Monday, August 30, 2021 by: S.D. Wells
Tags: badhealth, Blood clots, clot shot, conspiracy, covid clots, vaccine blood clots, vaccine death, Vaccine deaths, Vaccine injuries, vaccine injury, vaccine wars, vaccines, vax clots
3,220VIEWS
(Natural News) Oh, let us count the ways the insidious vaccine industry is already
running cover for the mass wave of vaccine-induced health carnage caused by
spike protein injections, all administered under the guise of ‘inoculation.’
We start off with a new, fake science, vaccine-industry-backed “UK study”
that claims catching Covid-19 causes blood clots, and of course it’s just a
cover story for the mass wave of vaccine-induced blood clots already happening
around the world.
The fake study twisted data
from “Covid” patients who were ALSO injected with spike proteins, in a
futile attempt to try to dwarf the shock of the quickly escalating number of
humans suffering from vaccine-induced blood clots. Researchers from Oxford
University were in on the ‘gig,’ along with several other vaccine-hyping
schools of medicine, who all swore to be “fully independent from the
Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine developers,” who are already guilty of making clot shots with severe health consequences.
Top symptoms of clot shot
syndrome include new, severe headaches that are not relieved with
painkillers. This headache worsens when lying down, so don’t even think about
sleeping through it. These intolerable headaches are just the tip of the
iceberg when it comes to new Covid-19 clot shot syndrome. Wait until the
“boosters” arrive.
Symptoms
of clot shot syndrome include leg swelling, intolerable headaches and
unexplainable bruising/bleeding
Many vaccine victims
complain of shortness of breath, as trillions of protein-prions invade the
capillaries of the lungs, and the body thinks coughing will get them out, but
it doesn’t. This coughing is known to burn the windpipe, a burning which also
may not ever subside or disappear (especially with booster shots that will
exacerbate the damage). If you bend over, unexplainable bruising and bleeding
can occur, along with your leg(s) swelling. “Gee doctors, what’s next?”
The study also distorts the
information by saying the risk of blood clots is significantly higher “as a
result of catching Covid-19, than it is from being vaccinated against the
virus,” and that is a flat out lie. We’re talking about 29 million people who
had already received their first dose of either Pfizer-BioNTech or
Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid jabs.
So the people who caught
Covid-19 AND got the clot shot are showing
higher incidence of blood
clots than just the people who got the vaccine and didn’t catch Covid, but the PCR tests are
massively faulty, showing false-positives
for anything from a common head cold to the flu and viral particles from
previous flu shots.
Thomboembolic events are
associated with all the Covid shots. They all carry warnings right on the
labels. Of course, once someone gets a clot shot, and still catches Covid
because their immune system is crippled by the
trillions of spike proteins, then the
blood clots become much more common and deadly.
How many “booster” shots
will it take before these vaccine zombies’ headaches turn them into drooling
vegetables while the vascular damage overworks their heart to the point of
failure? Got clot shot syndrome? Every side effect, symptom and disability caused by the Covid vaccine is
labeled “Covid” by all doctors, everywhere (or they’ll lose their job and
medical license).
Fake Covid “PCR” tests and real blood clots caused by trillions of spike
proteins
If you get Covid-19 and get
vaccinated, there is a high incidence of your blood clotting, according to new
research. This is the best way Pfizer and AstraZeneca could try to run cover
for the damage their vaccines are doing to the entire vascular system of their
jabbed victims. They lumped in (pun intended) the spike-protein jab blood clot
statistics with people they tested “positive” for Covid with fake tests. Any laymen with common sense can
see this.
The ultimate goal of the
“peer-reviewed” study was to shrink the shock of the number of clots caused by
Covid vaccines. Now the study is being plastered all over mainstream media, so
that anyone suffering from vaccine-induced blood clots now or in the very near
future will be ready to blame Covid, along with their oxygen-deprived doctors.
