The vaccines are making it more likely you'll be
infected with Omicron 90 days after you are fully vaccinated.
To keep vaccine
effectiveness high against omicron, vaccination every 30 days is needed.
Dec
25, 2021
Update Jan 7,
2022: The numbers in the Denmark study described
below are now confirmed
by government data from Germany showing that vaccinated people are 8X more likely to develop
Omicron than unvaccinated people. This is not surprising since a paper
from Germany showed the same thing: the more you vaccinate, the worse it gets.
Worried about Omicron? Guess what? After 90 days,
the vaccine they gave you is going to make you MORE likely
to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine
treadmill, the harder to get off in the future and the easier you’ll make it
for the virus.
In short, we’ve been lied to about the vaccine. It
is protecting you less and less over time. While you may get a benefit for
earlier variants, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is
going to be negative. In short, you are getting a short term benefit against
Delta, but at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to
everything else.
These vaccines may help you win the war against a
variant that may soon be rare, but the price you pay is that you make your
immunity to everything else worse. It’s a dumb tradeoff (especially since early
treatments work so well). But the people making the laws won’t believe any of
the science referenced in this article, so it will continue.
Alix Mayer alerted me to this game changing tweet
about a study in Denmark which instantly went viral as you can see from the
number of retweets:
Ezra Levant 🍁 @ezralevant
Holy moly. This study shows that after
three months the vaccine effectiveness of Pfizer & Moderna against Omicron
is actually negative. Pfizer customers are 76.5% more likely and Moderna
customers are 39.3% more likely to be infected than unvaxxed people. medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
10,584 Retweets19,863 Likes
I want to tell you what this really means and how
it is being attacked.
Summary: Refuse to comply with mandates. Now.
This paper means we will need to inject people
every 30 days if we want to “protect” them. Based on the harm that the vaccines
do to our immune system, it’s likely that the needed interval will shorten with
each booster.
If people don’t get boosted as required, they will
be MORE vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren’t vaccinated. That’s
what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. It doesn’t mean the protection wears off
(like we were told). It means the OPPOSITE of what you were told: it means the vaccines helps the virus to infect you
(by suppressing your immune system, probably permanently each time we are
injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole). It means we were lied to.
In short, the vaccine is like a heroin addiction:
once you’ve had a taste of it, you are hooked: you have to continue it for life
if you want protection. If you stop it, you’re a sitting duck for the virus.
What’s worse is our government is mandating this
now. In light of this paper, they will change the vaccine mandates to force you
to get vaccinated every month or you will be fired from your job. Their next
move could well be to make it illegal not to be vaccinated. This seems like
where things are headed based on what is happening in other countries where
they are quickly stripping away your rights to do anything without a
vaccination.
And we have no clue what monthly (and later weekly)
vaccination will do to your body. This has never been tested.
My advice is simple. If you have been vaccinated,
you need to stop now. Do not get the booster. My friend Dr. Robert Malone is
fond of repeating the old adage, “When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.”
Sadly, most people cannot afford to lose their
jobs, so they will get vaccinated and medical professionals will not speak out
since doing so will cause them to lose their license.
The faster, safer, lower cost way to end the
pandemic
Everyone needs to stop listening to the CDC ( Center for Disease Control nvdr.) now and
start listening to people who have been saying to ditch the vaccines and
aggressively promote early treatment with repurposed drugs.
The entire pandemic will end as soon as the CDC
stops ignoring the existing early treatment protocols which have been available
since March 2020 (Fareed and Tyson protocol was first available back then).
Masking, vaccines, mandates, lockdowns, and social distancing were never
needed. We could have (and still can) end the hospitalization and death with
just one thing: early treatment. Just like Japan has done. But the CDC refused
to listen.
What the paper said in detail
First, the link in the tweet is to the outdated
version of the paper. The
current version can be found here.
Start at the comments, both from social media and
also from medrxiv readers.
Check out the social media portion of the comments
Here are some comments (on old and new version of
the paper):
· So assume the results you like (high VE for recent
vaccination) are causal, but hand wave confounders at results you don't like
(negative VE for distant vaccination)? Science?
· This is a superb paper, especially the careful
approach to CNV calling and the Bayesian methods used throughout.
· Looking at the graphs, I see both vaccines lose all
effectiveness at 90 days, but worse, actually drop into strong negative effectiveness
after that time.
This would mean that these vaccines *increase*
one's chances of infection after the initial 90 days "honeymoon"
period.
Am I getting this right?
If so, why are governments pushing third doses as
Omicron is becoming dominant?
The key material is in the full
PDF:
The graphs above tell the story. Negative VE means
the vaccine is helping the virus, not you.
So at 60 days, the protection is close to zero, so
if you want to maintain protection, getting vaccinated every 30 days is
required.
This isn’t a vaccine at all. This is basically
stimulating your immune system so it is already “geared up” to fight the virus.
That’s not what a vaccine is supposed to do.
Furthermore, the negative VE after 90 days means
you are hooked for life and I would guess (based on the mechanism of action),
that we will need shorter and shorter dosing intervals for every booster you
get (since it kills off your immune system every time).
So it could very well be monthly boosters after the
2nd dose, weekly boosters after the 3rd dose, and perhaps daily boosters after
the 4th dose to maintain your “immunity.”
