dinsdag 12 juli 2022

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche smeekt: ‘Vaccineer je kinderen niet, het kan hun doodvonnis zijn’

9 JULI 2022    Redactie Blckbx

 


https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/videos-and-interviews/dont-vaccinate-your-children-with-covid-vaccines-ever 7:30

 In een videoboodschap smeekt dr. Geert Vanden Bossche ouders om hun kinderen onder géén voorwaarde te laten vaccineren tegen COVID. ‘Doe je het wel, dan kan dat hun doodvonnis betekenen’.

 Hieronder het hele transscript van zijn betoog. De video is onderaan het artikel in zijn geheel te bekijken.

 

“Mijn naam is Geert Vanden Bossche. Ik ben vaccinoloog. Ik heb vele, vele jaren in de vaccinindustrie gewerkt. Ik ben getraind als viroloog, en heb vele jaren gewerkt, niet alleen in de vaccinindustrie maar ook bij Gavi en de Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

 Vandaag wil ik het over jullie kinderen hebben.

 Ik smeek jullie, ik smeek jullie echt, vaccineer je kinderen niet tegen COVID.

 Ik zal mijn best doen om zo goed mogelijk uit te leggen waarom dit dramatisch zou zijn.

 Ik ga het niet eens hebben over het feit dat er geen noodzaak is om kinderen te vaccineren tegen COVID. En dat er te veel en te gevaarlijke bijwerkingen zijn.

 Ik ga het hebben over de invloed van deze vaccins op het immuunsysteem van kinderen. Ik overdrijf niet als ik zeg dat deze vaccins een doodsvonnis kunnen zijn voor je kind.


Aangeboren antilichamen

Laat me uitleggen hoe deze vaccins het aangeboren immuunsysteem van je kind zullen beschadigen.

 Ten eerste, en dit zijn feiten en data die je kan checken, we hebben nooit, echt nooit een viraal vaccin gebruikt, anders dan verzwakt levend vaccin. Tijdens de kindertijd gebruiken we nooit een ander vaccin dan verzwakt levend vaccin. En daar is een goede reden voor.

 Dit heeft alles te maken met de innate of aangeboren antilichamen in het kind. Een kind is uitgerust met een speciaal soort antilichamen, aangeboren antilichamen. En die antilichamen zijn maar gedurende een beperkte tijd aanwezig tijdens de kindertijd, daarna verdwijnen ze.

 

Kickoff immuunsysteem

Deze aangeboren antilichamen hebben een ontzettend belangrijke functie. Zij helpen het kind om zijn eigen immuunsysteem een kickoff te geven. De enige manier waarop het dit goed kan doen, is dankzij de aangeboren antilichamen. Wat doen deze antilichamen?

 Ten eerste kunnen de aangeboren antilichamen het virus neutraliseren. En niet alleen COVID maar allerlei virussen. Virussen zijn overal en mensen worden er continu aan blootgesteld.

 Maar nog belangrijker, door zich te binden aan het levende virus, leren de aangeboren antilichamen om de juiste instructies te geven aan het immuunsysteem om niet alleen de virussen waarmee het geconfronteerd is te herkennen, maar ook vele andere virussen. En dat is belangrijk want de aangeboren antilichamen zullen op termijn verdwijnen. Dus moet het immuunsysteem aangeleerd worden om later in het leven virussen te herkennen, als de aangeboren antilichamen er niet meer zijn.

 Maar dat is nog niet alles. Door zich te binden aan virussen zullen de aangeboren antilichamen voorkomen dat je aangeboren immuunsysteem zelfcomponenten herkent. Dit zijn componenten van het eigen lichaam van het kind, die niet herkend moeten worden.

 

Wat gebeurt er als je je kind vaccineert?

Wat gebeurt er als je je kind vaccineert? Dan creëert het vaccin antilichamen, die zich sterk zullen binden aan het virus en zij zullen de aangeboren antilichamen verdringen. De aangeboren antilichamen zijn dan niet meer in staat om zich te binden aan het virus.