They always have some fake
data, those insidious “vaccine” scientists, and nobody anywhere is allowed to
independently validate any of it (patents). Tune your smart device to Pandemic.news for updates on the upcoming “booster” vax-termination agenda and
other crimes against
humanity involving
spike-protein-bioweapons.
Sources for
this article include:
Pandemic.news
NaturalNews.com
TruthWiki.org
Bloomberg.com
AtlantaBusinessJournal.com
Deadly Blood Clots Caused by COVID-19 Vaccine
written by AdminTAA March 30, 2021
As of March 16, 2021, 19
European countries plus Thailand1 had suspended the use of
AstraZeneca’s vaccine, either in full or in part, following reports of deadly
blood clots.2,3 March 2, 2021, The Defender reported4 U.K.
data showing the AstraZeneca vaccine was responsible for 77% more adverse
events and 25% more deaths than the Pfizer vaccine, which in the U.S. has been
connected with a majority of death reports in the Vaccine Adverse Reporting
System (VAERS).
AstraZeneca’s vaccine has
received emergency use authorization in Europe but not in the U.S., where the
Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines are available. Contrary to
the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson
vaccines use a viral vector to deliver double-stranded DNA for the SARS-CoV-2
spike protein into your cells.5
Business Insider has
created a comparison chart6 of the four vaccines — Moderna,
Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson — currently available in the U.S.
and Europe.
Norway Links
Lethal Blood Clots to AstraZeneca Vaccine
While virtually all
post-vaccination deaths so far have been shrugged off as coincidence, even when
occurring in healthy individuals in their 20s and 30s, doctors at Oslo
University Hospital have now announced the blood clotting disorders experienced
by some recipients of the AstraZeneca vaccine are in fact caused by the vaccine.7
We have the reason. Nothing but the vaccine can
explain why these individuals had this immune response. ~ Professor Pål Andre
Holme, Oslo University Hospital
A March 18, 2021, article
in Science Norway reads, in part:8
“’Our theory that this is a powerful immune response most likely
triggered by the vaccine, has been confirmed,’ says professor and chief
physician Pål Andre Holme. Three Norwegian health workers under the age of 50
have been hospitalized. One is dead …
‘In collaboration with experts in the field from the University Hospital
of North Norway HF, we have found specific antibodies against blood platelets
that can cause these reactions, and which we know from other fields of
medicine, but then with medical drugs as the cause of the reaction,’ the chief
physician explains …
When asked to clarify why he says ‘most likely’ in the quote, Holme
confidently responds that the reason for these rare cases of blood clots has
been found.
‘We have the reason. Nothing but the vaccine can explain why these
individuals had this immune response,’ he states. [Norwegian national
newspaper] VG also asks how Holme can know that the immune response is not
caused by something other than the vaccine.
‘There is nothing in the patient history of these individuals that can
give such a powerful immune response. I am confident that the antibodies that
we have found are the cause, and I see no other explanation than it being the
vaccine which triggers it,’ he responds.”
The three health workers
reported acute pain, bleeding, low platelet counts and were found to have blood
clots in “unusual places,” such as their stomachs and brains. Later that same
day, March 18, 2021, the European Medicines Agency ruled the AstraZeneca
vaccine is “safe and effective, despite some concerns over possible side
effects,” CNBC reported,9 and that benefits of the vaccine
outweigh the risks.
Meanwhile, March 22, 2021,
Norway Today reported the Norwegian Medicines Agency had received two new
reports of blood clots with deadly consequences following vaccination with the
AstraZeneca vaccine. In a press release, the agency stated that “The Norwegian
Medicines Agency cannot rule out that these cases may have a connection with
the AstraZeneca vaccine.”10 One of the two victims was a health
care worker.
German
Experts Weigh In
A March 19, 2021, German
Spektrum article11 reviews preliminary findings by German
investigators, which add further weight to Holme’s findings in Norway. It
reads, in part (translation from German using translate.com):
“The effects of the suspended vaccinations with the AstraZeneca vaccine
are believed to have been due to a particular immune response that activates
platelets and thus triggers thrombosis. This preliminary conclusion is being
made by a working group made up of Andreas Greinacher from the University
Hospital Greifswald.
