Research group: Coronavirus vaccine “unsafe for humans” due to adverse events
Sunday, July 11, 2021 by: Ramon Tomey
Tags: adverse events, adverse reactions, badhealth, badmedicine, badscience, coronavirus vaccine, covid-19 pandemic, experimental medicine, Medicines and
Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, serious reactions, side effects, spike protein, United Kingdom, Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System, Vaccine dangers, Vaccine deaths, vaccine wars, vaccines, Wuhan coronavirus, Yellow Card system
17KVIEWS
(Natural News) A medical research group in the
U.K. pointed out that the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines are “unsafe for humans” based on
adverse event reports. Scientists and doctors looked at data from the British
government’s Yellow Card vaccine event reporting system. They found that the
“overwhelming” number of adverse
reactions from COVID-19 vaccines definitely raised alarm bells.
The Yellow
Card system is the British equivalent of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting
System (VAERS) in the U.S. The system is run by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
Through the Yellow Card system, the MHRA keeps track of COVID-19 vaccines on an
ongoing basis “to ensure their benefits continue to outweigh any risks.”
However,
researchers at the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy (EbMC) research group
based in Bath, England unveiled concerning findings. EbMC Director Dr. Tess
Lawrie wrote about her group’s findings in a June 9 letter to the MHRA Chief Executive Officer Dr. June Raine.
Lawrie wrote
in her letter that between Jan. 4 and May 6 of this year, a total of 888,196
adverse events and 1,253 deaths were reported to Yellow Card. Similar to VAERS
data, these were not directly proven as correlated with the COVID-19 vaccine.
Despite this, the EMBC director raised safety concerns for those getting the
vaccine. She wrote that given the Yellow Card figures, “the MHRA now has more
than enough evidence … to declare the COVID-19 vaccine unsafe for use in
humans.”
Lawrie then
asked urgent questions for the MHRA to answer as the soonest. She asked how
many people have died within 28 days of vaccination and how many people have
been hospitalized for the same period. She also asked the total number of
people disabled by the vaccination.
In a later interview
with TrialSiteNews, she described the total number of cases as “concerning” and called for
follow-ups on persons who reported adverse reactions “to ensure there are no
further problems.” Lawrie said: “The
scope of morbidity is striking, evidencing a lot of incidents and what amounts
to a large number of ill.”
Reports in the Yellow Card system only prove the coronavirus vaccines
are unsafe
Lawrie also
lamented that Yellow Card was “incredibly opaque” during her TrialSiteNews interview.
She shared that researchers are unable to filter vaccine safety incidents by
age, gender or other attributed. According to the EbMC director, about 60
percent or more of COVID-19 vaccines in the U.K. came from AstraZeneca, with
the remainder from the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
The letter
called on the MHRA to urgently make reports of vaccine adverse reaction public,
given that pharmacovigilance data is known to be subsequently under-reported.
It also called on the regulator to assist people with reporting adverse
reactions. (Related: British mainstream
media insists coronavirus vaccines are effective even though most covid deaths
now occur in vaccinated people.)
Lawrie
concluded the letter: “Preparation
should be made to scale up humanitarian efforts to assist those harmed by the
COVID-19 vaccines, and to anticipate and ameliorate medium to longer term
effects. As the mechanism for harms from the vaccines appears to be similar to
COVID-19 itself, this includes engaging with numerous international doctors and
scientists with expertise in successfully treating COVID-19.”
But according
to an article published in late June 2021, vaccine deaths and adverse reactions
are no cause for alarm. It even argued that people who died from COVID-19
vaccines served as proof of their effectiveness. (Related: The Guardian says
people dying from covid vaccines is “proof” that they work.)
In a June 27 piece for The Guardian, David Spiegelhalter and Anthony
Masters called on people to avoid thinking of vaccine deaths as “a bad sign.”
Rather, they insisted that such deaths were expected from an “effective but
imperfect” vaccine. They wrote: “Does this mean the [COVID-19] vaccines are
ineffective? Far from it, it’s what we would expect from an effective but
imperfect vaccine.”
The two also
took a swipe at reports of vaccine-related deaths circulating on various social
media platforms. “Coverage and effectiveness are important … for assessing
vaccination programs. It is better to look at cool analysis by analysis, rather
than hot takes on social [media],” they wrote.
Visit DangerousMedicine.com to read more about the risks of adverse reactions brought about
by the COVID-19 vaccines.
Sources
include:
TrialSiteNews.com 1 [PDF]
--------------------