digital libraries, meaning the entire scheme is
junk science circular logic with no basis in physical reality.
Why are there seemingly no
certified reference materials for covid available to laboratories for
instrument calibration?
I am the founder and owner of an analytical laboratory that routinely
conducts quantitative analysis of food contaminants, producing high-precision
analysis results for pesticides, herbicides and heavy metals. In every case
where we conduct lab analysis, we calibrate the instruments against
known physical samples called “external standards” or “certified reference
materials.” (CRM)
Any lab can purchase CRMs for mercury, arsenic, glyphosate and even
salmonella. For example, this link at Biosisto lists CRMs for various salmonella strains. Labs can purchase those
reference materials and use them to calibrate their instruments, making sure
their analysis is traced back to physical, real-world samples of a purified
material. These CRMs, in turn, must be NIST-traceable in order to confirm their
origin and authenticity. All CRMs are therefore labeled with lot numbers and
expiration dates.
While labs can purchase reference materials for microbes, heavy metals,
pesticides, etc. — all physical materials — I have searched
far and wide and have not been able to locate any certified reference materials
for SARS-CoV-2 or even a weakened, non-viable version of it. As far as I can
tell, there appear to be no physical specimens of isolated covid
viruses available for instrument calibrations and testing protocol quality
control.
To be clear, I’m not saying that viruses don’t exist, and it’s quite
clear that the Wuhan Institute of Virology colluded with Fauci, Daszak, the
NIH, Baric and others to develop a weaponized spike protein. But the
spike protein is not a virus by itself. It’s simply a toxic nanoparticle
that can be synthesized in quantity and then either dumped on cities or added
to vaccines and injected into people via immunization protocols.
I ask the big question about all this in my science lab whistleblower
video here, which presents more details about all this that will have your head
spinning. In essence, if “covid-19” is a real virus that can be
isolated, why are there apparently no physical reference materials to calibrate
laboratory instruments for covid detection? And why were no such
materials used in the development of the FDA-approved, CDC-endorsed PCR testing
protocols?
https://naturalnews.com/2021-07-30-cdc-fda-faked-covid-testing-protocol-by-using-human-cells-mixed-with-common-cold-virus.html
CDC pulls its own
fraudulent covid PCR testing protocol, implying it cannot differentiate between
covid and influenza
What adds to the mystery in all this is the fact that the CDC just issued a
“laboratory alert,” announcing
their intention to withdraw the faulty PCR testing protocol by the end of this
year. As part of their announcement, they implied that the current PCR test —
the same one the FDA mentioned above, which was developed without any physical
covid samples for calibration — cannot tell the difference between
influenza and covid.
From the CDC document:
In preparation for this change, CDC
recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC
2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another
FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption
of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and
differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.
Why might it be important to differentiate covid from influenza?
Because, as it seems, influenza cases nearly disappeared in 2020 as
influenza was re-labeled “covid” due to the faulty testing.
“Percentage influenza positivity decreased by 64% (p = 0.001) and
estimated daily number of influenza cases decreased by 76% (p = 0.002) in
epidemiologic weeks 5–9 of 2020 compared with the preceding years,” reported the CDC in 2020.
In essence, the medical establishment simply took all the people who
would normally be diagnosed with colds and the flu, and shifted them into the
“covid” category in order to push a covid mass hysteria narrative that would
drive people into vaccines. The vaccines, then, were formulated with spike
protein toxic nanoparticles to cause the “delta” panic wave, which is largely
occurring among vaccinated individuals.
From here, the plandemic scam proceeds like clockwork: People get sick
from the vaccines, so more vaccine boosters are demanded, which perpetuates the
illness. Rinse and repeat.
It never ends until the perpetrators are arrested
and people wise up to the scam.
The CDC has just published a science document that confirms the entire
scam. Click here to view the
PDF on our servers.
It’s entitled, “Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19
Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings —
Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021” and it shockingly admits
that 74% of infections occurred in fully vaccinated (double dose)
people:
During July 2021, 469 cases of COVID-19
associated with multiple summer events and large public gatherings in a town in
Barnstable County, Massachusetts, were identified among Massachusetts
residents; vaccination coverage among eligible Massachusetts residents was 69%.
Approximately three quarters (346; 74%) of cases occurred in fully
vaccinated persons (those who had completed a 2-dose course of mRNA vaccine
[Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna] or had received a single dose of Janssen [Johnson
& Johnson] vac- cine ?14 days before exposure).
See, the vaccine is the pandemic.
The vaccine is spreading the spike
protein, and the fake PCR tests provide the fuel to keep the mass hysteria
going.
I cover more details of all this in today’s bombshell podcast via
Brighteon.com:
Brighteon.com/dfb235d4-f0d6-4d7d-af06-d1f4e391c4f5
Also see this video from Dan Dicks, who covers the fake PCR tests as
well:
Brighteon.com/a8ef9e25-cdd3-453e-b4dc-97d2faada2b2
Find a new Situation Update podcast each weekday at:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Previous :
https://naturalnews.com/2021-07-29-cdc-confesses-vaccines-are-failing-the-vaxxed-can-be-super-spreaders.html