The Latest Google Censorship Due to Their Vaccine Investment
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
July 22, 2021
· YouTube’s parent company,
Google, is directly invested in the AstraZeneca/Oxford COVID “vaccine.” This is
why YouTube censors anything that threatens the rollout and future profits of COVID-19
gene modification therapies
· Silicon Valley has been
pushing to transform the health care system into a system based on telemedicine
and personalized care through the use of artificial intelligence (AI). Google is heavily involved in this movement
· Google is also partnered
directly with the U.S. military, which is increasingly working on a
transhumanist agenda
· DARPA is heavily invested
in transhumanist technologies for the use in soldiers, including brain-machine
interfaces and other even more extreme ideas. They recently teamed up with the
Wellcome Trust to create something called “Wellcome Leap,” a movement to usher
in transhumanism
· Normally, there are very
strict rules and regulations surrounding the testing and use of gene
modification technology in humans. It’s only because they’re calling the COVID
shots “vaccines” that they were able to get the EUA, which allows some standard
safety regulations to be bypassed
In the video
above, German attorney and co-founder of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary
Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss1),2,3 Dr. Reiner Fuellmich,4 interviews Whitney
Webb, an independent investigative reporter, about who’s really behind
YouTube’s censorship of medical researchers and their published works.
He recounts how
a medical doctor who after a great deal of trouble managed to get a risk-benefit
analysis of mask mandates published in the Journal of Pediatrics. He created a
short video about his findings, and within minutes of posting it to YouTube,
the video was removed. What is actually going on here? Who is behind the
censoring of peer-reviewed science? Who is trying to influence what?
Google Is Invested in the
COVID ‘Vaccine’
As noted by
Webb, YouTube’s parent company, Google, is directly invested in the
AstraZeneca/Oxford COVID “vaccine.” While the AstraZeneca jab has been framed
as a not-for-profit product, this is far from true. The developers of this gene
modification tool are Adrian Hill and Sarah Gilbert with the Jenner Institute
for Vaccine Research.
While the
Jenner Institute is the official developer of the shot, the actual patents and
royalty rights for the AstraZeneca shot are held by a private company called
Vaccitech, which was founded by Hill and Gilbert. Vaccitech’s investors include:5,6,7,8
·
Google Ventures
·
The Wellcome Trust, which has longstanding links to
the eugenics movement
·
The British government
·
BRAAVOS, a capital investment company set up by a
Deutsche Bank executive. BRAAVO’s investment is partially hidden, as BRAAVO is
the main shareholder of Oxford Science Innovation, which in turn is invested in
Vaccitech
·
Chinese interests, including a Chinese bank branch
and a drug company called Fosun Pharma
All of these
investors stand to profit from this “vaccine” at some point in the near future,
and Vaccitech has been quite open about the future profit potential with its
shareholders, noting that the COVID-19 shot will most likely become an annual vaccine
that is updated each season much like the seasonal flu vaccine.
Sure,
AstraZeneca promised it would not make any profit from this COVID-19 vaccine,
but there’s a time limit on this pledge. The not-for-profit vow expires once
the pandemic is over, and AstraZeneca itself can decide when that is.
Google Is Protecting Its
Financial Stakes
Since Google
has a direct financial interest in AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 “vaccine,” is it any
wonder that its subsidiaries, like YouTube, are censoring information that
threatens the future profitability of these products? I would think not.
More broadly,
Silicon Valley has been pushing to transform the health care system as a whole
into a system based on telemedicine and artificial intelligence (AI).
Essentially, they’re looking to replace doctors with AI-driven apps and the
like.
“They’ve started to sort of reimagine health care
as a way of taking control over people's lives, telling them it's for the
benefit of the public, the collective, and also their personal health, whereas
it's really a way to implement these transhumanist or technocratic technologies
under the guise of that being a health-related venture,” Webb says.
Google, of
course, is intimately involved in all of this. They’re also partnered directly
with the U.S. military. “So, the fact that they're censoring stuff that goes
against the narrative that they want to put forth on matters relating to public
health … really shouldn't surprise anyone,” Webb says.
Johnson & Johnson
Johnson & Johnson’s COVID shot, meanwhile, is
manufactured by an American company called Emergent BioSolutions, which was
previously called BioPort. According to Webb, BioPort was created as a spinoff
of the British biodefence facility at Porton Down.
In her April
2020 article, “A Killer Enterprise: How One of Big Pharma’s Most Corrupt
Companies Plans to Corner the COVID-19 Cure Market,”9 Webb details the
scandal-ridden history of BioPort and its role in the 2001 anthrax attacks and
the opioid crisis. The company was rebranded as Emergent BioSolutions in 2004.
In the featured video, she says:
“They were intimately involved in what happened
with the 2001 anthrax attacks, because it was basically the only way they were
going to manage to save their mandatory — for U.S. military personnel — anthrax
vaccine program,” she says.
