Zij tevens oprichter van 'Artsen Voor Waarheid'.
Dr. De Klerk is woordvoerdster van vele honderden artsen en is in contact met
bijna 90.000 verplegers.
Ze legt uit hoe er paniek wordt veroorzaakt met
valse testresultaten van een volslagen onbetrouwbare PCR test.
89-94% van alle zogenaamde 'besmettingen' zijn
niets anders dan valse positieven!
Download deze video
en verspreid hem
Download deze belangrijke video
en plaats hem overal waar je maar
kunt. Op social media, je website of blog, stuur hem naar vrienden, kennissen
en leidinggevenden in de samenleving. Laat het viraal gaan!
BREAKING: CDC, FDA faked “covid” testing
protocol by using human cells mixed with common cold virus fragments… PCR tests
are merely detecting the common cold
Friday, July 30, 2021 by: Mike Adams
Tags: badhealth, CDC, COVID, Fake, FDA, hoax, influenza, lab tests, pandemic, PCR, Plandemic, Staged, virology, virus
21KVIEWS
In a shocking revelation first reported by Dan Dicks of Press for
Truth (Canada), an FDA document admits that the CDC and FDA conspired to fabricate a
covid-19 testing protocol using human cells combined with common cold virus
fragments because they had no physical samples of the SARS-CoV-2
“covid” virus available.
Without
physical reference material to use for calibration and confirmation, the test
has zero scientific basis in physical reality. And all the PCR analysis based
on this protocol is utterly fraudulent, flagging people as “positive” for covid
when they merely possess tiny quantities of RNA fragments from other
coronavirus strains circulating in their blood.
The FDA
document, available from the FDA.gov website, is entitled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel .” The document astonishingly admits:
(emphasis ours)
Since no
quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the
time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed
for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in
vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of
known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of
human A549 cells and viral
transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
In other
words, they had no covid virus from which to develop and calibrate the test, so
they mixed up a cocktail of human cells and RNA fragments from a common cold
virus, then called it “covid.” The GenBank sequence referred to in this
paragraph is simply a digital library definition that’s labeled “covid” but
has no supporting reference materials in physical reality either.
That’s
because no doctor or researcher has isolated “covid” from any infected,
symptomatic patient. As a result, no laboratory instruments can be
calibrated against actual covid, and the tests simply rely on
digital libraries pushed out by the CDC and WHO, using “covid” as the label.
The PCR tests
are then instructed to look for these genetic sequences obtained from the
fabricated digital libraries, meaning the entire scheme is junk science
circular logic with no basis in physical reality.
Why are there seemingly no certified reference materials for covid
available to laboratories for instrument calibration?
I am the
founder and owner of an analytical laboratory that routinely conducts
quantitative analysis of food contaminants, producing high-precision analysis
results for pesticides, herbicides and heavy metals. In every case where we
conduct lab analysis, we calibrate the instruments against known
physical samples called “external standards” or “certified reference
materials.” (CRM)
Any lab can
purchase CRMs for mercury, arsenic, glyphosate and even salmonella. For example, this link at Biosisto lists CRMs for various salmonella strains. Labs can purchase those
reference materials and use them to calibrate their instruments, making sure their
analysis is traced back to physical, real-world samples of a purified material.
These CRMs, in turn, must be NIST-traceable in order to confirm their origin
and authenticity. All CRMs are therefore labeled with lot numbers and
expiration dates.
While labs
can purchase reference materials for microbes, heavy metals, pesticides, etc. —
all physical materials — I have searched far and wide and have
not been able to locate any certified reference materials for SARS-CoV-2 or
even a weakened, non-viable version of it. As far as I can tell, there
appear to be no physical specimens of isolated covid viruses available for
instrument calibrations and testing protocol quality control.
To be clear,
I’m not saying that viruses don’t exist, and it’s quite clear that the Wuhan
Institute of Virology colluded with Fauci, Daszak, the NIH, Baric and others to
develop a weaponized spike protein. But the spike protein is not a
virus by itself. It’s simply a toxic nanoparticle that can be synthesized
in quantity and then either dumped on cities or added to vaccines and injected
into people via immunization protocols.
I ask the big
question about all this in my science lab whistleblower video here, which
presents more details about all this that will have your head spinning. In
essence, if “covid-19” is a real virus that can be isolated, why are
there apparently no physical reference materials to calibrate laboratory
instruments for covid detection? And why were no such materials used
in the development of the FDA-approved, CDC-endorsed PCR testing protocols?
CDC pulls its own fraudulent covid PCR testing protocol, implying it
cannot differentiate between covid and influenza
What adds to
the mystery in all this is the fact that the CDC just issued a
“laboratory alert,” announcing
their intention to withdraw the faulty PCR testing protocol by the end of this
year. As part of their announcement, they implied that the current PCR test —
the same one the FDA mentioned above, which was developed without any physical
covid samples for calibration — cannot tell the difference between
influenza and covid.
From the CDC
document:
In
preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing
sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin
their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages
laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate
detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.
Why might it
be important to differentiate covid from influenza?
Because, as
it seems, influenza cases nearly disappeared in 2020 as
influenza was re-labeled “covid” due to the faulty testing.
“Percentage
influenza positivity decreased by 64% (p = 0.001) and estimated daily number of
influenza cases decreased by 76% (p = 0.002) in epidemiologic weeks 5–9 of 2020
compared with the preceding years,” reported the CDC in 2020.
In essence,
the medical establishment simply took all the people who would normally be
diagnosed with colds and the flu, and shifted them into the “covid” category in
order to push a covid mass hysteria narrative that would drive people into
vaccines. The vaccines, then, were formulated with spike protein toxic
nanoparticles to cause the “delta” panic wave, which is largely occurring among
vaccinated individuals.
From here,
the plandemic scam proceeds like clockwork: People get sick from the vaccines,
so more vaccine boosters are demanded, which perpetuates the illness. Rinse and
repeat. It never ends until the perpetrators are arrested and people wise up to
the scam.
The CDC has
just published a science document that confirms the entire scam. Click here to view the PDF on our servers.
It’s
entitled, “Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine
Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable
County, Massachusetts, July 2021” and it shockingly admits that 74% of
infections occurred in fully vaccinated (double dose) people:
During July
2021, 469 cases of COVID-19 associated with multiple summer events and large
public gatherings in a town in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, were
identified among Massachusetts residents; vaccination coverage among eligible
Massachusetts residents was 69%. Approximately three quarters (346; 74%)
of cases occurred in fully vaccinated persons (those who had completed a 2-dose
course of mRNA vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna] or had received a single
dose of Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vac- cine ?14 days before exposure).
See, the
vaccine is the pandemic. The vaccine is spreading the spike protein, and the
fake PCR tests provide the fuel to keep the mass hysteria going.
I cover more
details of all this in today’s bombshell podcast via Brighteon.com:
Brighteon.com/dfb235d4-f0d6-4d7d-af06-d1f4e391c4f5
Also see this
video from Dan Dicks, who covers the fake PCR tests as well:
Brighteon.com/a8ef9e25-cdd3-453e-b4dc-97d2faada2b2
Find a new
Situation Update podcast each weekday at:
https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
