TRUE CONSPIRACY: More than 96% of Lancet
“scientists” who denied covid lab origin theory have direct ties to Wuhan
Monday, September 13, 2021 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: badhealth, badmedicine, badscience, biological weapons, biowar, bioweapons, bombshell, China, communism, conspiracy, coronavirus, corruption, COVID, Daszak, deception, depopulation, Fauci, Plandemic, science clowns, science journals, spike protein, The Lancet, virology, Wuhan Institute of
Virology
6,830VIEWS
(Natural News) As you may recall from the early days of the plandemic, 27
“scientists” penned a letter published in The Lancet that
claimed the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) did not originate in a Wuhan
laboratory. Well, it turns out that 26 of these scientists have direct
ties to the Chinese lab in question, making their claims entirely untrustworthy.
That letter, which was
published on March 7, 2020, “strongly condemned conspiracy theories” related to
the Chinese Virus that suggest it did not come about by chance from bat soup at
a wet market. Chinese Germs, they insist, are a product of nature, not of
genetic tampering.
This declaration was
intended to be the end of the conversation, except for the fact that inquiring
minds decided to look into the matter further. What they found is that almost
all of the scientists in question have major conflicts of interest when it
comes to telling the truth.
The Daily Telegraph discovered
that 96 percent of the research team that authored the article for The
Lancet have links to Chinese researchers or their colleagues or
benefactors at the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), China’s only known level-four biosafety lab.
One of the authors is Peter
Daszak, the British president of an organization called EcoHealth Alliance that
was caught funneling money directly to the WIV to conduct illegal
gain-of-function research on coronaviruses. Another is Sir Jeremy Farrar, a
U.K. government scientific adviser.
The only scientist without
any obvious ties to the WIV is Ronald Corley, a microbiology expert from Boston University.
“The orchestrator of the
letter, British zoologist Peter Daszak, was already found to have a conflict of
interest through him being president of the US-based EcoHealth Alliance, which
has funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” reported the DailyMail
Online.
“Despite declaring no
conflicts of interest at the time the letter was penned, The Lancet was forced
to publish an addendum to the letter acknowledging Daszak’s connection to
EcoHealth Alliance.”
Covid is
a bioweapon that was developed to unleash a new world order
The reason why this is all
still important now is because this letter in The Lancet played
a critical role early on in the suppression of all inquiry into the true
origins of the Chinese Flu, which is still being debated to this very day.
There have been efforts
from the very beginning to distance China from carrying any of the blame. The
powers that be also want to distance Tony Fauci from the Chinese Virus as well,
even though we now know for a fact that Fauci sent American taxpayer dollars to
Wuhan to develop it.
Several of the letter’s
Wuhan-tied signers also hail from Britain’s Wellcome Trust, which was exposed
for also sending cash to the WIV to develop genetically modified (GMO)
coronaviruses capable of infecting humans.
A full rundown of each
signatory and his or her ties to Wuhan is available at this
link if you
are interested in learning more about what the investigation uncovered.
Suffice it to say that the
Chinese Virus was not a random occurrence in nature. It is a contrived
bioweapon that was unleashed for the purpose of dismantling the current world
order and replacing it with a new world order, among other things.
“Conflicts of interest were
not reported for any of the other 26 signers of the letter – not even those
with obviously material undisclosed conflicts such as EcoHealth employees and
Predict contractors,” says Rutgers University molecular biology Prof. Richard Ebright about the depths of this heinous
conspiracy.
More related news about
Chinese Virus deception can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for
this article include:
