"Long Vaccine" is rare, authors insist falsely
A new article in Science magazine admits that Covid vaccines can cause neurological and cardiovascular damage:
 |
On the face of it, the article recognizes the plight of the unfortunate people who suffered an injury due to Covid vaccinations:
in recent months, what some call Long Vax has gained wider acceptance among doctors and scientists, and some are now working to better understand and treat its symptoms.
The authors set out to minimize the suffering; without any editorial regard for repetitiveness, it goes on and on about how “rare” vaccine injuries are:
rare cases of abnormal blood clotting and heart inflammation … a debilitating suite of symptoms that resembles Long Covid, has been more elusive, its link to vaccination unclear … “You see one or two patients and you wonder if it’s a coincidence,” … Cases seem very rare—far less common than Long Covid after infection … regulators in the United States and Europe say they have looked for, but have not found, a connection … “We can’t rule out rare cases,” says Peter Marks … though rare, Long Covid–like symptoms after vaccination are a real phenomenon …
In insisting that Covid is much more dangerous than the vaccine, Science resorts to an outright lie, not noting the contradiction between two paragraphs:
Cases seem very rare—far less common than Long Covid after infection.
This is repudiated by the actual evidence Science discloses:
They found that within 90 days after a shot, the rate of POTS-related symptoms was about 33% higher than in the 3 months before; 2581 people were diagnosed with POTS-related symptoms after vaccination, compared with 1945 beforehand. However, the study found a bigger effect from COVID-19 itself: The rate of POTS symptoms in about 12,000 unvaccinated people after infection was 52% higher than beforehand.
Is a 33% increase in POTS after a vaccine shot “far less common” than the 52% increase from Covid? That is a very disingenuous suggestion: people routinely get multiple rounds of Covid vaccines, having the risk multiply with each dose.
Who are the experts Science is quoting for this article?
Peter Marks, an FDA Commissioner, for whom all vaccines are perfect
German Minister of Health Karl Lauterbach, the evil Covid clown of Germany
Tom Shimabukuro of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, author of a fake study using incorrect denominators he published to “prove” that Covid vaccines are safe for pregnancy
The article seems like an attempt to acknowledge the ill effects of Covid vaccines while simultaneously sweeping them under the rug as “rare.”
The “Harmless Spike Protein” Is Not So Harmless, After All
For about two years, COVID science and fact checkers required us to believe that spike protein is a harmless substance:
 |
That fact-checkers assurance was hollow and had no data behind it. Finally, Science acknowledges that:
AN IMMUNE OVERREACTION to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which COVID-19 vaccines use to induce protective antibodies, is one possible cause of these symptoms. One theory is that after vaccination some people generate another round of antibodies targeting the first. Those antibodies could function somewhat like spike itself: Spike targets a cell surface protein called the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor, enabling the virus to enter cells. The rogue antibodies might also bind to ACE2, which helps regulate blood pressure and heart rate, says Bernhard Schieffer, a cardiologist at the University of Marburg. If those antibodies disrupt ACE2 signaling, that could cause the racing heart rates and blood pressure swings seen in POTS.
Oddly enough, despite understanding some dangers of the spike protein, Science insists on giving people more shots of spike protein:
COVID-19 vaccines have saved millions of lives, and the world is gearing up for a new round of boosters.
Unsurprisingly, research projects involving Covid vaccine victims have difficulty attracting “funders”:
In the next few months, the nonprofit REACT19 plans to distribute small grants, in the tens of thousands of dollars, to teams studying immunology, biomarkers, and other features of postvaccine illness. Even modest support matters, Krumholz says, because “it’s incumbent on us to produce preliminary data” to win over funders with deep pockets.
The deep-pocketed funders of Covid vaccines had no problem pouring billions into them without any preliminary data - but helping their victims is not one of their financial priorities.
Thus, the researchers helping the vaccine-injured operate with tens of thousands of dollars, while Pfizer shareholders enjoy their multi-billion windfall.
Do you know any specific individuals who had a neurological or cardiovascular injury due to COVID vaccines? Describe them, but please be mindful of people’s privacy.
| ||||||||||