 Het binden van de vaccin-geïnduceerde antilichamen is volstrekt nutteloos. Waarom? Het is algemeen bekend dat de vaccinale antilichamen niet meer in staat zijn om de circulerende varianten te neutraliseren. Het virus is resistent geworden. De antilichamen kunnen de infectie door het virus niet meer voorkomen.

 Het is zelfs nog erger. Door zich te binden aan het virus zullen de vaccinale antilichamen de besmettelijkheid van het virus verhogen. Ik weet zeker dat sommigen van jullie al wel eens gehoord hebben van antibody dependant enhancement van infectie, dat is precies wat deze niet-neutraliserende vaccinale antilichamen zullen doen.

 In de tweede plaats. Omdat vaccinale antilichamen voorkomen dat de aangeboren antilichamen zich binden aan het virus, zullen ze ook voorkomen dat het aangeboren immuunsysteem getraind wordt om virussen te herkennen. Ook virussen waarmee het tijdens de pandemie geconfronteerd is zoals SARS-COV 2.

 Die training is cruciaal om ervoor te zorgen dat het immuunsysteem deze virussen later in het leven nog steeds kan herkennen, als het aangeboren immuunsysteem er niet meer is.

 Ten derde. Door te voorkomen dat aangeboren antilichamen zich binden aan levende virussen, omdat ze verdrongen zijn door de vaccinale antilichamen, sta je het aangeboren immuunsysteem toe om zelfcomponenten te herkennen. Dat zal leiden tot immuunpathologieauto-reactiviteit en immuunreacties die de componenten van het lichaam aanvallen.

 

Kinderen continu geboosterd

Maar ook zullen deze vaccin-geïnduceerde antilichamen veel langer blijven. Waarom? Als je kind gevaccineerd is, zal het continu geboosterd worden. Niet door andere vaccins, maar door de circulerende varianten. Omikron circuleert like hell. Het zal de antilichamen voortdurend boosten. Dus de antilichaam titers zullen hoog blijven en continu de aangeboren antilichamen verdringen. [De titer van een bepaalde stof in het bloed is de verdunning waarbij deze nog aantoonbaar is]. Dus dit betekent dat het aangeboren immuunsysteem van het kind niet meer getraind wordt, geen instructies meer krijgt. Dit is onomkeerbaar. Ik ben heel, heel serieus.

 Nu vertel je me, maar er zijn sommige kinderen die heel ziek worden. Die moeten we vaccineren. Ik ontken niet dat sommige kinderen nu heel ziek worden.

 

Duizend keer erger

Ik zal uitleggen dat als je kinderen vaccineert het duizend keer erger zal worden. Waarom worden ongevaccineerde kinderen nu en dan heel erg ziek? Ik vertelde al dat kinderen heel goed beschermd zijn door hun aangeboren antilichamen, gedurende hun kindertijd. Ze ontwikkelen wat we noemen asymptomatische besmetting. Ze worden geïnfecteerd maar vertonen geen of slechts milde symptomen. Als een consequentie van deze asymptomatische besmetting kunnen kinderen soms, niet altijd maar heel soms, antilichamen ontwikkelen die een beetje lijken op vaccinale antilichamen en die ook specifiek zijn. Maar deze antilichamen zijn er maar kort, ze verdwijnen na zes tot acht weken. In tegenstelling tot de vaccin-geïnduceerde antilichamen hebben deze antilichamen lage titers.

 Als een kind opnieuw wordt blootgesteld aan het virus, gedurende deze zes tot acht weken dat het te maken heeft met deze lage titers antilichamen door een vorige besmetting, gedurende die tijd kan de aangeboren immuunrespons onderdrukt worden. Want zelfs deze antilichamen kunnen de aangeboren antilichamen verdringen, maar slechts gedurende enkele weken, en met lage titers.

