A new scientific study by Nakahara et al. tested COVID-vaccinated people to see if they have “silent” changes in heart muscle function that standard radiology tests could detect. The study shows very unsettling results. Scientists measured myocardial 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake. F-FDG has molecular similarity to glucose. However, 18F-FDG does not metabolize like glucose. Therefore, PET scans could detect it, and its presence shows the heart muscle’s abnormally high demand for glucose, indicative of abnormal cardiac function. More about it here.
Indeed, this is what the Nakahara study finds: Results
This was not supposed to happen! The COVID vaccine is not supposed to affect the heart in any way. It was promised to “stay in the arm.” The explosive findings of the study are discussed in the editorial that the editor of the magazine, Dr. Bluemke, felt obliged to publish. Dr. Bluemke’s editorial is somewhat apologetic, and he gives faint praise for COVID vaccines.
Dr. Bluemke also does not mince words. He explains that the findings are not due to chance:
The editorial states that there is no rational way to ignore and explain away the negative findings of myocardial inflammation by Takahara et al.:
Dr. Bluemke calls for further research into this:
Was the increase in myocardial inflammation due to a few unlucky patients driving high averages, with most people remaining unaffected? Unfortunately, that is not the case: all quartiles were affected deleteriously, as this image shows: Dose-Response Relationship is Proof of Causality!Is there a dose-response relationship, providing further proof of causality? Can we see if the higher-dose Moderna vaccine causes MORE heart problems than the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine? Recall that studies of other topics, such as pregnancy outcomes, show a 42% greater miscarriage rate and 93% greater infant death rate for Moderna (higher dose vaccine) compared to Pfizer. What about the Nakahara study we are discussing? It shows a weaker but similar pattern of greater response due to Moderna: The authors say there is “no difference” between Pfizer and Moderna. However, there IS a difference. Pfizer-vaccinated patients’ SUVmax was 4.7, and Moderna-vaccinated patients (Moderna is a greater dose, remember) had a greater SUVmax of 5.1. The difference did not reach statistical significance, likely due to a small sample size. Does the Ill Effect Go Away As Time Passes?Unfortunately, the scientists’s chart of SUVmax over time does not show visible improvement during 180 days (half a year): They Could Have Tested This is COVID Vaccine Clinical Trials!A test of cardiac function via F-FDG uptake, a standard radiological test, is something that careful scientists conducting COVID vaccine clinical trials could carry on with a few hundred patients. Watchful vaccine safety agencies could demand such tests to be conducted to ensure the general public's safety. They chose not to do it, and their sponsors (Pfizer and Moderna) made much money selling unproven and untested COVID vaccines. The vaccines, instead of stopping the pandemic, damaged the heart muscles of millions. I hope that the vaccinated people will be able to ask for compensation for their damaged hearts. The reality, sadly, is that the damage will most likely be ignored, and the vaccine billionaires will enjoy their newfound wealth while the hysterical Pfizer-sponsored press will be scaring us with new distractions. What do you think? You're currently a free subscriber to Igor’s Newsletter. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription. |