“They've been involved in scandals really ever
since then … but were chosen to manufacture [the Johnson & Johnson COVID
shot] despite that, and the person they put in charge of quality control at
this facility that was manufacturing these Johnson & Johnson vaccines has
no experience in that at all, or really in the field of any sort of
pharmaceutical development or chemistry.
His background is being head of military
intelligence teams for the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan. [He] is also
an expert on Iran and North Korea …
More recently, the scandal that's developed in the
U.S. with the Johnson & Johnson vaccine is that these batches were
‘ruined,’ they say basically unusable, and who knows what would have happened
to people if that had been widely used …
Of course, they gave Johnson & Johnson a pass
on that, and the blame has been placed on Emergent BioSolutions, but of course,
nothing has really been done to them as a company. They're intimately connected
to the U.S. military and also to the CIA and a military contractor in Ohio,
Battelle, which has a lot of ties to the anthrax attacks as well.”
Many Unanswered Questions
One of several
deep concerns raised in this interview is whether there are any independent
controls or reviews of the contents of these COVID jabs. What’s really in them?
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, German physician and epidemiologist, asks. They’re all used
under emergency use authorization (EUA), which allows many standard controls to
be bypassed.
Wodarg wonders
whether the drug industry may simply be using the EUA to learn more about how
the mRNA technology actually works, using the public as guinea pigs.
Normally, there
are very strict rules and regulations surrounding the use of gene modification
technology in humans. It’s only because they’re calling them “vaccines” that
they were able to get the EUA that allows a lot of standard safety regulations
to be bypassed.
DARPA is
heavily invested in transhumanist technologies for the use in soldiers,
including brain-machine interfaces and other even more extreme ideas. They
recently teamed up with the Wellcome Trust to create something called ‘Wellcome
Leap,’ a rather unsettling movement to usher in transhumanism.
So, who
controls what goes into these shots? Wodarg points out that some injections
have been found to be nothing but saline, which suggests some people are
actually getting a placebo injection, even though they’re being told they’re
getting the real thing and they’ve not signed up for a formal trial.
Are
“undercover” studies being performed that we’ve not been told about? There are
many unanswered questions about what’s really going on with this COVID
“vaccine” rollout. Webb comments:
“There definitely needs to be more attention given
to the manufacturers of the vaccine because the developers ostensibly just
develop the formula, which is then given to the manufacturers who actually
produce and create the vaccine that is injected into people.
In the case of the U.S., the main manufacturer, not
just for the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, [but also] a few others, is that
same company, Emergent BioSolutions, which has an awful track record. The
Pentagon lost a lawsuit in 2004 where they were accused of using U.S. military
personnel as lab rats in an experimental off-label use of that particular
anthrax vaccine they were producing …
BioPort, now Emergent BioSolutions, have a lot of
interlocking ties with the U.S. military, and also with the department of
health and human services. In terms of the mRNA technology, I definitely agree
that they seized on this opportunity to use it more widely. So, the hidden
hand, I would argue, with the mRNA vaccine, is the U.S. military.
If you look at both the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA
technology, those both really started with a significant investment in 2013, to
both companies, from DARPA [Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency], which
is the advanced research branch of the U.S. military …”
Google’s ‘DARPA’ Program
DARPA, Webb
says, is also heavily invested in transhumanist technologies for the use in
soldiers, including brain-machine interfaces and other even more extreme ideas.
They recently teamed up with the Wellcome Trust to create something called
“Wellcome Leap,” a rather unsettling movement to usher in transhumanism.
As mentioned,
the Wellcome Trust has deep roots in the eugenics movement, making the
collaboration doubly disturbing. For more on this, read Webb’s investigative
report “A ‘Leap’ Toward Humanity’s Destruction.”10
Now, the CEO of
Wellcome Leap, Regina Dugan,11 worked at DARPA. She began working there in
1996 and between 2009 and 2012 served as its first female director. She was the
one who greenlighted the 2013 DARPA funding to Pfizer and Moderna. In 2012, she
left DARPA to create a DARPA equivalent for Google called Advanced Technology
and Projects (ATAP).
She later took
on a similar project at Facebook, called Building 8. Wellcome Leap is basically
slated to be a “global health DARPA,” Webb says, with all the transhumanist
connotations that brings.
Getting back to
the issue of undercover experiments taking place in an unsuspecting public,
Wodarg is very concerned that COVID-19 “vaccine” makers may be experimenting
with various amounts of lipid nanoparticles, which could help explain some of
the acutely lethal effects, and perhaps even the transfer phenomenon that
appears to be occurring between vaccinated individuals and unvaccinated ones.
Of course, we
don’t know if secret comparison trials are being done without our knowledge.
What we do know is that Moderna has been working on mRNA vaccine technology for
many years, and had been unable to solve the nanolipid toxicity problem. When
the dosage was too low, the mRNA didn’t stick around long enough for the drug
to work, and when too high, it became toxic.
Despite years
of work, they were never able to determine an effective nontoxic dose of mRNA
in nanolipid. At least they never announced success. Now we’re supposed to take
their word that they got it all figured out in less than a year? No, most
likely, they never did figure it out and are using the cover of the pandemic to
release an untested vaccine on the public under the guise of emergency use
authorization.