 Als de herinfectie gebeurt tijdens deze zes tot acht weken dan kan je kind heel kwetsbaar worden omdat zijn aangeboren immuunrespons onderdrukt is. Dan kan je kind erg ziek worden. Maar ten eerste is dat heel, heel zeldzaam, niet alle kinderen ontwikkelen dit. Ten tweede is het tijdelijk, omdat de antilichamen niet lang blijven in tegenstelling tot de vaccinale antilichamen. Ten derde zijn de antilichamen titers heel laag, die ze ontwikkelen als gevolg van de asymptomatische besmetting.

 Als je kind op tijd wordt behandeld zal het volledig herstellen en immuniteit ontwikkelen voor de rest van zijn leven.

 

Nieuwe varianten ontstaan door vaccineren

Waarom is het dat sommige kinderen opnieuw geïnfecteerd worden al zes tot acht weken nadat ze hun eerste besmetting meemaken? Dat heeft te maken met de hoge besmettelijkheid van de variant van het virus die nu rondgaat. Dat is een direct resultaat van de massale vaccinatiecampagne. Daardoor hebben we het virus toegestaan om zich aan te passen aan de bevolking met besmettelijkere varianten. Dat is de reden waarom iemand die vandaag is blootgesteld, over een paar weken opnieuw geïnfecteerd kan worden.

 Dus als je je kinderen vaccineert, verander je deze tijdelijke situatie in een permanente. Je gaat het aangeboren immuunsysteem onderdrukken voor een lange tijd, waarin het niet in staat zal zijn om aangeleerd te worden om alle virussen te herkennen die het moet herkennen. Maar in plaats daarvan zelfs ertoe gezet kan worden om componenten van het eigen lichaam te herkennen. Dat zal leiden tot auto-reactiviteit en immuunpathologie.

 De antilichamen die volwassenen en adolescenten ontwikkelen, neutraliseren ook niet, en ‘they do enhance’, ze vergroten de besmettelijkheid van het virus. Maar op hetzelfde moment kan ernstige ziekte nog steeds voorkomen worden bij deze mensen, die niet meer beschikken over aangeboren antilichamen. Bij kinderen is het enige wat deze infectieverhogende, niet-neutraliserende antilichamen doen het verdringen van de aangeboren antilichamen. Zodat het immuunsysteem in de eerste fase van het leven geen goede kickoff kan krijgen. Het kan geen vreemde virussen herkennen. Het zal zelfcomponenten herkennen. Het zal leiden tot gigantisch veel dood door COVID. Daar bestaat geen twijfel over. En zeer ernstige immuunpathologie.

 

Vaccineer je kind niet

Ik zweer. Ik heb dertig jaar vaccinexpertise. Dit is geen grap. Het kan niet bestaan dat ouders de goedkope publiciteit en de mainstreamboodschap aanvaarden dat ze hun ‘kinderen moeten vaccineren’. Het is extreem gevaarlijk. Waar ik het over heb is veel gevaarlijker dan de bijwerkingen waar mensen het over hebben. Dus alsjeblieft, denk eraan, ik smeek je, Ik smeek je echt, vaccinneer je kind niet. Omdat in veel gevallen het een doodvonnis zal betekenen voor je kind. Dankjewel.”

 


VIDEO LINKS:

https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/videos-and-interviews/dont-vaccinate-your-children-with-covid-vaccines-ever

https://rumble.com/v1az8uc-dont-vaccinate-your-children-with-covid-vaccines-ever.html

 

BRON:

https://www.blckbx.tv/corona/dr-geert-vanden-bossche-smeekt-vaccineer-je-kinderen-niet-het-kan-hun-doodvonnis-zijn

 

maandag 11 juli 2022

UNDERSTANDING WHAT WE’RE UP AGAINST - INTERVIEW WITH PATRICK WOOD


Video Link: https://www.bitchute.com/video/KTO0gU4GBzqY/


Patrick Wood, a repeat guest, has spent decades studying technocracy — an invented economic system that the global cabal is currently trying to implement worldwide. He was recently interviewed by The Defender, the Children's Health Defense newsletter. You will find that interview below. I would actually encourage you to watch that one first, because it provides a really good background of Wood and his work.

