vrijdag 24 september 2021

Doctor: Late medical freedom activist was a victim of ‘medical tyranny’

‘This is medical tyranny. It is overriding all of the legal and medical ethical principles that have been operative for my entire career, or my knowledge of the history of medicine in this country,’ said Dr. Vliet   



Patrick
Delaney

Tue Sep 21, 2021 - 7:47 am EDT

CHICAGO, IL (LifeSiteNews) — A medical freedom activist died after doctors denied her the treatment she sought.

In the wake of the recent COVID-19-related death of a medical freedom activist, her power-of-attorney-advocate (POA), along with an interceding physician, have alleged medical malfeasance on the part of the hospital and broader medical system, the policies and protocols of which repeatedly denied Veronica Wolski known successful treatments, (https://www.lifesitenews.com/tags/tag/hydroxychloroquine/ ) and even the ability to be transferred out of their hospital, though she begged for it continuously. 

“[We] were stymied at every turn,” said Dr. Lee Vliet, President and CEO of the Truth for Health Foundation, in a video interview on the John-Henry Weston Show last Thursday. 


Vliet was joined by Wolski’s Power of Attorney (POA), Ms. Nancy Ross, who explained the extraordinary efforts she had made, with Vliet’s help, in her attempt to save the woman’s life. Wolski died early on September 13 at the age of 64. 

Wolski was best known for hanging banners from a bridge over the Kennedy expressway in Chicago encouraging drivers to reject compliance with mask and dangerous gene-based “vaccine” mandates. Her hospital stay, along with her death, inspired tremendous support by medical freedom advocates, who called for her to be given suitable treatments for recovery, but also mockery by those who charged her with “anti-vaccine disinformation.”   

In providing insight into what was happening behind the scenes of this story, Ross began explaining how Wolski had been admitted to the Catholic AMITA Health Resurrection Medical Center somewhere around August 24 and diagnosed with “’COVID pneumonia,although her x-ray showed it was possible chest congestion.” 

Very soon after, Ross, a native of Chicago who now lives in South Carolina, explained, “I started receiving [text] messages” from Veronica begging for help to be moved from this hospital: ‘Get me out, get me oxygen, get me medical transport, get security here if you have to, get me out.’”  

In addition, after investigating the treatments Wolski was receiving, Ross observed 

even something as simple as IV vitamins… were denied to her

She wanted her Ivermectin. That was denied to her

She wanted so many things that were not part of the hospital’s protocol. 

So, we began this fight [and] this advocacy [on her behalf].”  

Catholic hospital ‘ethics committee’ revokes prescription for Ivermectin, bars Ross from premises 

Illustrating the resistance hospitals across the nation are exercising to prevent the use of successful treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, Ross mentioned a recent court case in nearby Elmhurst, IL, where the “court ordered a hospital to allow a COVID patient to have Ivermectin. She ended up coming out of a coma, as is my understanding, [and] is now home playing with her grandkids.” 

Striving for a similar outcome for her friend Veronica, Ross was “thrilled” to secure a prescription for Ivermectin from Wolski’s infectious diseases doctor, considering it a “breakthrough,” only to soon discover that 

this physician was overruled by the AMITA hospital system, by their ethics committee. 

Bovenkant formulier

Onderkant formulier

“We demanded a conference with the ethics committee,” she said.

“They met without us. They did not give us a chance to present what we felt was some solid case study on ivermectin and other medicines.” 

Puzzled by this process, Ross explained how despite being within standard patient rights, as even stipulated in the AMITA admission forms, Wolski’s right to refuse the treatment being given, and to try the Ivermectin protocol prescribed to her by two different doctors, was not being recognized. 

“We understand if we had informed consent on their position, we could refuse kindly, and say ‘Ok, but we still demand to try this. This is what she wants,’ but this right was somehow not recognized,” she said.

Having lost her appeal, Ross explained, “I left the hospital and they called to tell me I was not to come back in, that they would deal directly with Veronica, that she was of sound mind and could make her own decisions, and that they would talk to me on the phone. After that, I was not allowed back in the hospital.” 

Attempt to transfer Wolski out of hospital impeded 

Beginning her comments, Dr. Vliet explained how she and her team are all “very experienced at treating COVID at all levels from critical care to outpatient,” and that, as a team, they reviewed Wolski’s records after being requested to do so by Ross and an attorney. 

“The consensus to the entire medical team reviewing [the case] was that there were so many options to improve Veronica’s clinical condition that had been totally ignored and refused,” Vliet said.

Further, after assessing the situation, the team concluded that they had the capacity to fulfill Wolski’s demand to be transferred out of this hospital and into an outpatient setting, where she could receive the treatment protocols she wanted, and to which she had a right. 

