Groundbreaking Study Shows Unvaccinated Children Are Healthier Than Vaccinated Children
12/07/20
This study
adds to a growing list of published peer-reviewed papers that compare the
health of vaccinated children to the health of unvaccinated children. These
studies suggest we have long underestimated the scope of vaccine harms, and
that the epidemic of chronic illness in children is hardly a mystery.
Unvaccinated children are
healthier than vaccinated children, according to a new study published
in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. The
study — “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed
Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination” — by James Lyons-Weiler, PhD and Paul Thomas, MD,
was conducted among 3,300 patients at Dr. Thomas’ Oregon pediatrics practice, Integrative Pediatric.
This study adds to a growing
list of published peer-reviewed papers (Mawson, 2017; Hooker and Miller, 2020)
that compare the health of vaccinated children to the health of unvaccinated
children. These studies suggest we have long underestimated the scope of
vaccine harms, and that the epidemic of chronic illness in children is hardly a
mystery.
The study
the CDC refused to do
Since 1986, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been legally obligated to conduct
safety studies and issue a safety report on children’s vaccinations every two
years. In 2018, it was determined they had never done so. It is therefore
incumbent upon non-governmental groups to do the work the CDC refuses to do.
As the leading governmental
organization driving vaccination among Americans, the CDC refuses to
incriminate themselves in the epidemic of childhood chronic illness. It is a
classic case of the fox guarding the henhouse. They are complicit in creating
an evidence vacuum to deliberately manage against the possibility of the public
turning against vaccination.
Since the Lyons-Weiler and
Thomas study demonstrates that vaccinated children have more chronic illness
and were also more likely to get respiratory infections, those who downplay
vaccine risks will be sent into another round of apoplectic machinations to
attempt to invalidate the results.
Despite the rigor with which
this study was conducted, expect critics to do anything but cite opposing
science. They cannot. It simply has not been done. Instead, expect critics to
draw from a hackneyed playbook to draw the attention away from these scientific
findings by directing ad hominem attacks on the authors, criticizing the
journal where it was published, and claiming that the study design was not
sound.
When research highlights
anomalies that diverge from a dominant scientific paradigm, it’s important to
remember that the playground of science is not in proof, but in the
accumulation of evidence that bolsters an emerging paradigm. The Lyons-Weiler
and Thomas study strengthens this emerging paradigm that vaccines may cause
more harm than previously documented and characterized.
A perfect
pediatric practice to study health outcomes among varying rates of vaccination
Thomas’ pediatric practice
follows The Dr. Paul Approved Vaccine Plan,
allowing for fully informed consent and parental decision-making in vaccination
choices for their children. The plan was developed to reduce exposures to
aluminum-containing vaccines and to allow parents to stop or delay vaccinations
if some telltale signs of vaccine injury were starting to appear. Conditions
like allergies, eczema, developmental delay or autoimmune conditions are
typical signs that a child’s immune system is not processing vaccines normally.
These conditions serve as early
indicators to help the parent and pediatrician consider slowing or stopping
vaccination. As such, Dr. Thomas’ practice has an incredible mix of children
who range from fully vaccinated, to partially vaccinated, to not vaccinated at
all, making it the perfect pediatric practice to mine for insights into side
effects of vaccination.
Study
results based on relative incidence of office visits
The Lyons-Weiler and Thomas
study was conducted among pediatric patient records spanning 10 years, from
Thomas’ practice in Oregon. Instead of using odds ratios of diagnoses in the
two groups, the authors found that the relative incidence of office visit was more
powerful. Even after controlling for health care exposure, age, family history
of autoimmunity and gender, the associations of vaccination with many poor
health outcomes were robust.
Unvaccinated
children have less fever, seek 25X less pediatric care outside well-child
visits
The study found that vaccinated
children in the study see the doctor more often than unvaccinated children. The
CDC recommends 70 doses of 16 vaccines before a child reaches the age of 18.
The more vaccines a child in the study received, the more likely the child
presented with fever at an office visit.
The study had unique data that
allowed the researchers to study healthcare seeking behavior. Unlike increases
in fever accompanied by increased vaccine uptake, which is accepted as causally
related to vaccination, increases in vaccine acceptance was not accompanied by
a major increase in well-child visits. In fact, regardless of how many
vaccinations parents decided their children would have, the number
of well-child visits was about the same.