It’s become absolutely crucial to understand what we’re up against, globally, and who’s responsible for the rising totalitarianism and their ultimate intention.

The COVID pandemic was a coup d’état by the technocratic cabal that is behind the global takeover agenda, referred to as The Great Reset.

The Great Reset was introduced by the World Economic Forum, which is tightly coupled to the United Nations and the World Health Organization. Their agenda is to implement a global type of totalitarianism based on technocratic and transhumanist ideologies. Part of that plan also includes reengineering and controlling all life forms, including humans.

While the outward expression of technocracy will appear as totalitarianism, the control center is not an individual. Rather than a single person ruling by the decree, technocracy relies on control through technology and algorithm. This is a very important difference. In short, there will be no individual to blame or hold accountable. The “dictator” is an algorithm.

Technocracy is an invented and unnatural form of economics that expresses itself as totalitarianism and requires social engineering to work. Technocrats in the past defined technocracy as the science of social engineering. Controlling the populace is crucial for the system to function.

Article link: https://bit.ly/39g1Vyi

Subscribe for the latest health news: http://bit.ly/2CEBM8j

 



“Asymptomatic patient” is a hoax

 

“Asymptomatic patient” is a hoax

BY GREATREJECT · 15/01/2021

At this point, there is an overwhelming amount of evidence showing that the PCR tests are not doing what they’re supposed to be doing. The whole freaking world IGNORES this!!!

Who knows more about the PCR tests than it’s inventor? Kary Mullis: “With PCR, if you do it well you can find almost anything in anybody“. The MSM are doing everything they can to censor & ignore this.

Few weeks ago, a portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test, and that “the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%”. Not a single word from the media.

Study from november 2020: PCR does not detect SARS-CoV-2. Ignored by the MSM.

There are cases in which the false positive rate is 100%. It depends on the lab because each lab uses a different number of amplification cycles for the PCR.

International experts suggest that up to 90% COVID cases could be false positives. Not a word from the media.

A group of Australian lawyers have sent an open letter to their government: “This is no pandemic, Covid19 tests are unreliable to test any specific disease.” They are also ignored.

Former chief science officer for Pfizer says “second wave” is faked on false-positive COVID tests. What do the media do? They ignore him.

This is madness.

 

https://greatreject.org/asymptomatic-patient-is-a-hoax/

The last dance of the tyrants



GREAT RESET

The last dance of the tyrants

BY GREATREJECT · 28/01/2022

To the same extent that the vaccination campaign is becoming implausible, its advocates are stepping up the pressure – but they will not be able to hide their failure forever.

What helps when vaccinations often prove ineffective and even harmful? More vaccinations! And if many people just don’t want to go along with it anymore? Then more violence is needed. With this “logic,” the Corona clique is not only destroying the already crumbling trust in politics, but also the remnants of our democratic system. Debates on compulsory vaccination, expulsion of unvaccinated people from the Bundestag’s plenary chamber, shortening the period of validity of convalescent status – the champions of the coercive regime continue to rely on ridicule and division. They behave confidently, as if their path through the crisis, which so far has been accompanied by a trail of destruction, were a brilliant success story. Perhaps we are indeed witnessing the last gasp of a dying narrative – or perhaps its champions will manage to make it through one more time in the extension. One thing is certain: at this point, one would not like to be in the shoes of those who have to justify a seemingly largely useless vaccination, especially in the case of Omicron. The moment of truth may still be delayed, and the high incidence rates allow those in power to play on people’s fears once more – but sooner or later the final sigh will reach us. Already more and more misguided people are gathering at the gates of the spiritual fortress in which their tormentors have entrenched themselves, writes Roland Rottenfußer.

