woensdag 1 juni 2022

Christine Massey reveals to the Health Ranger: Covid-19 "virus" has NEVER been isolated and shown to cause disease.

 And this after a good year an a half of research and asking around the world in 25 countries (with the help of a lot of volunteers) regarding 137 institutions!

54360 views

FluorideFreePeel.ca

     Video Link: https://www.brighteon.com/cdf766f0-15a2-4502-911c-946e6ef8c6dd

 

187 health/science institutions globally all failed to cite even 1 record of “SARS-COV-2” purification, by anyone, anywhere, ever

  27 Comments


As of May 11, 2022:

187 institutions (mainly health and science institutions) in >30 countries have all failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing the alleged “SARS-COV-2” having been found in any sick human and purified, in order to sequence and characterize “it” and study “it” with controlled experiments.

In other words, none of these institutions can prove that the alleged RNA genome of 30,000 base pairs with a spikey protein shell actually exists…. let alone that “it” causes an allegedly new respiratory disease that is allegedly spread from host to host via contagion.

No one on the planet has a pure sample of the alleged virus.

There are no validated tests. Validation of a test for a “virus” would require a gold standard – the alleged virus.

Below is a list of the institutions. Note that from several of these institutions (i.e. the CDC, Public Health England, UK DHSC, India’s ICMR) we have multiple responses.


Excel file listing the 187 institutions (last updated May 11, 2022):
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Institution-list-for-website.xls

Click this link to see the actual responses:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/

Comments

Patricia Frazier

There’s another institution that was missed on this post: Health Service Executive (HSE) South Dublin, Ireland
https://www.bitchute.com/video/ScDhkApVJMbd/?fbclid=IwAR00aFrSdFloxAgCqtN4ntARzv17k1R7p4ExI2aoRwGvF2htKIgN9D7M138   

Of course, the fact [sic] checkers labeled it false by stating the following: “The HSE would likely not hold such distinct records because it is a scientific fact that SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes Covid-19) exists.”
That is nonsense. Any conclusion based on science requires proof. If it is a “scientific fact”, as this fake-news “journalist” states, then proof must exist. In order for the HSE to declare a state of emergency, it would have had to have been given that proof. Otherwise, the HSE did it illegally and the person who signed the order must be charged criminally.
source for “fact” checking: 
https://www.thejournal.ie/freedom-of-information-request-covid-19-hse-does-not-exist-5312279-Dec2020/

masa

https://fossaorg.files.wordpress.com/2021/01/the-irish-are-being-told-appalling-lies-about-covid.pdf

Ireland FOI request pdf

Brockland A.T.

Just two points/questions –

1. How many pathogenic viruses – not bacteria – VIRUSES, have been isolated to this particular standard of purification, and,

2. How does this disprove the existence of a SARS Cov-2/Covid-19 virus presently identified by a unique genetic signature?

Reasoning:

1. Viruses are very tiny; total isolation without noise may be difficult. Identification by unique genetic signature may be easier and cheaper for most countries.

2. (a) If SARS Cov-2 is a biological weapon, proliferation and rogue development (germ warfare research is always rogue, but you should get the idea…) can be discouraged by reducing the number of ‘purified’ samples available for research and release.

2. (b) If SARS Cov-2 is a biological weapon, as many suspect, for various reasons possession of purified samples will not only be discouraged but denied by those who can ‘purify’ virus samples to a high level and retain them for whatever purposes.

3. Why has no-one actively promoted nutritional first defense with vitamins D,C, K and zinc as well as other basic micronutrents like thiamine (vitamin B1)?

Regardless of whether SARS Cov-2 exists or not, something is killing people like colds and flus do, even if its just colds and flus.

Conclusion: None of the COVID-1984 measures are valid, for the simple reasons that they do not work and are cures worse than the disease at many levels of social being from physical and mental health to economic health and civil rights.

Claiming SARS Cov-2 does not exist, does not solve the underlying problems of vitamin malnutrition and health care cutbacks that made an overhyped pandemic crisis out of a beatable cold that’s nowhere on the level of the original Spanish influenza.

Claiming SARS Cov-2 does not exists does not explain the widespread suppression of therapeutics that cure COVID-19 such as ivermectin. Instead, this exonerates those that denied effective treatments and left people to die. After all… by the standard of SARS Cov-2 does not exist, there was nothing to treat??! (Even though, there was.)

Claiming SARS Cov-2 does exists, removes pressure for scrutiny on germ warfare and who may have created and released SARS Cov-2, some of the earliest recorded traces having been found in Spain and Italy, then the U.S., then finally China where SARS Cov-2 was formally recognized.

Claiming SARS Cov-2 does not exist with no caveat may convince some people to lower their guard and become victim to deadly ‘reset’ health care that clearly desires mass casualties. Reset cultists wouldn’t properly treat a common cold if they could get away with de facto murder.

Reply

Christine
Zero viruses have ever been purified, characterized, sequenced and shown to spread disease via natural modes of exposure, to my knowledge. Virology is simply not a science, it is a cover story for real causes of disease, much of which is industrial and caused by government policies and actions, and for gross abuses that people would never otherwise put up with. And “maybes” don’t cut it in science. Purification is required so that only the thing of interest is sequenced. You need to review the actual methods used to “sequence a virus”, there is nothing scientific or remotely logical about it. 

-------------------------


Health Ranger Report
Published 6 months ago | Comments

SUBSCRIBE (39356)

NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately 

dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world on the subject of natural 

healing remedies and personal liberty (food freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of 

speech, etc.). Together, we’re helping create a better world, with more honest food labeling, 

reduced chemical contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased 

scientific transparency.

Every dollar you spend at the Health Ranger Store goes toward helping us achieve important science and content goals for humanity: https://www.healthrangerstore.com/
Sign Up For Our Newsletter: https://www.naturalnews.com/Readerregistration.html
Brighteon: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport
Join Our Social Network: https://brighteon.social/@HealthRanger
Check In Stock Products at: https://PrepWithMike.com



 

Peer-reviewed autopsie-onderzoek legt verband tussen COVID-vaccins en 73% van de sterfgevallen na vaccinatie, dringt aan op onmiddellijke terugroeping door FDA

  november 24, 2024    12        Image by peoplecreations on Freepik E en baanbrekende peer-reviewed studie heeft het meest uitgebreide bewi...