You can’t stop after that because if you stop,
you’re in worse shape than if you never started.
The stunning conclusion of the paper
In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases,
these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and
booster vaccinations.
All I can say is “wow.” The people who wrote this
paper are clearly drinking the Kool-Aid on their interpretation of what their
study means.
They also wrote this (which is purely speculative
with no data behind it as noted in the italics were my addition):
The negative estimates in the final period
arguably suggest different behaviour and/or exposure patterns
in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts causing underestimation of the VE.
This was likely the result of Omicron spreading rapidly
initially through single (super-spreading) events causing many infections among
young, vaccinated individuals.
This paper should be a wake up call: the vaccines
do not work. Stop repeating the insanity.
Early treatments like the Fareed and
Tyson protocol are 10X
better than any
new therapy, they don’t
“hook you,” and they don’t cause disability or death.
If doctors started prescribing the Fareed and Tyson
protocol, we’d have virtually no deaths, and few hospitalizations. But they
can’t do that since medical board will take away the licenses of any physicians
who prescribe ivermectin, etc. This is happening now.
We are in this mess because the NIH, CDC, FDA are
corrupt and incompetent and they will not hold themselves accountable in an
open debate. This has been going on for 20 years in the vaccine space… it’s
nothing new. The book “Evidence
of harm” documents all of this.
Kirby was deliberately neutral in his presentation (being non-judgmental like
reporters are supposed to be), but any neutral thinking person will side
against the authorities.
Why the paper went viral
So, the reason this paper went viral is because
1.
It is well done,
2. It was done by PhDs in infectious disease and
epidemiology,
3. The results show what is really happening, and
4. Nobody has been able to attack the paper with a
credible argument, even on Twitter.
5. It confirms what my team of experts has been saying
about negative VE
Here are some of the ridiculous attempts to
discredit the paper:
@ezralevant The article says that it's not peer reviewed and is not
published in any scientific journals. So without verification there are all
kinds of claims out there about all kinds of things. We go by those principles
that have passed peer review to separate fact and fiction.
1 Retweet126 Likes
SwingTrader @SwingTrader1114
@ezralevant It is impossible to have a negative VE. You cannot have a
negative VE. The absolute lowest VE is zero, which infers no protection
whatsoever. Your statement is completely false, including the data table that
isn’t even in the study you cited.
1 Retweet81 Likes
Supporting evidence
The paper isn’t a fluke. There is lots of other
evidence in support of the negative VE (and not supporting their speculative
explanation for it).
Here’s the data from Canada which shows that we
have it backwards. We should be mandating “no vaccines” in order to keep your
job and fire all the vaccinated people because these people are the most risky.
In Ontario in the last few days, cases per capita
among the vaccinated have skyrocketed above cases per capita among the
unvaccinated. Clearly, mandates are nonsensical at this point,
because the entire case for restricting unvaccinated people is their presumed
higher per capita infection rate.
Here’s the UK data showing the same thing. We need
to flip around the mandates ASAP.
Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD
It looks like the U.K. data may support the vaccine-enhanced infection
issue both FDA and I have raised.
Triple-Vaccinated More Than FOUR Times As Likely to
Test Positive For Omicron Than Unvaccinated, Data Shows – The Daily ScepticAccording to new ONS data, the triple-vaccinated are
4.5 times more likely to test positive for Omicron than the unvaccinated. The
double-vaccinated, meanwhile, are 2.3 times more likely to have Omicron.dailysceptic.org
1,257 Retweets2,039 Likes
Other supporting data:
1.
On COVID
vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative
role in deaths after vaccination and the video about that
paper. If the vaccines don’t
kill you, they will leave you weaker. Over 90% of the deaths investigated after
vaccination were found to have been caused by the vaccines. There is no other
explanation.
2. The
BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms both adaptive and innate
immune responses
An excellent article by Jessica Rose which explains the underlying mechanism
for why we are seeing the effect that the more you vaccinate, the more you make
things worse for people. The vaccine damages both your adaptive and innate
immune systems.
3. Vaccine
efficacy declines to be negative in the UK (Expose article)
4. Booster
protection fades within 10 weeks against Omicron: UK study
5. Booster
shots protect against symptomatic Omicron infection for about 10 weeks, study
finds — which could mean more doses for some in 2022
6. This substack
article looks at the Danish
study (described here) and the UK data. Note that the VE numbers in the two
studies are different because if you separate our Omicron, you get a very
different picture of VE compared to analyses that don’t separate out VE by
variant.
7.
Dr. Ron Brown – Opinion Editorial
December 23, 2021
Ontario, Canada reported 5,790 new COVID-19 cases
on Thursday, December 23, 2021, setting the province’s one-day record for new
cases since the beginning of the pandemic: Ontario: Case numbers | COVID-19.
Thursday’s numbers include 971 unvaccinated new cases compared to 4,392 fully
vaccinated new cases—a rapidly rising trend over the past several weeks clearly showing that
most new cases are now occurring in fully vaccinated people.
Please help us to spread the word by sharing this
article on social media.
Subscribe to Steve Kirsch's newsletter
Thousands of
paid subscribers
I write about COVID vaccine safety and efficacy,
corruption, censorship, mandates, masking, and early treatments. America is
being misled by formerly trusted authorities.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-vaccines-must-be?s=r