Yet having prepared for such a transfer, mobilizing everything needed, including an ambulance with high-flow oxygen capacity, Ross attempted to arrange for Wolski’s removal from AMITA, but was met with resistance and indifference from hospital staff. “’Call back Monday morning when their hospice team gets in,’” Ross reports being told. “I couldn’t understand why there was no sense of urgency to at least let her go in peace.” 

Distraught about this situation, she then called the police who told her there was nothing they could do about the situation, as it was a “civil matter.”  

 


Onderkant formulier

Hospitals across nation using the ‘same playbook’ to block patient rights, ‘losing people every day’ 

In reflecting on their efforts to save Wolski’s life, Vliet said, “what was shocking to me as a physician, knowing what the legal and medical ethics are, is that the most astounding interference was the interference and refusal to honor the patient’s request… and not only that but to refuse the patient’s power-of-attorney, who has a legal duty as the agent, to carry out the patient’s wishes and to see that that is done.” 

“I have not, ever in my career … seen patient’s power of attorney legal rights overridden so flagrantly and abusively as we witnessed over this four days with Veronica’s situation,” she said. 

In hospitals across the United States, there appears to be “exactly the same pattern of abuse of patient rights [in these COVID situations]. This is medical tyranny,” Vliet continued.

“It is overriding all of the legal and medical ethical principles that have been operative for my entire career, or my knowledge of the history of medicine in this country.” 

These hospitals “are using the same tactics and the same playbook, and the same blocking of the patient’s rights and the power of attorney access to the patient,” she said. “This is a much bigger issue than simply denying Ivermectin as one medicine.” 

Furthermore, in her assessment, Vliet said, “basics are being denied: adequate IV fluids, adequate caloric intake, vitamins, comfort care with allowing private duty nurses if that is what the patient wants, allowing the patient to be discharged to home hospice, which is a legal right of the patient… That is supposed to be honored. It’s always been in my experience in medicine.” 

“And so, I think that the very, very serious and very chilling development is the consistency of the pattern hospitals are using: the fact that the patient’s legal rights as a patient are being overridden, the fact that power of attorney, legal documents are being thrown out and ignored. And if we don’t stand up to this medical tyranny then we are literally losing people every day because their wishes are not being followed and basic treatments are being ignored,” she said. 

 


Hospitals paid many thousands of extra dollars per each patient on a ventilator, causing ‘unnecessary deaths’ 

When asked about the interests of hospitals in insisting COVID patients take ventilators, Vliet said, “There’s a tragic and very simple answer [to that question]: They are paid thousands of dollars more for every patient on a ventilator. And this is happening in every hospital.” 

The enormous amount of extra dollars hospitals are paid for prescribing “Remdesivir, ventilators, and COVID diagnoses,” has all been documented, she said. 

Since emergency COVID-19 legislation was signed into law last year, establishing government COVID-19 “relief funding,” the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has been providing what some have called “perverse incentives” awarding significantly more compensation to hospitals 

if patients areclassifiedas COVID-19 positive ($13,000

or put on a ventilator ($39,000). 

According to the testimony of one whistleblower, such incentives, along with the policies of keeping family advocates out of the hospital, can lead to a “perfect storm,” involving a “complete and absolute disregard for human life” and many “unnecessary deaths.” 

Corporate interference with doctors’ ‘ability to practice independent medical judgment’ 

When asked to explain how so many doctors could forgo prescribing treatments that work against COVID-19 and instead pressure patients to accept a ventilator, Vliet said that:

“the majority of primary care doctors in the United States now … are employees of large, primary care, outpatient practice groups. Most of the large groups are actually owned by the hospital systems” which may tie the hands of physicians regarding the prescribing of medications “off label” though it has been a common practice in medicine immemorial. 

As was the case with a friend of hers, who is a doctor in one of these groups, the physicians have all been forbidden in many places by their employers from prescribing hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19. 

“So, all of the proper off-label uses for hydroxychloroquine, for many things, that many of us have done for years, was forbidden to this group of doctors by corporate interference with their ability to practice independent medical judgment,” Vliet explained. 

Thus, “the large health systems are actually controlling the outpatient practices and directing them not to do the outpatient care, and that drives everybody into the box canyon of the hospital,

-   where the diagnosis of COVID increases the revenue.

-   The use of Remdesivir … increases the revenue, and where,  

-   as soon as they can get them on the ventilator, it increases the revenue,” Vliet explained. 

“The public needs to understand that … patients are prisoners of protocols. They are not being treated as individual patients for this situation,” she concluded. 

Ross honored Wolski for her courage, boldness, and wisdom.

“She stood strong in this incredible battle that we’re seeing across the country, where our constitutional rights are being violated,” Ross said.