Mandatory vaccination has not been abolished, only postponed. For the first time in post-war history, people may end up in prison as early as this spring, not for something they have done, but for what they are. The unvaccinated may soon be fined by their government and jailed as a substitute. While a minority of citizens have remained themselves over the past two years, the world around them has gone into a swelling moral furor: it is no longer enough to entice 60, 70 or 80 percent of citizens to vaccinate or – to have chanted – “everyone must do it.”

And how do most citizens respond? Instead of directing their aggression at those who oppress them, they direct their aggression at those who point out the oppression. Kai Strittmatter describes the mentality of the submissive very aptly in his China book:

“A special stage of numbness is that in which the subject hates everything that is good and just. Every idealist is to him a hypocrite, everyone who stands up for justice is to him a shameless opportunist, who in reality acts only for himself.”

Why is this so?

“The impression of moral inferiority arouses defensive reflexes in people everywhere. Even in the West, studies have shown that those who are the only ones in a group to act morally right do not reap admiration, but hatred. They show the others their own flaws and remind them that other actions are still possible.”

The Fear of Truth

The current situation is patently absurd. The pressure to vaccinate seems to be increasing at the same rate as the inappropriateness of this injection for truly effective protection is proving itself. The more the prevailing narratives crumble – especially that about the supposedly blissful effect of the injection – the more confident and intolerant its proponents seem to become. We can only hope, as the Viennese psychiatrist Raphael Bonelli hypothesizes, that this is the last of several phases of “defense” – a psychological term describing resistance to a truth that comes to light in the therapeutic process and is perceived by the patient as unbearable.

People are dying in connection with vaccination. But noticing this is only the first step. The second would be to let this fact get to you, believe it, and draw the necessary conclusions from it – for example, distrust the current mass vaccination campaign or reconsider your own intention to vaccinate. Why do so many contemporaries fail to see the obvious and – even leftists! – remain loyal to the government in the worst attack on freedom in 76 years? This, says Bonelli, has much to do with the dynamics of repression well known to psychiatrists.

“When a belief system to which one’s own sense of security is closely tied threatens to collapse, people consistently and often aggressively reject truths that don’t fit into prefabricated images.”


The vulnerable vaccinated

Let’s look back: as early as the early fall of 2021, 60 to 70 percent of people were dually vaccinated. But instead of corona problems decreasing as a result of the supposedly beneficial jab, dramatically increasing “incidences” were reported. This was followed by a wave of discrimination against a certain segment of the population unprecedented in post-war history.

But again, none of this seemed to help, again the number of incidents rose. And one read reports everywhere of overcrowded intensive care units – mainly because there had already been a turnover of nursing staff during the epidemic, not because the physical object “bed” had become scarce. This was followed by a modern witch hunt of the worst kind: unvaccinated people would “occupy” the scarce hospital slots actually reserved for decent people.

The official figures on the ratio of vaccinated to unvaccinated people in intensive care units can safely be questioned – in many cases, there are not even usable figures available. In any case, the effect of the injection is not so impressive that one could not also respect its renunciation as a rational and humanly understandable decision.

In fact, recent figures from the Robert Koch Institute now suggest that vaccinated people are more likely to contract the Omicron variant than unvaccinated people, as Gunnar Kaiser, among others, reports in a video. “Of the 5,116 Omicron cases whose vaccination status was known, 4,020 were fully vaccinated.” Of those who were fully vaccinated, those who were “boostered” did better. Rounding up the numbers, we can say that one in five of those affected was unvaccinated, another had received a booster, and the remaining three had been vaccinated “only” twice.

So it looks like the twice-vaccinated are currently a particularly vulnerable group as far as Omicron is concerned – and that after a year of trying to sell us this status as the Non plus Ultra. Since it is not possible to become unvaccinated again, such vulnerable people can only take refuge in the next “booster.” Meanwhile, however, even fervent proponents of vaccination seem to realize that the protection provided by vaccination has a rather short shelf life – after two to three months, immunity declines rapidly.

