STUDY: mRNA vaccines present “tragic and even
catastrophic” side effects
Thursday, August 12, 2021 by: Ethan Huff
Tags: ADE, antibody-dependent
enhancement, badmedicine, catastrophic, coronavirus, COVID, Plandemic, Prion disease, shedding, tragic, vaccination, vaccines
9,480VIEWS
(Natural News) New
research published in
the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research shows
that experimental mRNA technology comes with serious risks that the medical
establishment refuses to acknowledge.
Dr. Stephanie Seneff from
the Massachusetts Institute of
Technology and naturopathic oncologist Dr. Greg Nigh
took a closer look at the mRNA injections from Pfizer and Moderna to see how
they might be causing serious adverse effects, discovering that they are much
riskier than people realize.
Their
paper, entitled
“Worse than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the
mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19,” explains that the jabs are very sensitive to temperature, and are
easily damaged if not stored in perfect conditions.
“Both are
delivered through muscle injection, and both require deep-freeze storage to
keep the RNA from breaking down,” it warns.
“This is
because, unlike double-stranded DNA which is very stable, single-strand RNA
products are apt to be damaged or rendered powerless at warm temperatures and
must be kept extremely cold to retain their potential efficacy.”
The type of
mRNA delivered through the injections is also entirely artificial with no
comparative form in nature. Nothing like this has ever been done before, and
the chances of something going wrong are exceptionally high with a strong
potential for “unknown consequences.”
“…
manipulation of the code of life could lead to completely unanticipated
negative side effects, potentially long term or even permanent,” Seneff and
Nigh warn.
Vaccinated people are shedding disease onto the unvaccinated
As is
already being
seen, many recipients are
developing antibody-dependent enhancement, or ADE, a phenomenon provoked by the
introduction of lab-created spike proteins into the human body.
These spike
proteins embed themselves within antigen-presenting cells, resulting in the
creation of monoclonal antibodies that produce high levels of cross-reactive
antibodies that react against endogenous human proteins.
“Given
evidence only partially reviewed here,” the paper further reveals, “there is
sufficient reason to suspect that antibodies to the spike protein will
contribute to ADE provoked by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination, which
may manifest as either acute or chronic autoimmune and inflammatory
conditions.”
There is also
evidence to suggest that vaccinated people are shedding these spike proteins
onto others, resulting in the spread of prion and neurodegenerative diseases.
This is creating a pandemic in and of itself, and would not be happening if the
jabs had not been introduced into the public.
Rather than
rush to get everyone injected like the government and media have been doing for
the past several months, it would have been preferable to take a more cautious
approach, especially with something as new and unpredictable as mRNA genetic
reprogramming.
“Public
policy around mass vaccination has generally proceeded on the assumption that
the risk/benefit ratio for the novel mRNA vaccines is a ‘slam dunk,'” the paper
goes on to explain.
“With the
massive vaccination campaign well under way in response to the declared
international emergency of COVID-19, we have rushed into vaccine experiments on
a world-wide scale.”
It remains to
be seen what happens with all this, but one thing is for sure: mass vaccination
with mRNA vaccines was not the right thing to do. Vaccinated
people are a threat to public health and the more people that get the jabs, the
more disease society is likely to see.
“Let’s make
sure we are clear: this is not a vaccine,” a Natural News commenter
wrote. “They are using the term ‘vaccine’ to sneak this thing under public
health exemptions. This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to
a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into
becoming a pathogen creator.”
The latest
news about the pandemic of vaccinated people can be found at Pandemic.news.
Sources for
this article include:
Worse
Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA
Vaccines Against COVID-19
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/51
Stephanie
Seneff 1 and Greg Nigh 2
1 Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA, E-mail: seneff@csail.mit.edu
2 Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland,
OR 97214, USA
ABSTRACT
Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United
States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and Moderna. Interim data
suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize
Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA.
However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these
vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple
safety concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying
these vaccines in detail.
We then review both components of and the intended
biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike
protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute
and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative
diseases and autoimmune diseases.
Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss
the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike
protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for
spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an
unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter.
We finish by addressing a common point of debate,
namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving
the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that
this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously
established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material,
whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for
transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding
surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these
experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of
these novel technologies.
