zondag 27 juni 2021
20 Mechanisms of Injuries (MOI)
The
spike protein behaves as a hapten, a small molecule that binds to the surface of
organs, leading to an autoimmune response.
The spike protein can damage organs directly
by promoting cardiovascular complications, damaging blood vessels in the lungs,
and breaking through the blood
brain barrier (BBB), important for
protecting the brain.
The spike protein can incorporate into human DNA through a process called transfection.
The spike protein evokes the release
of destructive
anti-spike-antibodies, [anti-S-Ab]
discussed below.
MOI #1: Injections can lead to death through anaphylactic
shock, a life-threatening allergic reaction. With COVID shots, the allergic reaction is
suspected to be caused by previous exposure to and sensitization to polyethylene glycol [PEG].
MOI #2: Anti-Inflammatory macrophages, called M2, are inhibited by anti-spike-antibodies [antiS-Ab]
MOI #3: All COVID shots lead to the creation of a spike protein through a process called translation.
The spike protein can damage the body by at least FOUR pathways:
1)
The spike protein behaves as a hapten, a small molecule that binds to the surface of
organs, leading to an autoimmune response.
2) The spike protein can damage organs directly
by promoting cardiovascular complications, damaging blood vessels in the lungs,
and breaking through the blood
brain barrier (BBB), important for
protecting the brain.
3) The spike protein can incorporate into human DNA through a process called transfection.
4) The spike protein evokes the
release of destructive
anti-spike-antibodies, [anti-S-Ab]
discussed below
MOI #4: Spike protein
can trigger changes in blood vessel walls, leading to pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH), which is fatal even under the best current conventional
and alternative treatments.
MOI #5: The spike protein can bind to the ACE2
receptor on surface of sperm and ovaries. Risk of infertility is high but not yet proven.
MOI #6: Spike proteins cause inflammation and
disruption of the blood brain barrier (BBB), leading to neuropathology and brain degeneration.
MOI #7: Neurological degeneration: spike proteins
can damage the FUS
gene
and mutate the TDP-43
protein, leading
to Amyotrophic
Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).
MOI #8: Neurological degeneration: mutation and
altered function of the TDP-43 protein can also lead to frontotemporal lobe degeneration (FTLD), a cluster of chronic, degenerative neurological
diseases
MOI #9: Mutation of the FUS gene can also lead to cancer.
MOI #10: Adenoviruses used in both the Johnson & Johnson
shot and the AstraZeneca shots pose a risk of cancer.
MOI #11: Anti-spike-antibodies [anti-S-Ab] can cause significant organ damage,
specifically to the lungs. The antibodies can also cross-react with 28 different human tissue types, establishing a mechanism for multi-system autoimmune disorders and
multi-organ failure.
MOI #12: Previous coronavirus exposure and the
concept called ‘original
antigenic sin’ stops
true protection against the SARS-CoV-2 if a person has been previously ill with
a common coronavirus infection.
MOI #13: There is an increased risk of COVID
illness and COVID-related death in people who have had a previous influenza vaccine.
MOI #14: The larger (highly elevated) SARS-CoV-2
antibody response from a COVID infection or from a COVID shot, results in prolonged and more severe illness.
MOI #15: COVID shots can lead to enlarged lymph nodes that may have long term ramifications.
MOI
#16: Widespread
use of COVID shots results in non-neutralizing antibodies, especially in people who have already had
a COVID infection. This may be leading to virulent mutant viruses
MOI #17: Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE) is a phenomenon occurs when a person is exposed
to a circulating coronavirus after being vaccinated. The anti-S-Ab enhances the entry of the SARS-CoV-2 virus
into the cell (usually macrophages) and accelerates its replication, causing more
severe illness than they would have experienced if they had not been
vaccinated.
MOI #18: Johnson/Johnson and AstraZeneca shots
release a
transgene that
can lead to potentially deadly side effects from injecting raw genetic material
that can
induce anti-DNA antibodies and can integrate into human DNA.
MOI #19: Both Johnson/Johnson and AstraZeneca shots
carry a snip of double stranded DNA (dsDNA) [transgene] wrapped in an adenovirus outer “shell.” 50-billion particles are injected with each injection. dsDNA-antibodies are diagnostic of a long
list of autoimmune disorders.
MOI #20 – The AstraZeneca shot has been known to be
associated with potentially deadly blood clots, a condition named Vaccine-Induced Prothrombotic Immune Thrombocytopenia (VIPIT).
“Approving a vaccine, utilizing novel
RNA technology without extensive testing is extremely dangerous. The vaccine
could be a bioweapon and even more dangerous than the original infection.”