“[Wolski] loved all people, she loved America, she loved her faith, and in the end she fought till her death for medical freedom,” she continued. 

“She is an American hero, and her work will continue.” 

 


RELATED: 

Medical ‘prisoner’: Woman dies in Catholic hospital after being denied her rights 

Georgia hospital refuses to honor pleas from gravely ill couple to be treated with effective COVID protocols 

Ohio judge orders hospital to treat COVID patient ‘on death’s doorstep’ with ivermectin 

COVID nurse explains becoming a whistleblower: ‘I recorded them murdering patients’ 

Distraught wife fighting hospital’s refusal to administer Ivermectin to Covid-stricken husband 

The biggest crime committed during the vaccine heist is the censorship of Ivermectin 

 

------- 

STUDY: Ivermectin is a “broad spectrum antiviral of interest” for humans

Thursday, September 09, 2021 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: antiviralbig governmentBig PharmaconspiracycoronavirusCOVIDdeceptiongoodhealthgoodmedicinegoodscienceivermectinliesmainstream mediamedia collusionmedical censorshipPlandemicresearch

10KVIEWS

 

(Natural News) In May 2020, Australian researchers published a little-known study in the journal Antiviral Research that presents ivermectin, an FDA-approved drug for humans, as a “broad spectrum antiviral of interest.”

RNA viruses such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1, influenza and dengue fever, the paper suggests, could be mitigated through the use of ivermectin, which blocks viral components from taking hold inside the body.

“Although RNA viruses replicate in the infected host cell cytoplasm, the nucleus is central to key stages of the infectious cycle of HIV-1 and influenza, and an important target of DENV nonstructural protein 5 (NS5) in limiting the host antiviral response,” the paper explains.

“We previously identified the small molecule ivermectin as an inhibitor of HIV-1 integrase nuclear entry, subsequently showing ivermectin could inhibit DENV NS5 nuclear import, as well as limit infection by viruses such as HIV-1 and DENV.”

Ivermectin’s broad spectrum functionality includes its ability to target the host importin (IMP) ?/?1 nuclear transport proteins that are responsible for nuclear entry of cargoes such as integrase and NS5, the paper goes on to reveal.

“We establish for the first time that ivermectin can dissociate the preformed IMP?/?1 heterodimer, as well as prevent its formation, through binding to the IMP? armadillo (ARM) repeat domain to impact IMP? thermal stability and ?-helicity.”

It is a bit complicated for the layperson to understand, but suffice it to say that ivermectin, which was developed in Japan from a natural soil organism, inhibits the attachment of viral components to human cells, effectively blocking infection without the need for masks or “vaccines.”

“Since it is FDA approved for parasitic indications, ivermectin merits closer consideration as a broad spectrum antiviral of interest,” the paper concludes.

If the government really cared about saving lives, it would get ivermectin into the hands of every American

This is critical information that needs to get out there, especially as the mainstream media continues to lie about ivermectin by calling it a “horse de-wormer.” While ivermectin is, in fact, also used in animals, it was also approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in humans.

The drug shows considerable promise in fighting the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), and is widely used in India, as one example, to treat the disease. There, citizens are being cured of their infections without the need for novel Big Pharma therapeutics and mystery injections.

This explains why ivermectin is so aggressively opposed here in the United States that it is now almost impossible to get, except for the animal variety which is easily accessible online and in feed stores, though those varieties are getting a lot more expensive.

The lying corporate media wants everyone to believe that ivermectin is nothing more than “horse paste” that should never be consumed by humans. Fake news reports continue to circulate about people “overdosing” on ivermectin, though several of them have been debunked as made-up nonsense.

While it may not be an absolute panacea against the Wuhan Flu, ivermectin deserves greater attention than it is currently getting. At the very least, it needs to stop being vilified by the medical fascists who refuse to look at the science showing its safety and efficacy.

“Acknowledging that any alternative is in any way effective against covid would automatically mean that all EUAs for the ‘vaccines’ are illegal and in direct violation of the FDA’s own rules,” wrote one commenter at Natural News.

“The ‘vaccines’ were just one of the many goals of the plandemic, and there is no way they were going to not have them as soon as possible, regardless of how many tens of thousands of people had to die. This is what crimes against humanity also look like.”

More of the latest news about Chinese Virus deception and the witch hunt against ivermectin can be found at Pandemic.news.

Sources for this article include:

PubMed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

NaturalNews.com

 


Er zijn ongeveer 100.000 Amerikanen die nog nooit gevaccineerd zijn en dit zeggen de data

Er zijn ongeveer 100.000 volwassenen in Amerika die hun hele leven nog nooit een vaccin hebben gekregen. Uit de data blijkt dat de ongevacci...