donderdag 22 december 2022

Is Depopulation we are Seeing, Planned or Incidental?

 Is Depopulation we are Seeing, Planned or Incidental? December Births and Deaths Update

I was WRONG in My Past Optimism

This is my routine update on reductions in birth rates and increases in mortality. Such reductions in birth rates and increases in mortality are called depopulation, which we will discuss today. I will also admit my mistake regarding my past hope that the birth rate decline would be temporary. A question arises: is the current depopulation-in-progress an accident, or was it intentional and planned?

Latest News on Births

Sweden's October birth rates were released: In Oct 2022, births were 8,138, and in October 2021, births were 9,316. So, live births are down 13% this year for October. El Gato recently published a good discussion in his October update. I also wrote a post on Sweden, which I published a while ago.

UK stopped updating live birth statistics in its UKHSA Vaccine reports - the last update stopped at June 2022 with a 15.3% decline in live births year-on-year.

California recently stopped providing monthly data for 2021 - so we can no longer compare the 2022 numbers with 2021. Fortunately, I have a saved CSV file from October, when 2021 birth numbers were still provided. Live births in November of 2022 were 33,815. They were 35,506 for Nov of 2021, which means that California’s live births dropped 5% year-on-year for November.

Germany also provides monthly live births. German statistics bureau DeStatis does not provide usable links. To get to monthly live births, visit DeStatis and search for “geburten”, then select “births”, select “births” again, and go to “Live births by months - preliminary results.” Maybe this link will work:

Unfortunately, DeStatis, like California, no longer provides live births by month for 2021 - to make it harder to compare 2022 with 2021. However, I found this tweet providing the 2021 data:

So, based on the last month available for 2022, we have a September-to-September change in births: 64348/71084 = 9.5% decline in live births in Germany for September.

Please read my early article on Germany, explaining the cause for the decline in births:

Igor’s Newsletter
New Data from Germany: Births and Even Abortions are Down!
Three weeks ago, I wrote an article about Germany, highlighting a very large and consistent drop in births starting January this year, 9 months after vaccination of young people began, until March. Since then, I found more data regarding Germany: Arkmedic pointed out that April births are available…
Read more

Admitting my Mistake on Birth Rates

I admit that my early hope that birth rates would recover did not pan out. It is a huge disappointment for me, not only because my hope did not materialize, but most importantly because the birth rate problem is worse than I hoped, and it saddens me.

This is the article where I expressed my hope, which proved false:

Igor’s Newsletter
Good Fertility News for Vaccinated People
I realize that my substack is full of bad news. That is not intentional and is because the important newsworthy stuff that I found, was of negative and gloomy nature. I was searching for something uplifting and finally found an interesting good trend…
Read more

The birth rates are NOT recovering! My hope still is that they will recover eventually, but the facts contradict this hope and suggest that birth rate reductions are permanent. Only time will tell.

Excess Mortality

Excess mortality, sadly, also continues in many countries, with hospitals full of sick people and alarmist news reports about multiple illnesses besetting us.

The best data source on mortality is Short Term Mortality Database, which allows downloading weekly data as a CSV file. I have a perl script that compares this year’s mortality, for any given week range, with mortality during the same weeks for years 2017-2019. This way, I compare current mortality to pre-pandemic mortality.

Below, I highlighted excess mortality for countries where it exceeds 12%, for weeks 30-44 (where available).

Is there a “Depopulation Agenda”?

Some people may accuse me of spreading conspiracy theories. I never do that!

Igor’s Newsletter
I Do Not Spread Conspiracy Theories - I Report on Actual News
I published a few recent posts that could, at first sight, seem like I am inventing or spreading far-fetched conspiracy theories. If you think so, I am extremely offended because I do nothing of the sort! Consider this absurd and baseless right-wing conspiracy theory about…
Read more

I only report on things that have already happened, with facts based on existing data or news articles. I never speculate and never put forth any wild conspiracy theories.

So, let’s look at the facts instead of guessing.

We have depopulation in progress: reduced births and increased deaths.

Some people do have a depopulation agenda. In a world of 8 billion diverse people, you can certainly find individuals with an agenda to reduce the population. That’s to be expected — people have all sorts of beliefs and agendas. So, some of them would speak in favor of reducing our population. No surprise here.

Here’s a fine example of one such person: Jane Goodall speaking at the World Economic Forum. “We can solve all the world’s problems if we reduce the world population to where it was 500 years ago”.

Jane, of course, is not suggesting in the video above that we take some sinister action to reduce the world’s population — she is just making an observation, as fact-checkers remind us.

The most important question to ask is: is the current depopulation that we are observing, a result of the depopulation agenda carried out deliberately, or is it just an accident and a confluence of random events?

The answer is that we do not know! I have no idea if the ongoing depopulation results from a deliberate plan!

It could be a completely random coincidence that a zoonotic virus, oddly containing HIV code and Moderna-patentedcancer vaccinesequences from patent 9,587,003, spreads worldwide.

It could be a completely random coincidence that the bats who naturally developed this virus flew 1,000 miles from their bat caves to Wuhan, where there is more than one virological bio laboratory, surreptitiously infected people near those laboratories, and flew away undetected.