Any concerns that the
non-vaccinated or less-vaccinated children would avoid the doctor are
unfounded, and puts the jaw-droppingly large difference in office visits in
perspective — outside of well-child visits, children who received 90 to 95% of
the CDC-recommended vaccines for their age group were about 25 times more
likely than the unvaccinated group to see the pediatrician for an appointment
related to fever.
Compared to their unvaccinated
counterparts, vaccinated children in the study were three to six times more
likely to show up in the pediatrician’s office for treatment related to anemia,
asthma, allergies and sinusitis. The striking charts below show age-specific
cumulative office visits for various conditions among the fully vaccinated
compared to the unvaccinated.
No ADHD
among unvaccinated
In a stunning finding sure to
rock the psychiatric community, not a single unvaccinated child in the study
was diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD,) while
0.063% of the vaccinated group were diagnosed with ADHD. Likely due to the
vaccine-friendly plan parent-doctor dyad decision-making at Dr. Thomas’
practice, the overall rates of ADHD and autism in the practice were roughly
half the rates found in the general population of American children.
Low levels
of chicken pox and whooping cough in vaccinated and unvaccinated
Regarding the question of
whether or not vaccines prevent the infections they are intended to prevent, a
quarter of a percent of the vaccinated were diagnosed with either chicken pox
or whooping cough, while a half percent of the unvaccinated were diagnosed with
chickenpox, whooping cough, or rotavirus.
Significantly, there were no
cases of measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, hepatitis or other vaccine-targeted
infections in either the vaccinated or unvaccinated, during the entire 10.5
year study period.
Vaccinated
70% more likely to have any respiratory infection
Vaccinations do appear to make
recipients more generally susceptible to infections, so it is ironic, yet not
surprising that the vaccinated children in the study appeared at the doctor’s
office for respiratory infections 70% more often than the unvaccinated. This
finding is likely why vaccinated children present to the pediatrician so often
with fevers. Your grandmother was right when she asked why kids these days seem
to be sick all the time, despite heavy vaccination.
Family
history of autoimmunity correlated with ear infection and allergic conditions
Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld and others
have described a condition called autoimmune syndrome induced by adjuvants
(ASIA), where genetics and family history of autoimmunity appear to pre-dispose
vaccinated patients to higher risks of developing an autoimmune condition. With
this in mind, the authors compared patient records from those with a family
history of autoimmune conditions — such as multiple sclerosis, type I diabetes
or Hashimoto’s thyroiditis — to patients whose families do not have
autoimmunity. The results were striking. Vaccination among children with
autoimmunity in their family appeared to increase the risk of ear infection,
asthma, allergies and skin rashes relative to the unvaccinated with family
history of autoimmunity.
Past studies
have used a weaker statistic
Readers of the study will learn
about flaws in past vaccine safety studies, such as over-adjustment bias, in
which the data are analyzed many times over in search of the right combination
of variables to make associations of adverse health outcomes with vaccines go
away. One of the most important findings of this study is that the comparison
of the number of office visits related to specific health condition is a far
more accurate tool than just using the incidence of diagnoses. In fact, the
study authors show this with simulation — and they point out that studies that
use odds ratios with incidence of diagnosis are using a low-powered special
case of the method introduced by their study, the relative incidence of office
visits, because patients with a “diagnosis” have at least one billed office
visit related to the diagnosis. The authors conclude that future vaccine
safety studies should avoid using weak measures such as odds ratios of
incidence of diagnosis.
Conclusion
Since the study found
healthcare seeking behavior could not explain vaccination rates, the only
remaining explanation of why vaccinated patients require more healthcare for
symptoms of chronic illness associated with vaccination is that vaccines are
not only associated with adverse health outcomes — they are also associated
with more severe and chronic adverse health outcomes. Recalling that 54% of
children and young adults in the U.S. have chronic illnesses that lead to
life-long pharmaceutical prescriptions, it seems a lot of human pain and
suffering could be reduced by adhering to informed choice regarding the true
risks of vaccination, and heeding signs of vaccine sensitivity. Although the
authors call for more studies to be conducted using similar methodology, this
study should certainly cause pediatricians to pause and wonder if they are
contributing to life-long chronic illness in some of their patients.
The views
and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not
necessarily reflect the views of Children's Health Defense.
Alix Mayer,
MBA serves on the board of Children’s Health Defense and is the president of
the California chapter of...
Sign up for
free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health
Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to
defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already
injured. Your support is
essential to CHD’s successful mission.