* REF: Classen JB. COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines
and the Risk of Prion Disease. Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021; 5(1):1-3.
https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf
----------
By injecting the
synthetically made SARS-CoV-2 spike protein into the entire population through
these genetic-modification injections, the risk of longterm side effects and
risk of developing an autoimmune illness will remain for an unknown period of
time. However, with B-cell priming and irreversible genetic manipulation, the
risk for developing chronic illness or sudden death could last forever.
_________________________
Résume uit: 20MOI E-book By Dr. Sherri Tenpenny.PDF
te bestellen via https://www.drtenpenny.com/ebook-20-moi
Global Pushback Against Tyranny Has Begun
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
March 20, 2021, on the 1-year anniversary of the first COVID-19 lockdown, people in more than 40 countries took to the streets to peacefully demonstrate against COVID-19 lies and tyrannical measures. The documentary above, "The Pushback," details the day the world stood together against government overreach and the destruction of human rights — and why we must unite, every day, and push back. Chances are, you didn't hear about this global rallying cry for freedom, as the mainstream media have near-universally censored any news of it. The few that did report it either understated the global nature of the event and its attendance, or misrepresented the intent of this "Worldwide Freedom Day."
Freedom From Fear
So, just what was the intent behind this
global demonstration? In short, to tell our elected officials and unelected
global leaders that we withdraw our consent to these unconstitutional
overreaches and attempts to strip us of our rights and freedoms, and that we
will no longer submit to and cower in fear. As noted in the film, fear and
hysteria were carefully nurtured using a false narrative that said:
·
A deadly
novel virus is sweeping across the planet
·
No one is
immune and there's no cure
·
Asymptomatic
people are major disease vectors, and therefore:
·
We have to
shut everything down, isolate everyone and wear masks until the whole world has
been vaccinated
And, of course, anyone who challenges this
crazy narrative is labeled a danger to society. Every part of this narrative is
false and unrealistic. In reality:
|
SARS-CoV-2 poses a high risk to a very limited group
of people and a negligible risk to the vast majority |
Few are susceptible to severe illness or death |
|
There are several effective treatments available |
Asymptomatic people — historically known as healthy
people — do not spread the infection |
|
Lockdowns and mask mandates did not work and have
caused great harm |
Vulnerable people have been harmed instead of helped |
Ground Zero of the False Narrative
March 3, 2020, the World Health
Organization tweeted out a comment by WHO director-general Tedros Adhanom
Ghebreyesus, which said:
"Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases
have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those
infected."
It makes COVID-19 sound like a serious
problem indeed. The problem is that Ghebreyesus compared apples and oranges. He
reported the case fatality rate (CFR) of COVID-19, versus the infection
fatality rate (IFR) for the flu.
As explained in the film, CFR is the
proportion of deaths from a disease compared to the number of people diagnosed
(the total number of confirmed cases). The IFR, meanwhile, is the proportion of
deaths from a disease compared to the total number of infected individuals,
confirmed or suspected.
Since CFR requires the infection to be
confirmed through laboratory testing and clinical evaluation, and the total
number of infected people can be hard to determine and includes suspected
cases, the CFR is always lower than the IFR.
By conflating CFR and IFR in the same
sentence, comparing two different sets of statistics, Ghebreyesus grossly
overstated the threat of COVID-19. Stanford University researcher John
Ioannidis pointed this out in a March 7, 2020, response, in which he said,
"Reported case fatality rates, like the official 3.4% rate from the WHO,
cause horror — and are meaningless."
October 14, 2020, Ioannidis published a
review of 61 seroprevalence studies1 showing
that the IFR for COVID-19 was actually only 0.23% — a far cry from the CFR of
3.4% — and for people under the age of 70, the IFR was just 0.05%. In other
words, COVID-19 is actually less deadly than the flu. Many have noted that the
IFR for flu is typically only around 0.1%, and even at that, COVID-19 is less deadly
for people under the age of 70.
PCR Test Added Fuel to the False Narrative
As noted in the documentary, at this
point, there are so many false narratives it's hard to know where to begin, but
a good place is the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
test, as it is at the heart of this scam. If it weren't for this flawed test,
there would be no pandemic to speak of.
The fact is, the PCR test is not designed to be used as a diagnostic tool
as it cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and "live" or
reproductive ones.2 This is a crucial point, since inactive and
reproductive viruses are not interchangeable in terms of infectivity. If you
have a nonreproductive virus in your body, you will not get sick and you cannot
spread it to others.