It could be a completely random coincidence that the Sars-Cov-2 virus, having an unusual ability to infect immune cells DC-Sign receptor and destroy immune systems, was described in Peter Daszak’s 2018 DEFUSE proposal.

It could be a completely random coincidence that our health authorities were so well prepared via “Event 201” exercise, conducted a month before the pandemic started, and involved WEF, Bill Gates, and China CDC.

It could be a completely random bit of luck that scientists were able to develop a novel vaccine in just two days and helpfully worked on the “Novel Coronavirus vaccine” in July 2019.

It could be an unfortunate accident that the Covid vaccine did not work and fueled the pandemic instead of stopping it.

It could be a simple bureaucratic mistake that taking the immune-system-destroying, HIV-peptide-containing genetic code was mandated for everyone without due diligence.

Surely, Spartacus from ICENI is totally wrong, insisting that Sars-Cov-2 was not an accidental lab leak but was developed intentionally:

ICENI Bulletins
It Wasn't a Lab Leak, it Was Intentional
A False Dichotomy Right now, there is an ongoing debate between the Zoonati and the Lab Leakers as to whether or not SARS-CoV-2 came out of a laboratory or a pangolin. The debate principally involves examination of genetic and epidemiological evidence to try and pin down whether or not the virus had a natural origin. Every now and then, the Zoonosis theo…
Read more

So, I would say, perhaps the depopulation we are observing is a pure accident!

What do you think:

Share your opinion in the comments!

Share

You're currently a free subscriber to Igor’s Newsletter. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Upgrade to paid

woensdag 21 december 2022

Ivermectin works, even if the establishment falsely claims otherwise

 Monday, December 19, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

Tags: alternative medicineantiviralbig governmentconspiracyCOVIDFDAgoodhealthgoodmedicinegoodscienceinfectionsivermectinmedical censorshipoutbreakpandemicparasitespharmaceutical fraudpropagandascience deceptionsmeared

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

8,990VIEWS

 

(Natural News) There was a lot of deception that came out of the covid scamdemic, one of the most prominent being the myth that ivermectin, a safe and effective FDA-approved drug, is somehow dangerous and ineffective to use in the context of the Fauci Flu.

We were told again and again that the drug is just “horse paste” or that it was designed for cattle, even though the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it for humans back in the ’90s. We were also told again and again that the drug does not even work for the Chinese Flu, which is scientifically false.

Truth be told, ivermectin is a wonder drug that is among the safest to ever have been developed by the pharmaceutical industry. It won a Nobel Prize and has been used ever since all around the world to treat parasites and other conditions.

After the Trump administration mentioned it to America, the establishment started to panic and run hit stories on ivermectin. We were told that the drug causes “serious harm” and that it is “dangerous.” We were also told it might be “laced” with “poison,” according to the FDA.

Every scare tactic in the book was attempted to dissuade people from choosing ivermectin over living in fear, avoiding others, wearing a mask, and taking endless “vaccines.” This campaign worked on some, but not all.

Even Merck & Co., the original developer of ivermectin, spoke out against it. The political pressure was simply too much, apparently, for anyone to dare speak out in favor of ivermectin, even though it works. (Related: Ivermectin was found to reduce the risk of death by 92 percent.)

Don’t believe the lies: Ivermectin is safe and effective

Though a handful of studies claim to have found it to be ineffective, many, many more studies – the vast majority, in fact – have found that ivermectin is safe and effective.

Even for those it does not seem to work for, ivermectin does not cause any harmful side effects. The fact that the FDA and other establishment figures felt the need to lie about ivermectin is suspect.

Why was it so important to stop people from using ivermectin? Why did the FDA even go so far as to try to intercept foreign shipments of it into the United States to prevent people from accessing it?

The reality is that ivermectin is a threat to the entire establishment and its covid agenda. The plan was to deceive the entire world into following the official covid protocols, which would have wiped out most people and left behind a small few to become the new globalist slave class.

That plan was intercepted when cracks began to form in the control matrix. The truth slipped out and some people asking questions became many people asking questions – and the rest is history.

We know for a fact that many lives have been saved by ivermectin, which costs next to nothing to make since it is generic and no longer under patent protections. It was an almost perfect medicine that we also know works against coronaviruses – as admitted by none other than Tony Fauci himself prior to the scamdemic.

Had ivermectin been made widely available over the counter for cheap, untold millions of lives could have been saved. Instead, those lives were ended by Fauci and his cadre of mass murderers who still to this day malign ivermectin.

“Ivermectin is a repurposed drug that helps, and could have helped so much more,” reported the Brownstone Institute. “It deserves recognition, not disparagement.”

“What we really need, however, is a way to inoculate ourselves against the lies and misrepresentations of powerful public figures, organizations, and drug companies. Sadly, there are no such vaccines for that contagion.”

Want to learn more about other plandemic deceptions? Visit Plague.info.

Sources for this article include:

Brownstone.org

NaturalNews.com

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-12-19-ivermectin-works-even-if-establishment-claims-otherwise.html

Griezelig nieuws voor de COVID-gevaccineerden

 12/09/2024 Een nieuw, angstaanjagend syndroom kan iedereen treffen, ongeacht leeftijd, die de prik krijgt. Een nieuw syndroom, het ‘ Post-A...