Effective
nontoxic dosing is probably what the public COVID vaccination campaign is going
to help them determine, so that knowledge can then be applied to other gene
modification drugs and vaccines. It’s convenient in the extreme, seeing how
they are not accountable for any of the damage and death their products are
causing, and their unremunerated human test subjects now number in the
billions.
What Is the Vaccination
Campaign Really About?
According to
Fuellmich, all the evidence currently suggests we’re not actually dealing with
a medical emergency that would warrant the use of these gene modification
tools, so the question is, why are they being pushed in such an unprecedented
manner? There must be a reason for it, and if it’s not to address a medical
emergency then what is it? Webb weighs in, saying:
“The Silicon Valley push to remake health care, a
key part of that is what they call precision medicine … They describe it as
medications and vaccines and gene therapies targeted to the individual, i.e.,
targeted to an individual's own genome. This is why we're seeing this increase,
under the guise of COVID-19 testing, of this huge effort to amass genetic data
of people across the world.
Of course, a lot of this is actually being held by
the same Silicon Valley companies. In the case of the Western [part of] the
U.S., a lot of COVID-19 testing has been done by Verily, which is a Google
subsidiary, which at the same time is trying to make their AI health care based
on this genetic data.
A lot of those same technologies for precision
medicine also come from the U.S., military [and] involve predictive diagnoses
where they say, based on an AI algorithm, you are likely to have this disease,
whether it's COVID or cancer or anything else, before you actually show
symptoms of it.
That's being co-developed right now by Google in a
part of the military called the Defense Innovation Unit. There are lots of
other examples of this going on. And so, I would argue that the wide-ranging
use of these RNA vaccines, and treating them as regular vaccines instead of …
gene therapy, is a way to normalize the same type of Silicon Valley-based
precision medicine that they want to be the new normal in healthcare around the
world.”
As you begin to
unravel the interconnected web of players involved in this global vaccination campaign, you keep coming back to
two key movements: the transhumanist movement and the eugenics movement, which
in the mid-1950s actually began to merge. As noted by Fuellmich, it appears
we’re observing “the coming out of a very long-running strategy” to reduce the
population and alter those who are left.
“Yes, absolutely,” Webb says. “If you look
back to someone like Julian Huxley, the [founding] director general of UNESCO
and former president of the British Eugenics Society, which still exists today.
It’s called the Galton Institute. They didn't rename until 1989.
Adrian Hill of the AstraZeneca vaccine spoke at
their 100-year anniversary, celebrating 100 years of … eugenics. The
Wellcome Trust houses their archive, which they think is a great use to
medicine in general.
Going back to Julian Huxley, in 1946 he said we
should make the unthinkable thinkable again. Roughly 10 years later, he coined
the term transhumanism and said that gene editing as a eugenics science needed
to be applied along with … efforts to merge humans with machines as a way to
create a new human being or human being 2.0 …
Recently, one of their board members … [published]
a book that was actually positively reviewed and the UK press about eugenics in
the 21st century. Front and center are these gene editing ‘medicines’ … I think
it's about control, and, ultimately … about eugenics.”
Webb goes on to
discuss the January 2020 meeting of technocratic elites in Davos, Switzerland,
at which an Israeli keynote speaker, Yuval Harari, warned we are entering an age
of digital dictatorship where humans “are no longer mysterious souls — we are
now hackable animals,”12 through the use of genetic engineering and
advances in brain machine interface and technology. Needless to say, he urged
the World Economic Forum members to make wise use of this technology.
Fruitful Dissent
It’s a very
interesting discussion so, if you have the time, please do listen to the whole
interview. In closing, Webb suggests that probably the best, most effective
form or resistance is counter-economics. To joint together with others to
produce what you need to survive, independent of the centralized systems and
corporations that seek to control us.
“The most powerful protest at this point is going
to be an economic protest,” Webb says. “Governments
around the world are just waiting for more violent protest or riots. They have
lots of tools and plans to deal with those. For example, in the U.S., they're
launching a war on domestic terror that is obviously going to target
dissidence, from the way it is written …
That is the type of response that they're
expecting, whereas a passive nonviolent protest of economic resistance and
counter-economics, just becoming independent of these people trying to build
these systems [of control], I think is the most effective way to really counter
it at this point.
And I think a
broader counter-economics movement, in addition to a larger movement of people
not consenting and just not engaging with the system, is something they fear a
lot more, [which] I think could be really powerful.”
- Sources
and References
·
1 Acu2020.org
Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss
·
2 Acu2020.org
Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee, English
·
4 Fuellmich.com, Dr. Reiner
Fuellmich Bio (German)
·
5 The Wall Street Journal August 2, 2020
·
9 Unlimited
Hangout April 9, 2020
·
10 Unlimited
Hangout June 25, 2021
·
11 Wellcomeleap.org Regina Dugan
·
12 WEF
January 24, 2020