The effect corresponds in many details to a heparin-induced
thrombocytopenia (HIT) type 2,12 in which antibodies
against a protein complex are formed in connection with heparin, which in turn
respond to a receptor on the platelets …
The team demonstrated the similarity of thrombosis with HIT in the blood
of four patients with sinus vein thrombosis. Antibodies appear to form against
a complex of heparin and the signaling molecule PF4, which in turn interact
with the receptor CD32 of the platelets and thus activate them.
This triggers the clotting cascade, which leads to the thrombosis. The
antibodies produced in the vaccinated individuals were very similar to those
found in HIT, Greinacher said at a news conference. So far, however, it is
still unclear where these antibodies come from, whether they form against the
vaccine virus or the spike antigen or perhaps against a factor only involved in
the immune response.”
According to Greinacher, people with a history of
thrombosis probably do not have a higher risk of complications from the vaccine
due to the mechanism of harm. He also points out that there is treatment
against HIT, which the team believes “should also work in the case of the
suspected vaccination side effect.”
Spektrum reports that, based on these findings, the
Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research suggests vaccinated individuals
who experience thrombosis or neurological symptoms such as dizziness, headache
or visual impairment on the fifth day post-vaccination and onward should be
tested for HIT type 2.
The HIT type 2 test will detect antibodies against
the heparin complex and, if positive, the Society recommends administering
intravenous immunoglobulin G to prevent the activation of CD32 and interrupt
the mechanism that results in thrombosis.
AstraZeneca
Efficacy Data Being Questioned
March 22, 2021, AstraZeneca13 announced
its Phase 3 U.S.-based trial showed the vaccine was 79% effective at preventing
symptomatic cases of COVID-19 and 100% effective against severe or critical
disease and hospitalization, with no increased risk for adverse effects
compared to placebo.
According to The Associated
Press,14 partial results from trials in the U.K, Brazil and
South Africa — where a “manufacturing mistake” had led to some participants
receiving only half of their first dose — suggested the vaccine was 70%
effective.
The AP goes on to cite a number of individuals
saying the U.S. results should allay concerns about the AstraZeneca vaccine.
That narrative broke apart
the very next day, March 23, 2021, when the U.S. National Institute of Allergy
and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) issued a statement15,16,17 first
thing in the morning, saying the Data and Safety Monitoring board (DSMB) had
notified them that AstraZeneca’s data may include “outdated information” that
cast doubt on its effectiveness. As reported by The Defender:18
“Notably,
in its most recent data, AstraZeneca neglected to include key information, such
as the number of trial participants who developed ‘severe COVID.’ AstraZeneca
President Ruud Dobber, during an interview on CNBC’s Squawk Box, said the
number was ‘5,’ shortly after the data were released.”
“We urge the company to
work with the DSMB to review the efficacy data and ensure the most accurate,
up-to-date efficacy data be made public as quickly as possible,” the NIAID said
in its statement.19
Dr. Anthony Fauci, who
heads the NIAID and was one of the people quoted by the AP as saying the U.S.
trial ought to put concerns to rest, went on the defensive, saying “This is
really what you call an unforced error because the fact is, this is very likely
a very good vaccine. If you look at it the data, they really are quite good,
but when they put it into the press release, it wasn’t completely accurate.”20
AstraZeneca responded21 saying
the data were based on a “pre-specified interim analysis with a data cut-off”
of February 17, 2021, and promised to share more data with the independent
review board.
In a Tweet,22 Francois
Balloux, professor and director of the UCL Genetics Institute, called the
NIAID’s statement “highly unusual,” noting it “comes close to accusing
Oxford/AZ of having willfully misrepresented” some of its trial results.