And while all of this information should have impressively refuted the fixation on vaccination as the supposed only solution, the proponents’ answer is: more vaccinations. Perhaps other, “updated” vaccines as well. The “vaccine taboo” previously painted on the wall only by incorrigible conspiracy theorists now appears to be seriously approaching humanity.

Toward the vaccine taboo

It goes without saying that those in charge in politics and the media, who have conducted this hitherto unprecedentedly intrusive vaccination campaign, will have a hard time selling the hitherto patient people an endless marathon of vaccination. Millions of people will sooner or later transform themselves from supporters of discrimination against the unvaccinated to being discriminated against themselves. At some point, almost everyone will be unable to keep up.

State power should therefore either openly propagate vaccination for life, or admit that the entire logic it had propagated for more than two years had been extremely fragile. It should be clear: since vaccinations not only produce predominantly no benefits for the subjects, but – apart from possible vaccine damage – even increase the risk of infection (!), compulsory vaccination should, at least in the case of Omicron, be shelved as a historically nonsensical idea.

Indirect pressure to vaccinate should also be completely eliminated from public life. Finally, advocates must act with the modesty appropriate to the rather meager results of their actions.

But the players are still playing for time. From the perspective of the pharmaceutical lobbyists and “their” politicians, this tactic makes perfect sense. Even if the whole house of cards collapses in mid-2022 or 2023, millions of doses of vaccine can still be injected until then. The ladies and gentlemen are playing poker.

They are trying to give the impression, through a self-confident aura completely divorced from reality, that things can go on forever, and that giving in to the call to vaccinate is the last chance for everyone to live a semi-carefree life for years to come. Being a resident of this state means buying one’s way out of the state’s harassment at regular intervals by offering one’s body resignedly to the invaders, in the hope that things will go well one more time and that worse health problems will not arise.

There are already signs that the “unvaccinated” will become the new enemy in 2022 alongside the already inadequate unvaccinated. We face an endless loop of seasonal relief, new wave, new panic, new vaccine failure, new booster, and so on. And even as the government-chanted “vaccination rate” rises, people will continue to blame the remaining 20, 10, 5 or 2 percent of the unvaccinated for the misery.

However, an annual cycle – as with voluntary flu vaccination – does not seem to be sufficient. If one extends this logic to the end, 20-year-olds today would still need to be vaccinated 120 or even 240 times in their remaining lives. And even if one considers the currently occurring vaccine damage to be relatively minor – which would be tantamount to mocking those affected – will it remain in such “few” incidents with such permanent exposure to dubious, insufficiently tested substances? Won’t the burden increase with each new booster?

The sick republic

The sickness rate among the people in this country is already high – as far as Corona is concerned, but also other infections and diseases. Never before have I observed such an accumulation in my personal environment. It is very difficult to prove whether this is often due to “vaccine damage”. But in the end, one can speak of a grandiose failure of health policy in recent years – whether the cause is a lack of help, especially for mental and psychosomatic illnesses, a broken health care system, or a minister who, along with like-minded people, talks and regulates health disorders. The vaccine scare only reinforces this tendency.

The more “health” became the focus of everyday politics and “stay healthy” became the mantra of our time, the sicker people became.

As a result, we urgently need the opposite of what is happening now: an end to the constant attacks on our psyche, our mental health, our social cohesion and our physical integrity.

There are also more optimistic predictions, namely that Omicron, as an infectious variant with relatively mild disease progression, could be Corona’s farewell performance, as it were. While the political panic orchestra will be reluctant to relinquish its cherished pretext of repression, other themes could follow in its footsteps: Eco-totalitarianism, new wave of refugees, supply shortages, financial crisis, energy crisis, tensions with Russia… Such a soft-boiled population can thus be further bent and reduced to worm shapes at will by a determined power elite.