What's more, the test was developed using
nothing more than computer modeling of a genetic sequence. No actual viral
isolate from a patient was ever used in the development of this test.
November 30, 2020, a team of 22
international scientists published a review3 challenging
the scientific paper4 on PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 written by
Christian Drosten, Ph.D., and Victor Corman. The Corman-Drosten paper was
quickly accepted by the WHO and the workflow described therein was adopted as
the standard across the world.
The 22 scientists demanded the
Corman-Drosten paper be retracted due to "fatal errors,"5 one of which is the fact that it was written (and the test itself
developed) before any viral isolate was available. All they used was the
genetic sequence published online by Chinese scientists in January 2020.
As if that doesn't make the test
unreliable enough, laboratories were instructed to amplify the RNA collected
far too many times, resulting in healthy people testing "positive."
The number of amplifications is known as the cycle threshold (CT).
When you get a positive result using
a CT of 35 or
higher, you're looking at the equivalent of a single copy of viral DNA. The
likelihood of that causing a health problem is minuscule. Yet the WHO,6,7,8 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention9 were
recommending CTs between 40 and 45, thereby guaranteeing a vast majority of
"cases" were in fact false positives.
How the Greatest Hoax in History Was
Fashioned
As detailed in the featured film,
widespread PCR testing gave the mainstream media the fodder needed to create
hysteria. For months on end, every broadcast had a tickertape showing the
number of "cases" detected.
Other fear-induction tactics included
universal masking and 6-foot social distancing rules, replete with plastic
barriers everywhere and signs on every floor telling you where to stand and in
which direction to walk.
One of the primary tactics that drove the
narrative that masking and social distancing were necessities was the lie that
asymptomatic people were spreading the infection. Anyone could be a lethal
threat. No one was to be exempted from suspicion.
That old man with a cough? Lethal threat.
That muscular jogger, flushed from fresh air and exercise? Lethal threat. That
pink-faced precocious 2-year-old? Lethal threat. A fearful public soaked up the
propaganda and started verbally and physically attacking non-maskers without
regard for logic, reason or science.
Without the PCR fraud and the asymptomatic spreader
lie, the COVID-19 pandemic
would have been a short-lived blip. The lies were able to stand for one reason
and one reason only, and that was the implementation of universal censorship of
anyone who spoke the truth and pointed out the scientific fallacies that were
driving the pandemic narrative.
With these psychological tools — preceded
by a single carefully crafted revision of the definition of
"pandemic" a decade ago — they manufactured the greatest hoax the
world has ever seen. Indeed, you could say the redefinition of pandemic was
what brought us to this precipice in the first place. The WHO's original
definition of a pandemic was:10,11
"… when a new influenza virus appears against
which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous
epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness."
The key portion of that definition is
"enormous numbers of deaths and illness." This definition was changed
in the month leading up to the 2009 swine flu pandemic. The change was a simple
but substantial one: They merely removed the severity and high mortality
criteria, leaving the definition of a pandemic as "a worldwide epidemic of
a disease."12
By removing the criteria of severe illness
causing high morbidity, leaving geographically widespread infection as the only
criteria for a pandemic, the WHO and technocratic leaders of the world were
able to bamboozle the global population into believing we were in mortal
danger.
What Works and What Doesn't
The total discarding of science is perhaps
the most perplexing part of this pandemic. We're told to follow the science,
but what they actually mean is that we must do as we're told, without evidence.
As noted in the film, we've long known what works and what doesn't, when it
comes to pandemic disease mitigation.
Effective measures include hand-washing
and isolating the sick. Everything we've been told to do over this past year
falls squarely in the "proven ineffective" category, and that
includes large scale quarantines, border closures, school closures, social
distancing and universal mask use. What's worse, everything we've been told
that is necessary to save lives, actually fuels disease.
What Was the Pandemic Really About?
In my best-selling book, "The Truth About
COVID-19 — Exposing the Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports and the New
Normal," I
detail the backstory of how the COVID-19 pandemic was created and, more
importantly, why. If you do not understand the geopolitical landscape we're in
right now, you will struggle to understand why anyone would possibly lie about
a virus and create a pandemic out of smoke and mirrors.
In a nutshell, a small but highly
organized technocratic elite have used this pandemic as a justification for
eroding liberty, freedom and democracy from Day 1, and the reason is because
they want to usher in a whole new global system. The global elite refer to this
new system as the Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Build
Back Better plan.
Make no mistake, the plan — as laid out in
various papers and reports, including s 2010 Rockefeller Foundation report,13 in which they describe their "Lockstep" scenario, which
is a coordinated global response to a lethal pandemic, and its 2020 white paper,14 "National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan" — is to use
bioterrorism to take control of the world's resources, wealth and people.