Stephen Evans, professor of
pharmacoepidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,
called the NIAID’s statement “unprecedented,” as while the DSMB will “sometimes
disagree with investigators over vaccine trial results,” they typically do so
“in private,” not publicly.23
This isn’t the first time
AstraZeneca has been challenged over its data handling, though. As reported by
The Defender:24
“‘The way they handled their data early on, AstraZeneca basically shot
themselves in the foot,’ Julian Tang, a virologist at the University of
Leicester, said even before the latest issue arose.
AstraZeneca has received criticism over its studies since the first data
released in the UK, which purported to show the vaccine was 70% effective, yet
failed to account for a manufacturing mistake and didn’t include enough
participants over 65 to determine efficacy among older patients …”
Full Throttle
Forward Despite Risks
Despite concerns about data mishandling and two
independent investigations finding a mechanism of harm, the World Health
Organization and the European Medicines Agency are saying the AstraZeneca
vaccine is good to go and urge countries to keep using it.
March 18, 2021, the EMA
issued a press release25 giving the AstraZeneca the
green-light, despite admitting it is associated with “very rare cases of blood
clots associated with thrombocytopenia, i.e., low levels of blood platelets.”
The justification, as usual, is that the benefits outweigh the risks.26,27,28
But do they? What exactly are the benefits? You can
still contract the virus. You can still spread the virus. All it promises to do
is lessen your symptoms when you get infected. Sure, the idea is that by
lessening symptoms, you’ll reduce your risk of hospitalization and death, but
lessening symptoms is not what a vaccine is supposed to do. A vaccine is
supposed to make you immune to the disease in question, and none of the
COVID-19 vaccines does that.
I’ve discussed this in
previous articles, including “COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines,” “COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Are Gene Therapy” and “How COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ May Destroy the Lives of Millions.”
What’s more, COVID-19 is
really only a serious risk to the very old and people with two or more
comorbidities. For the rest, its lethality is on par with the common flu.29,30,31,32,33 It
may be different in terms of symptoms and complications, but the actual
lethality is about the same.
Data34 have
shown the overall non institutionalized infection fatality ratio for all age
groups is 0.26%. If you’re under the age of 40, your risk of dying from
COVID-19 if you get infected is just 0.01%.
Meanwhile, as reviewed in “COVID-19 Vaccine Tested on Babies Even as Death Toll
Mounts,” the lethality rate of
COVID-19 vaccines is somewhere between 0.0024% and 0.0028%, and that’s assuming
all deaths are being reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
(VAERS), which is doubtful.
The key difference between being harmed or killed by COVID-19 and being
harmed or killed by the vaccine is that the illness kills those who are old,
sick and frail, while reports show the vaccine is killing young and healthy
people. From my perspective, the argument that the vaccine
benefits outweigh the risks simply does not hold water.
Side Effects
3X More Common in Those Previously Infected
In related news, according
to researchers at King’s College, people who have already had COVID are three
times more likely to experience vaccine side effects than those who have not
been exposed to the virus, and this appears true for both mRNA and DNA versions
of the vaccine.35
They gleaned this information from the college’s
ZOE app, which has logged more than 700,000 vaccinations. According to that
data, 35.7% of those given the Pfizer vaccine who had previously been infected
reported side effects, compared to just 12.2% of those not previously infected.
Looking at the AstraZeneca vaccine specifically,
52.7% of previously infected had side effects, compared to 31.9% of those who
had not been previously infected.
While The Telegraph reports this as being a
beneficial thing, saying “More severe side effects are often a sign of better
immunity, and emerging research suggests just one dose of vaccine gives a
similar protective effect to two doses in people who have had a previous
infection,” some experts vehemently disagree.
Proper Timing
May Eliminate Some Vaccine Risks
In January 2021, Dr. Hooman
Noorchashm, a cardiac surgeon and patient advocate, sent a public letter36 to
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration commissioner detailing the risks of
vaccinating individuals who have previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2, or
who have an active SARS-CoV-2 infection.