But the future is open. For the protagonists, too, the Corona maneuver is nothing more than an experiment that – from their point of view – can succeed or fail. The contradictions I alluded to could lead to a collapse of the narrative, which is already being kept alive more badly than well. At a time when we have been betrayed by almost everyone from whom we might have expected help, we are left to our own devices. This may seem frightening, but it is also an opportunity for us to become politically mature – if we have not already done so. A new culture of courage, solidarity and self-organization can emerge, and in many cases is already emerging.

My personal Winter Solstice

On December 28, 2021, my wife and I went to the town hall of our rather sleepy rural town late in the afternoon. It was rumored that a “candlelight walk” would take place there. Under the motto “Stand together, go together,” the vaccinated and unvaccinated wanted to send a signal that they would not be divided. We did not expect a large number of people. But then: a sea of lights, people who began to move on the sidewalk of our main street – candles in hand. Silent, wordless, mostly without masks. Banners were barely visible. No one was making speeches. The police behaved calmly and even praised the peaceful atmosphere.

Similar events also occurred in our neighboring municipalities – as in many larger and smaller cities around the country. It would have been difficult to dismiss these demonstrations as “right-wing” – it was too obvious that ordinary citizens were standing and walking. One can smile at the number of 500 people – set against the large demonstrations of Berlin in August 2020. But there are a lot of them. They are everywhere. And they will continue. The comparison with 1989 comes to mind.

The partly petrified, partly exhausted and ragged expressions of the leaders these days – Lauterbach, Wieler, Drosten, Scholz, Kretschmann – are also reminiscent of the final phase of the GDR, while a relaxed mood of optimism spreads among the demonstrators.

The candle at nightfall is a powerful symbol. I have been there 5 times now and will keep going. One of the few posters at the demos said, “Imagine it’s 3G – and no one is participating!” Yes, let’s imagine it!

This was my own Winter Solstice 2021, and it also helped me through the New Year, which was often accompanied by a rather depressed mood. More despair was rare in this terrible pandemic of destructive thought viruses. But also: more hope was rare.

We must not give in to crippling resignation now, for something is breaking. I recommend everyone to participate in such events regionally. My praise for this “silent” form of protest does not mean that I am opposed to other demonstrations with analytical and combative speeches. But what we need now is sobriety, determination and infectious perseverance.

Let’s turn budding hope into the certainty of a better reality. Right now – as early as 2022!

Source: Rubikon.news

 

https://greatreject.org/the-last-dance-of-the-tyrants/ 

Vaccinatiecampagne (de 4de al!?) in de herfst "gaat zeer veel kosten" (in België)

 6/07/2022 om 16:00

In het najaar komt er een nieuwe vaccinatiecampagne tegen het coronavirus, zo hebben de ministers van Volksgezondheid woensdag beslist, en die zal veel geld kosten.

                                               © PixabayVaccinatiecampagne in de herfst "gaat zeer veel kosten"

De nieuwe boostercampagne is vooral gericht naar het zorgpersoneel, iedereen die een zwak immuunsysteem heeft en wie ouder is dan 50 jaar: zij krijgen automatisch een uitnodiging voor een boosterprik.

Federaal minister van Volksgezondheid Frank Vandenbroucke geeft alvast aan dat deze campagne "zeer veel gaat kosten", maar hoe de verschillende overheden van het land deze kosten zullen verdelen, is nog niet bekend.

"Maar het is onze plicht om deze campagne op te zetten”, zo zegt Vandenbroucke nog.

(Fausto by Tagtik/Source: Nieuwsblad, Belga/Picture: Pixabay)

       Tagtik

Video: ‘Letterlijk alle oorlogen van onze eeuw zijn gevoerd op basis van leugens’

Er moet oorlog gecreëerd worden. In het geval van Irak en Afghanistan is duidelijk hoe ze dat hebben gedaan: leugens creëren. Nu lijkt ieder...