The plan is to use the need for coordinated
pandemic response as the justification for permanent surveillance and social
controls that hobble personal liberty and freedom of choice.
To learn more about the hidden power
structure running this global reorganization toward authoritarian control, see "Bill Gates Wants to
Realize Global Vision in His Lifetime," "The Great Reset and
Build Back Better," "Technocracy and the
Great Reset" and "Who Pressed the Great
Reset Button?"
The Time to Stand for Freedom Is Right NOW
In 2007, Naomi Wolf published "The
End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot," in which she lays
out the 10 steps to tyranny. She's now warning everyone, everywhere, that we
are at Step 10. Once Step 10 locks into place, there's no going back. It'll be
too dangerous to fight back.
Right now, you might face police brutality
or censorship. If that dissuades you from doing your part in standing against
the totalitarian dictates right now, in the future, you'll lose everything.
The good news is the would-be tyrants have
not won yet. That said, we have no time to spare. We have no time to remain
idle, hoping it will all just go back to normal on its own. In countries where
citizens do not have a Second Amendment right to bear arms, the answer is
peaceful mass civil disobedience.
In the U.S., we do have the Second
Amendment, which allows citizens to own and bear arms, and the mere possibility
of an armed uprising makes it more difficult for a tyrannical government to get
their way. That said, peaceful disobedience is the primary strategy in armed
countries as well.
We must also rally behind legislation that
prevents the alteration of laws that safeguard our freedoms. To that end, Wolf
has started the Five Freedoms Campaign, which you can find on her Daily Clout website.
The campaign focuses on creating
legislation to preserve key freedoms and prevent emergency laws from infringing
on our freedom to assemble, worship, protest and engage in business.
Legislation is also being crafted to open schools, remove mask mandates and
eliminate requirements for vaccine passports.
Hope, in the Face of Tyranny
I have no doubt that we will ultimately
stop the globalists' drive toward global tyranny. It's not going to be easy. It
may take years, and it may get far worse before it gets better.
The founders of the U.S. fled repressive
societies or were children or grandchildren of those who did. They had to
personally reckon with criminalized speech, arbitrary arrests and state
sanctioned torture and even murder. The men who signed the Declaration of
Independence knew that if they lost the war, they would be executed for
treason.
These men and women were radicals, fighting
for liberty and personal freedoms. They had a vision of reality that was an
absolute slap in the face of what the rest of the world tolerated. They were
willing to sacrifice their lives to turn that vision into a reality. Most all
of us have forgotten their sacrifices and have capitulated to the carefully
constructed narrative to create fear that allows most to give up their claim to
freedom.
The Founders trusted us to remember our
history and remain ever vigilant, to keep the precious web of liberty and
personal freedom that they constructed from evaporating so that there would
never be an American tyrant. The creators of the U.S. Constitution understood
that the price of liberty was eternal vigilance.
Hopefully, enough people will see through
the mainstream fog and see the truth of where we're headed and how we got here
(if you don't, read "The Truth About COVID-19"), and once you
understand who the actual enemy is, you become less fearful and more efficient.
You can now help educate others, so that they understand what's going on, how
they're being deceived and what they're actually about to give up.
Lastly, there are legal solutions that can help thwart the globalist takeover, technological
solutions that
can strengthen citizens' lobbying power, and censor-proof technologies that
will allow us to circumvent current Big Tech monopolies. We have to work on all
of these fronts but, together, I believe we can resecure freedom for our
children and future generations.
Sources and
References
·
1 Bulletin
of the World Health Organization October 14, 2020
·
2 CDC
2019 Novel Coronavirus RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel July 13, 2020 (PDF)
·
3 Corman Drosten Review Report
·
4 Eurosurveillance,
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus by real-time RT-PCR
·
5 Undercover DC December 3, 2020
·
6 WHO.int
Diagnostic detection of Wuhan Coronavirus 2019 by real-time RT-PCR, January 13,
2020 (PDF)
·
7 WHO.int
Diagnostic detection of 2019-nCOV by real-time RT-PCR, January 17, 2020 (PDF)
·
8 Eurosurveillance 2020 Jan 23;
25(3): 2000045
·
9 FDA.gov
CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel Instructions, July 13, 2020
(PDF) Page 35
·
11 Wayback
Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness May 1, 2009 (PDF)
·
12 Wayback
Machine, WHO Pandemic Preparedness September 2, 2009 (PDF)
·
13 Scenarios
for the Future of Technology and International Development
UK
Science advisory committee REGRETS using fear to control people, admit they
used “unethical” and “totalitarian” methods
Wednesday,
May 19, 2021 by: Lance D Johnson
Tags: Boris Johnson, control, death, ethics, Fear, fraud, government power, health problems, hospitalization, human rights, Liberty, medical fascism, Medical Tyranny, mental, mental abuse, mind control, oppression, psychological terrorism, restriction, sickness, totalitarianism, Trials
(Natural News) In March of 2020, the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior
instructed government officials across Europe to instill fear in the population
and increase “the perceived level of personal threat.” As countries prepared to
lock down, the science committee told government ministers “a substantial
number of people still do not feel sufficiently [and] personally threatened” by
covid-19. In order for the controlling lockdowns to work, the committee
instructed government officials to use fear to their advantage.