-------------------------------
Fact
Sheet on Vaccines: The Truth
Dr
Vernon Coleman MB ChB DSc FRSA
The pro-vaccine
establishment likes to demonise those who dare to question vaccination –
dismissing them as `anti-vaxxers’. UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson has declared
that anyone who questions vaccination is a `nut’. I have been demonised as an
`anti-vaxxer’ simple because I have published criticisms showing how and when
vaccines can be dangerous and ineffective. I believe it is important to study
the risk/value ratio for any medicine. If you’re giving a drug to a patient who
is dying then risks and side effects are less significant than if you’re giving
a drug for a relatively minor illness. Vaccines are usually given to healthy
patients, and so it is important that the risks are very small, and side
effects preferably transient and insignificant. Sadly, many modern vaccines are
neither safe nor effective. Pro-vaxxers steadfastly and obsessively believe
that all vaccinations are safe and effective all the time. This is patently not
true. The World Health Organisation has admitted that the vaccines pushed by
the WHO and Bill Gates have caused a polio outbreak in Sudan with several
children now paralysed as a result.
Here are some more facts about vaccines which your government (and
pro-vaxx journalists) may have forgotten to tell you…
1. Some vaccines (such as those administered nasally) contain millions
of live but attenuated viruses. These viruses may sometimes become live and can
mutate. In 2016, the Center for Disease Control in the USA, withdrew the nasal
flu vaccine because it was not effective. Nasal vaccines can cause serious
neurological and behavioural side effects.
2. Making a vaccine in a few months instead of many years massively
increases the dangers. Some serious side effects do not appear for years after
vaccination. Giving a relatively untested vaccine to seven billion people (as
is planned with the covid-19 vaccine) may result in hundreds of thousands dying
or being made seriously ill.
3. The H1N1 flu vaccine resulted in lawsuits all over the world. The
British Medical Journal has reported that months before serious side effects
were reported, both the manufacturer and public health officials knew about the
danger.
4. GlaxoSmithKline (one of the drug companies making a covid-19 vaccine)
has been fined many times. For example, after pleading guilty to federal
criminal offences GSK agreed to pay a fine of $3 billion. The largest health
care fraud in US history. The company was fined $490 million for bribery in
China. There is a list of some of the fines paid by GSK on www.vernoncoleman.Com
5. The British Government paid out £60 million to patients who had been
damaged by GSK’s Pandemrix vaccine. (GSK had demanded that the Government
indemnify it against claims for damages). The British Government has to pay out
so much money to the parents of children damaged by some vaccines that there is
a fixed fee of £120,000 per severely damaged child. In the United States, the
Government has paid out over $4 billion for vaccine injuries. That money has
been paid to 18,000 individuals. That’s a lot of money for governments to pay
out for treatments that are supposed to be perfectly safe. In the 2019 fiscal
year, $131,485,775 was paid out to vaccine damaged individuals in compensation.
6. The UK’s Chief Scientific Officer, Sir Patrick Vallance, worked for
GSK between 2006 and 2018. By the time he left, he was a member of the board.
Vallance is enthusiastic about a new vaccine for covid-19.
7. Other vaccine manufacturers also have a terrible safety record. Astra
Zeneca is also preparing a vaccine for covid-19. There is a list of fines paid
by Astra Zeneca on www.vernoncoleman.com. I suggest you read the details before accepting a vaccine made by the
company.
8. No long-term, independent research has been done to compare the
health of children who have had a full set of vaccinations against the health
of children who have had no vaccinations. Surely, if the vaccinators had faith
in their product that would be the first research they would do? Pro-vaxx
supporters refuse to debate the value of vaccination.
9. No long-term, independent research has been done to measure the
inter-reaction between vaccines and prescription drugs.
10. Does repeated vaccination weaken the immune system? No long-term,
independent research has been done to measure the effect of vaccination on the
immune system.
11. No research has been done to check whether giving so many vaccines to
small children causes health problems.
12. Patients who suffer from serious side effects after a covid-19
vaccination will not be able to take legal action for damages. Drug companies,
governments and doctors are all protected from litigation – even if patients
are paralysed for life.
Copyright Vernon Coleman September 2020
Dr Vernon Coleman, a former GP, is the author of many international
bestselling books including Anyone Who Tells You Vaccines Are Safe and
Effective is Lying (Here’s the Proof) which is available on Amazon as
an eBook and a paperback.
Bron:
http://www.vernoncoleman.com/vaccinesthetruth.htm