He urged the FDA to require prescreening for
SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins to reduce the risk of injuries and deaths following
vaccination, as the vaccine may trigger an adverse immune response in those who
have already been infected with the virus.
Fox TV host Tucker Carlson
recently interviewed him about these risks as well. In that interview,
Noorchashm said:37
“I think it’s a dramatic error on part of public health officials to try
to put this vaccine into a one-size-fits-all paradigm … We’re going to take
this problem we have with the COVID-19 pandemic, where a half-percent of the
population is susceptible to dying, and compound it by causing totally
avoidable harm by vaccinating people who are already infected …
The signal is deafening, the people who are having complications or
adverse events are the people who have recently or are currently or previously
infected [with COVID]. I don’t think we can ignore this.”
In an emailed response to
The Defender, Noorchashm fleshed out his concerns, saying:38
“Viral antigens persist in the tissues of the naturally infected for
months. When the vaccine is used too early after a natural infection, or worse
during an active infection, the vaccine force activates a powerful immune
response that attacks the tissues where the natural viral antigens are
persisting. This, I suggest, is the cause of the high level of adverse events
and, likely deaths, we are seeing in the recently infected following
vaccination.”
Noorchashm is now pushing for the implementation of
a prevaccine screening campaign (#ScreenB4Vaccine), using PCR or rapid antigen
testing to determine whether the individual has an active infection, and an IgG
antibody test to determine past infection.
If either test is positive,
he recommends delaying vaccination for a minimum of three to six months to
allow your IgG levels to wane. At that point, he recommends testing your blood
IgG level and use that as a guide to decide the timing of your vaccination. As
reported by The Defender:39
“Noorchashm told Carlson that he’s been wrongly accused of stoking
vaccine hesitancy, when just the opposite is true — if public health officials
want people to trust the vaccines, they need to do everything possible to avoid
creating situations where the vaccines can actually cause harm.
‘People aren’t stupid,’ Noorchashm said. ‘If you explain how the vaccine
works, and give them the information on how to keep themselves safe,’ that is
how you build trust.”
What to Do if
You Regret Getting the COVID-19 Vaccine
If you already got the vaccine and now regret
it, you may be able to address your symptoms using the same strategies you’d
use to treat actual SARS-CoV-2 infection. I review these strategies at the end
of “Why COVID Vaccine Testing Is a Farce.”
Additionally, if you’re experiencing side
effects, please help raise public awareness by reporting it. The Children’s
Health Defense is calling on all who have suffered a side effect from a
COVID-19 vaccine to do these three things:40
1. If you live in the U.S., file a report on VAERS
2. Report the injury on VaxxTracker.com, which is a nongovernmental adverse event tracker (you can file
anonymously if you like)
3.
Report the injury on the CHD
website
If You’re ‘Vaccinated’ You May Be
High-Risk for COVID
As discussed in
yesterday’s lead article (August 30, 2021), data are now mounting showing
people over the age of 50 who are “fully vaccinated” actually make up the bulk
of COVID-19 related hospitalizations and deaths in that age group. One possible
explanation for this is that antibody dependent enhancement is afoot, which
makes people more prone to serious illness rather than less.
To be on the safe side, I
recommend considering yourself “high-risk” for severe COVID if you’ve received
one or more shots, and implement known effective treatment at the first sign of
a respiratory infection.
Options include (amongst
many others) the Zelenko protocol,32 the MATH+ protocols33 and nebulized
hydrogen peroxide, as detailed in Dr. David Brownstein’s case paper34 and Dr.
Thomas Levy’s free e-book, “Rapid Virus Recovery.” Whichever treatment protocol you use, make sure you
begin treatment as soon as possible, ideally at first onset of symptoms.
Sources and References
32 Zelenko protocol
33 Covid19criticalcare.com
34 Science, Public Health Policy and The
Law July 2020; 1: 4-22 (PDF)