Now, just a year
later, the Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behavior (SPI-B) REGRETS
using fear to control people and admits they used “unethical” and
“totalitarian” methods to isolate,
defraud and intimidate people into submission.
One of the group’s
members, psychologist Gavin Morgan, said, “Clearly, using fear as a means of
control is not ethical. Using fear smacks of totalitarianism. It’s not an
ethical stance for any modern government.”
Government dictators are beginning to feel the
backlash from the public
These confessions
come at a time during intense public backlash. The people are accusing their
government officials of ramping up fear of infectious disease risk to
unlawfully detain individuals and deprive them of their civil liberties. These
government fear tactics used intimidation to discriminate and lock down select
businesses and activities, coercing people to abide by inconsistent and asinine
medical edicts. People across the United Kingdom are clamoring to hold
government officials accountable for illegal, totalitarian methods that led to
human rights abuses.
UK Prime Minister
Boris Johnson has been pressured to announce a public, independent inquiry into the
Covid-19 scandal. Johnson confirmed that the Government
will establish an independent public inquiry on a statutory basis, with full
powers under the Inquiries Act of 2005. This inquiry will take oral evidence in
public “under oath” and compel all relevant materials to be produced, beginning
in 2022.
SPI-B is the
sub-committee that initially fear-mongered to Sir Patrick Vallance, the chief
scientific adviser for the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE).
The fear mongering was used to manipulate populations to comply with government
authorities. One SPI-B scientist testified, “In March [2020] the Government was
very worried about compliance and they thought people wouldn’t want to be
locked down. There were discussions about fear being needed to encourage
compliance, and decisions were made about how to ramp up the fear. The way we
have used fear is dystopian. The use of fear has definitely been ethically
questionable. It’s been like a weird experiment.”
One SPI-B member
admitted that the committee’s purpose is to use psychology for “mind control.”
“That’s what we do… clearly we try and go about it in a positive way, but it
has been used nefariously in the past,” the member said.
The fear, control and loss of liberty are contributing
factors to sickness, hospitalization and death, not solutions
Another SPI-B
member said the “pandemic” was used by government to “grab power.” “We have to
be very careful about the authoritarianism that is creeping in,” the advisor said.
The fear of pathogens and fear of government led to a loss of liberty that was
a contributing facto to sickness, hospitalization, and death. The government
pretends these methods are for everyone’s “safety” but these methods have not proven to be public health
solutions in the slightest. Instead, the
control caused public disorder, drug addictions, domestic abuse, overdoses,
suicides, high blood pressure, weight gain, and a myriad of health problems
that are often the underlying factor for covid-19 mortality.
Indeed, governments
inundated the public with only fearful news, broadcasting case counts, but
never coming clean about how the covid-19 PCR tests were falsely calibrated
with a high cycle to generate an onslaught of false
positives. The number of people who recovered was
never broadcast either, and no information was provided to encourage a healthy
immune response and effective recovery.
The government used
data on hospitalizations and deaths, but did not sort out the reasons why
people were hospitalized in the first place or discuss the contributing factors
that went into their hospital death. Death was used for political gain and to
generate more fear, even though medical systems were fraudulently counting
people who “died with covid” as people “who died from covid.” The truth was
always buried and covered up by an agenda of fear and control. The
constant bombardment of fear and control destroyed countless
lives, oppressing natural immune function, and making people mentally and
physically susceptible to sickness and complications. This is an unacceptable
way for governments to treat their people.
Sources
include:
Abonneren op:
Posts (Atom)
Kan een magnetische motorgenerator worden gebruikt om onze huizen gratis van stroom te voorzien?
december 20, 2024 49 John Christie (links) and Lou Brits (rechts) met Lutec 1000 in 2001. Bron: Rex Research (via The Cairns Pos...
