Wednesday, March 08, 2023 by: Arsenio Toledo
Tags: carbon dioxide, Climate, climate alarmism, climate change, climate emergency, climate insanity, Climate Intelligence
Foundation, climate models, climate science, environment, environmental movement, Global Climate
Intelligence Group, global warming, green tyranny, weather
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
2,920VIEWS
(Natural News) Around 1,500 scientists and professionals from across the world have
declared that “there is no climate
emergency.”
They are
members of an organization known as the Global Climate Intelligence Group
(GCIG), a part of the Climate Intelligence Foundation, a think tank operating in the fields of
climate change and policy.
The GCIG
members come from all over the world, including Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway,
South Korea, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States.
(Related: Bond villain-like mad
climate scientist and virtue signaling CEO named “Iseman” (like Iceman) wants
to freeze the world by polluting the skies with sulfur particles.)
The GCIG lays
out five main arguments supporting its claim. First, the group pointed out that
the geological evidence proves that the planet’s climate regularly varies “with
natural cold and warm phases.” The latest significant variation, known as the
Little Ice Age, began at around the 13th or 14th century and only ended around
the middle of the 19th century.
Next, the
organization noted how climate models are “inadequate,” and those that claimed
the world was rapidly warming are false. “The world has warmed significantly
less than predicted by the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]
on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing.”
These climate
models also “blow up the effect of greenhouse gases” such as carbon dioxide,
which the organization noted is needlessly demonized. CO2, the group argues, is
not a pollutant like climate scientists claim, but an essential ingredient to
all life on earth.
“More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in
global plant biomass,” the group wrote. “It is also good for agriculture,
increasing the yields of crops worldwide.”
Furthermore,
the GCIG pointed out that, despite claims from climate scientists, global
warming has not actually increased the rate or severity of natural disasters
around the world.
“There is no
statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods,
droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” the group
wrote. “However, there is ample evidence that CO2 mitigation measures are as
damaging as they are costly.”
Climate science needs to be “less political”
As an
addendum to the GCIG’s statement, the scientists warned that there is no
climate emergency, and climate policy needs to be depoliticized by divorcing it
from the hijacked environmental movement.
“There is no
climate emergency,” the GCIG wrote. “Therefore, there is no cause for panic and
alarm. We strongly oppose unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. If
better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to
reflect and re-adapt.”
Climate
policies moving forward need to actually be in line with scientific evidence.
In particular, the GCIG warned that scientists need to recognize that computer
models supposedly predicting climate change a man-made, and their predictions
are heavily influenced by the “theoreticians and programmers” who made them.
“To believe
the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in.
This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate
models are central,” the group wrote. “Climate science has degenerated into a
discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. We should free
ourselves from the naive belief in immature climate models. In (the) future,
climate research must give significantly more emphasis to empirical science.”
Furthermore,
the GCIG noted that climate policy needs to respect “economic realities.”
“The aim of
global policy should be ‘prosperity for all’ by providing reliable and
affordable energy at all times,” the group wrote. “In a prosperous society, men
and women are well educated … and people care about their environment.”
Learn more
about actual science regarding the environment at ClimateScienceNews.com.
Watch this
episode of the “Health Ranger Report” as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger,
discusses the climate alarmism-fueled geoengineering scheme
to dim the sun, pollute the skies and freeze the planet’s oceans.
This video is
from the Health Ranger Report channel
on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
Climate “scientists”
push for society-wide food rationing to fix global warming.
Antarctica hasn’t
warmed in 70 years despite rising C02 levels; climate scientists baffled.
Most scientists agree
that changing climate conditions have nothing to do with human activity.
Very few scientists
agree that climate change is driven by human activity.
Top scientist says
globalist left’s ‘net zero’ emissions agenda will destroy modern civilization.
Sources
include:
https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-03-08-there-is-no-climate-emergency-scientists-say.html