Conclusion
Experimental mRNA vaccines have been heralded as
having the potential for great benefits, but they also harbor the possibility
of potentially tragic andeven catastrophic unforeseen consequences. The mRNA
vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been implemented with great fanfare, but there
are many aspects of their widespread utilization that merit concern. We have
reviewed some, but not all, of those concerns here, and we want to emphasize
that these concerns are potentially serious and might not be evident for years
or even transgenerationally. In order to adequately rule out the adverse
potentialities described in this paper, we recommend, at a minimum, that the
following research and surveillance practices be adopted:
•A national effort to collect detailed data on
adverse events associated with the mRNA vaccines with abundant funding
allocation, tracked well beyond the first couple of weeks after vaccination.
•Repeated autoantibody testing of the
vaccine-recipient population. The autoantibodies tested could be standardized
and should be based upon previously documented antibodies and autoantibodies
potentially elicited by the spike protein. These include autoantibodies against
phospholipids, collagen, actin, thyroperoxidase (TPO), myelin basic protein,
tissue transglutaminase, and perhaps others.
•Immunological profiling related to cytokine
balance and related biological effects. Tests should include, at a minimum,
IL-6, INF-α, D-dimer, fibrinogen, and C-reactive protein.
•Studies comparing populations who were vaccinated
with the mRNA vaccines and those who were not to confirm the expected decreased
infection rate and milder symptoms of the vaccinated group, whileat the same
time comparing the rates of various autoimmune diseases and prion diseases in
the same two populations.
•Studies to assess whether it is possible for an
unvaccinated person to acquire vaccine-specific forms of the spike proteins
from a vaccinated person in close proximity.
•Animal studies to determine whether
vaccination shortly before conception can result in offspring carrying
spike-protein-encoding plasmids in their tissues, possibly integrated into
their genome.•In vitro studies aimed to better understand the toxicity of the
spike protein to the brain, heart, testes, etc.
•In vitro studies to assess whether the mRNA
nanoparticles can be taken up by sperm and converted into cDNA plasmids.
Public policy around mass vaccination has generally
proceeded on the assumption that the risk/benefit ratio for the novel mRNA
vaccines is a “slam dunk.” With the massive vaccination campaign well under way
in response to the declared international emergency of COVID-19, we have rushed
into vaccine experiments on a world-wide scale. At the very least, we should
take advantage of the data that are available from these experiments to learn
more about this new and previously untested technology. And, in the future, we
urge governments to proceed with more caution inthe face of new
biotechnologies.
Finally, as an obvious but tragically ignored
suggestion, the government should also be encouraging the population to take
safe and affordable steps to boost their immune systems naturally, such as
getting out in the sunlight to raise vitamin D levels (Ali, 2020), and eating
mainly organic whole foods rather than chemical-laden processed foods
(Rico-Campà et al., 2019). Also, eating foods that are good sources of vitamin
A, vitamin C and vitamin K2 should be encouraged, as deficiencies in these
vitamins are linked to bad outcomes from COVID-19 (Goddek, 2020; Sarohan,
2020).
Keywords:antibody dependent enhancement,
autoimmune diseases, gene editing, lipid nanoparticles, messenger RNA, prion
diseases, reverse transcription, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines
Worse Than the Disease?
Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against
COVID-19
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23
·
Stephanie Seneff Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge
MA, 02139, USA
·
Greg Nigh Naturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
Keywords:
antibody dependent enhancement, autoimmune diseases, gene editing, lipid
nanoparticles, messenger RNA, prion diseases, reverse transcription, SARS-CoV-2
vaccines
Abstract
Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA
vaccines, produced by Pfizer and Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy
for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization
(EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines
through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety
concerns. In this review we first describe the technology underlying these
vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended
biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike
protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute
and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative
diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we
discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the
spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the
potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a
vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the
latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or
not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination.
While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening,
we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways
for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA
could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational
transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that
will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and
allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel
technologies.
Author
Biographies
Stephanie Seneff, Computer Science and
Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Computer Science and
Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
Greg
Nigh, Naturopathic
Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
Naturopathic
Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
